#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • reosarevok
        I was thinking literally "stuff it here for now", not "let's do things with it
      • 2013-09-05 24851, 2013

      • reosarevok
        "
      • 2013-09-05 24853, 2013

      • ruaok
        give a recording id -> JSON data.
      • 2013-09-05 24856, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I think the very minimum is basically something that you upload data dumps to and which stores them wholesale to splurt back out at you if requested :P
      • 2013-09-05 24811, 2013

      • ruaok
        ianmcorvidae: yeah, that too.
      • 2013-09-05 24813, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        ruaok: yeah -- I think the question there was for a scrobble-data-store service
      • 2013-09-05 24820, 2013

      • ruaok
        ah.
      • 2013-09-05 24824, 2013

      • reosarevok
        For now
      • 2013-09-05 24830, 2013

      • ruaok
        the scrobble data bit is harder.
      • 2013-09-05 24837, 2013

      • ruaok
        its a problem of critical mass.
      • 2013-09-05 24814, 2013

      • ruaok
        if we have to beg users to gather their data, this is never going to take off.
      • 2013-09-05 24814, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        true
      • 2013-09-05 24821, 2013

      • ruaok
        so, unless there is some help from last.fm, I'm not terribly keen on solving that problem.
      • 2013-09-05 24838, 2013

      • ocharles
        there's no way last.fm are going to cooperate on that
      • 2013-09-05 24848, 2013

      • ruaok
        the essentia/MTG bit is interesting since it can put us in a positiion to attract EU funding.
      • 2013-09-05 24852, 2013

      • ruaok
        ocharles: ding.
      • 2013-09-05 24813, 2013

      • ruaok
        which is why its off my radar for the time being.
      • 2013-09-05 24824, 2013

      • ruaok
        as much as I would love to have that functionality/data
      • 2013-09-05 24824, 2013

      • mb-chat-logger joined the channel
      • 2013-09-05 24808, 2013

      • navap joined the channel
      • 2013-09-05 24831, 2013

      • ruaok
        oh, so we've managed to kick off a conversation about MB and RDF support in the proper circles with our little blog post.
      • 2013-09-05 24805, 2013

      • ruaok
        which effectively means that we shouldn't do anything with that until we hear more concrete information back from that camp
      • 2013-09-05 24828, 2013

      • ruaok
        its good to know that some people do pay attention to our blog. :)
      • 2013-09-05 24832, 2013

      • reosarevok
        heh :)
      • 2013-09-05 24854, 2013

      • reosarevok
        At least Barry Norton follows the FB page, so it's possible linking the blog to that helped :)
      • 2013-09-05 24826, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Hopefully someone will take care of that
      • 2013-09-05 24846, 2013

      • reosarevok
        What do we threaten to remove next? I guess the release editor is being fixed already :D
      • 2013-09-05 24810, 2013

      • ruaok
        lol
      • 2013-09-05 24818, 2013

      • ruaok
        our "horrible" ui, for sure.
      • 2013-09-05 24835, 2013

      • reosarevok
        "We're going to remove the UI and default to plain text pages in two weeks"
      • 2013-09-05 24809, 2013

      • ruaok
        that would be a great april 1 blog post.
      • 2013-09-05 24814, 2013

      • reosarevok
        "For making edits, send an email to edit-$entity-$mbid [at musicbrainz.org]"
      • 2013-09-05 24845, 2013

      • ruaok
        ijabz: ping
      • 2013-09-05 24824, 2013

      • ruaok
        reosarevok: I just forwarded a commercial use request to info@
      • 2013-09-05 24857, 2013

      • ruaok
        along the same lines, did you see the one from Tixie ?
      • 2013-09-05 24805, 2013

      • reosarevok
        ruaok: ok. relatedly, we got a mail from someone not too long ago asking whether what they wanted was commercial use or not
      • 2013-09-05 24808, 2013

      • ocharles
      • 2013-09-05 24818, 2013

      • ruaok
        ocharles: :)
      • 2013-09-05 24818, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Yeah, that'd be it :p
      • 2013-09-05 24824, 2013

      • reosarevok
        I didn't know what to answer
      • 2013-09-05 24840, 2013

      • reosarevok
        ocharles: heh, I used to have a gopher server a few years ago - that'd be fun :p
      • 2013-09-05 24846, 2013

      • jonjomckay joined the channel
      • 2013-09-05 24845, 2013

      • ruaok
        years ago?
      • 2013-09-05 24848, 2013

      • ruaok
        not decades?
      • 2013-09-05 24808, 2013

      • ruaok
        seriously, two decades have passed since it was in style.
      • 2013-09-05 24825, 2013

      • reosarevok
        No, like 4 years ago, there's a small mailing list for people with gopher servers
      • 2013-09-05 24844, 2013

      • ocharles
        i'm sad i never got to use a gopher server
      • 2013-09-05 24801, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Install one then! :p
      • 2013-09-05 24801, 2013

      • ruaok
        ocharles: sounds like its not too late. :)
      • 2013-09-05 24804, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        people still use it, you could go ahead! :)
      • 2013-09-05 24809, 2013

      • reosarevok
        If I could do it, it has to be easy :p
      • 2013-09-05 24825, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (not that I remember how it worked)
      • 2013-09-05 24858, 2013

      • ruaok
        reosarevok: no clue.
      • 2013-09-05 24817, 2013

      • reosarevok
        oops, I used my gmail address
      • 2013-09-05 24819, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Well, whatever
      • 2013-09-05 24836, 2013

      • ruaok
        did you respond to the trixie one?
      • 2013-09-05 24855, 2013

      • reosarevok
        not yet
      • 2013-09-05 24812, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Is the answer just "yes, it's commercial if you start charging" I guess? :)
      • 2013-09-05 24817, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (plus the info)
      • 2013-09-05 24853, 2013

      • ruaok
        I would even go further and argue that even doing it for free is a commercial venture.
      • 2013-09-05 24807, 2013

      • ruaok
        just because they dont charge for the end product, doesn't mean its not a commercial venture.
      • 2013-09-05 24820, 2013

      • ruaok
        oh.
      • 2013-09-05 24843, 2013

      • ruaok
        we should add bandsintown and songkick to our "data users" (not customers) section.
      • 2013-09-05 24836, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        in fairness, commercial as concerns us is CC's definition, which IIRC pretty much has to do with money
      • 2013-09-05 24808, 2013

      • ruaok
        ianmcorvidae: yes. effectively it leaves the definition in the hands of the copyright owner.
      • 2013-09-05 24822, 2013

      • ruaok
        which is also why the license has been labeled as "evil"
      • 2013-09-05 24839, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        heh
      • 2013-09-05 24853, 2013

      • ruaok
        the wikimedia people dropped that on me. :)
      • 2013-09-05 24855, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        yeah, I guess it defines it circularly
      • 2013-09-05 24802, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        "You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You in Section 3 above in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation."
      • 2013-09-05 24812, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        you could argue that if someone using the data runs ads on their site, then it's commercial use.
      • 2013-09-05 24815, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        "commercial advantage" yup that could mean anything
      • 2013-09-05 24823, 2013

      • ruaok
        There has been plenty of evidence that douchey companies have used it in douchey ways.
      • 2013-09-05 24838, 2013

      • ruaok
        a dutch public broadcaster was one of those.
      • 2013-09-05 24851, 2013

      • ruaok
        kepstin-work: yes, exactly.
      • 2013-09-05 24807, 2013

      • ruaok
        which I what I normally say, but then just let people do that anyway.
      • 2013-09-05 24812, 2013

      • ruaok
        I know what ad revenues are like.
      • 2013-09-05 24822, 2013

      • ruaok
        and there is only one company that makes money off that shit.
      • 2013-09-05 24840, 2013

      • ruaok
        and fortunately they hand a tiny fraction of that money to us. :)
      • 2013-09-05 24841, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I hear some of the retargeting startups are doing okay at it too, but yeah :P
      • 2013-09-05 24857, 2013

      • ruaok
        retargeting?
      • 2013-09-05 24824, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
      • 2013-09-05 24846, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        semi-evil data-based ad optimization :P
      • 2013-09-05 24854, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Sometimes I really wish we would do something about them though :(
      • 2013-09-05 24806, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (the pages that display ads and our data and nothing else9
      • 2013-09-05 24827, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Does the definition require being consistent? :p
      • 2013-09-05 24837, 2013

      • ruaok
        actually, since I am talking to search guys at google right now, I could bring that up.
      • 2013-09-05 24846, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Or can you be "You have ads but I like you, go ahead" vs "You have ads and you suck, die"
      • 2013-09-05 24847, 2013

      • ruaok
        reosarevok: do you have a prime example of this to hand?
      • 2013-09-05 24849, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        (basically, retargeting is something that keeps track of people who click through at least once, and shows them more ads for your site based on that)
      • 2013-09-05 24813, 2013

      • ruaok
        ianmcorvidae: are they the ones who show me ads for products I've already purchased?
      • 2013-09-05 24815, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I mean, that's a consistent criterion: it's commercial advantage by our determination
      • 2013-09-05 24816, 2013

      • ruaok
        I *love* those.
      • 2013-09-05 24823, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        entirely possible, yes
      • 2013-09-05 24831, 2013

      • reosarevok
        ruaok: you mean you see ads? :p
      • 2013-09-05 24838, 2013

      • reosarevok
        I thought everybody reasonable used blockers by now
      • 2013-09-05 24840, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I mean, I block ads generally, so :P
      • 2013-09-05 24853, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        though, axciom put out a thing just the other day where you can look up what data they have on you
      • 2013-09-05 24857, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        mine is *comically* wrong
      • 2013-09-05 24808, 2013

      • kepstin-work only blocks flash, so he still sees non-flash ads.
      • 2013-09-05 24814, 2013

      • ruaok
        reosarevok: correct, I dont block ads.
      • 2013-09-05 24815, 2013

      • reosarevok
        They say you vote Republican, ian?
      • 2013-09-05 24831, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        it has me as 24-25, married with a 16-17 year old male kid, a car and insurance, making $125k a year
      • 2013-09-05 24836, 2013

      • reosarevok
        ruaok: why? :/
      • 2013-09-05 24838, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        apparently I was a *very* early bloomer
      • 2013-09-05 24843, 2013

      • reosarevok
        :D
      • 2013-09-05 24854, 2013

      • reosarevok
        I guess the 16 year old is also you :p
      • 2013-09-05 24802, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (based on your searches :p)
      • 2013-09-05 24805, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        then who is he married to? :)
      • 2013-09-05 24807, 2013

      • ruaok
        reosarevok: my brain is quite adept at erasing ads from my field of view.
      • 2013-09-05 24821, 2013

      • ruaok
        but he Baader Meinhof complex fucks it up at times. :)
      • 2013-09-05 24830, 2013

      • reosarevok
      • 2013-09-05 24841, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        ugh, yourfreediscographyandsongs
      • 2013-09-05 24853, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        what was that one we were looking at that was so poorly coded, was that them?
      • 2013-09-05 24856, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (this is one of the ones this guy who asked us to remove his profile linked at at some point like "I don't want this shit on google")
      • 2013-09-05 24859, 2013

      • reosarevok
        ianmcorvidae: think so
      • 2013-09-05 24805, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (also lacking any kind of contact link)
      • 2013-09-05 24808, 2013

      • ruaok
        we need a snappy name for those sites.
      • 2013-09-05 24816, 2013

      • ruaok
        im spam is spim.
      • 2013-09-05 24821, 2013

      • ruaok
        we've got splogs.
      • 2013-09-05 24835, 2013

      • ruaok
        spamographies?
      • 2013-09-05 24812, 2013

      • reosarevok
        That sounds like a site that has info about spam
      • 2013-09-05 24815, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Which would be kinda fun
      • 2013-09-05 24819, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Let's make SpamBrainz :p
      • 2013-09-05 24824, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        spographies.
      • 2013-09-05 24815, 2013

      • ruaok
        kepstin-work: +1 great.
      • 2013-09-05 24820, 2013

      • ruaok
        I'll use that in my email to google.
      • 2013-09-05 24823, 2013

      • reosarevok
      • 2013-09-05 24800, 2013

      • ruaok
        great, thanks.
      • 2013-09-05 24820, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Ok, transcluded
      • 2013-09-05 24836, 2013

      • ruaok
        gracies! :)
      • 2013-09-05 24826, 2013

      • hawke_1 joined the channel
      • 2013-09-05 24856, 2013

      • hawke joined the channel
      • 2013-09-05 24856, 2013

      • alastairp
        11:38 AM <luks> I didn't hear a single real user wanting RDFa, just the MO guys
      • 2013-09-05 24805, 2013

      • alastairp
        fyi, there are people here who want rdfa
      • 2013-09-05 24815, 2013

      • alastairp
        note that this is not the same as me wanting rdfa
      • 2013-09-05 24849, 2013

      • luks
        I was talking in the context of MB, not in general
      • 2013-09-05 24826, 2013

      • luks
        and if you mean RDFa [at MB], I'd like to know who are the people
      • 2013-09-05 24805, 2013

      • ruaok
        alastairp: here at MTG?
      • 2013-09-05 24820, 2013

      • ruaok
        if so, send them my way. I'd love to chat.
      • 2013-09-05 24811, 2013

      • alastairp
        luks: people who want rdfa in musicbrainz
      • 2013-09-05 24815, 2013

      • alastairp
        ruaok: yes. gopal
      • 2013-09-05 24826, 2013

      • alastairp
        he's at a ... semantic web conference .... currently
      • 2013-09-05 24832, 2013

      • ruaok
        alastairp: ah. fitting.
      • 2013-09-05 24833, 2013

      • alastairp
        but you should talk when he's back
      • 2013-09-05 24845, 2013

      • ruaok
        ok, nudge him when he gets back please.
      • 2013-09-05 24802, 2013

      • alastairp
        I sent him a link to the blog post, but i'm not sure he has time to follow it up
      • 2013-09-05 24840, 2013

      • ruaok
        understandably
      • 2013-09-05 24857, 2013

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2013-09-05 24848, 2013

      • reosarevok
        ruaok: heh, I had just sent a direct forward to Jamie as soon as I saw it but your version might be better :p