which would also eliminate the need for a lot of manual work creation & track-work linking work in 2 of the top 10 biggest artists (JS bach and Mozart)
2010-03-25 08430, 2010
murdos
brianfreud: this is really a different way of initializing works
2010-03-25 08452, 2010
brianfreud
an identical title match between an entry on one of those 4 lists and any track under that artist should likely be, in of itself, a sufficient 1:n work:track matchup I'd think
2010-03-25 08417, 2010
brianfreud
I know you're thinking of doing it w/ARs; I figured you could pick up the compositional ARs in reverse here - get the work, then get the composition detail ARs from the tracks you merged in, rather than the other way around
2010-03-25 08446, 2010
luks
many classical tracks already have ARs
2010-03-25 08453, 2010
luks
that would result in many duplicates
2010-03-25 08423, 2010
brianfreud
luks: I kind of assumed those would all be merged together, not one work with 4000 composer ARs to Mozart :D
2010-03-25 08419, 2010
murdos
brianfreud: so, you're saying that for these artists, "recording name" + artist is enough to distinguish a work?
2010-03-25 08434, 2010
murdos
there's no chance that some re-arrangements occured?
2010-03-25 08450, 2010
brianfreud
murdos: That was the goal of CSG Standard - to present a unified common Work title that could be used.
2010-03-25 08423, 2010
brianfreud
Theoretically, anyone using CSGv1 correctly would get to the exact same title, but I'd guess that the chances of that (b/c of the confusingness of CSGv1) are really low.
2010-03-25 08427, 2010
brianfreud
If anyone did actually use the CSG Standard title, and shouldn't have, or if there was a rearrangement, it'd seem a lot easier to fix those manually post-NGS, rather than try to spot them while manually linking every single one of those tracks
ruaok: I asked warp, but he said it wasn't ready to merge into master yet
2010-03-25 08403, 2010
aCiD2
so that review should probably stay open until it gets into master
2010-03-25 08434, 2010
ruaok
ok, can you please make a note there? I'm trying to get some of the reviews closed so its easier to see what still needs reviewing
2010-03-25 08450, 2010
ruaok
there are a handful of reviews that should be committed, but they're lingering.
2010-03-25 08430, 2010
aCiD2
really? I was sure I'd commited all of mine that I could
2010-03-25 08454, 2010
ruaok
I know warp has a couple that have ship its.
2010-03-25 08415, 2010
ruaok
he must be waiting for his shipment of toits
2010-03-25 08424, 2010
ruaok
I'm guessing they are the round ones.
2010-03-25 08446, 2010
aCiD2
ruaok: I'm just putting the last touches to a bit of reorganizing of the edit migration script. I've now got it at one branch which sets the foundations, and a branch for each edit type of there. I've merged back in my "easy" edit types that i've done before
2010-03-25 08459, 2010
aCiD2
i'll be throwing away ones that try to map pre-NGS to NGS, and we'll use a read only edit type for them.
2010-03-25 08408, 2010
aCiD2
Hopefully this cleaner layout will allow murdos and luks to hope on board
2010-03-25 08420, 2010
aCiD2
what do you think about utilising our crazy dutch employee for this too?
2010-03-25 08430, 2010
alastairp
he /is/ pretty crazy
2010-03-25 08448, 2010
ruaok
utilizing the crazy to do what?
2010-03-25 08457, 2010
aCiD2
write some read only edit types
2010-03-25 08414, 2010
ruaok
ask him.
2010-03-25 08427, 2010
aCiD2
i wonder if warp (poke poke) is still up
2010-03-25 08428, 2010
ruaok
I don't want you to burn out on it, but not sure how he feels about it.
2010-03-25 08434, 2010
ruaok
zzzzzzzzz
2010-03-25 08446, 2010
ruaok
him and carols seem to like getting up at the butt crack of dawn.
2010-03-25 08446, 2010
aCiD2
i'm full steam ahead at the moment - I *really* want to get this pretty much done by the end of next week
2010-03-25 08401, 2010
aCiD2
because then I'm going to have to start making revision a bit more of a priorty (atm it gets 1/2 hours a day if it's lucky)
2010-03-25 08417, 2010
aCiD2
i'll try and recruit him tomorrow, I wasn't sure if you wanted him to keep pushing at other things
2010-03-25 08459, 2010
ruaok
ok, you two figure that out.
2010-03-25 08407, 2010
ruaok
aCiD2: in lib/DBDefs.pm.default
2010-03-25 08415, 2010
ruaok
sub MB_SERVER_ROOT { "/home/httpd/musicbrainz/musicbrainz-server" }
2010-03-25 08432, 2010
ruaok
djce and I have been installing the codebases for production into /home/mbserver/...
2010-03-25 08444, 2010
ruaok
is there any reason you can see for us to keep /home/htttpd?
I get "Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 24 bytes) in /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/Title.php on line 639"
