acid2: Re MBS-259, I just tried it myself, and yes, it doesn't act as I'd expect it to (ie, I agree with nikki)
Though, reading your comments, I think you're expecting something different than I, in terms of what would be highlighted
It sounds as though you read the ticket as expecting the recording to be highlighted. I read the ticket (and myself would expect) such that the PUID, not the recording, would be the highlighted thing on the recording page.
Imagine a recording with 20 PUIDs; say, a Beatles track. 10 of those are x-linked to other recordings as well, and you've been able to verify, between the x-links and your own tracks that 15 of the 20 are bogus. Highlighted PUIDs that are being removed would better allow you to see which you've already put in an edit to remove, vs those which are as of yet untouched.
brianfreud joined the channel
nikki
ruaok: is mbdump-stats.tar.bz2 public domain or cc?
warp: If there's only one use of a css declaration do you think it should still go in a stylesheet?
I have no problem moving that declaration to a stylesheet and updating the patch, but I'm going to need some git hand holding to figure things out for me to do that :p
warp
navap: usually, yes. but that's just _my_ opinion though, I don't know if there is any kind css coding style musicbrainz adheres to.
so far I plan to attack these tickets today: MBS-424, MBS-202, MBS-136
navap
Ah the tagger one :)
I was thinking about that, isn't "Tagger" leftover from when that was the application we used?
Do you think we should rename the icon or the column to Picard?
warp
do other taggers use it? is it generic enough for other taggers to use if they wanted to?
navap
Generic enough == the function it provides, or the name?
warp
the function it provides.
ofcourse, if other taggers use that functionality... we should probably have different icons for each tagger. even just to show support for tagger developers.
navap
Do we have the room to add more icons?
warp
navap: I mean, look at whichever tagger does the initial request and store than in the session or unclude it in the tport= argument.
navap: and just serve only the icon specific to that tagger.
navap
Ah okay.
warp
but I expect picard is the only using it, really.
navap
And even if it isn't, I'm sure Picard will remain the most dominent user of it for quite some time.
warp
so, yes, I think we should picard icons. and if other taggers use the functionality, add icons for them too :)
+have
VectorX joined the channel
VectorX
hi
can someone tell me the link to the dependencies for installing the server on linux
oh dear, I've never seen this but a couple of weeks ago murdos did some work on refactoring the annotation index build, I wonder if he has broken something
warp
ijabz: I didn't see it using any cpu after this exception, so ctrl-c'ed it.
ijabz
I'll raise an issue with him, this wont have affected the other indexes so shouldnt effect you (unless you are working on annotations)
warp
ijabz: well, it didn't finish building indexes, but yes.. I should just start it again with the --index option then.
ijabz
no
all the others have worked so I woundnt bother
warp
well, cdstub and freedb are still missing.
ijabz: should i create a jira ticket in SEARCH-, or will you?
brianfreud joined the channel
ijabz
im doing it now
warp
ok, thanks :)
ijabz
ok, just built those two indexes then
warp nods.
brianfreud joined the channel
stereohead has left the channel
VectorX has left the channel
stereohead joined the channel
stereohead joined the channel
brianfreud joined the channel
nikki joined the channel
brianfreud
aCiD2: lol, I'd figured I'd just leave it as vague and unnamed as possible, as the particular case didn't matter, but the principal (going forward) does :D
if using the wiki didn't work before, what will make it work now?
(by that I'm simply asking how you've improved the idea)
I liked warp's idea before of people putting them under their user pages, that also makes it clear who's responsible without having to say anything, and it also makes it easy for two people to have two different proposals for the same thing (like with the vietnamese thing)
brianfreud
I can add the user pages bit, sure.
As for using wiki, well, imho it didn't work because noone was maintaining it, the docs never got updated (there's at least 3 old versions of the process/etc on the wiki), we had all sorts of headers, and there was no "clearinghouse" of active proposals.
Wiki's not perfect - I'd still rather use jira for the table - but it is the best of the status quo we've tried
nikki
I'll let warp argue with you about whether to use trac or not :P it'd be really nice if you two would pick one though instead of giving off mixed messages
brianfreud
I thought warp hated using trac as the clearing house?
nikki
exactly
brianfreud
Hence the table at bottom.
nikki
but you still included a "trac ticket for your proposal" bit, which to me would seem like we're expected to enter tickets too
brianfreud
Well, trac's benefit is being able to somewhat link together related proposals over time. The table's only tracking current proposals.
