I want Batsy to get more core functionality going in order for her to pass the mid-term.
2011-07-11 19216, 2011
ruaok
after that we'll get a review out.
2011-07-11 19220, 2011
warp
ok
2011-07-11 19226, 2011
ruaok
warp: there isn't that much code yet.
2011-07-11 19242, 2011
djce joined the channel
2011-07-11 19243, 2011
Batsy
I need to go over the rest of it and get the other widgets up to speed
2011-07-11 19258, 2011
ruaok
Batsy: ok, sounds good.
2011-07-11 19203, 2011
ruaok
hi djce.
2011-07-11 19207, 2011
djce
moin
2011-07-11 19209, 2011
ruaok
do you have anything for our review?
2011-07-11 19229, 2011
ianmcorvidae
speaking of huge hard-to-review blobs on codereview, mine is still sitting there; I haven't really done much in the last week
2011-07-11 19230, 2011
djce
No progress other than opening a ticket or two, closing a ticket or two (that were solved long ago).
2011-07-11 19245, 2011
ruaok
djce: ok.
2011-07-11 19256, 2011
ruaok
ianmcorvidae: lets see if we can get that worked down this week.
2011-07-11 19257, 2011
ianmcorvidae
tinkerd with some more statistics but that's about all; probably will push something in that vein later this week, and then evaluate where I'm going next with the timeline graph
2011-07-11 19257, 2011
djce
been on hols but back now, and as/when I get free time, mediawiki remains my focus.
2011-07-11 19206, 2011
ruaok
but the schema change release takes priority atm.
2011-07-11 19232, 2011
ianmcorvidae
of course, I figured that was why it hadn't been gotten to (also since it's a giant blob, sorry about that)
2011-07-11 19258, 2011
ocharles
ianmcorvidae: It's more the giant blob problem
2011-07-11 19208, 2011
ocharles
but I have been trying to get it reviewed
2011-07-11 19230, 2011
ruaok
bitmap: prod
2011-07-11 19237, 2011
murdos
ianmcorvidae: when will we be able to visualize other stats than the core ones?
2011-07-11 19240, 2011
ijabz
ruaok:u are taliking about a db schema change, but what is the change ?
2011-07-11 19240, 2011
bitmap
hi
2011-07-11 19245, 2011
ruaok
Batsy: also please post a new blog post
2011-07-11 19253, 2011
ianmcorvidae
murdos: once I add them; that's the other thing on my list for this week
2011-07-11 19202, 2011
ruaok
bitmap: how is your gsoc project coming along?
2011-07-11 19203, 2011
ianmcorvidae
shouldn't be hard, I just need to assign colors to them and some boilerplate
2011-07-11 19215, 2011
Batsy
I posted a short one this morning, just a quick update
2011-07-11 19225, 2011
ruaok
ijabz: they are not really changes to the schema as much as they are structural.
2011-07-11 19237, 2011
ruaok
we're combining the raw and readonly DB to live in one DB.
2011-07-11 19237, 2011
ianmcorvidae
murdos: if you have priorities re: what you'd like to see added soonest, it'd be great if you'd PM me so I can focus there :)
2011-07-11 19253, 2011
ijabz
right
2011-07-11 19258, 2011
bitmap
I'm pretty happy with last week, since I got a good patch out to fix issues with Picard's request handling (http://codereview.musicbrainz.org/r/1386/) and my collection-management work will probably be pushed out and have a review published today
2011-07-11 19211, 2011
ruaok
ijabz: that reminds me, we need to change how cartman builds indexes after the release.
2011-07-11 19225, 2011
bitmap
then I'll be working on bug fixes for that for a few days, but it seems pretty stable
2011-07-11 19242, 2011
ijabz
? speak after meting
2011-07-11 19256, 2011
ruaok
ijabz: ok
2011-07-11 19202, 2011
bitmap
it'll be nice to have people test the collections stuff too, once I push it out. :)
2011-07-11 19243, 2011
ruaok
ok, anyone else for review stuff?
2011-07-11 19207, 2011
ijabz
I could in the context of the md chnage
2011-07-11 19229, 2011
ruaok
ijabz: ok, thats up later.
2011-07-11 19236, 2011
ruaok
lets move on to linkedbrainz.
2011-07-11 19240, 2011
ruaok
BarryN: go!
2011-07-11 19213, 2011
BarryN
ok, so we didn't make much fuss at the NGS roll-out but, thanks mainly to kurtjx there's a lot of RDFa on MB.org
so (which outstanding tasks haven't moved forwards while we prepare this), the LinkedBrainz tasks are to:
2011-07-11 19230, 2011
BarryN
1) start dealing with the tickets relating to the RDFa
2011-07-11 19233, 2011
ruaok
I'm really glad that we don;t have to host the sparql endpoint. :)
2011-07-11 19244, 2011
BarryN
2) to put the RDF dump production live
2011-07-11 19211, 2011
BarryN
3) to talk with Peter about the licensing implications of advertising this endpoint (and its lovely widgets)...
2011-07-11 19241, 2011
BarryN
on the latter from the Ontotext (producers of OWLIM) point of view, we've agreed a non.commercial use license subject to having a 'powered by OWLIM' badge
2011-07-11 19205, 2011
ruaok nods
2011-07-11 19212, 2011
nikki
regarding 1, can someone create an account so they can be assigned to someone other than kurtjx? :P
2011-07-11 19216, 2011
nikki
(on jira)
2011-07-11 19221, 2011
BarryN
so it seems the funders are happy (to be confirmed tomorrow), but I'd welcome feedback from the MB community
2011-07-11 19228, 2011
ruaok
nikki: I already ask BarryN to do that...
2011-07-11 19239, 2011
BarryN
yes, I'm sorry that I haven't yet
2011-07-11 19248, 2011
BarryN
(review prep)
2011-07-11 19249, 2011
phaase
just to repeat it here: we are happy to host the endpoint and RDF-based portal for LinkedBrainz, there is potential to do a lot more based on our platform.
2011-07-11 19254, 2011
ruaok
BarryN: I'm happy so far. but we should talk about what to do if someone wishes to use it comercially.
2011-07-11 19202, 2011
BarryN
indeed
2011-07-11 19209, 2011
ruaok
phaase: thanks!
2011-07-11 19221, 2011
BarryN
the dump, of course, would be generic so potential to load into any RDF DB
2011-07-11 19230, 2011
kurtjx
i've got tickets! oh my
2011-07-11 19234, 2011
BarryN
disclaimer: I'm going to work for Ontotext from next month
2011-07-11 19243, 2011
ruaok
BarryN and I are going to speak more after our release, so then we can address more of these questions.
2011-07-11 19221, 2011
BarryN
that's me on status, I think
2011-07-11 19227, 2011
ruaok
ok, thanks!
2011-07-11 19232, 2011
ruaok
and congrats on the new gig.
2011-07-11 19240, 2011
ruaok
ok, cover art archive is next!
2011-07-11 19249, 2011
ocharles
twoot
2011-07-11 19254, 2011
ruaok
so, the board of directors has approved the project in its wides scope.
2011-07-11 19206, 2011
ruaok
meaning that we can host anything we want to host at the archive.
2011-07-11 19244, 2011
ruaok
unfortunately I do not see a method by which we can avoid having the images flow through musicbrainz servers.
2011-07-11 19259, 2011
andreas_s joined the channel
2011-07-11 19204, 2011
ruaok
at some point someone needs to provide the keys for the IA S3 service.
2011-07-11 19210, 2011
ocharles
what do you mean by "flow"?
2011-07-11 19214, 2011
ruaok
so we need to have *something* running on a IA machine.
2011-07-11 19235, 2011
ruaok
ocharles: meaning that when someone uploads an image, it should not flow via a musicbrainz machine.
2011-07-11 19247, 2011
ocharles
right, well why does it have to?
2011-07-11 19251, 2011
djce
you mean the image data must never hit an MB server?
2011-07-11 19259, 2011
ruaok
djce: correct. for legal reasons.
2011-07-11 19203, 2011
ocharles
were we going to allow uploads through MB into the CA archives?
2011-07-11 19214, 2011
ruaok
ocharles: someone, not MB needs to write to their S3 like service.
