if you would have asked me i would have said the brain is indeed lower in the 48px version.
2009-09-21 26451, 2009
nikki
higher?
2009-09-21 26459, 2009
outsidecontext
no, it really looks a bit lower to me.
2009-09-21 26435, 2009
NXisGOD
nope dun look too diff
2009-09-21 26404, 2009
NXisGOD
i put in a border so that at 48pix you can see the brain
2009-09-21 26426, 2009
nikki
hmm, odd
2009-09-21 26425, 2009
NXisGOD
here's the thing guys: 48 pix, 32 pix and 16 pix are most common
2009-09-21 26433, 2009
ruaok
Djce: racked. Jem should be up
2009-09-21 26435, 2009
NXisGOD
so must be most user friendly
2009-09-21 26440, 2009
djce
yup I see it
2009-09-21 26441, 2009
outsidecontext
true
2009-09-21 26426, 2009
NXisGOD
256pix, o well, it's just so ppl using vista, win7, osx can enjoy a bit more
2009-09-21 26435, 2009
ruaok
Your account on jem is active!
2009-09-21 26439, 2009
nikki
hehehe
2009-09-21 26452, 2009
ruaok
I'll go memtest misty
2009-09-21 26459, 2009
nikki
I'm just waiting for when you do an icns file so I can try replacing the current osx one with it >D
2009-09-21 26430, 2009
ruaok
nikki: :)
2009-09-21 26449, 2009
outsidecontext
NXisGOD: i think it now looks great. but maybe we should really use PicardV5-16-alt.png
2009-09-21 26414, 2009
nikki
well the icns file is just a file inside the folder, so I don't see why it won't work
2009-09-21 26419, 2009
outsidecontext
nikki: the icons which are used for the running application are normally defined inside the application. i don't know how osx handles this, but you could get a mix of both new and old icons
2009-09-21 26403, 2009
ruaok
Updating the icons in the bundle will work fine Nikki
2009-09-21 26405, 2009
nikki
I see some ugly 16px version of the windows icon in the toolbar, but I see the osx icon when alt-tabbing (which is where the huge icons are found)
2009-09-21 26411, 2009
nikki
no, not toolbar...
2009-09-21 26414, 2009
nikki
title bar
2009-09-21 26424, 2009
ruaok
Djce: you happy with jem?
2009-09-21 26447, 2009
djce
I'm in, and ssh host key restored.
2009-09-21 26452, 2009
djce
so good to go.
2009-09-21 26404, 2009
ruaok
Great
2009-09-21 26442, 2009
ruaok
I don't expect to have misty throw any errors... I think we've tried this before...
2009-09-21 26452, 2009
ruaok
Nothing after 4 passes. Screw it.
2009-09-21 26459, 2009
ruaok reboots
2009-09-21 26446, 2009
djce
k
2009-09-21 26450, 2009
ruaok
Plz confirm that you can log into misty
2009-09-21 26458, 2009
NXisGOD
updated 32 px
2009-09-21 26425, 2009
outsidecontext
NXisGOD: what did change?
2009-09-21 26409, 2009
ruaok
I can log in. I'm zipping up and heading home.
2009-09-21 26438, 2009
NXisGOD
slightly more glossy
2009-09-21 26447, 2009
NXisGOD
and more visible
2009-09-21 26455, 2009
NXisGOD
but i think i overdid it
2009-09-21 26456, 2009
outsidecontext
i can't say, i don't have the previous one for comparisson :(
2009-09-21 26429, 2009
ruaok_ joined the channel
2009-09-21 26410, 2009
navap
ruaok_: I think you might be stretching "better late than never..." a bit too far with that email ;)
2009-09-21 26417, 2009
navap
Gmail says I got it 4 hours ago, but I just got it.
2009-09-21 26433, 2009
NXisGOD
oh well, fixed it
2009-09-21 26443, 2009
NXisGOD
that shud be good enuf :P
2009-09-21 26410, 2009
outsidecontext
isn't it a bit dark now?
2009-09-21 26411, 2009
NXisGOD
gradient is much less obvious so it looks flatter now
2009-09-21 26426, 2009
nikki
navap: I only just got it too
2009-09-21 26404, 2009
navap
I only glanced through the dev chat, was the mailing list backed up or was it something else?
2009-09-21 26450, 2009
NXisGOD
now?
2009-09-21 26423, 2009
outsidecontext
yes
2009-09-21 26457, 2009
NXisGOD
better or u want it more faded?
2009-09-21 26413, 2009
outsidecontext
no, it's good
2009-09-21 26422, 2009
NXisGOD
sweet
2009-09-21 26429, 2009
navap
I notice the threads are hanging low in the 32, but high in the 48. I think it looks better high like the 48 so that they hang off the edge of the purple more.
2009-09-21 26458, 2009
navap
But that's just me nit picking :)
2009-09-21 26432, 2009
navap
aCiD2: new_editor:password isn't working on test:81, is it something else?
2009-09-21 26408, 2009
nikki
test uses your username and mb doesn't it?
2009-09-21 26422, 2009
navap
doh
2009-09-21 26427, 2009
ruaok__ joined the channel
2009-09-21 26432, 2009
navap
aCiD2: Nevermind
2009-09-21 26411, 2009
ruaok__
djce: how goes it? all good?
2009-09-21 26432, 2009
djce
jem: only problem so far is the Nagios script for raid checking needs a tweak
2009-09-21 26441, 2009
djce
I'm just about to start adding tomcat etc
2009-09-21 26447, 2009
ruaok__
nice.
2009-09-21 26417, 2009
ruaok tries to cool down
2009-09-21 26421, 2009
ruaok
damn heat wave
2009-09-21 26443, 2009
ruaok
ah ha. the mail clog was on the eorbit.net side of things.
2009-09-21 26434, 2009
djce
btw dns resolution on eorbit seems down
2009-09-21 26445, 2009
ruaok
that was the problem of the mail issue. when was the last time you checked?
2009-09-21 26411, 2009
pronik`` joined the channel
2009-09-21 26424, 2009
djce
a couple of hours ago
2009-09-21 26442, 2009
djce
looks better now
2009-09-21 26454, 2009
ruaok
yeah. kevin says: "I gave it a good thumping and things should be back to normal. Let me know if you have any further trouble."
2009-09-21 26416, 2009
ruaok
heh. the dev chatlog message came 3 hours before the reminder for the meeting.
2009-09-21 26419, 2009
outsidecontext
NXisGOD: just ping me when you have something to merge :) i'm going to bed now
2009-09-21 26428, 2009
outsidecontext
bye all
2009-09-21 26438, 2009
djce reboots jem
2009-09-21 26446, 2009
pronik``` joined the channel
2009-09-21 26432, 2009
NXisGOD
nite
2009-09-21 26433, 2009
ruaok
when we get tails in, I'd like to reboot dexter, just to get rid of the warning light.
2009-09-21 26437, 2009
ruaok
nn NXisGOD
2009-09-21 26409, 2009
djce nods
2009-09-21 26454, 2009
djce wonders exactly why all these east Asian fonts are necessary for running a search server.
2009-09-21 26418, 2009
ruaok
you and me both.
2009-09-21 26410, 2009
djce copies across indexes
2009-09-21 26403, 2009
djce starts on misty
2009-09-21 26400, 2009
djce
ruaok: still there?
2009-09-21 26408, 2009
ruaok
yup
2009-09-21 26414, 2009
djce
jem is ready to go, I think.
2009-09-21 26423, 2009
djce
would appreciate a sanity check.
2009-09-21 26432, 2009
ruaok
shoot
2009-09-21 26438, 2009
djce
a couple of nagios checks are acting up, but nothing serious
2009-09-21 26403, 2009
djce
it serves a couple of URLs in a sensible-looking way
2009-09-21 26430, 2009
djce
so I /suspect/ it's ok
2009-09-21 26438, 2009
ruaok
jem, right?
2009-09-21 26441, 2009
djce
yup
2009-09-21 26406, 2009
ruaok
are jem and cartman using the same indexes?
2009-09-21 26433, 2009
ruaok
I see a tiny discrpancy between the two.
2009-09-21 26447, 2009
djce
yes, unless cartman just built some fresh data
2009-09-21 26447, 2009
ruaok
but probably not a symptom of misconfiguration or anything like htat
2009-09-21 26450, 2009
djce
which is quite likely
2009-09-21 26425, 2009
djce
release_index might be new I think
2009-09-21 26451, 2009
djce
Does that explain what you're seeing?
2009-09-21 26412, 2009
ruaok
I saw a discepancy on artist.
2009-09-21 26426, 2009
ruaok
one search got 1420 results and the other 1421
2009-09-21 26431, 2009
ruaok
not really cause for alam, IMHO
2009-09-21 26404, 2009
ruaok
I think jem looks fine from my cursory check.
2009-09-21 26415, 2009
ruaok
did you re-enable the reboot schedule we had in place before?
2009-09-21 26425, 2009
djce
no, not yet.
2009-09-21 26441, 2009
ruaok
before you head to bed, please do that.
2009-09-21 26444, 2009
djce
ok
2009-09-21 26453, 2009
ruaok
it helps quite a bit, but its not perfect.
2009-09-21 26421, 2009
djce
while I think about it: MBBACKUP3 (currently on blik) needs an fsck.
2009-09-21 26425, 2009
djce
it has corruption.
2009-09-21 26401, 2009
ruaok
feh.
2009-09-21 26410, 2009
ruaok
I'll do it from my office next monday.
2009-09-21 26413, 2009
ruaok
that ok?
2009-09-21 26409, 2009
djce
reboots in place for both jem + misty.
2009-09-21 26415, 2009
djce
backups: fine
2009-09-21 26439, 2009
djce
or: we fsck it "in place", but that might mean skipping a day of backups
2009-09-21 26442, 2009
djce
'cos it takes ages
2009-09-21 26426, 2009
ruaok
your call.
2009-09-21 26439, 2009
ruaok
I could also swing by again tomorrow and pick up the disk.
2009-09-21 26451, 2009
djce
no hurry , I'll think about it tomorrow :-)
2009-09-21 26401, 2009
djce
maybe I'll set it going right after the backups.
2009-09-21 26419, 2009
djce
so: are you happy for me to put jem into service?
2009-09-21 26422, 2009
djce
lucene i mean
2009-09-21 26451, 2009
djce
Of course, just like tails it doesn't receive automated updates yet
2009-09-21 26432, 2009
ruaok
why not push updates to them yet?
2009-09-21 26443, 2009
ruaok
but yes, I'm happy with jem to proceed.
2009-09-21 26435, 2009
djce
'cos I haven't written the script for that yet.
2009-09-21 26438, 2009
djce
ok
2009-09-21 26458, 2009
ruaok
lol
2009-09-21 26418, 2009
djce
here we go
2009-09-21 26452, 2009
djce
ok I'm going to spend a few minutes getting misty up to "bare server" standard,
