Hi, could anyone give me a clue why MP3 files are greyed out in Picard. I am using Feisty Fawn
2007-08-21 23350, 2007
luks
sudo apt-get install libtunepimp5-mp3
2007-08-21 23351, 2007
luks
:)
2007-08-21 23320, 2007
Gharbeia_
Thanks, luks . I use aptitude :)
2007-08-21 23332, 2007
Bad_Seed has quit
2007-08-21 23309, 2007
Gharbeia_ has left the channel
2007-08-21 23329, 2007
HairMetalAddict joined the channel
2007-08-21 23323, 2007
rpedro joined the channel
2007-08-21 23305, 2007
SerialNumber^
SerialNumber^ has joined #MusicBrainz
2007-08-21 23322, 2007
CatCat
rawr
2007-08-21 23329, 2007
CatCat
ping katta
2007-08-21 23319, 2007
brianfreud
howdy mo :)
2007-08-21 23343, 2007
SerialNumber has quit
2007-08-21 23318, 2007
Knio1 joined the channel
2007-08-21 23337, 2007
CatCat
:D
2007-08-21 23341, 2007
CatCat
mo has internet
2007-08-21 23344, 2007
CatCat
mom*
2007-08-21 23354, 2007
brianfreud
:)
2007-08-21 23323, 2007
CatCat
she is katta
2007-08-21 23333, 2007
CatCat
you can say hi to her if you like
2007-08-21 23350, 2007
CatCat
she's away watching "millions of bats on TV"
2007-08-21 23331, 2007
CatCat
funfact: in norwegian "of" is 'av' but "off" is also 'av'
2007-08-21 23325, 2007
Knio has quit
2007-08-21 23325, 2007
Knio1
Knio1 is now known as Knio
2007-08-21 23339, 2007
brianfreud
hi katta :)
2007-08-21 23349, 2007
warp
brianfreud: how do you keep track of those edits which you added a note, but are waiting for the original editor to do some fixing and such?
2007-08-21 23324, 2007
brianfreud
That's where abstaining only on those I'm leaving such notes on come in handy
2007-08-21 23339, 2007
brianfreud
I just do a adv search for all open edits I abstained on
2007-08-21 23314, 2007
warp
ok, hm... i also abstain when i don't have an opinion but don't want to see the edit again.
2007-08-21 23331, 2007
brianfreud
well, you coul;d further limit to add release edits
2007-08-21 23315, 2007
warp
i already assumed that :)
2007-08-21 23354, 2007
brianfreud
:P
2007-08-21 23305, 2007
warp
also, a bunch i prefer they would fix it, but in general the add release edit isn't too bad and I already voted yes.
2007-08-21 23335, 2007
warp
i could ofcourse abstain those too if i know i'll get back to them. hmmm.
2007-08-21 23357, 2007
brianfreud
yeah, a "follow up on me" checkbox would be nice to mark those
2007-08-21 23326, 2007
warp
i mean, the problem is only if the original editor doesn't respond. if he does, i'll see the notes.
2007-08-21 23309, 2007
warp
i'll try to use that abstaining method of yours.
2007-08-21 23309, 2007
brianfreud
yeah - pretty much, if it needs follow up, but I voted yes, I have to pull it from the emails. the abstains tend to be the ones needing more - verification urls or whatever
2007-08-21 23331, 2007
warp
you could just start voting no on verification url notes. then they just fail if there is no response :)
2007-08-21 23356, 2007
brianfreud
:P
2007-08-21 23311, 2007
CatCat
omg
2007-08-21 23316, 2007
CatCat
my mum learns stuf fast
2007-08-21 23303, 2007
CatCat er kjempe glad
2007-08-21 23307, 2007
CatCat
Now grooving to: Chachani ~ Tamia (from Vol. 6: Perumanta)
btw mo, I tried to ID the authors of the older proposals, but can you couble check that I listed you for the right ones in there?
2007-08-21 23309, 2007
CatCat
yes
2007-08-21 23329, 2007
brianfreud
cool
2007-08-21 23331, 2007
CatCat
there isalso one where i propose adding [instrument] to 'was member of' (or adda seperate one)
2007-08-21 23337, 2007
warp
CatCat: thanks :)
2007-08-21 23338, 2007
CatCat
its i nthe mailing lsit
2007-08-21 23316, 2007
luks
I that page should track only style proposals
2007-08-21 23338, 2007
CatCat
no it shouldnt
2007-08-21 23344, 2007
CatCat
it shoudl track all proposlas
2007-08-21 23346, 2007
CatCat
no devidings
2007-08-21 23352, 2007
luks
it doesn't make much sense to track most of the feature proposals
2007-08-21 23353, 2007
CatCat
besides its warps page :D
2007-08-21 23358, 2007
CatCat
does to me
2007-08-21 23303, 2007
luks
because it's not just a simple decision: let's do this
2007-08-21 23317, 2007
CatCat
it can be seperate later
2007-08-21 23318, 2007
luks
it needs to be actually done, which involves a lot of work
2007-08-21 23322, 2007
CatCat
seperated*
2007-08-21 23331, 2007
luks
while for style proposals, the decision is the only thing you need
2007-08-21 23340, 2007
CatCat
but findign and listign all proposals was a good job, currently stuff is a *mess*
2007-08-21 23348, 2007
CatCat
true
2007-08-21 23357, 2007
brianfreud
luks: a lot of the proposals need just to be made official, just never were - the three caps ones for example
2007-08-21 23301, 2007
CatCat
but its still under warp for that reason
2007-08-21 23304, 2007
CatCat
its not complete
2007-08-21 23317, 2007
brianfreud
yeah, he said he's gonna move it, just didn't think it'd get fleshed out so quick
2007-08-21 23324, 2007
CatCat
yes
2007-08-21 23324, 2007
luks
brianfreud: I meant things like "Artist Role Inheritance Proposal"
2007-08-21 23332, 2007
luks
or "Album Rework Proposal"
2007-08-21 23335, 2007
brianfreud
well, why not list them?
2007-08-21 23341, 2007
brianfreud
they're active proposals, right?
2007-08-21 23346, 2007
warp
luks: i sort of agree.
2007-08-21 23347, 2007
luks
because they will never be implemented in that way
2007-08-21 23351, 2007
CatCat
amnd then 'current style porposales can be oen page and 'current feature propsoals camn be another
2007-08-21 23310, 2007
brianfreud
right - so they ought to be marked historical, rather than active proposals then
2007-08-21 23318, 2007
CatCat
amny of those can be 'preserved ofr historical purposes'1
2007-08-21 23319, 2007
luks
those are proposal you can steal ideas from then working on a feature
2007-08-21 23327, 2007
CatCat
brianfreud: jikns
2007-08-21 23336, 2007
CatCat
luks: exactly
2007-08-21 23301, 2007
luks
so why do they need tracking, if they never will be implemented fully?
2007-08-21 23303, 2007
brianfreud
hence historical, but oughtn't to still be marked CategoryProposal and no "this is for historical blah" note - makes it hard to distinguish truely active from "dead"
2007-08-21 23317, 2007
warp
luks: would you prefer seperate pages, like CurrentStyleProposals and CurrentFeatureProposals?
2007-08-21 23322, 2007
brianfreud
if only so they get noticed, marked historical, then removed
2007-08-21 23326, 2007
CatCat
thats what i said :P
2007-08-21 23331, 2007
brianfreud
I'd prefer a CategoryHistorical
2007-08-21 23339, 2007
CatCat
thats great frø
2007-08-21 23343, 2007
CatCat
get to it >:D
2007-08-21 23347, 2007
trolloma1 joined the channel
2007-08-21 23353, 2007
luks
warp: we already have a few pages for RFEs
2007-08-21 23359, 2007
luks
+ trac
2007-08-21 23312, 2007
warp
luks: trac is mostly for tracking issues, not their proposed solutions.
luks: you have to remember that a) this was a rawdata list fetched from wiki and mailing lists, b) it can be fixed/refined alter c) its in uh 'alpha' right now :D
2007-08-21 23358, 2007
brianfreud
hehe, yup
2007-08-21 23302, 2007
brianfreud
alpha 0.2
2007-08-21 23310, 2007
CatCat
yes
2007-08-21 23319, 2007
CatCat
it makes sence to seeprate featurws fro mstuyle
2007-08-21 23330, 2007
luks
i dunno, it's just that I think filling it with RFEs kills it's usefulness
2007-08-21 23302, 2007
warp
my main goal was to track the style issues, because they are often forgotten and usually not that much effort to follow up on and get some closure either way.
2007-08-21 23303, 2007
CatCat
and luks;: remember that you know more avout how the server will be lookign the next year(s) than anyone esle talkign right now
2007-08-21 23304, 2007
CatCat
:)
2007-08-21 23314, 2007
CatCat
warp: yes
2007-08-21 23317, 2007
brianfreud
well, finding all the open proposals is, imho, the 1st step. then sorting into some sort of categorys, then figuring which just need to be quickly passed, or marked historical only
2007-08-21 23326, 2007
CatCat
brainfraud said however sicne their foudn the old feature things
2007-08-21 23337, 2007
CatCat
can be marked has historical and put in a category and moved of that page
2007-08-21 23346, 2007
CatCat
yes
2007-08-21 23327, 2007
MrPloddy29 has quit
2007-08-21 23335, 2007
CatCat
so the finished moved-onto-actual-page-not-just-subpage-page can be what luks said probably
2007-08-21 23340, 2007
CatCat
and what warp intended
2007-08-21 23345, 2007
CatCat
(wich isorta agree with)
2007-08-21 23304, 2007
CatCat
but the initial findign of all the proposals (be it style or feature) was a good idea
