#musicbrainz

/

      • creature
        Got a libretto for Le Nozze di Figaro handy?
      • 2008-03-02 06221, 2008

      • lauri
        i adore cute
      • 2008-03-02 06240, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        pulling up my local copy of the list, and the NMA for it
      • 2008-03-02 06249, 2008

      • petros
        FauxFaux: Sure ;)
      • 2008-03-02 06200, 2008

      • lauri
        BrianFreudf: I must admit, I didn't actually know the proper name for the Onedin Line theme :)
      • 2008-03-02 06208, 2008

      • mikemorr
        "krazykiwi says there's a band called 'Tilly and the Wall' who make a feature out of having a tap dancer instead of a drummer (both live and on recordings)." Is that OK? How do I sign and date my wiki comment?
      • 2008-03-02 06213, 2008

      • creature
        I haven't got a printed copy, but I am working from the booklet and http://www.aria-database.com/translations/figaro.…
      • 2008-03-02 06235, 2008

      • creature
        Right now, I am looking at the No. 25 aria, given in the wiki as Le nozze di Figaro, K. 492: Act IV, Scene VI. No. 25 Aria "Il capro e la capretta" (Basilio)
      • 2008-03-02 06238, 2008

      • lauri
        primarily because I've not seen the Onedin line in about 25 years, and hadn't actually ever tried to find out
      • 2008-03-02 06240, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        ugh, aria-database is quite full of errors, I wouldn't trust it much
      • 2008-03-02 06258, 2008

      • creature
        But, the booklet indicates it's sung by Marcellina, and the translation suggests it's in Scene IV, not VI.
      • 2008-03-02 06221, 2008

      • lauri
        mikemorr: that's great thaks, and -- ["yourWikiName"] (dunno about date :)
      • 2008-03-02 06240, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        ok, 1 sec, still waiting on NMA
      • 2008-03-02 06248, 2008

      • creature
        What's NMA?
      • 2008-03-02 06225, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        Neue Mozart-Ausgabe - the urText version of every WA Mozart score
      • 2008-03-02 06256, 2008

      • creature
        Also, you may want to look at http://musicbrainz.org/show/release/relationships… and compare with the list; there's a few things in there I've changed. As mentioned, I came across something wikied as a Duettino but listed as a Recitative.
      • 2008-03-02 06226, 2008

      • creature
        Le nozze di Figaro, K. 492: Act III, Scene IX. Duettino "Io vi dico, signor, che Cherubino" (Contessa) for instance.
      • 2008-03-02 06238, 2008

      • creature
        Not quite sure how it's a duet with only one character listed.
      • 2008-03-02 06238, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        well, it's quite possible there's errors, esp in the upper list (which hasn't been checked against the NMA yet)
      • 2008-03-02 06216, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        ok, fially loaded
      • 2008-03-02 06217, 2008

      • creature
        Also, the wiki has no entry for the introductory Sinfonia.
      • 2008-03-02 06247, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        No 25 is an Aria, according to NMA
      • 2008-03-02 06204, 2008

      • creature
        BrianFreudf: We agree, but who sings it, and in which scene?
      • 2008-03-02 06243, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        hmmm, yes, you're right, it ought to be: Le nozze di Figaro, K. 492: Act IV, Scene IV. No. 25 Aria "Il capro e la capretta" (Marcellina)
      • 2008-03-02 06203, 2008

      • creature
        I haven't been keeping full track of the errors, but when you come to proof Le Nozze di Figaro, be very cautious about trusting the wiki entries. :)
      • 2008-03-02 06226, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        and the other yes, it ought to be Le nozze di Figaro, K. 492: Act III, Scene IX. Recitativo "Io vi dico, signor, che Cherubino" (Antonio, Il Conte)
      • 2008-03-02 06209, 2008

      • creature
        Yep, that matches with my notes.
      • 2008-03-02 06217, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        well, that's one benefit of moving it from the wiki to something like what we really wanted in the first place - people can fix :)
      • 2008-03-02 06228, 2008

      • mikemorr
        aha: [[DateTime()]]
      • 2008-03-02 06253, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        mikemorr, trying to timestamp your comments?
      • 2008-03-02 06217, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
      • 2008-03-02 06218, 2008

      • luks_ joined the channel
      • 2008-03-02 06219, 2008

      • creature
        BrianFreudf: I'm pretty sure the scene numbers are at least partially screwy from Aria 25 onwards.
      • 2008-03-02 06241, 2008

      • mikemorr
        BrianFreudf: yes, I think I figured it out
      • 2008-03-02 06256, 2008

      • mikemorr
        Isn't there a shortcut @SIG@ or something?
      • 2008-03-02 06201, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        yes, that's it
      • 2008-03-02 06244, 2008

      • mikemorr
      • 2008-03-02 06214, 2008

      • lauri
        lesson: do not ask me for anything about the wiki, the wiki hates me, i hate it, we mostly steer clear of each other
      • 2008-03-02 06219, 2008

      • lauri
        thanks a ton :)
      • 2008-03-02 06239, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        creature: as I have both in front of me to check: starting with No. 25: IV., V-VII., VII., VIII., Aprite is VIII. and ought to be Aria not Recitativo, IX, X, X, XI-XIV., Ultima
      • 2008-03-02 06251, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        only one scene was off
      • 2008-03-02 06221, 2008

      • creature
        OK, that seems to gel with the listing. Thanks.
      • 2008-03-02 06239, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        np
      • 2008-03-02 06209, 2008

      • creature
        Keep it in front of you, though.
      • 2008-03-02 06223, 2008

      • creature
        Le nozze di Figaro, K. 492: Act IV, Scene VII. No. 26 Recitativo "In quegli anni in cui val poco" (Figaro) I have this as No 26 Aria (Basilio)
      • 2008-03-02 06200, 2008

      • creature
        As does the Jpeg you linked.
      • 2008-03-02 06251, 2008

      • creature
        Can I trust the jpeg over all? Is it useful for me to tell you of these errors?
      • 2008-03-02 06223, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        sure :)
      • 2008-03-02 06236, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        had just jumped to the wiki, waiting for it to reload back at NMA
      • 2008-03-02 06249, 2008

      • creature
        OK, the next two are borked as well.
      • 2008-03-02 06200, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        the jpeg is pretty much correct; there may occasionally be an error or two in the indexes that's not in the actual score
      • 2008-03-02 06200, 2008

      • Freso
        Does anyone know of some sed (or similar commandline) trickery to replace on line in a file with the contents of another file?
      • 2008-03-02 06207, 2008

      • Freso
        *one
      • 2008-03-02 06213, 2008

      • creature
        No 27 is listed as Recitativo/Recitativo Susanna/Figaro, when it's Recitativo/Aria Figaro/Figar.
      • 2008-03-02 06223, 2008

      • creature
        (Figaro/Figaro)
      • 2008-03-02 06223, 2008

      • ruaok
        Freso: you used rpl before?
      • 2008-03-02 06228, 2008

      • ruaok
        (on a linux box)
      • 2008-03-02 06230, 2008

      • Freso
        ruaok: rpl?
      • 2008-03-02 06232, 2008

      • Freso
        Nope.
      • 2008-03-02 06244, 2008

      • ruaok
        multi file search and replace.
      • 2008-03-02 06254, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        creature, 1 sec, I'll look
      • 2008-03-02 06208, 2008

      • yllona joined the channel
      • 2008-03-02 06200, 2008

      • creature
        No 28 Recitativo and Aria are transposed (Aria labelled as Recitativo and vice versa).
      • 2008-03-02 06211, 2008

      • Freso
        ruaok: Hm. It's stable on all platforms but amd64. Thanks for the tip! I'm looking into it. :)
      • 2008-03-02 06219, 2008

      • Clint
        Freso: you can do it with just GNU sed
      • 2008-03-02 06222, 2008

      • ruaok
        :-)
      • 2008-03-02 06234, 2008

      • mikemorr
        lauri: np
      • 2008-03-02 06251, 2008

      • Freso
        Clint: That's what I figured (hence my original question), but that's more than I can wrap my head around right now.
      • 2008-03-02 06202, 2008

      • creature
        BrianFreudf: Also, that's just Susanna.
      • 2008-03-02 06204, 2008

      • Clint
        Freso: do you wanna do it by line number or by pattern?
      • 2008-03-02 06255, 2008

      • Freso
        Clint: Well, pattern would probably be best/most portable, but as it's for a one-off right now, line number would do as well.
      • 2008-03-02 06234, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        ok, this should be what you need, post-corrections (so you don't have to reload the wiki): http://musicbrainz.pastebin.com/d332b927b
      • 2008-03-02 06236, 2008

      • Freso
        Clint: I could write the pattern to find the line though, I'm just not sure on how to make it replace that line with the contents of the other file.
      • 2008-03-02 06257, 2008

      • creature
        I have Le nozze di Figaro, K. 492: Act IV, Scene Ultima. No. 29 Finale "Pian pianin le andrò più presso" (Il Conte, Tutti) listed as (Cherubino, Countess), but the jpeg doesn't quite line up with that.
      • 2008-03-02 06235, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        yes, they don't break apart multi-movement-within-a-movement opera works and such in the indexes
      • 2008-03-02 06251, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        that'd where it's 100-some pages of score to dig through instead :P
      • 2008-03-02 06259, 2008

      • cooperaa_ joined the channel
      • 2008-03-02 06201, 2008

      • Clint
        Freso: sed '/happypattern/ {r /file/to/include
      • 2008-03-02 06204, 2008

      • Clint
        d} filename
      • 2008-03-02 06214, 2008

      • Clint
        er, missed the ' after d}
      • 2008-03-02 06245, 2008

      • Freso
        Clint: So `sed '/happypattern/ {r /file/to/include d}' /file/to/act/on`?
      • 2008-03-02 06204, 2008

      • Clint
        Freso: that space between include and d should be a newline, but yes
      • 2008-03-02 06214, 2008

      • Freso
        Ah.
      • 2008-03-02 06228, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        creature: though, I'd guess that Tutti could be better specified, if you feel like digging through and ID'ing the particular roles for each part :D
      • 2008-03-02 06202, 2008

      • Clint
        Freso: er, and if you want it to replace the file in-place, use -i
      • 2008-03-02 06207, 2008

      • creature
        (Count, Figaro, Basilio, Antonio, Susanna, Barbarina, Cherubino, Marcellina, Countess) for the final movement (Gente, gente, all'armi, all'armi!)
      • 2008-03-02 06228, 2008

      • Freso
        Clint: sed -i '/happy...
      • 2008-03-02 06233, 2008

      • Clint
        yes
      • 2008-03-02 06244, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        I just put the corrrections in the wiki - feel free to edit the roles in place there :)
      • 2008-03-02 06200, 2008

      • Clint
        that will replace any line that matches happypattern with the contents of /file/to/include
      • 2008-03-02 06202, 2008

      • lauri
      • 2008-03-02 06203, 2008

      • Clint
        and not make any backup of your old file
      • 2008-03-02 06209, 2008

      • creature
        I'm not sure I can face trying to load up that huge table on the wiki. :)
      • 2008-03-02 06249, 2008

      • Freso
        Clint: Excellent! I hate backups.
      • 2008-03-02 06250, 2008

      • Freso
        :p
      • 2008-03-02 06253, 2008

      • lauri
        all that one needs is a featured vocalist (and I suspect, because Salem al Fakir is a violinist, it probably even has one), and we're almost up to that silly example i made up
      • 2008-03-02 06219, 2008

      • lauri
        but he does sing too, so maybe it doesn't, dunno without listening to it
      • 2008-03-02 06219, 2008

      • Clint
        -i.bak to make the hated backups
      • 2008-03-02 06229, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        use http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/CSGStandard/Mozart?ac… to jump right to the much smaller editing page, save, then just browse away when it starts to load the saved page :)
      • 2008-03-02 06248, 2008

      • Freso
        Clint: Awesome. Thanks! I knew there'd be some simple way of doing it. :)
      • 2008-03-02 06206, 2008

      • Clint
        long live unix
      • 2008-03-02 06236, 2008

      • Freso
        Indeed.
      • 2008-03-02 06247, 2008

      • creature
        BrianFreudf: Sorry, I think I'm going to wuss out and wait for someone to do it 'properly' from the score, either for the wiki or the new-system, whenever that happens.
      • 2008-03-02 06206, 2008

      • creature
        It's taken me a couple of hours to do the release, and I'm not confident enough to copy-and-paste direct from that to update the wiki.
      • 2008-03-02 06214, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        lol, personally, if I didn't have a copy to edit and dump locally, I'd too be waiting for something better :P
      • 2008-03-02 06201, 2008

      • creature
        Is there an easy way to link releases together for multi-disc sets? That might be nice.
      • 2008-03-02 06209, 2008

      • creature
      • 2008-03-02 06212, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        just annotation interlinks
      • 2008-03-02 06227, 2008

      • chefkoch
        chefkoch is now known as chefkoch_AW
      • 2008-03-02 06238, 2008

      • cooperaa has quit
      • 2008-03-02 06206, 2008

      • cooperaa_
        creature: tags
      • 2008-03-02 06221, 2008

      • cooperaa_
        cooperaa_ is now known as cooperaa
      • 2008-03-02 06250, 2008

      • cooperaa
        (or click info next to the ASIN)
      • 2008-03-02 06224, 2008

      • pronik joined the channel
      • 2008-03-02 06239, 2008

      • pronik has left the channel
      • 2008-03-02 06237, 2008

      • UserErr0r has quit
      • 2008-03-02 06255, 2008

      • UserErr0r joined the channel
      • 2008-03-02 06247, 2008

      • srotta has quit
      • 2008-03-02 06252, 2008

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2008-03-02 06204, 2008

      • pronik joined the channel
      • 2008-03-02 06208, 2008

      • pronik has left the channel
      • 2008-03-02 06210, 2008

      • luks_
        theoretical question...
      • 2008-03-02 06213, 2008

      • luks_
        with tracks merging implemented, how do you think should track search results (e.g. http://musicbrainz.org/search/oldsearch.html?quer…) look like?
      • 2008-03-02 06219, 2008

      • luks_
        no release column, multiple releases in the column or one row for each release even if it's really the same track?
      • 2008-03-02 06219, 2008

      • warp
        yay, internet without lag.
      • 2008-03-02 06234, 2008

      • warp is almost home.
      • 2008-03-02 06239, 2008

      • lauri
        how about a tricksy 'appears on 3 releases' in the releases column that you can click to see a list of?
      • 2008-03-02 06250, 2008

      • lauri
        or is that too tricksy just for search results
      • 2008-03-02 06220, 2008

      • lauri
        or if you get to that anyway by clicking the trackname, it'd be kind of redundant
      • 2008-03-02 06235, 2008

      • warp
        i'd like to have the releases mentioned in some way. a track without context has very little meaning to me.
      • 2008-03-02 06236, 2008

      • warp
        train is here
      • 2008-03-02 06239, 2008

      • warp afk again :)
      • 2008-03-02 06202, 2008

      • lauri
        yeah, but437 VA comps for context maybe isn't that useful either
      • 2008-03-02 06238, 2008

      • lauri
        luks: how about show the 'original release album title' one if we know it, and '..and 437 other releases'? which either expands in place or goes to a list
      • 2008-03-02 06214, 2008

      • luks_
        hm, I just realized it was probably a stupid question
      • 2008-03-02 06230, 2008

      • lauri
        which would be epic fail for any classical release, and half of electronica, where stuff shows up on comps first anyway
      • 2008-03-02 06232, 2008

      • luks_
        because those 'release tracks' may have different titles from 'tracks'
      • 2008-03-02 06233, 2008

      • lauri
        never mind
      • 2008-03-02 06244, 2008

      • luks_
        so it will really need one row per release
      • 2008-03-02 06258, 2008

      • luks_
        and maybe one extra search type only for tracks without context
      • 2008-03-02 06222, 2008

      • luks_
        hm
      • 2008-03-02 06201, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        I think it'd be helpful to see the context, though seeing the same track repeated (if it is actually the same track on the same release) is somewhat redundant
      • 2008-03-02 06238, 2008

      • luks_
        not if you have 'Foo (album version)', 'Foo (album mix)' and 'Foo', while they are still the same track
      • 2008-03-02 06241, 2008

      • luks_
        (IMO)
      • 2008-03-02 06259, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        ah, yes, I thought you meant multiple hits listing for the same actual instance
      • 2008-03-02 06213, 2008

      • luks_
        this is the same instance
      • 2008-03-02 06227, 2008

      • luks_
        all of them would be the same master track 'Foo'
      • 2008-03-02 06243, 2008

      • luks_
        but they has different titles depending on the release
      • 2008-03-02 06250, 2008

      • lauri
        so this is searching 'work titles' and showing the 'releases it appears on' although they may not have the same 'track title'
      • 2008-03-02 06252, 2008

      • BrianFreudf
        yes, but on the same release, I would have the same track listed with three titles?