if two bootleg compilations contain exactly the same tracks (or rather, recordings), should they be in one RG?
2010-03-15 07442, 2010
v6lur
or maybe just link them with "is a later release" AR?
2010-03-15 07410, 2010
KRSCuan
If they contain the same recordings, I'd put them into one release group and link them as well.
2010-03-15 07444, 2010
KRSCuan
The only real exceptions for bootlegs are live bootlegs – apparently because they'd likely contain different recordings of the same performance, but I didn't follow the discussion concerning them.
2010-03-15 07432, 2010
v6lur
should the combined RG then be titled like "Title of Bootleg 1 / Title of 2"?
hm. thanks. I'll see if the person who asked replies to clarify.
2010-03-15 07441, 2010
navap
heh He replied just now
2010-03-15 07442, 2010
igndenok joined the channel
2010-03-15 07406, 2010
yoasif joined the channel
2010-03-15 07458, 2010
Cuan joined the channel
2010-03-15 07433, 2010
perstar
What release/track artist should I use for a cd which says "Cab Calloway" on the spine, "Cab Calloway and Orchestra" on the front cover and on the disc, and "Cab Calloway with the Cabbaliers" on the back cover with the track listing?
2010-03-15 07404, 2010
drsaunde joined the channel
2010-03-15 07413, 2010
perstar
Is there a rule about obvious typos? I couldn't find it mentioned in the style guides. If the track listing on the cd says "Whats New" should I insering an apostrophe when adding the cd?
2010-03-15 07436, 2010
fupp
I dunno, could be that they meant to name the track "Whats New" and not "What's New"
and the "correct" title should prob be "What's New?" with a question mark as well.
2010-03-15 07408, 2010
Dr-Hfuhruhurr joined the channel
2010-03-15 07420, 2010
CatCat
obvious typoes that misstaken (crappy wallmart releases etc) are fixed, a good indicator is if various sites have it with/without fixed
2010-03-15 07453, 2010
CatCat
if you consequently find it only with the "broken" spelling thoguh, it might ne intentional
2010-03-15 07412, 2010
CatCat
jazz standards are fixed to the jazz standar's "proper" use
2010-03-15 07447, 2010
CatCat
'Take the "A" Train' for example
2010-03-15 07409, 2010
danbri joined the channel
2010-03-15 07427, 2010
jessew joined the channel
2010-03-15 07421, 2010
perstar
OK, thanks. In this case it's not a rerelease of a recording that has been released with the "proper" title earlier though, but something recorded in 2003.
2010-03-15 07433, 2010
nima joined the channel
2010-03-15 07448, 2010
xlotlu joined the channel
2010-03-15 07456, 2010
tru joined the channel
2010-03-15 07438, 2010
bluephysh joined the channel
2010-03-15 07433, 2010
danbri joined the channel
2010-03-15 07454, 2010
Cuan
What's the maximum track length supported by the server?
2010-03-15 07417, 2010
Cuan
I tried to enter a 525948766 minutes long track, but it was set to -1 ms.
2010-03-15 07459, 2010
Muz
In the database the column is an INTEGER.
2010-03-15 07426, 2010
Muz
iirc, times are stored in ms. In seconds alone that is 31556925960, so 31556925960000. Which is clearly BUFFEROVERRUN time.
2010-03-15 07426, 2010
Muz
2147483647 is the apparent limit for INTEGERS in PostGres.
considering they're both unofficial bootlegs... i don't know
2010-03-15 07428, 2010
mr_maxis joined the channel
2010-03-15 07408, 2010
brianfreud
v6lur: so long as the release exists, to my mind, it doesn't matter if it were legal or bootleg; what matters is the title that appeared on the thing, not the legality of the thing. :)
Do we need a whole page defining those rare artists? (Esp given the text that was on Supporting Musician Relationship Type, which suggested inventing such artists rather than using that AR)
2010-03-15 07448, 2010
herojoker joined the channel
2010-03-15 07458, 2010
tru joined the channel
2010-03-15 07400, 2010
Jormangeud joined the channel
2010-03-15 07450, 2010
dinog joined the channel
2010-03-15 07402, 2010
aCiD2
anyone able to explain how public key authentication works? I figure it's a challenge-response type thing, but I don't get how the challenge is decided
2010-03-15 07404, 2010
Clint
aCiD2: the client could say "hi, i've got this key", and then the server can decide to validate it if it's heard of that key
2010-03-15 07424, 2010
aCiD2
I guess the client should encrypt that key with the servers public key too
2010-03-15 07451, 2010
Clint
yes, typically there is a session key negotiated first
2010-03-15 07443, 2010
aCiD2
ok, that makes sense
2010-03-15 07414, 2010
srotta
Of course the actual key isn't trnasferred at any point, but something that's encrypted with that key.
brianfreud: the language is supposed to be urdu and is available in previous releases but I cannot select it
2010-03-15 07446, 2010
schlifers
I will add the sources for the rest
2010-03-15 07454, 2010
brianfreud
hit "show full lists" to get Urdu
2010-03-15 07427, 2010
brianfreud
As for the script, all the text on your IRC screen, and in those releases - that's Latin :)
2010-03-15 07409, 2010
Freso joined the channel
2010-03-15 07437, 2010
BurgessShale joined the channel
2010-03-15 07430, 2010
brianfreud
ruaok: Is CA in a different daylight savings from EST? 1 PM PST, but still 3 PM EST?
2010-03-15 07427, 2010
brianfreud
;)
2010-03-15 07418, 2010
schlifers
brianfreud: added sources for those that were missing some are pronunciation fixes and sometimes the original website gets is wrong and wikipedia gets it right. It is really hard to get a 100% correct source since you are trying to pronounce one language in another
2010-03-15 07442, 2010
brianfreud
I have to admit, I don't agree with a lot of the reasoning in these later notes
2010-03-15 07402, 2010
brianfreud
Artist's website always wins against Wikipedia or 'general pronounciation', imho
2010-03-15 07419, 2010
brianfreud
and the RE edits are giving YYYY-MM-DD and a country; Wikipedia only has YYYY.
