#musicbrainz

/

      • hawke_
        CallerNo6: Part of it is that the formatting is just ridiculously complicated
      • 2012-04-24 11552, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        Which is why picard scripts should be doing the formatting.
      • 2012-04-24 11538, 2012

      • hawke_
        CallerNo6: And all the bits should be in separate fields?
      • 2012-04-24 11543, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        yes
      • 2012-04-24 11550, 2012

      • Leftmost joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11556, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        A schema in a schema
      • 2012-04-24 11527, 2012

      • hawke_
        Could work, though most of that stuff ends up being attributes of the work more than the recording or track
      • 2012-04-24 11517, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        true
      • 2012-04-24 11504, 2012

      • hawke_
        So you still need a standard for how to put it into the recording disambiguation or title or whatever
      • 2012-04-24 11545, 2012

      • hawke_
        unless you want to [untitled] most of ’em.
      • 2012-04-24 11525, 2012

      • slackerIII joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11536, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        My starting point is the assumption that the way we do classical titles is barely better than using the annotation field.
      • 2012-04-24 11502, 2012

      • hawke_
        It’s much better than that simply because it’s searched by default
      • 2012-04-24 11527, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        right, well, what I mean is that it's structured data crammed into a text field.
      • 2012-04-24 11536, 2012

      • hawke_
        And the CSG semi-“standard” naming format lets us synthesize titles
      • 2012-04-24 11518, 2012

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11557, 2012

      • the_metalgamer joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11553, 2012

      • ijabz_ joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11527, 2012

      • mchou joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11544, 2012

      • jmvanel joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11505, 2012

      • adhawkins joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11548, 2012

      • kepstin-laptop joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11553, 2012

      • adhawkins
        When translating, is there any way of finding out what context a string is used in?
      • 2012-04-24 11559, 2012

      • adhawkins
        For example "(unknown)"
      • 2012-04-24 11546, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11547, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11506, 2012

      • nikki
        hm. if you click the details tab, it'll tell you which files it's used in. right now that's the only thing there is :/
      • 2012-04-24 11528, 2012

      • adhawkins
        Yeah, I get the file list if I download the po.
      • 2012-04-24 11534, 2012

      • adhawkins
        Not necessarily helpful.
      • 2012-04-24 11502, 2012

      • nikki
        well, you can always ask me for more info. not ideal, I know :/
      • 2012-04-24 11556, 2012

      • MaskMaster joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11501, 2012

      • adhawkins
        Yeah ok. Might be doing that for 4200 of the 4500 strings though :)
      • 2012-04-24 11539, 2012

      • kepstin-laptop
        adhawkins: what language are you translating into?
      • 2012-04-24 11517, 2012

      • kepstin-laptop is tempted to do one for canadian english ;)
      • 2012-04-24 11523, 2012

      • adhawkins
        Welsh :)
      • 2012-04-24 11543, 2012

      • reosarevok
        adhawkins: we'll need a British English one too at some point, although I guess nikki is willing to do that one :p
      • 2012-04-24 11507, 2012

      • adhawkins
        That shouldn't be too hard I don't suppose
      • 2012-04-24 11510, 2012

      • adhawkins
        s/z/s/ :D
      • 2012-04-24 11539, 2012

      • kepstin-laptop
        s/es/se/
      • 2012-04-24 11550, 2012

      • kepstin-laptop
        and throw in an s/o/ou/ :)
      • 2012-04-24 11552, 2012

      • adhawkins
        I doubt we'll have to correct the abominal spelling of aluminium
      • 2012-04-24 11558, 2012

      • nikki
        reosarevok: of course I'm planning to do british english :P
      • 2012-04-24 11518, 2012

      • nikki is longing to get rid of "catalog" :P
      • 2012-04-24 11534, 2012

      • reosarevok
        "aluminum", srsly?
      • 2012-04-24 11540, 2012

      • reosarevok shakes his head at Americans
      • 2012-04-24 11509, 2012

      • adhawkins grins
      • 2012-04-24 11537, 2012

      • nikki
        I was planning to wait though, 'cause most of the strings will be the same so I'd rather avoid having to keep updating it over the summer
      • 2012-04-24 11526, 2012

      • warp
        s/am/amme/
      • 2012-04-24 11519, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11530, 2012

      • reosarevok
        warp: you mean Americans say "Jean-Claude Van Dam"?
      • 2012-04-24 11532, 2012

      • reosarevok hides
      • 2012-04-24 11544, 2012

      • adhawkins
        Right, enough.
      • 2012-04-24 11548, 2012

      • adhawkins
        Night all, speak soon
      • 2012-04-24 11554, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Night
      • 2012-04-24 11557, 2012

      • reosarevok goes too
      • 2012-04-24 11559, 2012

      • adhawkins waves
      • 2012-04-24 11531, 2012

      • CatCat
        Wizzcat: \o/
      • 2012-04-24 11554, 2012

      • hawke_
        I’m sorry, I can’t understand anyone in here, you’re all writing British english and I’m American.
      • 2012-04-24 11512, 2012

      • hawke_
        Can we add a translate function to MBChatLogger?
      • 2012-04-24 11530, 2012

      • hawke_
        So it can say “color” every time somone says “colour”
      • 2012-04-24 11532, 2012

      • hawke_
        *someone
      • 2012-04-24 11535, 2012

      • CatCat
        RAGE TO THE MAX
      • 2012-04-24 11544, 2012

      • CatCat
        ok so i try creating a transifex account
      • 2012-04-24 11550, 2012

      • CatCat
        "this email is already in use"
      • 2012-04-24 11553, 2012

      • CatCat
        okidoki
      • 2012-04-24 11532, 2012

      • CatCat
        try singign up "your acount has bee ndisabeled check your email for a activation thingy" ok nothing happens
      • 2012-04-24 11539, 2012

      • CatCat
        try requestign new password
      • 2012-04-24 11550, 2012

      • CatCat
        "That e-mail address doesn't have an associated user account. Are you sure you've registered?"
      • 2012-04-24 11557, 2012

      • CatCat
        AAAAAAARRRRGGGWTFFFF?
      • 2012-04-24 11527, 2012

      • CatCat
        godalso i hate pages that keep refreshing so it goes from O to X in the toolbar constantly
      • 2012-04-24 11501, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11516, 2012

      • CatCat
        i found the email ,but for some reason it's from 2011 mai? it doesn't work
      • 2012-04-24 11533, 2012

      • CatCat
        can someone help me contact these guys
      • 2012-04-24 11509, 2012

      • nikki
        they apparently have a channel on this server (#transifex), you could try asking there
      • 2012-04-24 11525, 2012

      • CatCat
        dang
      • 2012-04-24 11541, 2012

      • CatCat
        #transifex you say?
      • 2012-04-24 11558, 2012

      • nikki
        that's what google suggests
      • 2012-04-24 11510, 2012

      • CatCat
        thanks nikki
      • 2012-04-24 11548, 2012

      • CatCat
        well I asked the q, so I'll see what they say
      • 2012-04-24 11504, 2012

      • MestreArsenal joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11528, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11516, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11530, 2012

      • CatCat
      • 2012-04-24 11543, 2012

      • hawke_2 joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11551, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        hawke_2: an example of a classical track w/ multiple composers would be the tracks w/ cadenza on e.g. http://musicbrainz.org/release/7cb4f8ed-f12a-48e2…
      • 2012-04-24 11517, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        (arguably)
      • 2012-04-24 11530, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        (maybe an AC join phrase "cadenza: "?)
      • 2012-04-24 11523, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Hmm, makes some sense.
      • 2012-04-24 11539, 2012

      • hawke_2
        I seem to recall that we wanted to get away from putting roles in the AC though
      • 2012-04-24 11543, 2012

      • hawke_2
        leave that for the ARs.
      • 2012-04-24 11535, 2012

      • hawke_2
        (So “Ludwig Van Beethoven, Fritz Kriesler” would make more sense)
      • 2012-04-24 11536, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        that makes sense. I just worry about the ambiguity between "co-composed" vs. "part composed by x, and part by y"
      • 2012-04-24 11536, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Right
      • 2012-04-24 11536, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        but since that would be clear by linking the two works, I guess it doesn't matter
      • 2012-04-24 11544, 2012

      • hawke_2
        I was going to suggest that.
      • 2012-04-24 11501, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Though it’s hard to say whether a composition-with-cadenza is two works
      • 2012-04-24 11540, 2012

      • hawke_2
        (as opposed to a work derived from the composition alone.
      • 2012-04-24 11542, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        I guess that's not settled. In my mind, a written/composed cadenza is a second work. An improvised on, I dunno.
      • 2012-04-24 11524, 2012

      • hawke_2
        I think an improvised one would also be a second work
      • 2012-04-24 11500, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Since someone else could come along and play that improvisation (it would no longer be improvised, of course)
      • 2012-04-24 11544, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        Well, that's like jazz then. Every performance would become a new work.
      • 2012-04-24 11522, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        I prefer to think that improvisation can be used as a compositional tool (artist intent) but is generally an aspect of performance.
      • 2012-04-24 11545, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        but that's just my mind trying to impose order using duct tape and chewing gum
      • 2012-04-24 11502, 2012

      • hawke_2
        hehe
      • 2012-04-24 11524, 2012

      • nikki
        arrrrgh
      • 2012-04-24 11527, 2012

      • hawke_2
        It would help if work creation were simpler
      • 2012-04-24 11539, 2012

      • nikki
        who the fuck at youtube thought autoplaying when you load the page was a good fucking idea
      • 2012-04-24 11554, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        nikki +1
      • 2012-04-24 11508, 2012

      • hawke_2
        and not something where you had to think about whether something deserved to be a work.
      • 2012-04-24 11511, 2012

      • hawke_2
        nikki: +1
      • 2012-04-24 11530, 2012

      • nikki
        I had the volume turned right up because I was watching a really quiet video. then osx crashed. so I restarted, it reopened all my windows (despite me repeatedly telling to stop doing that) and then firefox reopened like 10 different youtube pages and youtube was like OH YEAH *plays all of them at full volume simultaneously*
      • 2012-04-24 11557, 2012

      • nikki
        and if I hadn't been firmly sat in my chair, I think I would have fallen off :P
      • 2012-04-24 11513, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        nikki, flashblock is (well, was) my friend
      • 2012-04-24 11529, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        I always use chromium's click-to-play feature
      • 2012-04-24 11534, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        for flash and java both
      • 2012-04-24 11539, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        bonus: way more secure, also :P
      • 2012-04-24 11555, 2012

      • nikki
        I only use firefox for flash stuff anyway :P
      • 2012-04-24 11507, 2012

      • nikki
        foxyproxy <3
      • 2012-04-24 11553, 2012

      • CatCat
        <3 youtubeler script
      • 2012-04-24 11559, 2012

      • CatCat
        stops that autoplay bullshit
      • 2012-04-24 11501, 2012

      • nikki
        do you happen to have a link?
      • 2012-04-24 11557, 2012

      • CatCat
        hmm hang on a sec i'll find it
      • 2012-04-24 11507, 2012

      • Dremora joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11521, 2012

      • CatCat
      • 2012-04-24 11548, 2012

      • ianweller
      • 2012-04-24 11554, 2012

      • ianweller
        "Normally editors would be urged to just redo them all."
      • 2012-04-24 11509, 2012

      • ianweller walks away from the internet for the day
      • 2012-04-24 11532, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11500, 2012

      • kurtjx joined the channel
      • 2012-04-24 11533, 2012

      • CallerNo6
        ianweller, maybe a better way to put it is that editors are encouraged to fix issues in a way that is easy on the open edit queue and on voters.
      • 2012-04-24 11513, 2012

      • ianweller
        sure.
      • 2012-04-24 11536, 2012

      • CallerNo6 was never very good at putting a positive spin on things. oh well.
      • 2012-04-24 11504, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Why does demono think that this edit passing would cause a further edit to it, to fail?
      • 2012-04-24 11524, 2012

      • hawke_2
        “when this edit assumingly passes since there are no votes against it, then it would cause the other edit to fail.”
      • 2012-04-24 11507, 2012

      • ianweller
        that's what i wondered too.
      • 2012-04-24 11512, 2012

      • ianweller
        but my head hurt too much to respond
      • 2012-04-24 11546, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Another better way to put it is “Our edit system sucks at the moment” :-D
      • 2012-04-24 11508, 2012

      • ianweller
        how would you resolve it -- make it so you can edit edits?
      • 2012-04-24 11512, 2012

      • hawke_2
        “…and there are bigger fish to fry than fixing that, so don’t hold your breath”
      • 2012-04-24 11526, 2012

      • hawke_2
        approximately
      • 2012-04-24 11531, 2012

      • nikki
        you can make edits to an add release edit
      • 2012-04-24 11548, 2012

      • hawke_2
        How I would like to see it done, and how it is likely to be done, are not the same though. :-)
      • 2012-04-24 11553, 2012

      • nikki
        but if you want to make edits to an edit edit, you need to cancel it and redo it, or wait until it hopefully passes
      • 2012-04-24 11517, 2012

      • ianweller
        the main reason i haven't re-edited the release is because i disagree with him :) and so i wanted it to go to a separate vote
      • 2012-04-24 11545, 2012

      • ianweller
        which may not be the right answer, but seemed right in my head at the time
      • 2012-04-24 11501, 2012

      • hawke_2
        I find it slightly unreasonable for people to say that kind of thing anyway — if he wants it changed he should fix it himself.
      • 2012-04-24 11507, 2012

      • hawke_2
        not block your edits
      • 2012-04-24 11513, 2012

      • ianweller
        yeah.
      • 2012-04-24 11517, 2012

      • ianweller
        fortunately he didn't actively block my edits
      • 2012-04-24 11521, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Right