#musicbrainz

/

      • MClemo
        weird smiley
      • 2009-03-30 08907, 2009

      • aCiD2
        Probably the solution
      • 2009-03-30 08935, 2009

      • brianfreud
        I think it's the newlines within common-macros.tt
      • 2009-03-30 08953, 2009

      • aCiD2
        yup
      • 2009-03-30 08917, 2009

      • aCiD2
        that's what I think is the problem
      • 2009-03-30 08916, 2009

      • warp has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08925, 2009

      • brianfreud tries it
      • 2009-03-30 08901, 2009

      • brianfreud
        yeah, webkit's doing all sorts of fun things, rendering the DOM entirely differently from any other engine
      • 2009-03-30 08916, 2009

      • catgroove
        exsessive whitespace also wastes space
      • 2009-03-30 08924, 2009

      • catgroove
        (and bytes)
      • 2009-03-30 08928, 2009

      • LiangHF has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08906, 2009

      • brianfreud
        looks like turning on the PRE_CHOMP and POST_CHOMP options in tt might be a good idea acid2 - I'm just not sure where you configure tt atm
      • 2009-03-30 08924, 2009

      • aCiD2
        lib/MusicBrainz/Server.pm
      • 2009-03-30 08925, 2009

      • aCiD2
        I'll try that
      • 2009-03-30 08959, 2009

      • brianfreud
        TRIM also
      • 2009-03-30 08914, 2009

      • Sargun joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • lind joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08930, 2009

      • outsidecontext has left the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08944, 2009

      • nikki joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08901, 2009

      • bess_away has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08938, 2009

      • nikki_ has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08929, 2009

      • nikki_ joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08943, 2009

      • brianfreud
        yay, webkit is happy now - and the webkit fixes also got rid of all that extra height and width nikki
      • 2009-03-30 08917, 2009

      • aCiD2
        What did you have to add to fix?
      • 2009-03-30 08930, 2009

      • warp joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08914, 2009

      • brianfreud
        I'm just checking everything in the browsers now, then I'll push it to github - had to tweak a good bit with the DOM structure and css to fix some issues in 8 or 10 files
      • 2009-03-30 08955, 2009

      • brianfreud
        boiled down to unconstrained divs, in most cases
      • 2009-03-30 08956, 2009

      • aCiD2
        alright
      • 2009-03-30 08904, 2009

      • aCiD2
        i'm really lost as to how much you've done in what branches now :)
      • 2009-03-30 08910, 2009

      • aCiD2
        hopefully we can cover that in a few hours
      • 2009-03-30 08924, 2009

      • brianfreud
        I've not touched anything but the ES branch in a month
      • 2009-03-30 08941, 2009

      • aCiD2
        right
      • 2009-03-30 08948, 2009

      • brianfreud
        the bugs I just fixed were making the ES essentially overwrite the rest of the page in webkit
      • 2009-03-30 08937, 2009

      • nikki has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08945, 2009

      • brianfreud
        ok, pushed, but still one issue to fix - the sidebar links aren't actually functional for some reason, save in opera
      • 2009-03-30 08918, 2009

      • srotta_ joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08957, 2009

      • catgroove
        hahha opera ++
      • 2009-03-30 08930, 2009

      • brianfreud
        oh, lol, no, opera just needed a reload - lol, sidebar links don't actually work in any browser now :D
      • 2009-03-30 08901, 2009

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08913, 2009

      • aCiD2
        is MOD_ADD_TRACK still used?
      • 2009-03-30 08918, 2009

      • aCiD2
        or does MOD_ADD_TRACK_KV take over?
      • 2009-03-30 08959, 2009

      • v6lur has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08946, 2009

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08941, 2009

      • srotta has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08941, 2009

      • ruaok
        the latter
      • 2009-03-30 08909, 2009

      • aCiD2
        cool
      • 2009-03-30 08913, 2009

      • aCiD2 checks that off the list :)
      • 2009-03-30 08928, 2009

      • aCiD2
        What about MAC_TO_SAC?
      • 2009-03-30 08941, 2009

      • aCiD2
        does MOVE_RELEASE take over from that? (and SAC_TO_MAC)
      • 2009-03-30 08926, 2009

      • ruaok
        that one isn't as clear in my mind...
      • 2009-03-30 08959, 2009

      • aCiD2
        no worries, I'll leave them on the list
      • 2009-03-30 08914, 2009

      • brianfreud
        is github down?
      • 2009-03-30 08948, 2009

      • aCiD2
        doesn't matter if it is :P
      • 2009-03-30 08900, 2009

      • nikki joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • nikki_ has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08952, 2009

      • chefkoch_AW joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08900, 2009

      • chefkoch_AW
        chefkoch_AW is now known as chefkoch
      • 2009-03-30 08909, 2009

      • brianfreud
        Virgin just announced they're closing all their US stores
      • 2009-03-30 08920, 2009

      • FauxFaux
        :/
      • 2009-03-30 08926, 2009

      • aCiD2
        wow
      • 2009-03-30 08955, 2009

      • warp has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08931, 2009

      • warp joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08904, 2009

      • Kerensky97
        I thought that happened a few months ago. I know the local store here closed a while ago.
      • 2009-03-30 08950, 2009

      • ruaok
        that was just the first wave.
      • 2009-03-30 08948, 2009

      • ruaok heads to the office
      • 2009-03-30 08954, 2009

      • ruaok
        I'm really looking forward to a
      • 2009-03-30 08914, 2009

      • ruaok
        "normal" work week. but nothing about it looks normal so far. :-(
      • 2009-03-30 08921, 2009

      • ruaok
        oh well. :)
      • 2009-03-30 08914, 2009

      • ruaok has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08924, 2009

      • aCiD2
        He had a normal work week about 5 months ago and he wants another already!?
      • 2009-03-30 08926, 2009

      • aCiD2
        now that's just greedy
      • 2009-03-30 08902, 2009

      • futilius joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08922, 2009

      • futilius has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08911, 2009

      • navap
        I have 2 albums (Foo and Bar), 2 discs in each (Foo1, Foo2, Bar1, Bar2). If Bar is a live performance of Foo, should Foo2 and Bar2 be linked? Or just Foo1 and Bar1?
      • 2009-03-30 08939, 2009

      • navap
        Second question, if Foo1 and Foo2 are later released together on one disc (Baz), should Baz have an AR to both Foo1 and Foo2? Or just to Foo1?
      • 2009-03-30 08905, 2009

      • symphonick joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08916, 2009

      • aCiD2
        back in 15!
      • 2009-03-30 08925, 2009

      • aCiD2
        (ran out of plugs and gotta unplug the router :P)
      • 2009-03-30 08917, 2009

      • Kerensky97
        navap: 1st question. I'd link disc to disc, Foo1+Bar1, and Foo2+Bar2.
      • 2009-03-30 08951, 2009

      • Kerensky97
        second question, I'm not sure. I think I'd link the CD to both of the earlier CDs.
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • pronik joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08952, 2009

      • kurros joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08920, 2009

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08953, 2009

      • navap
        Kerensky97: But doesn't that create a cluster of sorts, for the first question.
      • 2009-03-30 08922, 2009

      • navap
        Because Foo1 and Foo2 are already linked together, and Bar1 and Bar2 are as well.
      • 2009-03-30 08927, 2009

      • lind has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08913, 2009

      • zout joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08935, 2009

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08939, 2009

      • aCiD2` joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08902, 2009

      • aCiD2 has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • murdos joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08906, 2009

      • Sooke joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08913, 2009

      • Sooke
        Hi all
      • 2009-03-30 08920, 2009

      • Sooke
        I hope somebody can help me. Does anybody know the name of that song of SUPERTRAMP rock fashioned, that the videoclip is in 3D animation and it shows 2 guys (a fat and slim one) moving tvs ??
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • nikki has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • outsidecontext has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • srotta_ has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • Sargun has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • Kerensky97 has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • dholmes has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • alastairp has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • Loto has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • creature has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • nikki joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • srotta_ joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • Sargun joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • Kerensky97 joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • dholmes joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • alastairp joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • Loto joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08912, 2009

      • creature joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08926, 2009

      • futilius joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08945, 2009

      • symphonick has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • fr00d has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08951, 2009

      • fr00d joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08934, 2009

      • Sooke has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08941, 2009

      • RifRaf joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08924, 2009

      • ruaok
        luks: any idea what modbot is complaining about?
      • 2009-03-30 08936, 2009

      • ruaok
        I dont even understand the nature of the problem. :-(
      • 2009-03-30 08906, 2009

      • luks
        ruaok: it's fixed in svn
      • 2009-03-30 08909, 2009

      • luks
        I've sent you a mail
      • 2009-03-30 08916, 2009

      • ruaok
        oh.
      • 2009-03-30 08920, 2009

      • ruaok hugs luks
      • 2009-03-30 08922, 2009

      • ruaok
        tahnks!
      • 2009-03-30 08957, 2009

      • catgroove
        [20:28] <navap> Second question, if Foo1 and Foo2 are later released together on one disc (Baz), should Baz have an AR to both Foo1 and Foo2? Or just to Foo1? <-- both, i'd say
      • 2009-03-30 08904, 2009

      • ruaok
        I didn't get that mail. :-(
      • 2009-03-30 08917, 2009

      • navap
        catgroove: Thanks
      • 2009-03-30 08939, 2009

      • luks
        hm
      • 2009-03-30 08958, 2009

      • luks
        well, the fix is in svn anyway :)
      • 2009-03-30 08905, 2009

      • ruaok
        :-)
      • 2009-03-30 08935, 2009

      • ruaok reruns modbot
      • 2009-03-30 08956, 2009

      • bfirsh joined the channel
      • 2009-03-30 08949, 2009

      • zout has quit
      • 2009-03-30 08941, 2009

      • brianfreud
        ruaok: on the /bare thing - both regular and the ESI-version wikidocs broke in tt when the switch was made to wikidocs
      • 2009-03-30 08954, 2009

      • nikki
        luks: do you really think disc ids don't work the way they are? :o
      • 2009-03-30 08958, 2009

      • luks
        nikki: I don't think they are useful
      • 2009-03-30 08908, 2009

      • ruaok
        they aren't. tocs are.
      • 2009-03-30 08938, 2009

      • ruaok
        if I had know this and that and this and that, when I started this project...
      • 2009-03-30 08941, 2009

      • luks
        I'm not sure about that either, if we have track times and we allow +/- 5 second difference, we don't need exact CD TOCs
      • 2009-03-30 08943, 2009

      • ruaok
        if only....
      • 2009-03-30 08907, 2009

      • catgroove
        i like disc ids
      • 2009-03-30 08908, 2009

      • nikki
        I like having exact tocs... I often find exact matches when I put a cd in my drive
      • 2009-03-30 08918, 2009

      • catgroove
        yes
      • 2009-03-30 08934, 2009

      • catgroove
        its invaluable from classical
      • 2009-03-30 08940, 2009

      • nikki
        I can see the advantages of searching by times, but having an exact match a lot of the time is nice too :/
      • 2009-03-30 08943, 2009

      • luks
        I should try to implement this track time index some time
      • 2009-03-30 08944, 2009

      • catgroove
        many things couldnt even be found then
      • 2009-03-30 08953, 2009

      • luks
        just to see if it could replace discid lookups
      • 2009-03-30 08956, 2009

      • outsidecontext
        luks: you still would want exact matches sometimes, but i guess scoring by relevancy will just give the client as much accuracy as he wants