20:38 PM
plaintext
thanks
2012-09-18 26208, 2012
20:39 PM
ruaok
updated.
2012-09-18 26206, 2012
20:40 PM
plaintext
I have to restart again :)
2012-09-18 26211, 2012
20:40 PM
ruaok
k
2012-09-18 26241, 2012
20:41 PM
ruaok starts the search server release
2012-09-18 26207, 2012
20:42 PM
ocharles
ruaok: ticket price?
2012-09-18 26219, 2012
20:42 PM
ruaok
$850 for you $700 for warp
2012-09-18 26224, 2012
20:42 PM
ruaok
both on united.
2012-09-18 26234, 2012
20:42 PM
ruaok
avoid US airways. they have a cheaper flight, but with stops.
2012-09-18 26241, 2012
20:42 PM
ruaok
its vastly more chance of them fucking things up.
2012-09-18 26200, 2012
20:43 PM
ocharles
oh, you're looking into that for us?:)
2012-09-18 26220, 2012
20:43 PM
ruaok
in general, I'm keeping my eyes out for prices, yes.
2012-09-18 26224, 2012
20:43 PM
ocharles
you know i'm flying in on the wednesday before, right?
2012-09-18 26231, 2012
20:43 PM
ruaok
yep
2012-09-18 26232, 2012
20:43 PM
plaintext
ruaok: still no success :l let me read some stuff, so maybe I find something
2012-09-18 26233, 2012
20:43 PM
ocharles
kewl
2012-09-18 26239, 2012
20:43 PM
ruaok
I'm not buying, I'm just trying to coordinate shit. :)
2012-09-18 26243, 2012
20:43 PM
ruaok
plaintext: ok
2012-09-18 26244, 2012
20:43 PM
ocharles
ok, cool
2012-09-18 26253, 2012
20:43 PM
ocharles
who will ultimately be buying? is this something I should be watching too?
2012-09-18 26254, 2012
20:43 PM
ruaok
trying to figure out my situation.
2012-09-18 26203, 2012
20:44 PM
ruaok
ocharles: if you can do it, that would be great.
2012-09-18 26211, 2012
20:44 PM
ruaok
and then tack it onto the next invoice.
2012-09-18 26217, 2012
20:44 PM
ruaok
if that is a probelm, I can buy.
2012-09-18 26237, 2012
20:44 PM
ocharles
ok, i'll look into that then this week
2012-09-18 26213, 2012
20:45 PM
ruaok
k
2012-09-18 26230, 2012
20:45 PM
ruaok
my free ticket that I was offered to/from the UK evaporated.
2012-09-18 26241, 2012
20:45 PM
ruaok
and just the return flight is $1800.
2012-09-18 26252, 2012
20:45 PM
ruaok
when a round trip can be had for $800. fuck the airlines.
2012-09-18 26241, 2012
20:46 PM
ruaok
ijabz: dora is up with the new code.
2012-09-18 26248, 2012
20:46 PM
ruaok
want to test from hobbes or should I just go live?
2012-09-18 26256, 2012
20:46 PM
ruaok
two test queries came back ok.
2012-09-18 26230, 2012
20:47 PM
ijabz
go live
2012-09-18 26256, 2012
20:47 PM
ijabz
2012-09-18 26203, 2012
20:49 PM
ruaok
dora is live
2012-09-18 26221, 2012
20:49 PM
ruaok
I'll wait a minute to go live with roobarb
2012-09-18 26250, 2012
20:50 PM
ijabz
warp, assume json will be in next mbserver release ?
2012-09-18 26210, 2012
20:51 PM
ocharles
json should be on beta now if he'd hurry up and ship his stuff :)
2012-09-18 26242, 2012
20:51 PM
ruaok
lol
2012-09-18 26209, 2012
20:52 PM
ruaok
I'm so happy that with jetty and daily restarts the search servers have been behaving really well.
2012-09-18 26211, 2012
20:52 PM
ruaok
finally.
2012-09-18 26258, 2012
20:52 PM
plaintext
ruaok: I can't really find anything that we did wrong
2012-09-18 26213, 2012
20:53 PM
ruaok
let me finish this release and see if there are some logs to look at
2012-09-18 26217, 2012
20:53 PM
plaintext
although the docs say the config file only needs a single line specifying the source name
2012-09-18 26228, 2012
20:53 PM
plaintext
yeah, sure
2012-09-18 26245, 2012
20:53 PM
ijabz
oh good, I wonder what the underlying problem is, maybe when Lucene 4.0 is released and we move to it that will improve stability further
2012-09-18 26217, 2012
20:54 PM
ijabz
ocharles: oh I thought it was already on beta, but seems it isn't, I actually meant on live I thought it was going to be in th least release
2012-09-18 26222, 2012
20:54 PM
ruaok
I perceive tomcat to be the largest problem.
2012-09-18 26227, 2012
20:54 PM
ocharles
it still smells a bit off to have to restart something daily
2012-09-18 26232, 2012
20:54 PM
ocharles
but at least we're looking stable
2012-09-18 26211, 2012
20:55 PM
ocharles
ijabz: if it goes into beta in the next 5 days then it'll be in the next stable release
2012-09-18 26223, 2012
20:55 PM
ruaok
ocharles: agreed, but its far less leaky than our perl stuff. :)
2012-09-18 26235, 2012
20:55 PM
ruaok
it has to be restart once a day, not once every 50 requests. :)
2012-09-18 26250, 2012
20:55 PM
ijabz
It maybe tomcat, or maybe a problem with codebase that jetty is dealing better with then tomcat.
2012-09-18 26251, 2012
20:55 PM
ruaok
roobarb is back in.
2012-09-18 26201, 2012
20:56 PM
ruaok
ijabz: we should be 100% back now. plz to be checking that.
2012-09-18 26216, 2012
20:56 PM
ruaok
ijabz: could be.
2012-09-18 26236, 2012
20:56 PM
ocharles
ruaok: scheduling game hasn't been restarted since Jun 27th ;)
2012-09-18 26255, 2012
20:56 PM
ruaok
that is what? 35 requests? wooo. :)
2012-09-18 26209, 2012
20:57 PM
ruaok
its a matter of traffic really.
2012-09-18 26212, 2012
20:57 PM
ocharles
2012-09-18 26222, 2012
20:57 PM
ocharles
sadly my logs rotate too fast
2012-09-18 26223, 2012
20:57 PM
ruaok
if jetty can do a few million requests before being restarted, I'm ok with that.
2012-09-18 26227, 2012
20:57 PM
ocharles
and i'm too stoopid to fix it
2012-09-18 26242, 2012
20:57 PM
ruaok
ah, my guess was pretty close. :)
2012-09-18 26253, 2012
20:57 PM
ocharles
for a day, yes :)
2012-09-18 26207, 2012
20:58 PM
ruaok
feh, whatever. :)
2012-09-18 26211, 2012
20:58 PM
ruaok
units don't matter!
2012-09-18 26227, 2012
20:58 PM
ocharles
2012-09-18 26235, 2012
21:02 PM
ijabz
ruaok: all looks fine, now just created MBS-5317 rehired for it to be accessable from webservice
2012-09-18 26236, 2012
21:02 PM
mb-chat-logger
2012-09-18 26227, 2012
21:03 PM
ruaok
ocharles: who should I assign 5317 to?
2012-09-18 26249, 2012
21:03 PM
ijabz_ joined the channel
2012-09-18 26219, 2012
21:04 PM
ocharles
ruaok: leave it unassigned but just set an appropriate fix version
2012-09-18 26231, 2012
21:04 PM
ruaok
ocharles: ok
2012-09-18 26231, 2012
21:04 PM
ocharles
chances are i'll probably pick it up, but it's free game for whoever is free at the time
2012-09-18 26253, 2012
21:04 PM
ruaok
ijabz_: the release notes say: "We also now output the date the index was last updated so you know how old the results received are." that makes it sound like that feature should work right away. it needs server support, no?
2012-09-18 26216, 2012
21:05 PM
ijabz_ joined the channel
2012-09-18 26225, 2012
21:05 PM
ruaok
ruaok: ijabz_: the release notes say: "We also now output the date the index was last updated so you know how old the results received are." that makes it sound like that feature should work right away. it needs server support, no?
2012-09-18 26250, 2012
21:05 PM
ijabz_
it does already work
2012-09-18 26203, 2012
21:06 PM
ruaok
is it end user visible?
2012-09-18 26209, 2012
21:06 PM
ijabz_
murdos had already added last updated date to the indexes a while ago :)
2012-09-18 26222, 2012
21:06 PM
ruaok
ocharles: what is the apprporiate fix version for that ticket?
2012-09-18 26254, 2012
21:06 PM
ocharles
ruaok: this release or the schema change release
2012-09-18 26258, 2012
21:06 PM
ijabz_
2012-09-18 26209, 2012
21:07 PM
ruaok
ah, in the XML output.
2012-09-18 26216, 2012
21:07 PM
ruaok
I'll clarify that in the release notes.
2012-09-18 26244, 2012
21:07 PM
ijabz
its also in the LastModified header
2012-09-18 26227, 2012
21:08 PM
ruaok
ocharles: I didn't see an appropriate "this version" so I set it to schema change.
2012-09-18 26229, 2012
21:08 PM
ruaok
ijabz: ok
2012-09-18 26234, 2012
21:09 PM
ruaok
ijabz: I'm wondering whom to thank in the blog post.
2012-09-18 26237, 2012
21:09 PM
ruaok
you and murdos?
2012-09-18 26241, 2012
21:09 PM
ruaok
or just you for this round?
2012-09-18 26215, 2012
21:11 PM
ijabz
Both I guess, murdos added last-updated for replication not this, but it did make things much easier
2012-09-18 26222, 2012
21:11 PM
ruaok
2012-09-18 26228, 2012
21:11 PM
ruaok
k
2012-09-18 26212, 2012
21:12 PM
ruaok
2012-09-18 26215, 2012
21:12 PM
ocharles
haha
2012-09-18 26217, 2012
21:12 PM
ruaok
see if I screwed anything up.
2012-09-18 26219, 2012
21:12 PM
ocharles
i hadn't thought of that
2012-09-18 26243, 2012
21:12 PM
ruaok
expiration dates should be coded into RFID tags. :)
2012-09-18 26200, 2012
21:14 PM
ijabz
2012-09-18 26235, 2012
21:14 PM
ruaok
I got that.
2012-09-18 26209, 2012
21:15 PM
ruaok
how about this working to make it more clear: "This will be exposed to the end-user in the web search results in an upcoming release of musicbrainz-server."
2012-09-18 26217, 2012
21:15 PM
ijabz
But 'This will be exposed to the end-user in an upcoming release of musicbrainz-server.' shouldn't be there
2012-09-18 26243, 2012
21:15 PM
ijabz
But its already exposed
2012-09-18 26256, 2012
21:15 PM
ruaok
the way you wrote the release notes, people would expect it to show up here:
2012-09-18 26257, 2012
21:15 PM
ruaok
2012-09-18 26201, 2012
21:16 PM
ruaok
but it doesn't.
2012-09-18 26220, 2012
21:16 PM
ruaok
so, I added the quip about it being shown on the web search results.
2012-09-18 26248, 2012
21:16 PM
ijabz
ah, sorry I was just thinking about webservice
2012-09-18 26257, 2012
21:16 PM
ijabz
didn't notice it was web search
2012-09-18 26200, 2012
21:17 PM
ruaok
no worries. our end users dont much think about that.
2012-09-18 26222, 2012
21:17 PM
mb-chat-logger
New post: blog: Search server release: 2012-09-18 <http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=1593>
2012-09-18 26222, 2012
21:17 PM
ruaok
then we're all set with the release. I only need to tweak jira milestones
2012-09-18 26228, 2012
21:17 PM
ruaok
thank mb-chat-logger
2012-09-18 26239, 2012
21:17 PM
ruaok
@thanks!
2012-09-18 26222, 2012
21:19 PM
ruaok
ijabz: milestone renamed, new milestone created.
2012-09-18 26226, 2012
21:19 PM
ruaok
should be all done now, right?
2012-09-18 26240, 2012
21:19 PM
dsteiner joined the channel
2012-09-18 26231, 2012
21:20 PM
ruaok pops an item off the stack
2012-09-18 26239, 2012
21:21 PM
ruaok
gzip: musicbrainz-dump-keys.tar.gz: not in gzip format
2012-09-18 26241, 2012
21:21 PM
ruaok
:-(
2012-09-18 26200, 2012
21:22 PM
ocharles
tar xzf ?
2012-09-18 26229, 2012
21:22 PM
ruaok
that complained, so I tried straight unzip.
2012-09-18 26234, 2012
21:22 PM
ocharles
have you decrypted it?
2012-09-18 26238, 2012
21:22 PM
ocharles
it's encoded with your public key
2012-09-18 26241, 2012
21:22 PM
ruaok
oh!
2012-09-18 26253, 2012
21:22 PM
ocharles
at least the public key I have in my GPG key list for rob [at
musicbrainz.org ]
2012-09-18 26207, 2012
21:23 PM
ruaok
which presumably is what I sign the releases with
2012-09-18 26212, 2012
21:23 PM
ruaok goes to try that
2012-09-18 26200, 2012
21:26 PM
ruaok
ocharles: two binary keys were extracted successfully.
2012-09-18 26223, 2012
21:26 PM
ocharles
excellent
2012-09-18 26254, 2012
21:26 PM
ocharles
so, one is for signing the dumps, and we'll probably add .gpg signatures to the full exports. the other is for encrypting our private dump
2012-09-18 26206, 2012
21:27 PM
ocharles
only the encryption is coded so far, but I figured i'd just generate both keys now
2012-09-18 26204, 2012
21:28 PM
ruaok
k.
2012-09-18 26211, 2012
21:28 PM
ruaok
keys stashed appropriately. thanks.
2012-09-18 26220, 2012
21:28 PM
ruaok pops another item off the stack
2012-09-18 26223, 2012
21:28 PM
ruaok
plaintext: still here?
2012-09-18 26227, 2012
21:28 PM
plaintext
yes
2012-09-18 26209, 2012
21:30 PM
Prophet5 joined the channel
2012-09-18 26218, 2012
21:30 PM
plaintext
I think the source is in the right place
2012-09-18 26228, 2012
21:30 PM
plaintext
but the docs say we only need a single line in the config
2012-09-18 26241, 2012
21:30 PM
ruaok
?
2012-09-18 26248, 2012
21:30 PM
ruaok
and not in a section?
2012-09-18 26206, 2012
21:31 PM
plaintext
oh yes, I mean the section
2012-09-18 26233, 2012
21:31 PM
plaintext
according to the docs we only need [mvdedup]\nfilename=...
2012-09-18 26201, 2012
21:32 PM
ruaok
whops.
2012-09-18 26207, 2012
21:32 PM
ruaok
the file was not the apps/search dir.
2012-09-18 26216, 2012
21:32 PM
plaintext
oh :)
