ollie: Added correct Bounded/enumFrom for Vote/EditStatus
2012-11-14 31906, 2012
Freso
Is VirtualBox generally the recommended virtualisation thing to use these days? I don't want to use VMware, and I'm not exactly sure how QEMU is the similar/different - and I don't know of other virtualisation stuff. :)
2012-11-14 31954, 2012
ianmcorvidae
KVM is another at some level
2012-11-14 31924, 2012
ianmcorvidae
and the one I've heard recommended most highly; qemu is a bit small, virtualbox is oracle and has weird issues
2012-11-14 31935, 2012
ianmcorvidae
libvirt might be a thing related to kvm? unsure
2012-11-14 31948, 2012
ianmcorvidae
kepstin does something with something in that vein
2012-11-14 31959, 2012
ianmcorvidae
which was of course exceptionally vague, but :P
2012-11-14 31958, 2012
MBJenkins
ollie: Rewrote relationship stuff to provide better compile warnings
2012-11-14 31956, 2012
ocharles
Freso: "it depends'
2012-11-14 31959, 2012
ocharles
mostly on what you're doing
2012-11-14 31919, 2012
ocharles
VirtualBox is great consumer level virtualization, but I'm not sure it's suited for running something in a server
2012-11-14 31958, 2012
warp
if you have a bunch of servers which need to run a bunch of vms, probably openvz or xen are more appropriate.
2012-11-14 31919, 2012
ianmcorvidae
yeah, xen's pretty nice if you set it up right
2012-11-14 31920, 2012
ianmcorvidae
server-wise
2012-11-14 31937, 2012
ianmcorvidae
be careful though, it's a huge headache if you don't research options carefully
2012-11-14 31945, 2012
Freso
I'm just on the "consumer level". :)
2012-11-14 31957, 2012
ianmcorvidae
project at my college vs. hoser (here) is night and day XD
2012-11-14 31909, 2012
warp
the most impressive thing with openvz is that you can migrate a running vm to a different physical machine with no downtime.
2012-11-14 31911, 2012
MBJenkins
ollie: Change Data.Relationship to be entirely endpoint-type independent
2012-11-14 31912, 2012
Freso
So probably either VirtalBox or QEMU/KVM.
2012-11-14 31928, 2012
warp
I don't know if any other virtualization environments can do that.
2012-11-14 31924, 2012
warp
(some quick wikipedia'ing shows that that is more common nowadays, and apparently supported by xen, virtualbox and a bunch more)
2012-11-14 31939, 2012
Freso
:)
2012-11-14 31922, 2012
luks
vmware can do that, of course :)
2012-11-14 31917, 2012
Prophet5 joined the channel
2012-11-14 31931, 2012
dekarl joined the channel
2012-11-14 31948, 2012
kepstin-work joined the channel
2012-11-14 31935, 2012
Freso
504'ing on beta! \o/
2012-11-14 31956, 2012
voiceinsideyou joined the channel
2012-11-14 31951, 2012
kurtjx_ joined the channel
2012-11-14 31958, 2012
Freso
504'ing here, 504'ing there, 504'ing everywhere!
2012-11-14 31903, 2012
Freso does the 504 dance
2012-11-14 31902, 2012
Freso
ianmcorvidae ocharles warp: Did beta break?
2012-11-14 31943, 2012
olaf_ joined the channel
2012-11-14 31920, 2012
olaf_
I have a question about picard and cover art. the sony mp3 walkman comes with a few mp3 sample files. they have cover art embedded. if I open such file in picard it shows the picture. but appearently its not possible to "migrate" or preserve that image inside the mp3 file. if I lookup the info for the mp3 file the cover image is removed.
olaf_: As far as I know, Picard doesn’t read existing embedded cover art — it can store new cover art and that’s all.
2012-11-14 31918, 2012
hawke_1
luks or bitmap might be able to answer that better.
2012-11-14 31939, 2012
olaf_
I dont care so much about the sample files itself. but it would be nice if I can retag the mp3 albums I have and encode the image into the mp3 files so that all the albums have a picture instead of a gray box in the walkman.
2012-11-14 31925, 2012
hawke_1
What model is it?
2012-11-14 31928, 2012
olaf_
hawke_1: it does a lookup, just the sample file I picked has no entry in data base. would be nice if it can reuse existing images
2012-11-14 31920, 2012
olaf_
hawke_1: <Model>NWZ-E460 Series</Model>
2012-11-14 31945, 2012
olaf_
is there any restriction in the cover art images, licenses, or can I go and find the missing images and upload them somewhere? I see the current mb database allows me to upload images. would picard find them?
2012-11-14 31954, 2012
hawke_1
Yes.
2012-11-14 31956, 2012
hawke_1
Well
2012-11-14 31959, 2012
hawke_1
not for standalone recordings
2012-11-14 31909, 2012
hawke_1
but if they’re part of an album, yes.
2012-11-14 31923, 2012
olaf_
oh, it does. fine
2012-11-14 31937, 2012
olaf_
just uploaded one yesterday and picard shows it.
2012-11-14 31936, 2012
Freso
:)
2012-11-14 31902, 2012
Freso was actually thinking of filing a ticket for cover art for SA recordings.
2012-11-14 31917, 2012
Freso
nikki: ^ is there one already?
2012-11-14 31907, 2012
olaf_
interesting that Eliminator lacks coverart...
2012-11-14 31944, 2012
nikki
not that I know of
2012-11-14 31913, 2012
kepstin-work
well, I still think that sa recordings should be promoted to some sort of release so we can record other data, like release dates etc.
2012-11-14 31935, 2012
hawke_1
+1 to that
2012-11-14 31949, 2012
hawke_1
kepstin-work: How about “single” ;-)
2012-11-14 31959, 2012
Freso
kepstin-work: Like, having dynamic attributes?
2012-11-14 31901, 2012
kepstin-work
they're not quite singles, really :/
2012-11-14 31919, 2012
kepstin-work
maybe add a new release group type, "standalone recording" ;)
2012-11-14 31913, 2012
Freso
kepstin-work: I still root for recordings being able to have CA though. I have entered at least one release, where I've later found "cover art" for each track.
2012-11-14 31923, 2012
Freso
*one digital (Bandcamp) release
2012-11-14 31932, 2012
hawke_1
I kind of think they are singles…at least, I can’t think of a difference between the two.
2012-11-14 31932, 2012
kepstin-work
freso we have a 'track' cover art type
2012-11-14 31932, 2012
reosarevok
Freso: well, there is a "track" cover art type
2012-11-14 31934, 2012
Freso
I know there's a type for that in the CAA types.
2012-11-14 31947, 2012
kepstin-work
common usage is to put the track number in the comment field on each piece of track art.
2012-11-14 31919, 2012
Freso
But it'd still be niftier to have it directly associated with the recording/track.
2012-11-14 31946, 2012
hawke_1
+1
2012-11-14 31902, 2012
hawke_1
I’m liking more and more the idea of track-as-entity.
2012-11-14 31939, 2012
hawke_1
(partly so that we could actually associate art with a track, but also for ARs.
2012-11-14 31959, 2012
olaf_ has left the channel
2012-11-14 31902, 2012
kepstin-work wants a level below recordings -tracks- to be linkable, and a level above recordings (recording groups? performance?) to allow grouping together alternate mixes/edits.
2012-11-14 31934, 2012
reosarevok
I want arrangements, meatbags and a pony
2012-11-14 31950, 2012
reosarevok
:)
2012-11-14 31908, 2012
reosarevok sadly suspects he's more likely to get the pony anytime soon
2012-11-14 31909, 2012
kepstin-work isn't that fond of ponies, but he would take a unicorn in lieu.
2012-11-14 31931, 2012
Freso
Meh. Screw ponies. I'm with the Canadianian - unicorns to the people!
2012-11-14 31936, 2012
Freso
That, or pegasi.
2012-11-14 31943, 2012
Freso
Pegasi would also be awesome.
2012-11-14 31905, 2012
jdamcd joined the channel
2012-11-14 31936, 2012
jdamcd joined the channel
2012-11-14 31927, 2012
noobie joined the channel
2012-11-14 31945, 2012
ianmcorvidae
Freso: it was having trouble earlier, hopefully back later
