#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • kepstin-work
        i've never used it either :)
      • 2012-10-31 30558, 2012

      • nikki
        ianmcorvidae has. he once gave me something I copied and pasted into psql
      • 2012-10-31 30503, 2012

      • nikki kicks him out of bed
      • 2012-10-31 30507, 2012

      • kepstin-work
      • 2012-10-31 30536, 2012

      • ocharles
        yea, that's a CTE
      • 2012-10-31 30544, 2012

      • nikki
        a CTE?
      • 2012-10-31 30552, 2012

      • ocharles
        common table expression, which is what kepstin is talking about
      • 2012-10-31 30555, 2012

      • ocharles
        (that WITH stuff)
      • 2012-10-31 30523, 2012

      • ocharles
        WITH outer AS (SELECT foo, bar FROM sometable WHERE ...) UPDATE somecolumn = foo USING outer WHERE someothercolumn = bar;
      • 2012-10-31 30527, 2012

      • ocharles
        I think that's right
      • 2012-10-31 30553, 2012

      • ocharles
        I don't think you need a CTE actually, UPDATE ... USING (SELECT ) WHERE blah; should work, no?
      • 2012-10-31 30547, 2012

      • nikki
        using using just gives me syntax errors :/
      • 2012-10-31 30558, 2012

      • ocharles
        it might be FROM then
      • 2012-10-31 30511, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        yeah... update ... using isn't syntax supported in postgresql
      • 2012-10-31 30513, 2012

      • ocharles
        yea, it's FROM, sorry
      • 2012-10-31 30515, 2012

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2012-10-31 30523, 2012

      • nikki
        what I don't get is that I must have done this before, yet this time it totally stumped me :/
      • 2012-10-31 30510, 2012

      • ocharles
        UPDATE somecolumn = foo FROM (SELECT foo, bar FROM sometable where ..) WHERE someothercolumn = bar;
      • 2012-10-31 30511, 2012

      • nikki
        wooo finally
      • 2012-10-31 30529, 2012

      • nikki
        thanks :D
      • 2012-10-31 30533, 2012

      • Freso joined the channel
      • 2012-10-31 30509, 2012

      • Mineo
        is there a hidden setting to make jira subscribe me automatically to issues I comment on?
      • 2012-10-31 30552, 2012

      • nikki
        probably not :/
      • 2012-10-31 30506, 2012

      • reoafk joined the channel
      • 2012-10-31 30513, 2012

      • Freso
        Is there a reason STYLE-* isn't sent to mb-bugs?
      • 2012-10-31 30550, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        or for that matter, to mb-style ;)
      • 2012-10-31 30547, 2012

      • Freso
        Well, about everything else going on in JIRA is sent to mb-bugs, so I'd find it more natural to see them there.
      • 2012-10-31 30559, 2012

      • nikki
        everything else in jira is developer stuff :P
      • 2012-10-31 30530, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        hmm. actually, sending them to -style would probably be a good idea.
      • 2012-10-31 30500, 2012

      • Freso
        Developers know how to set up filters for "Subject: .*(STYLE-.*)" > /dev/null.
      • 2012-10-31 30511, 2012

      • Freso
        If they don't want to read them.
      • 2012-10-31 30558, 2012

      • hawke_1
        But they shouldn’t have to.
      • 2012-10-31 30511, 2012

      • hawke_1
        Unless there’s a good reason that developers should see STYLE bugs
      • 2012-10-31 30519, 2012

      • hawke_1
        but I can’t see one
      • 2012-10-31 30551, 2012

      • nikki
        somewhat relevant to this discussion: I was discussing with reoafk yesterday whether instrument requests should be style tickets rather than trying to track them on a big long wiki page
      • 2012-10-31 30516, 2012

      • hawke_1
        Hmm…that would make some sense, I think
      • 2012-10-31 30523, 2012

      • hawke_1
        Though it would be a lot of tickets
      • 2012-10-31 30548, 2012

      • hawke_1
        Actually, instruments should be entities. ;-)
      • 2012-10-31 30554, 2012

      • Freso
        "This list is a read-only automated notification of changes in our bug tracking system. This list is quite high traffic as an email is sent to this list whenever someone enters or changes a bug. " - doesn't mention anything about mb-bugs being only for devs.
      • 2012-10-31 30557, 2012

      • nikki already entered the ticket for that :P
      • 2012-10-31 30530, 2012

      • Freso
        On the contrary, "This list is a read-only automated notification of changes in our bug tracking system." would suggest all change notifications, not a subset of it only relevant for devs.
      • 2012-10-31 30508, 2012

      • hawke_1
        In that case, I agree.
      • 2012-10-31 30526, 2012

      • nikki
        the big advantage is that people would be able to watch tickets for instruments they want added, so they'll know when it does get added
      • 2012-10-31 30542, 2012

      • nikki
        and jira has a full content view which displays tickets with all the comments on a big long page, if people want a big long page to look at like we have now :P
      • 2012-10-31 30512, 2012

      • kurtjx joined the channel
      • 2012-10-31 30530, 2012

      • ocharles
        SELECT * FROM revision_path a, revision_path b WHERE a.parent_revision_id = b.parent_revision_id AND a.revision_id = 12 AND b.revision_id = 13 ORDER BY a.distance asc, b.distance asc LIMIT 1; -- find a common ancestor between revisions
      • 2012-10-31 30531, 2012

      • ocharles
        <3 NES
      • 2012-10-31 30532, 2012

      • mb-chat-logger
      • 2012-10-31 30559, 2012

      • CatCat
        <3
      • 2012-10-31 30500, 2012

      • mb-chat-logger
      • 2012-10-31 30502, 2012

      • CatCat
        huh
      • 2012-10-31 30548, 2012

      • nikki
        are we going to get rid of that or should I just block the damn thing already?
      • 2012-10-31 30518, 2012

      • CatCat
        c|~
      • 2012-10-31 30522, 2012

      • CatCat
        what no ♪?
      • 2012-10-31 30527, 2012

      • CatCat
        probably block it nikki
      • 2012-10-31 30545, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        warp: yes, it should be 16 in DBDefs.pm.default, nobody updated that at the schema change
      • 2012-10-31 30549, 2012

      • reosarevok joined the channel
      • 2012-10-31 30549, 2012

      • nikki
        I don't even know why it was added
      • 2012-10-31 30559, 2012

      • CatCat is a bit confused why à is up but ~ isn't
      • 2012-10-31 30527, 2012

      • nikki
        hm?
      • 2012-10-31 30531, 2012

      • CatCat
        i man i press alt ¨ a and i get ã but i press just alt ¨i get ~
      • 2012-10-31 30550, 2012

      • CatCat
        why isn't ~ higher up
      • 2012-10-31 30558, 2012

      • hawke_1
        Ooh, ♩
      • 2012-10-31 30505, 2012

      • hawke_1 learns some new compose shortcuts
      • 2012-10-31 30508, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        the vertical position of the ~ character depends on the font.
      • 2012-10-31 30513, 2012

      • CatCat
        ah
      • 2012-10-31 30530, 2012

      • CatCat
        💝 what do you guys see?
      • 2012-10-31 30535, 2012

      • hawke_1
        ♪♩♮♬
      • 2012-10-31 30541, 2012

      • hawke_1
        I see a square with 0419fd in it
      • 2012-10-31 30554, 2012

      • Zaphodbeeblebrox
        huh it works here
      • 2012-10-31 30557, 2012

      • Zaphodbeeblebrox
        but not an image
      • 2012-10-31 30557, 2012

      • nikki
        I see lion's scary emoji stuff
      • 2012-10-31 30505, 2012

      • CatCat
        yea
      • 2012-10-31 30512, 2012

      • CatCat
        I don't get the emoji stuff
      • 2012-10-31 30524, 2012

      • CatCat
        💝 aha! can ciscumvent
      • 2012-10-31 30526, 2012

      • CatCat
        no!
      • 2012-10-31 30536, 2012

      • CatCat
        i chose to circumvent it!
      • 2012-10-31 30539, 2012

      • CatCat
        :(
      • 2012-10-31 30515, 2012

      • CatCat
        many of these plain text ones are better than the image/icon/emoji
      • 2012-10-31 30523, 2012

      • CatCat
        like 💖
      • 2012-10-31 30530, 2012

      • CatCat
        it's black font thing is awesome
      • 2012-10-31 30517, 2012

      • CatCat
        "SMILING CAT FACE WITH HEART-SHAPED EYES"
      • 2012-10-31 30520, 2012

      • CatCat
        seriously?
      • 2012-10-31 30507, 2012

      • CatCat
        🇯🇵
      • 2012-10-31 30522, 2012

      • Zaphodbeeblebrox
        hehe that can't see a japanese flag
      • 2012-10-31 30508, 2012

      • CatCat
        骁 should i be amused that catq there is ma-yao
      • 2012-10-31 30529, 2012

      • hawke_1 joined the channel
      • 2012-10-31 30519, 2012

      • CatCat
        hey cool i can disable it
      • 2012-10-31 30529, 2012

      • CatCat
        by putting it IN THE TRASH
      • 2012-10-31 30520, 2012

      • CatCat
        natta has mb- d- evel
      • 2012-10-31 30524, 2012

      • CatCat
        hash*
      • 2012-10-31 30555, 2012

      • reosarevok
        warp, nikki: so, should I ask something to the IA people about CAA-47 or is something we can do from our side with this CORS stuff?
      • 2012-10-31 30555, 2012

      • mb-chat-logger
      • 2012-10-31 30508, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (as in, should I ask what happened and why it wasn't a 503)
      • 2012-10-31 30519, 2012

      • nikki
        I guess so
      • 2012-10-31 30541, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Ok
      • 2012-10-31 30533, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        ianmcorvidae has changed the topic to: tropical week! | http://musicbrainz.org/#devel | Next meeting: reviews, decoupling search server from web service (ocharles), log analysis project (ocharles), MBS-3665 (ian)
      • 2012-10-31 30541, 2012

      • bitmap
        reosarevok: I'm not sure what you mean on MBS-5476...I thought that ticket was for it (wrongly) selecting an instrument, but there's no instrument field when editing a work…
      • 2012-10-31 30541, 2012

      • mb-chat-logger
      • 2012-10-31 30509, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ooops, did I leave the comment in the wrong ticket? :D
      • 2012-10-31 30530, 2012

      • reosarevok
        bitmap: I meant the one with the ISWC stuff
      • 2012-10-31 30532, 2012

      • bitmap
        maybe? :P
      • 2012-10-31 30547, 2012

      • bitmap
        oh
      • 2012-10-31 30527, 2012

      • reosarevok moves the comment
      • 2012-10-31 30537, 2012

      • adhawkins
        ocharles: Whoops, posted this in the wrong channel
      • 2012-10-31 30550, 2012

      • adhawkins
        After the virtual box upgrade, the download ran a lot longer than it ever had before.
      • 2012-10-31 30555, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Good, adhawkins!
      • 2012-10-31 30501, 2012

      • adhawkins
        I've blown the VM away and am trying again from scratch.
      • 2012-10-31 30503, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I'm not the only one posting things in the wrong places :)
      • 2012-10-31 30513, 2012

      • adhawkins
        Odd that my virtualbox reckoned it was up to date...
      • 2012-10-31 30539, 2012

      • bitmap
        reosarevok: hm, works fine for me when editing a work (userscript is disabled + verified that the new code is on the page)
      • 2012-10-31 30550, 2012

      • reosarevok
        huh
      • 2012-10-31 30556, 2012

      • reosarevok tries again
      • 2012-10-31 30508, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ... so it does
      • 2012-10-31 30509, 2012

      • reosarevok
        wtf
      • 2012-10-31 30517, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Neevermind then
      • 2012-10-31 30523, 2012

      • reosarevok deletes the comment *again* :)
      • 2012-10-31 30525, 2012

      • bitmap
        heh
      • 2012-10-31 30540, 2012

      • bitmap
        apparently the relationship editor is completely broken on beta
      • 2012-10-31 30552, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        heh, great
      • 2012-10-31 30514, 2012

      • bitmap
        I wonder if I added a trailing comma to one of the js files again, since the minified js is blank
      • 2012-10-31 30533, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        hm
      • 2012-10-31 30545, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        it seems to have failed to build some things
      • 2012-10-31 30549, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae tries redeploying
      • 2012-10-31 30541, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        bitmap: check now? no failures this time compiling
      • 2012-10-31 30510, 2012

      • Prophet5 joined the channel
      • 2012-10-31 30555, 2012

      • bitmap
        ianmcorvidae: still not working
      • 2012-10-31 30517, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        ah, then it may be your fault :)
      • 2012-10-31 30529, 2012

      • bitmap
      • 2012-10-31 30551, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        oh
      • 2012-10-31 30506, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        the manifest still mentions knockout-latest.debug.js
      • 2012-10-31 30517, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        hm, I guess that's still right
      • 2012-10-31 30527, 2012

      • bitmap
        yeah
      • 2012-10-31 30559, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        heh, yeah, that's an empty file
      • 2012-10-31 30538, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        not sure why though
      • 2012-10-31 30525, 2012

      • bitmap
        hm, last time warp used some command line tool for the minifier that displayed parse errors
      • 2012-10-31 30551, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        hm
      • 2012-10-31 30506, 2012

      • warp
        indeed
      • 2012-10-31 30525, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        cool, he's here, he can tell us what it was :)
      • 2012-10-31 30530, 2012

      • warp
      • 2012-10-31 30555, 2012

      • warp
        find . -name "*js" -exec /path/to/closure-verify {} \;
      • 2012-10-31 30523, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        since you have that installed already, any chance of you just running that on the beta branch? :)
      • 2012-10-31 30528, 2012

      • warp
        (yes, it's a bit of a hack, but it works well enough)
      • 2012-10-31 30509, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae waiting for closure to download
      • 2012-10-31 30552, 2012

      • warp
        it will complain about TrackParser.js, I should fix that eventually.
      • 2012-10-31 30505, 2012

      • warp
        otherwise only OK so far
      • 2012-10-31 30528, 2012

      • bitmap
        ianmcorvidae: can this be installed system-wide on rika or something? :)
      • 2012-10-31 30558, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        bitmap: well, the thing warp linked is just a shell script that downloads the .jar and uses it :P
      • 2012-10-31 30504, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        I can make sure java's on rika though
      • 2012-10-31 30523, 2012

      • bitmap
        oh, then that's convenient enough