based on the first round of feedback I've changed things around a bit.
2007-03-12 07141, 2007
ruaok
low, unknown, high
2007-03-12 07152, 2007
cooperaa
Ya I was playing with metallica
2007-03-12 07108, 2007
ruaok
don and I had discussed bad, unknown and good.
2007-03-12 07119, 2007
ruaok
but that looked ugly and gave the wrong impression.
2007-03-12 07119, 2007
cooperaa
I don't like the idea of making an edit to change the quality though :(
2007-03-12 07136, 2007
ruaok
well, its a data safety issue.
2007-03-12 07153, 2007
ruaok
we don't want people setting an artist to low, making THEIR changes and then setting back to high.
2007-03-12 07159, 2007
cooperaa
I think quality is subjective and each person who stumbles across a release should be able to show their opinion
2007-03-12 07114, 2007
cooperaa
true...
2007-03-12 07115, 2007
ruaok
you want a rating system, basically.
2007-03-12 07121, 2007
cooperaa
yes
2007-03-12 07132, 2007
ruaok
that's VASTLY more complex/
2007-03-12 07138, 2007
cooperaa
popular artists who have a lot of subscribers will obviously get higher ratings...
2007-03-12 07139, 2007
ruaok
not even in the same ballpark.
2007-03-12 07142, 2007
cooperaa
making things harder to mess up
2007-03-12 07150, 2007
cooperaa
yes, I know
2007-03-12 07103, 2007
cooperaa
what is implemented now *is* a big step in the right direction I think
2007-03-12 07111, 2007
ruaok
I'm not convinced we need that.
2007-03-12 07136, 2007
ruaok
I'd like to tinker with this approach first. if it fails we can regroup and reconsider a full rating system.
2007-03-12 07131, 2007
ruaok
so, the question that I want to answer, (hopefully before I leave for 5 days) what the levels should be called.
2007-03-12 07136, 2007
ruaok
and what should something be by default?>
2007-03-12 07149, 2007
ruaok
I think the current system is ok, but no the best...
2007-03-12 07150, 2007
cooperaa
an advantage of giving +/- 1 is that it represents several opinions... if you see that Metallica's Master of Puppets has +223 you know pretty confidently that there's probably nothing to fix here
2007-03-12 07151, 2007
ruaok
not
2007-03-12 07127, 2007
cooperaa
what about unverified / unkown / verified?
2007-03-12 07153, 2007
Muz_ joined the channel
2007-03-12 07134, 2007
cooperaa
ruaok: ?
2007-03-12 07133, 2007
ruaok ponders
2007-03-12 07105, 2007
ruaok
I've thought about this so much I think I've overthought it. I think.
2007-03-12 07115, 2007
ruaok feels a blog post coming on.
2007-03-12 07116, 2007
Muz_ has quit
2007-03-12 07128, 2007
cooperaa
:)
2007-03-12 07145, 2007
cooperaa
280 * 20 = 5600 EDITS!!!
2007-03-12 07152, 2007
cooperaa
how can we vote on all those?
2007-03-12 07159, 2007
cooperaa
lol :)
2007-03-12 07157, 2007
Muz_ joined the channel
2007-03-12 07124, 2007
cooperaa
ruaok: can you please add a "approve" vote option? :(
2007-03-12 07114, 2007
ruaok
we have that for automods....
2007-03-12 07139, 2007
cooperaa
a radio button like Yes/No/Abstain/No Vote
2007-03-12 07101, 2007
cooperaa
I think that could considerably cut down the queue size
2007-03-12 07126, 2007
ruaok doubts it
2007-03-12 07142, 2007
cooperaa
I'd prove you wrong ;)
2007-03-12 07152, 2007
ruaok
that will lead people to abuse it, which in that turn means you're actually right.
2007-03-12 07108, 2007
ruaok
but lets just say that is not the goal of the excercise.
2007-03-12 07115, 2007
ruaok returns to hacking
2007-03-12 07133, 2007
cooperaa
okay, but I think that we've entrusted the autoeditors with power... and we expect them not to abuse it
2007-03-12 07155, 2007
ruaok
its all about checks and balances. adding an approve voting option is not balanced.
2007-03-12 07126, 2007
Muz has quit
2007-03-12 07129, 2007
kijjaz joined the channel
2007-03-12 07144, 2007
BrianG
ruaok: could it read "Data quality" rather than "Quality"?
2007-03-12 07128, 2007
BrianG
it kind of gives the impression that it's the quality of the artist since the addition is on the same line as other information about the artist
2007-03-12 07133, 2007
choklitcow joined the channel
2007-03-12 07149, 2007
choklitcow has left the channel
2007-03-12 07125, 2007
dholmes_ joined the channel
2007-03-12 07125, 2007
dholmes has quit
2007-03-12 07147, 2007
cooperaa_ joined the channel
2007-03-12 07103, 2007
ruaok
BrianG: yeah, that needs improvement.
2007-03-12 07110, 2007
ruaok
in general its quite ugly right now.
2007-03-12 07121, 2007
ruaok
and adding the word data will make it worse.
2007-03-12 07130, 2007
ruaok is totally open for suggestions
2007-03-12 07127, 2007
cooperaa has quit
2007-03-12 07127, 2007
BrianG
what about just moving the data quality stuff to the "Info:" line?
2007-03-12 07147, 2007
BrianG
or where the change quality link is
2007-03-12 07114, 2007
BrianG
some how combining the link and the status into one spot
2007-03-12 07141, 2007
BrianG
sorry im just baked-storming.. theres a million ways to display it i guess
2007-03-12 07151, 2007
BrianG
brain*
2007-03-12 07112, 2007
cooperaa_ has quit
2007-03-12 07129, 2007
ruaok
heh. mr freud your stoner slip is showing...
2007-03-12 07136, 2007
ruaok
but that is actually a good idea.
2007-03-12 07137, 2007
ruaok stops messing with the test server and goes back to the dev server
