"Seto San" is a fictional character who - in the tv show - has a performance name "SUN" under which music was released in the real world. She is played by Halko Momoi.
2011-06-01 15232, 2011
hawke_
kepstin-laptop: Seems reasonable to me.
2011-06-01 15242, 2011
hawke_
kepstin-laptop: Though it does make “legal name” kinda bad.
2011-06-01 15248, 2011
Krystof joined the channel
2011-06-01 15259, 2011
hawke_
I’ve never really been a fan of the legal name phrase anyway
2011-06-01 15232, 2011
kepstin-laptop
hmm. maybe just change it to "performed by" or something.
2011-06-01 15208, 2011
kepstin-laptop
except that would be weird for some of the western artist cases of performance names
2011-06-01 15251, 2011
kepstin-laptop
I.e. would you say Eminem is "performed by" Marshall Mathers?
2011-06-01 15222, 2011
hawke_
True.
2011-06-01 15240, 2011
kepstin-laptop
I think I would prefer to have a different relationship to link roles/characters to artists as opposed to performance names. Something to add to my idea about a new artist type for roles/characters, I guess :)
2011-06-01 15247, 2011
hawke_
Not a bad idea.
2011-06-01 15227, 2011
reosarevok
kepstin-laptop: sounds coherent
2011-06-01 15243, 2011
reosarevok
kepstin-laptop: please do that. Also, what about Cap_Stand_Japanese? :p
2011-06-01 15237, 2011
kepstin-laptop
reosarevok: I need to send an RFV for my proposal to add a website link to releases first, before nikki reminds me about that again :)
2011-06-01 15257, 2011
reosarevok
Then do it! Just needs one little mail anyway :)
2011-06-01 15256, 2011
kepstin-laptop
hmm. I actually wanted to make a few changes to that homepage proposal based on the discussion; is the correct thing to do there to send out an RFV with the updated text, or send out a new version of the RFC?
2011-06-01 15232, 2011
reosarevok has left the channel
2011-06-01 15248, 2011
reosarevok joined the channel
2011-06-01 15255, 2011
reosarevok
Let's ask warp about it
2011-06-01 15209, 2011
warp is innocent!
2011-06-01 15216, 2011
reosarevok
Yeah, we know
2011-06-01 15225, 2011
reosarevok
But what about the RFC / RFV thing
2011-06-01 15226, 2011
reosarevok
?
2011-06-01 15251, 2011
warp
reosarevok: which RFC / RFV thing?
2011-06-01 15258, 2011
reosarevok
What kepstin just said
2011-06-01 15236, 2011
reosarevok
If a few changes are made to an RFC based on the discussion, can it go into RFV or does it need another RFC?
2011-06-01 15237, 2011
warp
you can always go to RFV imo, however if you expect that more discussion will follow, it would be better to do another round of RFC first.
2011-06-01 15240, 2011
kepstin-laptop
hmm. I think the changes are the logical outcome of the existing discussion, so I probably will just put out an RFV. If anyone disagrees I can always start a round 2 :)
2011-06-01 15251, 2011
reosarevok
Makes sense to me
2011-06-01 15238, 2011
ruaok joined the channel
2011-06-01 15215, 2011
cjk32 joined the channel
2011-06-01 15224, 2011
cjk32
ping: caller_6
2011-06-01 15240, 2011
hawke_
Grr…why does “Piano accordion” have to be the first result when searching for piano on an instrument AR?
2011-06-01 15202, 2011
caller_6
cjk32:pong
2011-06-01 15206, 2011
reosarevok
hawke_: to annoy us
2011-06-01 15226, 2011
cjk32
caller_6: Sorry I missed your response earlier re deleting works.
2011-06-01 15203, 2011
cjk32
caller_6: The works in question were created mistakenly by me (after unknowingly switching from the test to the live site).
2011-06-01 15221, 2011
hawke_
reosarevok: Sounds about right. So many times I’ve entered a “piano accordion” AR when I meant piano.
