16:30 PM
reosarevok
)
2011-11-02 30649, 2011
16:32 PM
navap misses the convenience of face to face interaction :(
2011-11-02 30656, 2011
16:32 PM
navap
Typing thoughts out sucks.
2011-11-02 30606, 2011
16:35 PM
reosarevok
A bit, yeah...
2011-11-02 30615, 2011
16:35 PM
reosarevok
But I guess we have to do with what we have
2011-11-02 30626, 2011
16:36 PM
navap
If we modify links and make them external wiki links, do you think that would be odd when a user's browsing /doc and then all of a sudden ends up browsing on our wiki?
2011-11-02 30650, 2011
16:38 PM
ijabz_
but typing something and having 36 people hear it is quite useful
2011-11-02 30607, 2011
16:40 PM
reosarevok
navap, maybe
2011-11-02 30615, 2011
16:40 PM
reosarevok
But it can be documented as the way doc works :p
2011-11-02 30621, 2011
16:40 PM
reosarevok
I don't think it is ideal
2011-11-02 30630, 2011
16:40 PM
reosarevok
But it is better than displaying all the userspace
2011-11-02 30638, 2011
16:40 PM
reosarevok
which kinda makes it feel as if we were endorsing its contents
2011-11-02 30649, 2011
16:41 PM
navap
One thought I had was to create (yet another) namespace for just content that is available on /doc. If a page isn't in that namespace it won't load and any links to non-doc namespace articles are automatically removed (like we remove broken links)
2011-11-02 30626, 2011
16:42 PM
bitmap
warp: want me to just discard that review given that the code will be changed a lot, and the diff there is obsolete?
2011-11-02 30643, 2011
16:43 PM
reosarevok
Hmm
2011-11-02 30605, 2011
16:44 PM
reosarevok
I could see that working in an ideal wiki but ours is far from that
2011-11-02 30623, 2011
16:44 PM
reosarevok
I mean, it involves reviewing every page and deeming it doc-(un)worthy
2011-11-02 30646, 2011
16:44 PM
bitmap
2011-11-02 30622, 2011
16:45 PM
navap
Which is really not that hard. We'd start with everything in the wikidoc table and then add other pages only when necessary.
2011-11-02 30648, 2011
16:45 PM
reosarevok
So you'd keep the /doc part only for actual documentation?
2011-11-02 30659, 2011
16:45 PM
reosarevok
(and a few other things)
2011-11-02 30604, 2011
16:46 PM
reosarevok
That would definitely make sense to me
2011-11-02 30613, 2011
16:46 PM
navap
Yes. Like you said, only for things we actually endorse
2011-11-02 30617, 2011
16:46 PM
reosarevok
It might even make me start seeing the point of the whole /doc thingy
2011-11-02 30618, 2011
16:46 PM
reosarevok
:p
2011-11-02 30621, 2011
16:46 PM
navap
Yeah
2011-11-02 30619, 2011
16:47 PM
reosarevok guesses that's something to be discussed at next meeting though?
2011-11-02 30642, 2011
16:47 PM
navap
Yes
2011-11-02 30603, 2011
16:48 PM
reosarevok
You could add a ticket for it :)
2011-11-02 30604, 2011
16:48 PM
navap
It would be very similar to how we'd put the metabrainz pages into the wiki.
2011-11-02 30628, 2011
16:48 PM
reosarevok
Would a namespace be the right way though?
2011-11-02 30634, 2011
16:48 PM
reosarevok was thinking of just a category
2011-11-02 30642, 2011
16:48 PM
reosarevok
Can't it be done with that?
2011-11-02 30618, 2011
16:49 PM
Leftmost joined the channel
2011-11-02 30641, 2011
16:49 PM
navap
It could, but I think it's much clearer if it's done either via a separate namespace or by nesting everything under one page.
2011-11-02 30655, 2011
16:49 PM
navap
That way the url itself is different and it's more obvious.
2011-11-02 30604, 2011
16:50 PM
reosarevok
Hmm
2011-11-02 30606, 2011
16:50 PM
navap
I'd be against the nesting method though.
2011-11-02 30613, 2011
16:50 PM
reosarevok
But it would mean we'd have
2011-11-02 30623, 2011
16:50 PM
reosarevok
"Whatever:Style/Titles/Whatever2"?
2011-11-02 30647, 2011
16:50 PM
reosarevok
Or are you proposing "Style:Titles/Whatever2"?
2011-11-02 30657, 2011
16:50 PM
reosarevok
(and "Documentation:Whatever"?
2011-11-02 30600, 2011
16:51 PM
reosarevok
)
2011-11-02 30615, 2011
16:51 PM
reosarevok
The problem with that way would be the difficulty of finding the right "box" to put some pages
2011-11-02 30624, 2011
16:51 PM
navap
I don't think we need to separate style pages from other pages available on /doc.
2011-11-02 30633, 2011
16:51 PM
reosarevok
Sure
2011-11-02 30644, 2011
16:51 PM
reosarevok
But the style pages have crazy names already
2011-11-02 30653, 2011
16:51 PM
reosarevok
Without them having *also* a namespace...
2011-11-02 30655, 2011
16:51 PM
navap
I'd use Doc as the namespace. (WikiDoc would be annoying to type out all the time)
2011-11-02 30619, 2011
16:52 PM
warp
bitmap: if the diff is obsolete, yes, discard the review.
2011-11-02 30631, 2011
16:52 PM
warp
bitmap: just submit a new one later.
2011-11-02 30611, 2011
16:53 PM
bitmap
warp: okay. provided review board works with Picard still :P
2011-11-02 30609, 2011
16:55 PM
bitmap
not that it did to begin with, but I’d think it should be easier to fix now that it's on git
2011-11-02 30622, 2011
16:56 PM
voiceinsideyou1 joined the channel
2011-11-02 30606, 2011
16:57 PM
reosarevok looks at http://www.tunecore.com/songwriters and wonders if it will actually work
2011-11-02 30619, 2011
16:57 PM
reosarevok
(not that I am a songwriter anyway, but I'm curious)
2011-11-02 30626, 2011
17:00 PM
voiceinsideyou joined the channel
2011-11-02 30647, 2011
17:00 PM
ocharles
2011-11-02 30628, 2011
17:05 PM
warp
ocharles: one issue mentioned in a post on mb-users I need to double check.
2011-11-02 30651, 2011
17:05 PM
warp
ocharles: I'll put that on my TODO for tomorrow.
2011-11-02 30621, 2011
17:06 PM
ijabz_
ocharles, did you sort the database on test ?
2011-11-02 30630, 2011
17:07 PM
ocharles
ijabz_: still going
2011-11-02 30633, 2011
17:07 PM
ocharles
ijabz_: on 3rd attempt :(
2011-11-02 30647, 2011
17:07 PM
ocharles
first failed because the server was running/cron jobs were on. then it failed because I imported on next instead of master
2011-11-02 30649, 2011
17:07 PM
ocharles
this one should get it
2011-11-02 30615, 2011
17:08 PM
ijabz_
its the seemingly straight forward things that get you
2011-11-02 30619, 2011
17:09 PM
reosarevok
ocharles, did you merge the two codereviews I asked for in the end?
2011-11-02 30634, 2011
17:09 PM
ocharles
ijabz_: :)
2011-11-02 30651, 2011
17:09 PM
reosarevok
(they both need the new database anyway, just asking)
2011-11-02 30653, 2011
17:09 PM
ocharles
reosarevok: no, I haven't done that, but I am working on reviews today. I'm on lukas' atm, when I get to yours I will merge them
2011-11-02 30602, 2011
17:10 PM
ocharles
I will be clearing next as well, and setting that back up
2011-11-02 30655, 2011
17:13 PM
apx joined the channel
2011-11-02 30652, 2011
17:24 PM
ruaok joined the channel
2011-11-02 30656, 2011
17:27 PM
MBChatLogger
2011-11-02 30656, 2011
17:27 PM
Mineo
hm, does anybody know which base directory I'm supposed to use on
codereview.mb.org for python-musicbrainz2?
2011-11-02 30638, 2011
17:29 PM
ruaok
which repository?
2011-11-02 30617, 2011
17:30 PM
Mineo
Python Musicbrainz
2011-11-02 30629, 2011
17:30 PM
Mineo
(if that's the one for python-musicbrainz2)
2011-11-02 30640, 2011
17:30 PM
ruaok
yeah, I would think so.
2011-11-02 30655, 2011
17:30 PM
ruaok
if its not, it will barf, so no reason not to try it
2011-11-02 30639, 2011
17:31 PM
Mineo
it's already barfing, that's why I'm askin :)
2011-11-02 30617, 2011
17:32 PM
warp
Mineo: if you cannot get code review to not barf, just link to a changeset (e.g. on github) in the review itself.
2011-11-02 30648, 2011
17:32 PM
Mineo
I can't create a review at all
2011-11-02 30655, 2011
17:32 PM
warp
ah
2011-11-02 30637, 2011
17:33 PM
ocharles
Mineo: might be easier to just use mb-devel if you're having troubles
2011-11-02 30602, 2011
17:34 PM
apx joined the channel
2011-11-02 30615, 2011
17:34 PM
ocharles
2011-11-02 30632, 2011
17:34 PM
Mineo
that's what I was going to do if asking here didn't bring up any results
2011-11-02 30605, 2011
17:35 PM
ocharles
Mineo: what path are you using?
2011-11-02 30612, 2011
17:35 PM
ocharles
(base directory)
2011-11-02 30630, 2011
17:35 PM
Mineo
I tried that svn url, ., /
2011-11-02 30648, 2011
17:35 PM
ocharles
try /trunk
2011-11-02 30650, 2011
17:35 PM
ocharles
or 'trunk'
2011-11-02 30614, 2011
17:36 PM
ocharles
I have a hard time getting svn patches up against the xml schema
2011-11-02 30636, 2011
17:36 PM
Mineo
both trunk and /trunk didn't work either
2011-11-02 30658, 2011
17:36 PM
Mineo starts mutt
2011-11-02 30623, 2011
17:44 PM
ocharles
** I have just reset the next branch **
2011-11-02 30634, 2011
17:44 PM
ocharles
a quick fyi if anyone was going to work with that at all
2011-11-02 30649, 2011
17:44 PM
ocharles
hobbes is indexing the new data atm
2011-11-02 30654, 2011
17:44 PM
reosarevok
:)
2011-11-02 30658, 2011
18:00 PM
ruaok
ijabz_: ping
2011-11-02 30630, 2011
18:32 PM
ocharles
2011-11-02 30643, 2011
18:32 PM
ocharles
i lie, it's not starting up
2011-11-02 30646, 2011
18:34 PM
ocharles
all done
2011-11-02 30649, 2011
18:35 PM
nikki
finally
2011-11-02 30606, 2011
18:36 PM
nikki is glad to see the last of the narrow windows :P
2011-11-02 30636, 2011
18:36 PM
ocharles
:)
2011-11-02 30644, 2011
18:36 PM
ocharles
reosarevok has broken the artist index page though
2011-11-02 30609, 2011
18:37 PM
nikki
yay
2011-11-02 30610, 2011
18:40 PM
ruaok
and its snappy. :)
2011-11-02 30623, 2011
18:40 PM
ruaok
ijabz_: ping ding ding!
2011-11-02 30650, 2011
18:40 PM
navap wonders why we have musicbrainz.org mentioned in DB_STAGING_SERVER_DESCRIPTION
2011-11-02 30609, 2011
18:41 PM
navap
And what should I do if my merge conflict was handled incorrectly?
2011-11-02 30641, 2011
18:41 PM
ijabz_
ruaok: pong dong dong
2011-11-02 30647, 2011
18:41 PM
ruaok
lol
2011-11-02 30656, 2011
18:41 PM
ruaok
what was the reload url again?
2011-11-02 30605, 2011
18:42 PM
ijabz_
been out trying to burn off some calories
2011-11-02 30627, 2011
18:42 PM
ijabz_
2011-11-02 30637, 2011
18:42 PM
ijabz_
if that the right port
2011-11-02 30612, 2011
18:46 PM
ocharles
navap: bug the person who cocked the merge up :)
2011-11-02 30622, 2011
18:49 PM
navap gently pokes warp again
2011-11-02 30641, 2011
18:49 PM
ruaok
ijabz_: do I need to re-do the mmap call if I do a reload?
2011-11-02 30601, 2011
18:50 PM
ijabz_
no
2011-11-02 30605, 2011
18:50 PM
ruaok
ok.
2011-11-02 30619, 2011
18:50 PM
ruaok
can you do me a favor and make mmap the default on the branch you made?
2011-11-02 30651, 2011
18:50 PM
ijabz_
reload just updates modified parts of the existing index
2011-11-02 30659, 2011
18:50 PM
ijabz_
ok
2011-11-02 30629, 2011
18:51 PM
ruaok
thx
2011-11-02 30640, 2011
18:51 PM
ruaok
I tried one reload and that slightly increased the load.
2011-11-02 30648, 2011
18:51 PM
ruaok
I'm watching it now.
2011-11-02 30602, 2011
18:54 PM
apx has left the channel
2011-11-02 30644, 2011
18:55 PM
ruaok fetches some noms
2011-11-02 30654, 2011
19:03 PM
ijabz_
ruaok: checked in the mmap as default
2011-11-02 30620, 2011
19:11 PM
djce joined the channel
2011-11-02 30656, 2011
19:13 PM
warp was poked.
2011-11-02 30632, 2011
19:14 PM
warp
navap: oh, right, what did I get wrong?
2011-11-02 30619, 2011
19:15 PM
navap
2011-11-02 30605, 2011
19:16 PM
navap
I was adding the IF statemnt, not taking it out.
2011-11-02 30615, 2011
19:16 PM
warp
navap: ah
2011-11-02 30622, 2011
19:16 PM
warp
that first link is empty for me.
2011-11-02 30632, 2011
19:16 PM
warp
"master is up to date with all commits from nitpick-2011-10. Try switching the base for your comparison. "
2011-11-02 30608, 2011
19:17 PM
warp
navap: so I just need to put the if statement back in, that's everything?
2011-11-02 30649, 2011
19:17 PM
navap
Yeah
2011-11-02 30653, 2011
19:17 PM
navap
2011-11-02 30636, 2011
19:18 PM
navap
Thanks!
2011-11-02 30602, 2011
19:20 PM
warp
navap: ok, pushed. (commit 87cdee195b7bac547345e7dba5c03f976917d2d5).
2011-11-02 30618, 2011
19:20 PM
warp
navap: thanks for noticing :)
2011-11-02 30608, 2011
19:27 PM
ruaok returns
2011-11-02 30628, 2011
19:27 PM
ruaok
ijabz_: r13318 ?
2011-11-02 30655, 2011
19:27 PM
ijabz_
yes
