#musicbrainz

/

      • warp
        assumed
      • 2007-05-01 12111, 2007

      • Jugdish
        ok, in those instances i would say they should then be added to "non-album tracks", but not create an artificial
      • 2007-05-01 12115, 2007

      • Jugdish
        ...album out of them
      • 2007-05-01 12125, 2007

      • Jugdish
        just because the iTunes Store wants to sell them together
      • 2007-05-01 12131, 2007

      • warp
        Jugdish: i have full albums which are iTunes exclusive.
      • 2007-05-01 12142, 2007

      • warp
        or well.. i have 1 and still need to get around to buying the other ;)
      • 2007-05-01 12150, 2007

      • Jugdish
        what makes it an "album" though?
      • 2007-05-01 12113, 2007

      • warp
        Jugdish: that's how iTunes sells it, that's how it is marketed elsewhere.
      • 2007-05-01 12132, 2007

      • Jugdish
        elsewhere? if it says "iTunes Exclusive" then it's not sold elsewhere
      • 2007-05-01 12142, 2007

      • warp
        not sold != not marketed
      • 2007-05-01 12145, 2007

      • warp
      • 2007-05-01 12104, 2007

      • Jugdish
        official bootleg, heh
      • 2007-05-01 12109, 2007

      • Jugdish
        oxymoron?
      • 2007-05-01 12122, 2007

      • luks
        http://musicbrainz.org/release/32388730-17e8-4aaa… - here is an example of an album that was only released on itunes and nowhere else
      • 2007-05-01 12124, 2007

      • warp
        yeah, it's a weird release.
      • 2007-05-01 12149, 2007

      • Jugdish
        label is set to iTunes Store? is that how we've decided to handle this?
      • 2007-05-01 12139, 2007

      • luks
        well, if the itunes store did release it then I'd say yes
      • 2007-05-01 12150, 2007

      • luks
        but I don't think there was any "official" decision
      • 2007-05-01 12104, 2007

      • Jugdish
        how do you get the release date?
      • 2007-05-01 12111, 2007

      • luks
        from itunes
      • 2007-05-01 12132, 2007

      • Jugdish
        and it gives a catalog # too?
      • 2007-05-01 12108, 2007

      • luks
        cat# is just itunes's album ID, there already were some releases under itunes store to I just followed the style
      • 2007-05-01 12122, 2007

      • luks
        *so
      • 2007-05-01 12110, 2007

      • Jugdish
        ah
      • 2007-05-01 12113, 2007

      • Jugdish
        so what would the musicbrainz-approved title of "Live Session (iTunes Exclusive) - EP" be?
      • 2007-05-01 12145, 2007

      • luks
        I think "Live Session" is enough
      • 2007-05-01 12150, 2007

      • Jugdish
        k
      • 2007-05-01 12113, 2007

      • warp
        luks: where is that itunes' album id?
      • 2007-05-01 12146, 2007

      • luks
        I don't know how to find it in itunes, but I know people are able to get URLs from there :/
      • 2007-05-01 12106, 2007

      • luks
      • 2007-05-01 12109, 2007

      • luks
        for example
      • 2007-05-01 12150, 2007

      • warp
        <http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?id=212928630&s=143452>
      • 2007-05-01 12158, 2007

      • warp
        woops.
      • 2007-05-01 12116, 2007

      • warp
        luks: thanks. i clicked 'tell a friend' in itunes and got the link trhough email.
      • 2007-05-01 12120, 2007

      • luks
        ah
      • 2007-05-01 12141, 2007

      • warp
        so that id is used as catalog id?
      • 2007-05-01 12157, 2007

      • luks
        I think it's the best info we have
      • 2007-05-01 12104, 2007

      • warp nods.
      • 2007-05-01 12108, 2007

      • Jugdish
        sounds good to me
      • 2007-05-01 12127, 2007

      • srotta
        I don't like it.
      • 2007-05-01 12139, 2007

      • srotta
        How likely is it for those IDs to stay the same for, say, half a year?-)
      • 2007-05-01 12153, 2007

      • luks
        why would they change them?
      • 2007-05-01 12102, 2007

      • srotta
        Because they haveno reason not to?
      • 2007-05-01 12104, 2007

      • luks
        stable IDs = more money
      • 2007-05-01 12124, 2007

      • luks
        and isn't more money the reason for running itunes store? :)
      • 2007-05-01 12127, 2007

      • srotta
        Stable IDs = not an issue, if they decide to "develop" their shop further.
      • 2007-05-01 12148, 2007

      • srotta
        That's just a fact, links rot.
      • 2007-05-01 12117, 2007

      • srotta
        And if the ID is not exactly advertised, they have no reason to keep them if they change the architecture, or just for the heck of it.
      • 2007-05-01 12138, 2007

      • luks
        they are using the ID to link to their store
      • 2007-05-01 12149, 2007

      • luks
        if they change it, they break many sites linking to them
      • 2007-05-01 12109, 2007

      • luks
        which mean people won't be able to find albums and thus won't buy them
      • 2007-05-01 12118, 2007

      • luks
        apple would go against itself
      • 2007-05-01 12132, 2007

      • luks
        it's the same as with amazon, they have no reason to change asins
      • 2007-05-01 12132, 2007

      • srotta
        Which wouldn't be exactly the first time.
      • 2007-05-01 12135, 2007

      • srotta
        8)
      • 2007-05-01 12141, 2007

      • srotta
        But yeah, I probably won't be buying anything from them in near future, and I probably won't go checking those IDs either. I just don't like the idea of using a part of an URL, if it's not documented to stay the same.
      • 2007-05-01 12138, 2007

      • warp buys more itunes exclusives :(
      • 2007-05-01 12151, 2007

      • Muz_ joined the channel
      • 2007-05-01 12159, 2007

      • Muz_
        Wanted the topic :)
      • 2007-05-01 12102, 2007

      • Tedius joined the channel
      • 2007-05-01 12150, 2007

      • Tedius has left the channel
      • 2007-05-01 12102, 2007

      • Jugdish
        luks: what happens if you try to merge an album into another album with a different number of tracks?
      • 2007-05-01 12128, 2007

      • aCiD2
        Uhh... if change track numbers, does the order of the tracks not update?
      • 2007-05-01 12146, 2007

      • luks
        aCiD2: it does
      • 2007-05-01 12153, 2007

      • Jugdish
        aCiD2: the track change edit has to get applied for it show up
      • 2007-05-01 12153, 2007

      • aCiD2
        Good
      • 2007-05-01 12102, 2007

      • aCiD2
        It hasn't in the preview, just checking
      • 2007-05-01 12103, 2007

      • luks
        Jugdish: the extra tracks will be moved to the other album
      • 2007-05-01 12147, 2007

      • Jugdish
      • 2007-05-01 12144, 2007

      • luks
        not if you remove puids and trms from 7 [untitled]
      • 2007-05-01 12109, 2007

      • luks
        otherwise they will be moved to 7 [silence]
      • 2007-05-01 12111, 2007

      • Jugdish
        ok
      • 2007-05-01 12114, 2007

      • Jugdish
        warp, was it you who was saying removing trm's is pointless because they are going to be eliminated soon?
      • 2007-05-01 12115, 2007

      • luks
        or just remove the track, easier :)
      • 2007-05-01 12143, 2007

      • Jugdish
        luks: would the removal of the track need to get applied before i do the merge edit?
      • 2007-05-01 12150, 2007

      • luks
        yes
      • 2007-05-01 12105, 2007

      • luks
        just post the link here, I'm sure you can get 3 votes quickly :)
      • 2007-05-01 12108, 2007

      • Jugdish
        k
      • 2007-05-01 12149, 2007

      • warp
        Jugdish: er, not likely.
      • 2007-05-01 12107, 2007

      • Jugdish
        oh sorry, i thought you were murdos :P
      • 2007-05-01 12135, 2007

      • Jugdish
        does he ever come in here?
      • 2007-05-01 12155, 2007

      • warp
        meh.. you ppl.
      • 2007-05-01 12126, 2007

      • warp
        spent atleast half an hour buy stuff from iTunes, removing DRM, getting all info ready to enter those into musicbrainz.
      • 2007-05-01 12148, 2007

      • warp is at work and should've been working ;)
      • 2007-05-01 12106, 2007

      • warp
        damn itunes exclusives.
      • 2007-05-01 12152, 2007

      • Jugdish
      • 2007-05-01 12124, 2007

      • FauxFaux votes no. ¬_¬
      • 2007-05-01 12141, 2007

      • Freso is going to vote no as well...
      • 2007-05-01 12150, 2007

      • Freso
        FauxFaux: Did you add a note?
      • 2007-05-01 12106, 2007

      • FauxFaux
        I didn't even click the link. :p
      • 2007-05-01 12131, 2007

      • Jugdish
        jerks!
      • 2007-05-01 12100, 2007

      • Freso
        Jugdish: Read my note.
      • 2007-05-01 12142, 2007

      • Jugdish
        Freso: the "[untitled]" track is final track on the other release
      • 2007-05-01 12143, 2007

      • luks
        Freso: do realize he is going to merge the releases?
      • 2007-05-01 12150, 2007

      • luks
        er, +you
      • 2007-05-01 12126, 2007

      • luks
        the other option is to add 17 "silence" tracks
      • 2007-05-01 12128, 2007

      • Freso
        luks: Yes, but that means that I'll just have to find that merge and vote no there too. :)
      • 2007-05-01 12138, 2007

      • luks
        huh?
      • 2007-05-01 12103, 2007

      • Freso
        luks: Read my note.
      • 2007-05-01 12108, 2007

      • luks
        Freso: merging two unrelated tracks is wrong, renamed or not
      • 2007-05-01 12126, 2007

      • Freso
        luks: If they're not the same, neither are the releases.
      • 2007-05-01 12132, 2007

      • Jugdish
        Freso: I understand neither of the 2 notes you added there
      • 2007-05-01 12151, 2007

      • luks
        Freso: the real release has 17 silence tracks
      • 2007-05-01 12105, 2007

      • luks
        somebody added it without them, because AMG doesn't list them
      • 2007-05-01 12119, 2007

      • luks
        are you saying the bogus release should be kept?
      • 2007-05-01 12116, 2007

      • Freso
        luks: No, I just hadn't heard the magic words "bogus release" before now.
      • 2007-05-01 12143, 2007

      • luks
        well, the first note has a link to it...
      • 2007-05-01 12135, 2007

      • luks
        hehe
      • 2007-05-01 12140, 2007

      • luks
        AMG actually does list them
      • 2007-05-01 12152, 2007

      • Freso
        luks: No. The first note has a link to another release, which might as well be the bogus release from where I'm sitting. Nowhere is it stated that one release or the other is non-existant.
      • 2007-05-01 12159, 2007

      • Jugdish
        but torrent sites wouldn't include the silence tracks and that's probably where the person who added the "bogus release" got their copy since they didn't add a DiscID to it
      • 2007-05-01 12104, 2007

      • Jugdish
        Freso: you're saying that this artist released to physical copies of a CD, one with 17 silence tracks and one without? does that really seem more logical than somebody obtaining their copy online with no silence tracks, and another person obtaining the actual CD with the silence tracks?
      • 2007-05-01 12146, 2007

      • Freso
        Jugdish: Unfortunately, I've found that humans are not (always) logical. :)
      • 2007-05-01 12113, 2007

      • ajh
        There's no reason at all the keep the silence tracks.
      • 2007-05-01 12121, 2007

      • luks
        ajh: there is
      • 2007-05-01 12132, 2007

      • Freso
        ajh: Huh?
      • 2007-05-01 12143, 2007

      • ajh
        No, you compensate for the fact they could or could-not actually be there as files.
      • 2007-05-01 12149, 2007

      • luks
        Jugdish: can you cancel the remove track edit? I'll add the silence tracks and then it can be merged
      • 2007-05-01 12108, 2007

      • ajh
        Sure keep them in the database entry.
      • 2007-05-01 12109, 2007

      • luks
        they way the track id will be kept
      • 2007-05-01 12154, 2007

      • Jugdish
        luks: done
      • 2007-05-01 12136, 2007

      • luks
      • 2007-05-01 12156, 2007

      • Jugdish
        thanks luks
      • 2007-05-01 12108, 2007

      • Jugdish
        sigh....you skeptics making things so difficult! :P
      • 2007-05-01 12134, 2007

      • luks
        yeah, I had to click "Add Tracks" 17 times! :)
      • 2007-05-01 12140, 2007

      • luks
        we need a better way to add multiple tracks
      • 2007-05-01 12120, 2007

      • Freso
        luks: Open Source, for itch scratchers ;)
      • 2007-05-01 12135, 2007

      • luks
        hm?
      • 2007-05-01 12106, 2007

      • Freso
        16:53] luks: we need a better way to add multiple tracks
      • 2007-05-01 12159, 2007

      • aCiD2
        luks, I second that!
      • 2007-05-01 12109, 2007

      • aCiD2
        I had to add 5 tracks and the re-organise, that was painful enough
      • 2007-05-01 12131, 2007

      • luks
        the whole release editor could use more javascript
      • 2007-05-01 12123, 2007

      • aCiD2
        Yea
      • 2007-05-01 12144, 2007

      • aCiD2
        And way more async stuff... to much clicking and going to other pages
      • 2007-05-01 12101, 2007

      • aCiD2
        What framework is MB using?
      • 2007-05-01 12104, 2007

      • aCiD2
        Jquery?
      • 2007-05-01 12134, 2007

      • luks
        I've started using mochikit since the last release
      • 2007-05-01 12147, 2007

      • aCiD2
        Mootools is my favourite
      • 2007-05-01 12154, 2007

      • luks
        but there isn't much code written in it, shouldn't be hard to port it
      • 2007-05-01 12157, 2007

      • aCiD2
        So light yet powerful
      • 2007-05-01 12114, 2007

      • aCiD2
        hmm, when I finish xhtml'izing the site, I might start to look into some js solutions
      • 2007-05-01 12101, 2007

      • aCiD2
        luks, can ubuntu display some fonts without antialiasing?
      • 2007-05-01 12108, 2007

      • aCiD2
        I hate looking at blurry code
      • 2007-05-01 12115, 2007

      • luks
        only some or all of them?
      • 2007-05-01 12120, 2007

      • chillware
        morning everyone :) any update on when Alpha9 will be ready?
      • 2007-05-01 12121, 2007

      • aCiD2
        Only some
      • 2007-05-01 12135, 2007

      • luks
        you will need to make a config file for that
      • 2007-05-01 12153, 2007

      • luks googles
      • 2007-05-01 12105, 2007

      • aCiD2
        Hmm, I swear I had some fonts (Terminius or something?) that only displayed fixed width without antialiaising
      • 2007-05-01 12141, 2007

      • aCiD2