#musicbrainz

so now I can put the take I like the most with the best quality overall among the four dupes

in my iphone

Bleh, picard crash.

chefkoch is now known as chefkoch_AW

Rudd-O: i wanted to try butterscotch on 2 "remasters", but i get an OverflowError for one wav. and always "No such file or directory" for mp3s

http://www.hasbro.com/default.cfm?page=browse&a... The best kind of Butterscotch

pony!!

xlotlu: please report the traceback back to me via the bug tracker or via email to rudd-o [at rudd-o.com]

thanks in advance :-)

chefkoch is now known as chefkoch_AW

Why would the Linux tagger not pick up any albums?

hmm

I try to use web lookup, and get nothing.

SeveredCross: hmm

Rather, I click on an album in the web lookup, but it doesn't translate back to Picard.

are you clicking the "Tagger" button?

you need to launch the musicbrainz site from picard to make it show up

Yep, did that.

It worked on Windows a bit ago, decided to restart to Linux for stability reasons

heh

hmm, unsure then

*nods*

Haha, now it worked...

I opened port 8000 in my router.

Don't know why I would have to do that, but I'll take ti.

hmm, that shouldn't make a difference

if you had a firewall in place, then maybe

Nope, unless Ubuntu's turned one on on me.

nah, it doesn't have one

Well, it has ufw, which manages iptables, but that's not on.

how's your linux-fu?

Strong.

can you try and telnet to the picard webserver?

telnet localhost 8000, or something

Sure, give me a sec.\=

Er, \= are not supposed to be there.

What should I tell it?

no idea :)

the fact it connected means that side is OK

Yeah.

although, if you said it was working, i'm not sure what the problem is/was

I think it was just a temporary glitch.

For some reason, a ton of music lost metadata.

With > 5000 songs, lost metadata = bad.

yeah :)

$ find -type f -name *.mp3|wc -l

24653

Damn.

a little more than 5000 :-P

Your MP3-peenor is much larger than mine.

The question begs itself though, how much of it have you listened to at least once? ^__^

10%, maybe

:)

So why the other 90%?

^^ The next question.

plenty of disk space

Thats my argument, disk space doesn't cost much so theres no point deleting stuff you don't like, or limiting the size of ones collection

eg i have no idea how to do this one http://www.discogs.com/release/933695

$ find -type f -name *.mp3|wc -1

63126

Christ.

Hahahaehaha.

Picard just told me it crashed, and then promptly resumed tagging songs.

anyone in here use/using mp3fs?

Nope. What is it?

a FUSE filesystem. an on-the-fly transcoder of flac files to mp3

(great for burning MP3CDs without making a big todo over converting everything first)

nice

I expect access is pretty slow though

that's part of the reason I Access

...

I ask*

the throughput I get is TERRIBLE

the site says it should be a lot better

VxJasonxV: Interesting concept..but how is that better then taking your collection and creating mp3s all at once?

because I don't have to have two copies of everything

Any other reason?

What do you use the transcoded mp3s for?

I can keep/and listen to my FLACs, but have them accessible as mp3s for burning mp3 cds, or what have you

Do you use those mp3s on an mp3 player?

on my cd player that reads mp3 data cds, yes

lol

seems pretty obvious, to me.

so, anyways

long story short, the page says it can copy a file out of the mp3fs fs, to wherever, in about 12 seconds

but, I was trying to burn stuff off with K3b and it took FOREVER, for just one file

upwards of a minute.

My computer sucks, but it can't honestly be that bad

Well I just think if you have a sizeable music collection, all in flac format, then you have quite a decent amount of storage, more then enough to create an additional mp3 copy of everything..specially if you're having speed problems

I have a sizeable music collection, everything that I actually owned ripped by myself in flac, and I'm... out of space

so now, I can't create an additional mp3 copy of everything, not to mention I don't want to

All I really wanted to do was see real world bench marks, see how well other people use it.

As of yet, I haven't found anyone.

Rudd-O: it's caused by a zero chunk in

Rudd-O: it's caused by a zero chunk in calculate_rms_dB

if you really must have a bug report i can do it, but i'm quite lazy :)

find . -type f -iname '*.mp3' -o -iname '*.flac' | wc -l;226413

drsaunde: :)

O_o

I don't understand you're trying to say/do, zeno__

VxJasonxV: Find all of his music.

226413 songs..

Why even bother?

That's likely more music than you could ever listen to.

probably, but i only listen to stuff once in a long time

and instead of having to dl when i hear about something i just play it (scripts to dl so not much work)

VxJasonxV: if you're going to burn to CD grab the flac

VxJasonxV: just do something like for f in *; do lame whatever f;, ez

*/*.flac that is

like I said

I don't have too terribly much free hard drive space

and I don't want to have to do that

ogg is pretty good at ~192 to save disk space

which q is that?

also

my cd player doesn't read OGG

only mp3...

I'd love to use Ogg Vorbis, but I can't.

VxJasonxV: ah, go with lame -v2 or -v0 then

inhouseuk__ is now known as inhouseuk

Amblin is now known as Guest97754

I'm using MusicBrainz Picard, and it can find the correct Amazon page for the cover art; but it doesn't show the cover art in the cover art viewer and doesn't embed it in the MP3 files.

When you say Picard can find the correct Amazon page, what do you mean?

Picard doesn't embed cover art, at least not without a plugin

picard only saves it off to a seperate file as specified