I think a VA is best, but if you feel that a feat. would be better, that is your call.
2003-10-04 27708, 2003
verus
thats me
2003-10-04 27709, 2003
verus
hehe
2003-10-04 27723, 2003
verus
hm
2003-10-04 27729, 2003
verus
i just won't put it into musicbrainz yet
2003-10-04 27735, 2003
verus
see if someone else will do it with more balls
2003-10-04 27701, 2003
ruaok
balls??
2003-10-04 27711, 2003
ruaok
That would be my GF. Her last name is Balsz. :-)
2003-10-04 27712, 2003
verus
maybe skills
2003-10-04 27717, 2003
ruaok
She's got em too!
2003-10-04 27722, 2003
verus
haha
2003-10-04 27727, 2003
ruaok
No, seriously, just enter it as a VA.
2003-10-04 27752, 2003
verus
i know of a girl who's name is 'jenna' and her last name is thalls
2003-10-04 27708, 2003
ruaok
HAHAHAHAHA!
2003-10-04 27729, 2003
ruaok
Scary what people will do to their kids.
2003-10-04 27704, 2003
verus
yea parents dont care because its not THEIR name
2003-10-04 27718, 2003
djce
ruaok: I like the new header*.gif images
2003-10-04 27708, 2003
ruaok
Thanks. You're the first person to mention it.
2003-10-04 27719, 2003
ruaok
I think Erin will take a stab at making a better version.
2003-10-04 27724, 2003
djce
I'm not surprised, it's a nice but subtle change.
2003-10-04 27730, 2003
ruaok
The drop shadows on my version are all janky.
2003-10-04 27735, 2003
djce
I saw the CVS commits :-)
2003-10-04 27738, 2003
ruaok
:-)
2003-10-04 27757, 2003
djce
Did you see, and understand, my mail about voting changes?
2003-10-04 27701, 2003
ruaok
And it seems squished to the left a bit -- I'll have her nudge it more to the right to give it more space.
2003-10-04 27729, 2003
ruaok
I read it briefly, but haven't taken the time to respond yet. Sorry.
2003-10-04 27733, 2003
ruaok reads
2003-10-04 27738, 2003
djce
np
2003-10-04 27736, 2003
ruaok
Oh I remember, I had problems loading the page last time I checked.
2003-10-04 27742, 2003
djce
It's up now.
2003-10-04 27705, 2003
ruaok
The page still hasn't loaded.
2003-10-04 27711, 2003
ruaok
In any case, two thoughts.
2003-10-04 27733, 2003
ruaok
First, the 'no vote' option staying on top.
2003-10-04 27757, 2003
ruaok
Could we somehow make them disappear for the time being and shuffle them to the end??
2003-10-04 27702, 2003
djce
(should be port 8080. Sorry, I didn't realise that port 80 only works on my loopback interface).
2003-10-04 27709, 2003
ruaok
np
2003-10-04 27718, 2003
djce
I did think of a "defer for /x/ days/hours" option
2003-10-04 27719, 2003
ruaok
I'm just considering the case where there are more than 1 page worth of 'no votes'.
2003-10-04 27738, 2003
djce
well, that's your cue to get your ass in gear and vote properly
2003-10-04 27745, 2003
ruaok
What if you want to stop the deferrement??
2003-10-04 27753, 2003
ruaok
djce: fair enough.
2003-10-04 27729, 2003
djce
The "no vote" option, as it currently stands, is simple to understand, even if it's not the most advanced feature ever.
2003-10-04 27702, 2003
ruaok
Second thought: The not being able to see the votes before you vote was mainly done to prevent 'me too' voters.
2003-10-04 27711, 2003
djce
yup
2003-10-04 27726, 2003
ruaok
That is still in effect with the change vote feature.
2003-10-04 27733, 2003
djce
Currently I've set it so that you only get to see votes once the mod has closed.
2003-10-04 27738, 2003
djce
or, it's your mod.
2003-10-04 27702, 2003
ruaok
People can change their mind and that is a matter of flexibility, not some conduit for laziness.
2003-10-04 27723, 2003
ruaok
Its more work to change your vote than to 'me too' vote, so I think your new feature is fine.
2003-10-04 27726, 2003
djce
I'm not expecting many people to vote more than once.
2003-10-04 27706, 2003
ruaok
You mean change their vote??
2003-10-04 27727, 2003
djce
yes
2003-10-04 27732, 2003
ruaok
agreed.
2003-10-04 27714, 2003
ruaok
In other words, I'm all for your suggestions.
2003-10-04 27720, 2003
djce
good :-)
2003-10-04 27744, 2003
djce
I think I've finally fixed a whole slew of bugs today.
2003-10-04 27750, 2003
djce
Missing triggers for albummeta, mainly.
2003-10-04 27719, 2003
djce
Which means there's quite a (relatively) complex set of database updates next time round.
2003-10-04 27727, 2003
djce
See ServerUpdateNotes.txt
2003-10-04 27728, 2003
ruaok
I saw all the commits. Seeing those messages makes me smile.
2003-10-04 27740, 2003
ruaok
yeay.
2003-10-04 27735, 2003
djce
I'm thinking that all names of things like [silence] [data track] [untitled] [non-album tracks] should be kept out of the search indexes. What do you think?
2003-10-04 27739, 2003
ruaok
Sure.
2003-10-04 27748, 2003
ruaok
But it would be nice to be able to query for them somehow.
2003-10-04 27731, 2003
djce
hmm. one to ponder.
2003-10-04 27730, 2003
ruaok
In your mail on text indexing:
2003-10-04 27731, 2003
ruaok
Code changes: minimal (except that
2003-10-04 27732, 2003
ruaok
> artist is renamed.
2003-10-04 27750, 2003
ruaok
WHy would that be any different than what we're currently doing??