#musicbrainz

/

      • Kerensky97 has left the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25533, 2006

      • Yllona has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25540, 2006

      • rpedro has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25506, 2006

      • rpedro joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25507, 2006

      • Aankh|Clone joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25540, 2006

      • Aankhen`` has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25527, 2006

      • Aankh|Clone has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25505, 2006

      • chefkoch joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25512, 2006

      • chefkoch
        chefkoch is now known as chefkoch_Zzz

        • 2006-09-12 25501, 2006

      • slaad has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25530, 2006

      • chefkoch_AW has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25509, 2006

      • mudcrow has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25553, 2006

      • Amblin joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25520, 2006

      • Amblin- has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25523, 2006

      • d3ity has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25501, 2006

      • UserError joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25546, 2006

      • UserErr0r has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25547, 2006

      • sidd|__ joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25530, 2006

      • sidd| has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25548, 2006

      • sidd| joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25518, 2006

      • sidd|__ has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25502, 2006

      • SixtyFold joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25515, 2006

      • sidd| has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25536, 2006

      • FauxFaux has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25506, 2006

      • FauxFaux joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25524, 2006

      • srotta joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25547, 2006

      • slaad joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25505, 2006

      • sidd_ joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25537, 2006

      • rpedro has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25518, 2006

      • rpedro joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25522, 2006

      • sidd__ joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25524, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        man, xhtml pisses me off

        • 2006-09-12 25545, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        why is a list required to be a child element of one of "button", "map", "object", "ins", "del", "noscript" ?

        • 2006-09-12 25531, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        (<ol> or <ul)

        • 2006-09-12 25550, 2006

      • srotta
        Eh?

        • 2006-09-12 25527, 2006

      • nightgroove
        I tought that's what all lists needed

        • 2006-09-12 25530, 2006

      • nightgroove
        to be a list, I mean

        • 2006-09-12 25550, 2006

      • nightgroove
        you judst want to make a bullet or twowitouth a header?

        • 2006-09-12 25509, 2006

      • srotta
        VxJasonxV: Doesn't sound correct :P

        • 2006-09-12 25523, 2006

      • sidd joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25531, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        w3c validation

        • 2006-09-12 25540, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I always have errors when I use ol or ul...

        • 2006-09-12 25551, 2006

      • nightgroove
        :/

        • 2006-09-12 25509, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvx…

        • 2006-09-12 25513, 2006

      • nightgroove stilldoesn't understand why <enter whatever here>-validation is such a big deal

        • 2006-09-12 25526, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        because it's an e-peen thing

        • 2006-09-12 25532, 2006

      • nightgroove
        a what?

        • 2006-09-12 25559, 2006

      • nightgroove
        wtf is e-peen

        • 2006-09-12 25500, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        ... I'll call it an ego

        • 2006-09-12 25502, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        that's clean :P

        • 2006-09-12 25521, 2006

      • srotta
        Well, the spec certainly doesn't limit lists to be inside those elements.

        • 2006-09-12 25525, 2006

      • sidd_ has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25535, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        then wtf @ validator?

        • 2006-09-12 25551, 2006

      • nightgroove
        but it seems is that all it does is make code that people have written o nwebsites do to one or the other hard to do because 'it has to fit validation'

        • 2006-09-12 25514, 2006

      • nightgroove
        screw the validator

        • 2006-09-12 25517, 2006

      • nightgroove
        :D

        • 2006-09-12 25523, 2006

      • nightgroove
        'bollocks to that'

        • 2006-09-12 25535, 2006

      • nightgroove is in a better mood now

        • 2006-09-12 25518, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        VxJasonxV: Wrap them in a p? </guess>

        • 2006-09-12 25535, 2006

      • luks joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25538, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        they are

        • 2006-09-12 25552, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I had 67 errors when not wrapped in <p>

        • 2006-09-12 25557, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        now to 2

        • 2006-09-12 25504, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I've never understood this problem

        • 2006-09-12 25518, 2006

      • srotta
        I'd reformat the whole page, but... 8)

        • 2006-09-12 25552, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        Hmm, http://faux.uwcs.co.uk/ renders and validates fine, try a div? :p

        • 2006-09-12 25554, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        there's really not a lot to reformat...

        • 2006-09-12 25539, 2006

      • srotta
        Umh, considering that everything's separated with br's, I'd say there is. But of course it's a matter of preference ;)

        • 2006-09-12 25551, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        there is a div now

        • 2006-09-12 25508, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        everything seperated by br's is a problem???

        • 2006-09-12 25511, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        what else should I do?

        • 2006-09-12 25518, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I guess I could logically chunk the videos in <p>'s

        • 2006-09-12 25522, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        <br /> is deprecated in real html.

        • 2006-09-12 25522, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        not one p per video though

        • 2006-09-12 25538, 2006

      • dejv_ joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25539, 2006

      • srotta
        I'd say that's more of the problem than the list.

        • 2006-09-12 25543, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        O_O

        • 2006-09-12 25544, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        WHAT

        • 2006-09-12 25550, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        p.s. FauxFaux you're not using XHTML 1.1

        • 2006-09-12 25551, 2006

      • dejv_
        hello

        • 2006-09-12 25558, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        (which I think is the difference here)

        • 2006-09-12 25514, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        VxJasonxV: Basic is a limited subset of xhtml 1.1. :)

        • 2006-09-12 25515, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        hmm, maybe not

        • 2006-09-12 25526, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I'm so confused

        • 2006-09-12 25537, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        Also, I really do have a problem with one line per paragraph, but whatever :P

        • 2006-09-12 25543, 2006

      • dejv_
        I've got a small problem: there is album with two releases and the second one contains extra tracks (which aren't in MB database).

        • 2006-09-12 25558, 2006

      • dejv_
        what is the right way to fix this?

        • 2006-09-12 25507, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        Why does it need to be fixed?

        • 2006-09-12 25508, 2006

      • dejv_
        http://musicbrainz.org/release/0a2d0d74-27e2-46b7…

        • 2006-09-12 25517, 2006

      • srotta
        VxJasonxV: How about changing the link list into... errrrr, list?-)

        • 2006-09-12 25522, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        Tons of albums released overseas have extra tracks. And it's not a problem, it's a different release.

        • 2006-09-12 25523, 2006

      • dejv_
        add tracks to second release only

        • 2006-09-12 25523, 2006

      • sidd_ joined the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25535, 2006

      • sidd__ has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25554, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        srotta, eh?

        • 2006-09-12 25525, 2006

      • dejv_
        well, should make a "new album" containing all tracks or add it to this one?

        • 2006-09-12 25535, 2006

      • dejv_
        *should I

        • 2006-09-12 25552, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        if that album you linked us too exists, leave it

        • 2006-09-12 25557, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        make a new album with all tracks + extras

        • 2006-09-12 25508, 2006

      • srotta
        VxJasonxV: Well, you're basically listing video links in that page. So why wrap them inside <p> and separating them with <br/>'s, when you could use proper list elements?-)

        • 2006-09-12 25517, 2006

      • dejv_
        thanks

        • 2006-09-12 25531, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        multiple identical releases are not a problem, assuming each release has something different about it

        • 2006-09-12 25505, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        true...

        • 2006-09-12 25509, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I see what you mean srotta.

        • 2006-09-12 25522, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        for all the videos, not just the site/project links

        • 2006-09-12 25555, 2006

      • srotta
        Exactly.

        • 2006-09-12 25510, 2006

      • VxJasonxV shrugs

        • 2006-09-12 25515, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I don't care really

        • 2006-09-12 25518, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        ( XD )

        • 2006-09-12 25522, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        my point is, the error message is RETARDED

        • 2006-09-12 25549, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        http://faux.uwcs.co.uk/vxjasonx.html

        • 2006-09-12 25557, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        Although that server won't serve that as xhtml.

        • 2006-09-12 25540, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        Hmm, VxJasonxV, damn. Close enough. :p

        • 2006-09-12 25504, 2006

      • sidd has quit

        • 2006-09-12 25514, 2006

      • srotta
        It seems that the validator doesn't allow list element inside <p>.

        • 2006-09-12 25529, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        And, ugh, that list of Links to software needs some serious fixing. :p

        • 2006-09-12 25554, 2006

      • srotta
        ... Which isn't exactly surprise, since I was reading XHTML 2.0 spec, not XHTML 1.1 :D

        • 2006-09-12 25517, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        uhhh

        • 2006-09-12 25526, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        how does a server not serve xhtml?

        • 2006-09-12 25509, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        It'll serve it as text/html instead of application/x-xhtml or whatever the mime type is that xhtml1.1 requires iirc.

        • 2006-09-12 25518, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        oops

        • 2006-09-12 25521, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I forgot about the doctype

        • 2006-09-12 25557, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        ...

        • 2006-09-12 25500, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        MIMETYPOE

        • 2006-09-12 25501, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        -O

        • 2006-09-12 25508, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        jesus, I hope I'm better than this with the customers tonight

        • 2006-09-12 25522, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        !quote :P

        • 2006-09-12 25523, 2006

      • BrainzBot
        No matches found.

        • 2006-09-12 25530, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvx…

        • 2006-09-12 25532, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        :D

        • 2006-09-12 25536, 2006

      • dejv_ has left the channel

        • 2006-09-12 25536, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        thanks FauxFaux

        • 2006-09-12 25548, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        no, it's not being served as application/xhtml+xml yet, but oh well

        • 2006-09-12 25553, 2006

      • mustaqila mooses in sleepily

        • 2006-09-12 25556, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        isn't w3c supposed to warn on that...?

        • 2006-09-12 25511, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        I thought it did. :|

        • 2006-09-12 25545, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        Maybe they haven't implemented that yet, just to keep the IE users happy.

        • 2006-09-12 25537, 2006

      • VxJasonxV should start adding AAAA records...

        • 2006-09-12 25548, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I had a great idea for a CMS for the semantic weg

        • 2006-09-12 25549, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        web*

        • 2006-09-12 25557, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I just don't know that I'll ever make it, because I'm a total lazy ass XD

        • 2006-09-12 25535, 2006

      • srotta
        Semantic web, the evil hype thingie whose meaning nobody knows :P

        • 2006-09-12 25555, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        wrong, that's AJAX

        • 2006-09-12 25509, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        semantic web is stuff like the Sandbox theme for Wordpress

        • 2006-09-12 25512, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        uber flexibility, etc.

        • 2006-09-12 25520, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        speaking of, anybody in here a css guru?

        • 2006-09-12 25525, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        ¬_¬

        • 2006-09-12 25540, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        I also need to leave for work, however.

        • 2006-09-12 25543, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        awww

        • 2006-09-12 25546, 2006

      • VxJasonxV
        I'll ask in #css