and it provides enough information already for anyone using the data to create the url themselves
kurtjx joined the channel
Mineo
fiiiine, I'll change the wiki :P
LordSputnik
:)
Mineo
I have no idea if this is one of the automatically updating pages on /doc, so some transclusion editor (ha!, hi not me!) might have to do some magic :)
LordSputnik: fwiw, the json also contains a full url to the release in a field called "release", not "release-url"
reosarevok checks
reosarevok
Apparently it is, so I shouldn't need to do anything :)
(Cover_Art_Archive is manually transcluded but /API doesn't seem to be)
djce joined the channel
warp
Freso: hrm, in general full urls seem better. but we'd have to regenerate all those .json files if we want to change it now :S
Freso: I expect we'll just update the documentation, but I'd like to ask ocharles before we make that the final decision.
Mineo: ^
reosarevok
warp: well, we did update the docs :p But they can be updated "back" if we change it
Freso
warp: The docs are already updated, so they're correct with the current system.
warp
Freso, reosarevok: ok, thanks :)
Freso
warp: It should be easy enough to re-correct the docs if the system is changed.
Freso: I think I removed the fix version on MBS-4627 because it wasn't fixed in that version. but I could be misremembering or I could have been wrong at the time.
Freso
warp: Alright.
nikki
tbh the edit id on its own would be more useful for me if I had any use for that (I have that data locally, so I don't really), since I prefer beta and https over main and http :P
reosarevok
nikki: yeah, in general it seems simpler to just let users form their own urls
kurtjx joined the channel
ruaok joined the channel
ruaok joined the channel
Freso
warp: You didn't comment on the missing Christmas release Git tag. Did you mis that or do you not have a comment? Is it ocharles' dept.?
Or Ian's?
warp
Freso: didn't see that. ocharles tags releases, so I'd say his dept.
Freso
ocharles: There is no tag for the Christmas release in Git. :)
