#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21742, 2011

      • flamingspinach joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21737, 2011

      • luks just discovered mbs-3161
      • 2011-08-05 21749, 2011

      • MBChatLogger
      • 2011-08-05 21749, 2011

      • bitmap
        I get a stack trace on test.mb.org when I include the ratings parameter in /ws/2/release: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/452960/
      • 2011-08-05 21720, 2011

      • djce joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21721, 2011

      • djce
        ruaok: ping
      • 2011-08-05 21735, 2011

      • ruaok
        pong
      • 2011-08-05 21736, 2011

      • ruaok
        moin
      • 2011-08-05 21739, 2011

      • djce
        %T!
      • 2011-08-05 21702, 2011

      • djce
        Today I ar been kipping at a cheap hotel near work, and hence am in the office waaaaaaaay too early.
      • 2011-08-05 21705, 2011

      • djce
        Anyway,
      • 2011-08-05 21716, 2011

      • djce
        re gzipping, it's now enabled on test.mb
      • 2011-08-05 21718, 2011

      • ruaok
        kipping?
      • 2011-08-05 21722, 2011

      • djce
        sleep
      • 2011-08-05 21729, 2011

      • ruaok
        ah.
      • 2011-08-05 21742, 2011

      • ruaok
        sweet!
      • 2011-08-05 21744, 2011

      • djce
        Yesterday I was at my desk, working, by 0715
      • 2011-08-05 21753, 2011

      • ruaok
        O_o
      • 2011-08-05 21702, 2011

      • ruaok
        what behooved this move?
      • 2011-08-05 21703, 2011

      • djce
        And considering I /normally/ have a 1h45m journey to get to work, that's unusual :-)
      • 2011-08-05 21712, 2011

      • ruaok nods
      • 2011-08-05 21727, 2011

      • djce
      • 2011-08-05 21742, 2011

      • ruaok
        ah yes.
      • 2011-08-05 21748, 2011

      • ruaok
        the true motivator: beer.
      • 2011-08-05 21730, 2011

      • djce
        So, anyway, gzip: the gzipping should now be enabled for test.musicbrainz.org, only for content >1100 bytes long, and only for text/html and application/xml
      • 2011-08-05 21744, 2011

      • ruaok
        just a proxy setting, no?
      • 2011-08-05 21752, 2011

      • djce
        I'm guessing we want to bed that in for a bit to see if it causes any problems.
      • 2011-08-05 21756, 2011

      • djce
        front end nginx, yes
      • 2011-08-05 21701, 2011

      • ruaok
        kewl.
      • 2011-08-05 21711, 2011

      • ruaok
        I'll task voice with that. :)
      • 2011-08-05 21737, 2011

      • ruaok adds a note to the bug
      • 2011-08-05 21728, 2011

      • djce
        I think what was being compressed before was only local html content, i.e. not proxied. Which is basically nothing.
      • 2011-08-05 21739, 2011

      • ruaok nods
      • 2011-08-05 21755, 2011

      • ruaok
        I was wondering where the large drop in bandwidth went.
      • 2011-08-05 21706, 2011

      • ruaok
        it should have a significant impact on our bandwidth.
      • 2011-08-05 21715, 2011

      • ruaok
        so, this will be nice to see. that gives us spare bandwidth. :)
      • 2011-08-05 21740, 2011

      • reosarevokphone joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21706, 2011

      • djce
        Sounds good. I like graphs that do that. :-)
      • 2011-08-05 21713, 2011

      • ruaok
        srsly.
      • 2011-08-05 21728, 2011

      • djce
        I'll just wait for the nod to apply it to more/all sites
      • 2011-08-05 21758, 2011

      • ruaok
        perfect.
      • 2011-08-05 21729, 2011

      • ruaok
        and when we cut it over, we can also do it for a limited time and see how things go.
      • 2011-08-05 21724, 2011

      • djce
        sure
      • 2011-08-05 21758, 2011

      • dinog joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21751, 2011

      • reosarevokphone joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21711, 2011

      • pecastro joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21705, 2011

      • reosarevokphone joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21741, 2011

      • warp
        yay, fresh eyes.
      • 2011-08-05 21740, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21749, 2011

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21711, 2011

      • ocharles
        meh, what an unproductive day so far
      • 2011-08-05 21724, 2011

      • ocharles
        no progress on the 502s, and 2 hours spent spinning wheels on the (rare) unicode problems
      • 2011-08-05 21718, 2011

      • warp
        :(
      • 2011-08-05 21726, 2011

      • dinog joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21724, 2011

      • jdamcd joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21710, 2011

      • pecastro
        Hi guys.. awfully quit here today ...
      • 2011-08-05 21734, 2011

      • pecastro
        I think I might have my Search server index builder running in an infinite loop or similar ?
      • 2011-08-05 21702, 2011

      • warp
        pecastro: indexing does take a while .
      • 2011-08-05 21744, 2011

      • pecastro
        warp: I know... But I could swear that last time I ran it on this box it took ~1h30m ... What's puzzling me is this..
      • 2011-08-05 21749, 2011

      • pecastro
        Index Builder Finished:13:42:22
      • 2011-08-05 21753, 2011

      • warp
        I don't remember how long it takes on my desktop at home. 1h 30m could be right.
      • 2011-08-05 21717, 2011

      • warp
        pecastro: and it's stuck now? doesn't display anything more but also hasn't quit?
      • 2011-08-05 21718, 2011

      • pecastro
        ...and from what I see from IndexBuilder.java that's should be the last println in main after es.shutdown() ?
      • 2011-08-05 21744, 2011

      • pecastro
        warp: stuck, with the process consuming half of the CPU ... though not generating any perceivable load in the machine.. :|
      • 2011-08-05 21739, 2011

      • warp
        pecastro: odd. I don't know much about the search server, perhaps best to ask ijabz about it.
      • 2011-08-05 21700, 2011

      • pecastro
        warp: I have time.. I'm going to kick it again and see what happens... I'll nudge ijabz l8rs. Tkx.
      • 2011-08-05 21748, 2011

      • adhawkins joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21708, 2011

      • reosarevokphone joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21708, 2011

      • warp
        yikes. git diff master...HEAD created a horrible diff just now.
      • 2011-08-05 21734, 2011

      • ocharles
        rebase that branch onto master
      • 2011-08-05 21737, 2011

      • ocharles
        that'll probably solve it
      • 2011-08-05 21752, 2011

      • warp
        or diff from the correct branch instead of next >_<
      • 2011-08-05 21707, 2011

      • ocharles
        lol
      • 2011-08-05 21752, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou1 joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21726, 2011

      • warp
        oh no, modbot on astro said something again.
      • 2011-08-05 21759, 2011

      • warp
        could not obtain lock.
      • 2011-08-05 21715, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21712, 2011

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21712, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou1 joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21739, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21753, 2011

      • reosarevokphone2 joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21719, 2011

      • dinog joined the channel
      • 2011-08-05 21750, 2011

      • ruaok wonders if ocharles has caught modbot sending him love notes.
      • 2011-08-05 21703, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: did you read the email?
      • 2011-08-05 21710, 2011

      • ocharles
        I think that's the cause of our 502s
      • 2011-08-05 21731, 2011

      • ruaok
        heh. I just read the email that said you had no clues on 502s. :)
      • 2011-08-05 21740, 2011

      • ocharles
        see timestamps :)
      • 2011-08-05 21745, 2011

      • ocharles
        they seem to go together though
      • 2011-08-05 21751, 2011

      • nikki wonders what the suspected cause is
      • 2011-08-05 21701, 2011

      • ocharles
        modbot problems with row locking, 502s all touch the database for transactions
      • 2011-08-05 21713, 2011

      • ocharles
        it points to our database connections being problematic
      • 2011-08-05 21715, 2011

      • ruaok
        who is doing the locking causing modbot to fail?
      • 2011-08-05 21749, 2011

      • ruaok
        and why are we blocking the edit table in the first place?
      • 2011-08-05 21748, 2011

      • ocharles
        we don't lock the edit table
      • 2011-08-05 21758, 2011

      • ocharles
        scrap that
      • 2011-08-05 21703, 2011

      • ocharles
        we lock rows of the edit table*
      • 2011-08-05 21717, 2011

      • ocharles
        getting source link now
      • 2011-08-05 21749, 2011

      • ruaok scrambles for a cup of coffee
      • 2011-08-05 21758, 2011

      • ocharles
      • 2011-08-05 21727, 2011

      • ocharles
        i've seen this before and I can't remember exactly what I did
      • 2011-08-05 21734, 2011

      • ocharles
        djce has some query to show open locks
      • 2011-08-05 21757, 2011

      • ocharles
        select pg_class.relname,pg_locks.* from pg_class,pg_locks where pg_class.relfilenode=pg_locks.relation;
      • 2011-08-05 21709, 2011

      • ocharles
        Doesn't show anything very interesting though, I wonder if the cover art script could be responsible for it?
      • 2011-08-05 21711, 2011

      • ocharles
        but I can't see how...
      • 2011-08-05 21735, 2011

      • ocharles
        that wouldn't really explain why /work/create would fail
      • 2011-08-05 21751, 2011

      • ruaok
        have you stopped that illustrious script to find out?
      • 2011-08-05 21756, 2011

      • ruaok
        not that it seems to be doing any good. :)
      • 2011-08-05 21752, 2011

      • ocharles
        well it's changed now
      • 2011-08-05 21708, 2011

      • ruaok
        improved? changed how?
      • 2011-08-05 21722, 2011

      • ocharles
        the order for finding releases to update has changed
      • 2011-08-05 21737, 2011

      • ocharles
      • 2011-08-05 21741, 2011

      • ruaok
        since when?
      • 2011-08-05 21700, 2011

      • ocharles
        Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:25:18 +0000 (12:25 +0100)
      • 2011-08-05 21720, 2011

      • ruaok
        and we you deployed it?
      • 2011-08-05 21722, 2011

      • ocharles
        i'm checking the ticket now to see what's happened
      • 2011-08-05 21724, 2011

      • ruaok
        -we
      • 2011-08-05 21728, 2011

      • ocharles
        sort of
      • 2011-08-05 21729, 2011

      • ruaok
        we/you
      • 2011-08-05 21733, 2011

      • ruaok
        sort of?
      • 2011-08-05 21735, 2011

      • ocharles
        I updated the code on astro, and started the loop
      • 2011-08-05 21739, 2011

      • ocharles
        you don't have to restart the server for it
      • 2011-08-05 21747, 2011

      • ocharles
        i can only type so fast!
      • 2011-08-05 21751, 2011

      • ocharles
        :)
      • 2011-08-05 21759, 2011

      • ruaok
        that coincinces with when the 502s started.
      • 2011-08-05 21707, 2011

      • ruaok
        lets do this: turn off the script.
      • 2011-08-05 21712, 2011

      • ruaok
        go back to 30 second timeouts
      • 2011-08-05 21714, 2011

      • ruaok
        watch the logs
      • 2011-08-05 21717, 2011

      • ocharles
        script stopped
      • 2011-08-05 21733, 2011

      • ocharles
        we do however still have code that doesn't match exactly what is actually running
      • 2011-08-05 21740, 2011

      • ocharles
        it may be worth restarting astro and pingu too
      • 2011-08-05 21744, 2011

      • ruaok
        we need to restart both servers for the timeout change.
      • 2011-08-05 21749, 2011

      • ocharles
        ah, that works nicely then
      • 2011-08-05 21749, 2011

      • ruaok
        yes.
      • 2011-08-05 21702, 2011

      • ocharles
        in that case
      • 2011-08-05 21711, 2011

      • ocharles
        let me update them to have the reduced-warnings-code too
      • 2011-08-05 21718, 2011

      • ruaok
        sweet
      • 2011-08-05 21720, 2011

      • ocharles
        (already pushed, but not deployed)
      • 2011-08-05 21737, 2011

      • ruaok
        oh man. quiet(er) logs.
      • 2011-08-05 21739, 2011

      • ruaok
        hott
      • 2011-08-05 21741, 2011

      • ocharles
        lol
      • 2011-08-05 21750, 2011

      • ocharles
        oddly, pingu seems to get a lot more traffic than astro too
      • 2011-08-05 21704, 2011

      • ocharles
        anyway, ready on astro when you are
      • 2011-08-05 21724, 2011

      • ruaok is looking at traffic
      • 2011-08-05 21737, 2011

      • ocharles
        well, I say traffic. pingu's log is noiser
      • 2011-08-05 21722, 2011

      • ruaok
        astro is out
      • 2011-08-05 21759, 2011

      • ruaok
        next time we should take out pingu first and see if astro is as sluggish afterwards
      • 2011-08-05 21707, 2011

      • ocharles
        ok, astro done
      • 2011-08-05 21728, 2011

      • ruaok
        heh. now its just loads of *one* warning.
      • 2011-08-05 21741, 2011

      • ocharles
        it is? I don't see that here