in that case it should also be moved down a bit, as that definitely seems less important compared to the Artist page.
2009-10-26 29938, 2009
nikki
yeah
2009-10-26 29942, 2009
warp
nikki: yeah, you're right.
2009-10-26 29943, 2009
warp edits.
2009-10-26 29912, 2009
nikki
oh, would the release page also include release group stuff?
2009-10-26 29958, 2009
warp
no, probably not. I've just completely ignored release groups :)
2009-10-26 29923, 2009
warp
a release group style guideline would be more focused on which releases to group under it, I think that's a seperate thing.
2009-10-26 29950, 2009
warp
nikki: I moved release and removed the box/volume/disc stuff, and added release groups.
2009-10-26 29952, 2009
aCiD2
"All tests successful."
2009-10-26 29956, 2009
aCiD2
happiness and joy!
2009-10-26 29907, 2009
ruaok
aCiD2: good news!
2009-10-26 29924, 2009
ruaok
out bank had nearly folded and via a shotgun wedding was sold to chase.
2009-10-26 29933, 2009
ruaok
over the weekend they switched over to the new banking system.
2009-10-26 29940, 2009
ruaok
and they allow online wire transfers!
2009-10-26 29943, 2009
ruaok
HOLY SHIT!
2009-10-26 29950, 2009
aCiD2
woot!
2009-10-26 29957, 2009
ruaok
that makes me pretty damn happy.
2009-10-26 29901, 2009
aCiD2
so no more xe, and dumb clerks who don't know what they are doing?
2009-10-26 29940, 2009
ruaok
correct.
2009-10-26 29948, 2009
ruaok
I should be able to order the transfers from wherever.
2009-10-26 29901, 2009
ruaok
and it should work as fast, if not faster, than when the dumbass clerks were doing it.
2009-10-26 29951, 2009
ruaok
ok, off to another free lunch. back for the meeting in a few.
2009-10-26 29956, 2009
outsidecontext joined the channel
2009-10-26 29914, 2009
outsidecontext_ joined the channel
2009-10-26 29955, 2009
navap
So since the the meeting didn't start at 3pm EST, can I safely assume it will start at 4pm EST?
2009-10-26 29931, 2009
navap wakes up after sleeping ~12 hours :/
2009-10-26 29936, 2009
outsidecontext_
navap: i think so
2009-10-26 29940, 2009
warp
navap: yes.
2009-10-26 29923, 2009
ruaok joined the channel
2009-10-26 29920, 2009
aCiD2
navap: I did that this morning :(
2009-10-26 29922, 2009
ruaok
ruaok has changed the topic to: agenda: review, ???
2009-10-26 29939, 2009
aCiD2
push @agenda, "release editor unit testing"
2009-10-26 29939, 2009
navap
heh
2009-10-26 29916, 2009
outsidecontext_
nikki: can you publish the wikidoc pages Picard_Download, Picard_Plugins and Picard_Scripting?
2009-10-26 29908, 2009
nikki
ok
2009-10-26 29931, 2009
outsidecontext_
thanks :)
2009-10-26 29904, 2009
ruaok
ruaok has changed the topic to: agenda: review, release editor unit testing, ponies.
2009-10-26 29907, 2009
luciddrmr joined the channel
2009-10-26 29918, 2009
ruaok
uh oh
2009-10-26 29906, 2009
ruaok
<BANG>
2009-10-26 29913, 2009
ruaok
Welcome everyone!
2009-10-26 29924, 2009
nikki
outsidecontext_: the scripting page isn't in the wikidocs list, should I add it?
2009-10-26 29926, 2009
ruaok
greetings from an unseasonably nice San Francisco!
2009-10-26 29934, 2009
ruaok
aCiD2: wanna take the lead?
2009-10-26 29937, 2009
aCiD2
sure thing
2009-10-26 29951, 2009
aCiD2
so to recap from last week, I was continuing my focus on the release editor and trying to wire it up with the server side
2009-10-26 29901, 2009
aCiD2
good news is, I'm mostly there!
2009-10-26 29907, 2009
outsidecontext_
nikki: it's maybe better as a normal wiki page
2009-10-26 29915, 2009
ruaok
nice! again, I'm really pleased to see your progresss on the RE.
2009-10-26 29921, 2009
aCiD2
You can submit edits to edit release information, editing tracks, adding new tracks and some other stuff
2009-10-26 29922, 2009
nikki
outsidecontext_: I've done the other two pages
2009-10-26 29933, 2009
outsidecontext_
nikki: thanks a lot
2009-10-26 29939, 2009
navap
ruaok: New agenda item: MediaWiki captcha
2009-10-26 29941, 2009
ruaok
aCiD2: very nice.
2009-10-26 29944, 2009
aCiD2
The only bit missing is deleting mediums and new tracklists (not existing ones) -- these need edit types, so a few more hours work
2009-10-26 29950, 2009
ruaok
have you touched the stash features yet?
2009-10-26 29907, 2009
aCiD2
Still haven't touched them yet
2009-10-26 29912, 2009
ruaok
ok.
2009-10-26 29914, 2009
aCiD2
Do we want the stash n for the alpha?
2009-10-26 29922, 2009
ruaok
I was about to address that.
2009-10-26 29928, 2009
aCiD2
I've been focussing on just getting it working, but I understand you want this to "sell" the effort we've been doing :)
2009-10-26 29930, 2009
ruaok
I think we should not do that right away.
2009-10-26 29939, 2009
ruaok
the sooner we get more eyeballs on the codebase, the better.
2009-10-26 29944, 2009
aCiD2
yea
2009-10-26 29956, 2009
ruaok
lets keep the road to the beta release as short as we can.
2009-10-26 29912, 2009
aCiD2
we're going to need to start making sure we have that definition down really soon too
2009-10-26 29928, 2009
ruaok
I think one of the things I am going to do this week is pick up a list of things that need to be done for the beta release.
2009-10-26 29928, 2009
MBChatLogger
aCiD2 probably meant ' (ie, make sure the milestone on bugs.musicbrainz.org is full of exactly everything we want) '
2009-10-26 29928, 2009
aCiD2
(ie, make sure the milestone on bugs.mb.org is full of exactly everything we want)
2009-10-26 29936, 2009
ruaok
I think its become a lot more tangible now.
2009-10-26 29938, 2009
aCiD2
excellent :)
2009-10-26 29952, 2009
ruaok
agreed, aCiD2.
2009-10-26 29900, 2009
ruaok
anything blocking you this week?
2009-10-26 29909, 2009
ruaok prods pronik`
2009-10-26 29916, 2009
aCiD2
nope, I have more time this week now that a course finished, 6 more me-hours this week :)
2009-10-26 29923, 2009
ruaok
ruaok has changed the topic to: agenda: review, release editor unit testing, summit, moose
2009-10-26 29930, 2009
warp
:)
2009-10-26 29943, 2009
ruaok
nice.
2009-10-26 29953, 2009
ruaok
warp: any progress on the style guidelines?
2009-10-26 29927, 2009
ruaok wonders if djce and ijabz_ are present.
2009-10-26 29933, 2009
warp
ruaok: I just transferred my proposal to the musicbrainz wiki, and fixed a few issues nikki reported earlier which I forgot.
2009-10-26 29938, 2009
ijabz_
hi
2009-10-26 29944, 2009
warp
ruaok: I'll post a link to mb-style after the meeting.
2009-10-26 29904, 2009
ruaok
ruaok has changed the topic to: agenda: review, release editor unit testing, summit, mediawiki captcha, colorful ponies
2009-10-26 29912, 2009
ruaok
warp: excellent.
2009-10-26 29918, 2009
ruaok
anything that you need help with?
2009-10-26 29951, 2009
warp
not right now, in the future i need some graphic designers/interaction designers to think about how we can make the guidelines themselves more accessible
2009-10-26 29915, 2009
warp
I've already prodded pronik` about that, and he had some nice ideas which were completely outside the box I was thinking in, so that's good
2009-10-26 29922, 2009
ruaok
warp: I can probably rile up some support for that.
2009-10-26 29925, 2009
warp
but right it's too early to really worry about any of that.
2009-10-26 29930, 2009
warp
right now.
2009-10-26 29932, 2009
ruaok
I was about to say that.
2009-10-26 29947, 2009
ruaok
I think we should have a clear goal of what we're asking for when we look for help.
2009-10-26 29912, 2009
ruaok
now that aCiD2 has managed to design a release editor what doesn't require any new icons, I feel like I have some egg on my face wrt to the BBC designer.
2009-10-26 29917, 2009
aCiD2
That reminds me, we still have an icon designer I may need to contact soon :)
2009-10-26 29923, 2009
warp
I have a clear goal, but to reach it we have to focus on the content first ;)
2009-10-26 29926, 2009
aCiD2
not quite, it does need some
2009-10-26 29926, 2009
ruaok
(thats not to say aCiD2 is doing a bad job! au contraire!)
2009-10-26 29930, 2009
aCiD2
hehe
2009-10-26 29930, 2009
navap_ joined the channel
2009-10-26 29950, 2009
ruaok
warp: agreed. let me know when the time comes. or when you have a timeframe for when that will come.
2009-10-26 29957, 2009
warp
will do.
2009-10-26 29906, 2009
ruaok
ijabz_: how are things in NGS search land?
2009-10-26 29919, 2009
ruaok
are any of the v2 schema bits blocking you
2009-10-26 29920, 2009
ruaok
?
2009-10-26 29921, 2009
ijabz_
Ive done all the entities to a reasonable degree, though wierd bug with work stopping it working which I havent figured out yet
2009-10-26 29949, 2009
ruaok
maybe put up a review for murdos to take a peek?
2009-10-26 29952, 2009
ijabz_
So I was going to paste the output Im getting tot the wiki or som ewhere for comment
2009-10-26 29959, 2009
ruaok
that works.
2009-10-26 29918, 2009
ruaok
so with all the entities done, those are v2 entities, right?
2009-10-26 29923, 2009
ruaok
have you done any v1 work?
2009-10-26 29931, 2009
ruaok
how about the json for the web?
2009-10-26 29932, 2009
ijabz_
Yes thats all finsihed
2009-10-26 29938, 2009
ruaok
very good.
2009-10-26 29939, 2009
ijabz_
(v1)
2009-10-26 29958, 2009
ijabz_
No json yet, it seems to be just the same as the xml without the brackets
2009-10-26 29900, 2009
ruaok
and json should be pretty trivial. can you put a different serializer in front of the v2 data generator?
2009-10-26 29907, 2009
ruaok nods
2009-10-26 29921, 2009
ruaok
once the json stuff is there I'll hammer out the web portions on the mb_server side.
2009-10-26 29923, 2009
ijabz_
but I think I should wait for your webservice work to progress further, I posted a code review of it
2009-10-26 29954, 2009
ruaok
I saw that, thanks. I'll be going through that review later today.
2009-10-26 29905, 2009
ruaok
anything blocking you this week?
2009-10-26 29954, 2009
ijabz_
I have some non-mb stuff for the next few days, there was one other comment on the mmdschema I added
2009-10-26 29934, 2009
ruaok
I'll look at that comment when I have a decent sized screen in front of me.
2009-10-26 29941, 2009
ruaok
editing the schema on a laptop is a pita.
2009-10-26 29953, 2009
ruaok
ok, thanks ijabz_ -- I'm really happy with your work on the search server.
2009-10-26 29908, 2009
ruaok
I've actually spent a bit of time talking about our search stuff at the mentor summit.
2009-10-26 29920, 2009
ruaok
in the end MB data was used as the example in the search session that we had.
2009-10-26 29928, 2009
ruaok
ok, my turn.
2009-10-26 29948, 2009
ruaok
last week, I hacked on the schema some more and I finished up the first cut of the artist resource for the v2 WS.
2009-10-26 29912, 2009
ruaok
its up for review and I got good feedback that should let me continue to crank on it. I'm pleased on that front.
2009-10-26 29932, 2009
ruaok
I also went to the digital hollywood conference in santa monica (LA) last week.
2009-10-26 29956, 2009
aCiD2
heh
2009-10-26 29907, 2009
ruaok
but I got some nice contacts, chatted with some good people and we're getting a medium powered server.
2009-10-26 29933, 2009
ruaok
I'm going to pick that up on the way home. that will gives us a good replacement machine for one of our machines thats been a little less than trustworthy.
2009-10-26 29943, 2009
pronik`
sorry, back now
2009-10-26 29952, 2009
pronik is catching up
2009-10-26 29954, 2009
ruaok
so, there will be more hosting stuffs in my week.
2009-10-26 29956, 2009
ruaok
hi pronik
2009-10-26 29912, 2009
ruaok
loads to do. :)
2009-10-26 29919, 2009
ruaok
djce: here now?
2009-10-26 29931, 2009
ruaok
aCiD2: take it away with release editor unit testing!
agenda: release editor unit testing, summit, mediawiki captcha, psychadeledic ponies
2009-10-26 29906, 2009
aCiD2
This tests that if the user submitted those fields, we get the right edit in, which is great. But obivously, most people aren't going to be editing with Curl :)
2009-10-26 29929, 2009
aCiD2
So we need a way to test the javascript, and I'm really not experienced here, other than knowing about selenium (but never usedit)
2009-10-26 29937, 2009
aCiD2
I wondered if anyone here had any advice?
2009-10-26 29931, 2009
aCiD2
I guess the sort of tests we're looking for are going to be "If the user clicks this, then this new row should be added with these form fields" which is sort of mix between unit and functional testing
