#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • ruaok
        speaking of which, if anyone has a recommendation for a small case PC a la mac mini, I'd love to hear it.
      • 2013-09-30 27333, 2013

      • ruaok
        I'll be in .ca next week and could easily pick up something cheap
      • 2013-09-30 27333, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        Raspberry Pi :P
      • 2013-09-30 27349, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        that's small :)
      • 2013-09-30 27350, 2013

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2013-09-30 27301, 2013

      • ruaok
        LordSputnik: would you believe the has been my primary development platform for 9 months now?
      • 2013-09-30 27307, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        ouch
      • 2013-09-30 27315, 2013

      • ruaok
        great for making cocktails, terrible for metadata. :)
      • 2013-09-30 27322, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        heh
      • 2013-09-30 27326, 2013

      • ruaok
        anyways, mail me if you have real tips. :)
      • 2013-09-30 27300, 2013

      • ruaok
        onward then.
      • 2013-09-30 27315, 2013

      • ruaok skips the broccoli comment
      • 2013-09-30 27327, 2013

      • ruaok
        how come there are no donut plush toys?
      • 2013-09-30 27338, 2013

      • reosarevok_
        Hey, don't skip your broccoli! Bad kid!
      • 2013-09-30 27345, 2013

      • ruaok
        are there general discussion comments? questions?
      • 2013-09-30 27310, 2013

      • ruaok already had plenty of broccoli this week
      • 2013-09-30 27327, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I'm wondering if anyone has heard from our other two GSoC people
      • 2013-09-30 27330, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        bitmap, mjjc
      • 2013-09-30 27335, 2013

      • ruaok
        I have.
      • 2013-09-30 27351, 2013

      • ruaok
        not this week, but we did chat last week.
      • 2013-09-30 27305, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I've been gone and haven't followed up with bitmap in a while, though he'll get pinged by this, presumably :P
      • 2013-09-30 27305, 2013

      • ruaok
        bitmap will be joining us in about 15-20 minutes or so.
      • 2013-09-30 27310, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        cool
      • 2013-09-30 27330, 2013

      • ruaok
        and I'll follow up with mjjc.
      • 2013-09-30 27338, 2013

      • ruaok
        I really want to use critiquebrainz. :)
      • 2013-09-30 27343, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        yeah
      • 2013-09-30 27352, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        has anyone tried out the sandbox recently? I haven't
      • 2013-09-30 27356, 2013

      • ruaok
        right then. any comments or should we launch into topics?
      • 2013-09-30 27304, 2013

      • ocharles
        no comments here
      • 2013-09-30 27314, 2013

      • ruaok
        ianmcorvidae: as far as the schedule was concerned he met all the points.
      • 2013-09-30 27323, 2013

      • ruaok
        but, as always, there is polish left.
      • 2013-09-30 27324, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        cool
      • 2013-09-30 27338, 2013

      • ruaok
        which, admittedly, is hard to squeeze into a gsoc project.
      • 2013-09-30 27345, 2013

      • ruaok
        ok, onward.
      • 2013-09-30 27358, 2013

      • ruaok
        LordSputnik: resolving genres
      • 2013-09-30 27318, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        ruaok: don't know if you want to take this, I put my name by it because I wanted to see it happen really...
      • 2013-09-30 27333, 2013

      • ruaok
        yeah, I think this does fit into my court.
      • 2013-09-30 27353, 2013

      • ruaok
        effectively the message I got from the summit was that we need to convene a smaller group of people.
      • 2013-09-30 27307, 2013

      • ruaok
        those people need to pick an approach and we need to implement it.
      • 2013-09-30 27335, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        ruaok: on that front, a small group of us talked about it over dinner at Max und Moritz
      • 2013-09-30 27341, 2013

      • ruaok
        because our conversations have explored the details as far as we can go. after 5 years (hours) of talking about it, we've reached some form of stalemate.
      • 2013-09-30 27331, 2013

      • ijabz
        i dont think it is that hard to make a start on thisd problem, even if not perfect
      • 2013-09-30 27345, 2013

      • ruaok
        LordSputnik: were any specific goals/consensuses/consesii reached?
      • 2013-09-30 27355, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        ruaok: we mostly decided all genres should be entities
      • 2013-09-30 27357, 2013

      • ruaok
        ijabz: agreed.
      • 2013-09-30 27311, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        and you should be able to select multiple genres per release group/recording/artist
      • 2013-09-30 27329, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        ijabz: anything else we were sure about?
      • 2013-09-30 27339, 2013

      • ruaok
        LordSputnik: yeah, I think those bits we did reach consensus on.
      • 2013-09-30 27350, 2013

      • ruaok
        I might just take ianmcorvidae and propose a session on this at the gsoc summit.
      • 2013-09-30 27359, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        heh
      • 2013-09-30 27306, 2013

      • ruaok
        either with anyone who wants to come or just the two of us. I haven't decided yet.
      • 2013-09-30 27307, 2013

      • ocharles
        sounds reasonable
      • 2013-09-30 27312, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        introduce more edge-case generators to the problem? :P
      • 2013-09-30 27327, 2013

      • ruaok
        ianmcorvidae: I can't decide if that is smart of suicidal. :)
      • 2013-09-30 27335, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        we talked about the grouping of genres into "mostly" and "hints of", but I'm not 100% convinced on that. We did decide that the bottom-up approach was best though
      • 2013-09-30 27341, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        well, we can always ignore them if it's inconvenient :P
      • 2013-09-30 27342, 2013

      • ruaok
        but, I will take the task of moving this forward one way or another.
      • 2013-09-30 27343, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        (not top-down adding)
      • 2013-09-30 27310, 2013

      • reosarevok_
        heh, I'm not sure I agree with that bit :p
      • 2013-09-30 27322, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        reosarevok_: no-one's going to agree on all of it :P
      • 2013-09-30 27330, 2013

      • reosarevok_
        Anyway, whatever gets implemented will be better than nothing. Probably.
      • 2013-09-30 27342, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        ijabz and navap and me did though, so that's a start :)
      • 2013-09-30 27347, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        well, better than our weirdo tag system, probably :P
      • 2013-09-30 27358, 2013

      • ruaok
        anyways. lets move on.
      • 2013-09-30 27303, 2013

      • ocharles
        I still like the tri-genre system
      • 2013-09-30 27307, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        indeed, onward
      • 2013-09-30 27308, 2013

      • ocharles
        fwiw :)
      • 2013-09-30 27312, 2013

      • ruaok
        perl transition. who was that?
      • 2013-09-30 27317, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        everyone
      • 2013-09-30 27317, 2013

      • ocharles
        LordSputnik!
      • 2013-09-30 27326, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        ocharles! :P
      • 2013-09-30 27328, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        don't speak for everyone :P
      • 2013-09-30 27331, 2013

      • Leftmost
        LordSputnik added it, the rest of us brought along our bikeshed paint.
      • 2013-09-30 27339, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        so
      • 2013-09-30 27340, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        ...
      • 2013-09-30 27348, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        we came up with a plan to get rid of Perl
      • 2013-09-30 27306, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        I've made a ticket which outlines it, which I'm just finding
      • 2013-09-30 27334, 2013

      • nikki
      • 2013-09-30 27348, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        >.< got there first
      • 2013-09-30 27352, 2013

      • nikki
        of course :P
      • 2013-09-30 27301, 2013

      • andreypopp joined the channel
      • 2013-09-30 27327, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        so, the plan is to implement a replacement system one entity at a time, allowing us to do it incrementally
      • 2013-09-30 27341, 2013

      • ruaok
        hmm.
      • 2013-09-30 27344, 2013

      • ijabz
        working bottom up
      • 2013-09-30 27350, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        this system would comprise of a web service for accessing the data for each entity, returning minimalistic responses
      • 2013-09-30 27308, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        that's incredibly high-level, it doesn't even address doing the webservice design, which is substantial by itself
      • 2013-09-30 27309, 2013

      • ijabz
        or at least do it foe one entity ,and see how that goes, and review it
      • 2013-09-30 27321, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        another service then aggregates the data into a form that the top (very thin) perl layer can use to render into a template
      • 2013-09-30 27327, 2013

      • ruaok
        so, I would like to actually take a step back for a second.
      • 2013-09-30 27329, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        as a very rough notion it possibly makes sense
      • 2013-09-30 27333, 2013

      • ocharles
        ianmcorvidae: there were thoughts to not even design that, and see what emerges from needs
      • 2013-09-30 27341, 2013

      • ocharles
        and then tighten screws as you decide to go more public
      • 2013-09-30 27358, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        sounds like a recipe for /ws/2 :P but let's let rob talk
      • 2013-09-30 27310, 2013

      • ruaok
        namely, as it became evident at the summit, ocharles pointed out that he's been with us for 6 years.
      • 2013-09-30 27323, 2013

      • ruaok
        and that it might be time to move on.
      • 2013-09-30 27344, 2013

      • ruaok
        which, of course brings about all sorts of questions of what happens with NES.
      • 2013-09-30 27352, 2013

      • ruaok
        and languages and this and that.
      • 2013-09-30 27303, 2013

      • ocharles
        that might has become a concrete is, since then (we should talk about that soon)
      • 2013-09-30 27323, 2013

      • ruaok
        ocharles was very kind and has agreed to ride out his contract which, ends at the end of january.
      • 2013-09-30 27345, 2013

      • ruaok
        so, I took the opportunity to act on a suggestion that more than a couple of you have made to me.
      • 2013-09-30 27311, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        you kidnapped ocharles and forced him to stay?? :P
      • 2013-09-30 27323, 2013

      • ruaok
        and I am very pleased to shared with you that bitmap will be joining us to replace ocharles around the beginning of december.
      • 2013-09-30 27324, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        better programming through isolation chambers!
      • 2013-09-30 27329, 2013

      • ocharles
        fantastic!
      • 2013-09-30 27330, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        and whoo!
      • 2013-09-30 27333, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        \o/
      • 2013-09-30 27338, 2013

      • ruaok
        welcome bitmap!
      • 2013-09-30 27341, 2013

      • bitmap
        I can confirm this. :)
      • 2013-09-30 27347, 2013

      • bitmap
        thank you!
      • 2013-09-30 27348, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Yay!
      • 2013-09-30 27350, 2013

      • ruaok
        we're obviously still working out the details.
      • 2013-09-30 27358, 2013

      • navap
        Yay, more NA devs :)
      • 2013-09-30 27313, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        now I *really* should go show up in chicago at some point and/or plan a north american meetup :)
      • 2013-09-30 27317, 2013

      • ruaok
        so, I think this discussion is a bit premature/unwise/whatever to hold right now.
      • 2013-09-30 27355, 2013

      • ocharles
        i think so too
      • 2013-09-30 27302, 2013

      • ruaok
        in essence I'd like to ask for ocharles, bitmap, ianmcorvidae and I to figure out a few things more before we delve into detailed discussions as far as languages and such are concerned.
      • 2013-09-30 27315, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        sounds sensible to me
      • 2013-09-30 27326, 2013

      • ruaok
        I think the timing, as much as it sucker punched me in Berlin, is actually quite good.
      • 2013-09-30 27336, 2013

      • ijabz
        well ocharles got us into this mess
      • 2013-09-30 27338, 2013

      • ruaok
        I think we can work out something that is going to work for everyone.
      • 2013-09-30 27342, 2013

      • ruaok
        ijabz: now now.
      • 2013-09-30 27355, 2013

      • ruaok
        let's leave that here for now.
      • 2013-09-30 27301, 2013

      • CallerNo6
        so everybody wins? nice.
      • 2013-09-30 27311, 2013

      • ruaok
        we need some time to make plans, for the short term and then for the longer term.
      • 2013-09-30 27320, 2013

      • ruaok
        CallerNo6: it sorta worked out for all of us, I think.
      • 2013-09-30 27342, 2013

      • ruaok
        ok, anyone have comments or questions for this right now?
      • 2013-09-30 27356, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        whatever happens, please no more perl :P
      • 2013-09-30 27358, 2013

      • ruaok
        remember that we're short on details as of yet. but that only a rough plan has been worked out so far.
      • 2013-09-30 27305, 2013

      • ruaok
        LordSputnik: I promise you that.
      • 2013-09-30 27311, 2013

      • ijabz
        LordSputnik +100
      • 2013-09-30 27319, 2013

      • ruaok
        with that onward.
      • 2013-09-30 27319, 2013

      • ocharles
        i don't see that being questioned :)
      • 2013-09-30 27325, 2013

      • LordSputnik
        and if you do use python, i'll probably help out 10-15 hours a week
      • 2013-09-30 27331, 2013

      • ruaok
        rdfa is the next topic.
      • 2013-09-30 27335, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        ocharles: I'm keeping quiet :P
      • 2013-09-30 27351, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        dunno if nikki's totally here, IIRC that topic is "so where's that again?"
      • 2013-09-30 27300, 2013

      • ruaok
        we have a meeting here in london with various RDF inclined people on wednesday.
      • 2013-09-30 27316, 2013

      • ocharles
        ianmcorvidae: heh
      • 2013-09-30 27334, 2013

      • ruaok
        we've had a number of volunteers speak up and I'm going to start the conversation on wed.
      • 2013-09-30 27337, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        ruaok: cool -- so hopefully some answers on that there?
      • 2013-09-30 27303, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae would be content with that as this topic's concerned. slow-moving, but :P
      • 2013-09-30 27304, 2013

      • ruaok
        not sure if we will have answers, but we'll have a discussion and BBC sandwiches.
      • 2013-09-30 27305, 2013

      • nikki
        yes, that was what I wanted to ask
      • 2013-09-30 27309, 2013

      • ruaok
        not sure which one will be worse. :)
      • 2013-09-30 27311, 2013

      • ocharles
        :)
      • 2013-09-30 27323, 2013

      • ruaok
        yes, there is progress.
      • 2013-09-30 27331, 2013

      • ruaok
        with that, onward.
      • 2013-09-30 27343, 2013

      • ruaok
        MBS-3841 & co, ocharles
      • 2013-09-30 27300, 2013

      • mb-chat-logger
      • 2013-09-30 27308, 2013

      • ocharles
        ok, so I had a look at starting MBS-3841, which is about large releases causing time outs