#musicbrainz

aww, 502 adding a url relationship :/

... again.

502 again.

I'm tempted to give up, but I really want that relationship on there.

k, thanks

... 502 again.

502

too bad there are some 7 pairs of such songs :P

but okay, 21 works it is then

aww, 502...

kepstin: regarding 'set track durations', it seems like it would complicate the UI unnecessarily to have to select which releases to set track durations on. What’s wrong with just setting the durations of the one you click “set track durations” for?

makes sense to me

what hawke_ said, that is

returning to my earlier question: what if there never was a separate poem, and a later song just has the same lyrics to different music? does that merit a third work for just the lyrics?

or should there just be an earliest version AR between the two songs, and different composer linked to each?

great, now I get a 502 on an isrc add edit

repeatable :/

does anyone know what the problem is with all these 502s the last few days?

looks like no edits are working right now. 502s everywhere :/

drsaunde: one theory is that modbot is breaking everything else while it runs

(which it's supposed to do at :10 after the hour, I think?)

modbot doesn't run 100 times a day though so there's something else

drsaunde: no, only 24 times of day, for a couple minutes at around :10 after each hour

which corresponds approximately to when I've seen them

hi ruaok

(e.g. everything is magically working again now)

I thought modbot ran on the hour

ruaok: you just missed another bout of 502s :)

yep, thats modbot then.

502 while loading a page :-(

I'll be watching logs then. :)

bitmap: is it just me or doesn't http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/104349 hide the ARs shown by the server itself?

v6lur: I think I updated it once but then it broke again

clicking on "Hide credits" should always hide the server ones though

yeah, it's kind of pointless to have it hide the server ones now that the server supports hiding them itself :)

what is this "hide credits" of which you speak... i can't seem to find it

Could I get a y-bomb on this edit? Trying to sort out a rather confusing work w/multiple official titles issue. :P http://musicbrainz.org/edit/15930297

v6lur: hidden in the header of the tracklist table

kepstin: well, server doesn't show everything... plus the script's indentation looks nicer to me

it's in the top right of the header IIRC

v6lur: I know... that's why I still use the script

ooooh, and there it is! thanks

basically identical to how Discogs does it :P

I'm ready.

bring on 502s!

they're not here yet, but soon ;)

and here they are :)

Request for http://musicbrainz.org/work/8bb5b46d-944e-3078-... took over 30 seconds. Killing process

that was mine.

Request for http://musicbrainz.org/release/1198de23-4c98-46... took over 30 seconds. Killing process

twice.

should get another work/8b... one soon

odd, it loaded just fine here just now

brianfreud: it's /submitting edits/ that's the issue.

ah

loading pages is generally fine.

and just when I have none queued up

yeah, requests are timing out. thats all we know.

read: nothing new

nod

been getting them for days now myself too

so, you don't have anything to get a traceback to find out where it's hanging set up yet?

based on the fact that I only see it when submitting edits, it's probably hanging when trying to write the the db?

502s on 1084fe62-7881-4c1d-8e59-324a1cabc7e1 and http://musicbrainz.org/work/1084fe62-7881-4c1d-... were me

well, some reads are timing out too, so its not as simple as that.

but some DB contention would be my guess right now.

right now we're not logging much DB output. I need to increase that.

I can say that I haven't yet had a 502 where I got the error, but the edit went in anyhow, unlike most other errors

and another one for ya ruaok :P

feck. logging is totally turned off and will require a DB restart.

HEY

everyone shut up

what was that song on mtv, latish 90's

something about the battle of "lost angeles"

anyone know what im talking about?

*brother

nm i finally found it after like 15 years of trying to remember it

thanks useless irc where 100 ppl are in a channel and no one ever says anything

yesssssssssssssssss http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=So3gbmaDUuM&... YESSSSSSSSSS

destryalhmns : feel it.

and the one major thing you have to remember tonight, when you go back to the woods or whether you stay here, is that the man next to you is your brother, and yo udamn well better treat each other Because if you dont, then we blow the whole thing

i mean treat each other THAT WAY

awesome song.... awesone

m

again only making sense???? OKAY...

and the one major thing you have to remember tonight, when you go back to the woods or whether you stay here, is that the man next to you is your brother, and you damn well better treat each other that way, Because if you dont, then we blow the whole thing

everyone is who they are for a reason.... even if that reason is just boring genetics

christ all mighty, what is the sense in advertising yourself as having over 100 users if barely 1 person even talks?!!??!!

oh sorry, im talking to myselff

IRC IS DEAD

TIME TO START SOMETHIGN THAT WORKS!!!

wait wait

shhhhhhhhhh

someone is transcending time

they will look at this channel 15 hours from now and comment, then leave

this is not my thing

can i please have op???

my first order of business woudl be honesty

and that means booting everyone but the person who gave me op and the two or three ppl i have seen making noise in the last hours

irc is fucking useless

time to look elsewhere

GOODBYE USERS OF ANCIENT TECHNOLOGY

WAIT! I was going to say somethi...

jacobbrett: hehe, he will read the logs and come back at you :-)

I don't think that's his thing

lmao

that was an exciting 30 minutes.

he left too soon

Death in Vegas - Dirt

was the song he wanted

yeah, he found it.

aww man, I go to make some edits and it's all 502 time again

at least the user-agent rate limiting seems to be holding up :)

at least now i know to expect the 502s between 05-15, that helps

Iration Steppas Meet D. Rootical or "Iration Steppas meet D. Rootical"

any perl'ers willing to give me a hand with something? I'm totally in over my head.

VxJasonxV: no guarantees, but I can try (wouldn't exactly call myself a perl'er but maybe it happens to hit an area where I've worked)

I assume this should be relatively easy.

I'm trying to use WWW::Mechanize to access a page. I've previously generated a cookie_jar that should include active session cookies for an authenticated instance, and the Mech object is setting the cookie jar.

Do I have to do something specific to specify a cookie? Or should requests just use it during the HTTP communication?

The page is acting like I'm not logged in, and I'm not sure why that is.

hm

I'm unfortunately not familiar with WWW::Mechanize specifically, but it should (I think?) just work that you initialize the Mechanize object with the relevant cookie jar

Oh snap. I just did it.

So, funny story;

oh, cool

glad my lack of help worked :P

I was using HTTP::Cookies::Mozilla to load my cookie jar, then save it off to a file. Then loading that file via HTTP::cookies and using /that/ object in Mech

I realized since I was no longer trying to load a classic "cookie jar" type file, and just needed an HTTP::Cookies object, that I could just use the object created by loading my mozilla cookies

so I stripped out all the extra cruft, and *bam*, I can see the difference in the html output already, and no existence of "Sign In" (yay)

yay!

silly me