#musicbrainz

/

      • Guest14115 joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13128, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Funny that my google translated text from Danish is clearer than your original Englis text :p
      • 2012-05-10 13132, 2012

      • hawke_2
        given that he remained through the present
      • 2012-05-10 13135, 2012

      • reosarevok
        *English even
      • 2012-05-10 13105, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (admittedly that's not the case for all the text)
      • 2012-05-10 13102, 2012

      • reosarevok
        heh
      • 2012-05-10 13107, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Composers in residence next? :p
      • 2012-05-10 13134, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (grr, I really want to be able to add instruments to orchestra players now :( )
      • 2012-05-10 13151, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        maybe we should just go all-out and support custom text attributes on ARs :)
      • 2012-05-10 13139, 2012

      • hawke_2
        reosarevok: if I do both 'principal' and 'guest', that makes it 'principal guest conductor', right?
      • 2012-05-10 13143, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Yes
      • 2012-05-10 13151, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (and guest is allowed with others, unlike the rest)
      • 2012-05-10 13133, 2012

      • reosarevok
        kepstin-work: I would want this to be db-data though
      • 2012-05-10 13138, 2012

      • reosarevok
        As in, not free text
      • 2012-05-10 13109, 2012

      • hawke_2
        semi-free (i.e. free with suggestions?)
      • 2012-05-10 13136, 2012

      • hawke_2
        hmm…is there any reason we couldn’t do a combination?
      • 2012-05-10 13106, 2012

      • hawke_2
        so you could choose the type from a predefined list and type in text that would change how it was displayed?
      • 2012-05-10 13111, 2012

      • kepstin-work notes that free-text stuff makes it untranslatable, as well
      • 2012-05-10 13115, 2012

      • hawke_2
        similar to artist credits
      • 2012-05-10 13141, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        not that our current AR system is that friendly to translation right now...
      • 2012-05-10 13109, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Why?
      • 2012-05-10 13117, 2012

      • reosarevok
        For most languages, it's not specially bad
      • 2012-05-10 13139, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (it will feel forced in some, but it's not terrible)
      • 2012-05-10 13140, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        hmm, I suppose the strings do let you alter the locations of where things are subbed in, eh.
      • 2012-05-10 13121, 2012

      • reosarevok
        You mean where to put attributes etc? Then yes
      • 2012-05-10 13144, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Now, instruments are going to be a pain
      • 2012-05-10 13104, 2012

      • reosarevok realises in many languages, "played X" is in a different case from just "X"
      • 2012-05-10 13121, 2012

      • reosarevok hopes ianmcorvidae and nikki have thought of this kind of stuff :)
      • 2012-05-10 13100, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        heh
      • 2012-05-10 13101, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        well
      • 2012-05-10 13110, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        if nothing else, I can pester you to enter tickets ;)
      • 2012-05-10 13135, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Is it even possible to do that with our current system though?
      • 2012-05-10 13141, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        I still want the multiple-attribute ARs (e.g. instruments, vocals) split into multiple ARs
      • 2012-05-10 13149, 2012

      • reosarevok
        heh
      • 2012-05-10 13155, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        to make the entire UI more consistent.
      • 2012-05-10 13108, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        yes, agreed
      • 2012-05-10 13109, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Not always!
      • 2012-05-10 13126, 2012

      • kepstin-work accidentally made someone perform "lead vocals", "background vocals", and "lead and background vocals" a couple days ago.
      • 2012-05-10 13139, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (if we add them to members, it'd be a pain to have "member, vocals", "member, guitar" and "member, keyboards" :p
      • 2012-05-10 13140, 2012

      • reosarevok
        )
      • 2012-05-10 13105, 2012

      • hawke_2
        +1 kepstin-work
      • 2012-05-10 13118, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        alternately, some way of magically merging them in the database would work just as well
      • 2012-05-10 13101, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        but that would be annoying, because adding a new instrument performance, for example, wouldn't show up immediately.
      • 2012-05-10 13114, 2012

      • hawke_2
        kepstin-work: it could…
      • 2012-05-10 13125, 2012

      • hawke_2
        kepstin-work: Its appearance would just change after awhile
      • 2012-05-10 13146, 2012

      • hawke_2
        i.e. show it as it is now, and then have an automatic process merge them daily or however often
      • 2012-05-10 13154, 2012

      • adhawkins joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13158, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        well, the internal implementation doesn't matter, as long as all of them can be edited separately and displayed merged.
      • 2012-05-10 13137, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        (i.e. removing an attribute from an AR should generate a 'remove artist played instrument on recording' edit)
      • 2012-05-10 13139, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        that gets a bit more tricky, because right now we can support a single recording having both "performed vocals on" and "performed background vocals on" - which /can't/ be merged without information loss.
      • 2012-05-10 13102, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        it could be displayed as "performed vocals and background vocals" tho, I guess?
      • 2012-05-10 13121, 2012

      • adhawkins joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13126, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Isn’t that redundant?
      • 2012-05-10 13134, 2012

      • hawke_2
        If you performed background vocals, you performed vocals
      • 2012-05-10 13135, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        not really.
      • 2012-05-10 13146, 2012

      • Guest60065 joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13155, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        could mean "performed background vocals and some other vocal type not currently in musicbrainz"
      • 2012-05-10 13157, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Let me know how someone can perform background vocals without performing vocals. ;-)
      • 2012-05-10 13106, 2012

      • reosarevok
        kepstin-work: that'd be "other" though :p
      • 2012-05-10 13119, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (although admittedly, I'm not going to use "other" for all rapping)
      • 2012-05-10 13125, 2012

      • brianfreud
        Ok, here's a fun one for you... A release consisting of the music to a podcast. (bumpers, etc) Is that a podcast soundtrack, or just an album?
      • 2012-05-10 13137, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        brianfreud: I'd say soundtrack.
      • 2012-05-10 13150, 2012

      • hawke_2
        brianfreud: Soundtrack album.
      • 2012-05-10 13156, 2012

      • brianfreud
        me too, it just feels wierd somehow to even consider a podcast having a soundtrack :P
      • 2012-05-10 13106, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        hawke_2: we don't have that yet ;)
      • 2012-05-10 13117, 2012

      • jmv_ joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13118, 2012

      • hawke_2
        kepstin-work: Soon though, I think?
      • 2012-05-10 13138, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Anyway, it’s clearly soundtrack.
      • 2012-05-10 13139, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        hawke_2: one more week
      • 2012-05-10 13104, 2012

      • kepstin-work has a lot of soundtrack singles to reclassify :)
      • 2012-05-10 13114, 2012

      • reosarevok
        brianfreud: I've seen soundtracks to books...
      • 2012-05-10 13133, 2012

      • hawke_2
        I have a soundtrack to a boardgame. :-)
      • 2012-05-10 13146, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        hmm. does our 'soundtrack' category also include the sort of 'music inspired by' releases?
      • 2012-05-10 13101, 2012

      • hawke_2
        All conductors have been added to the Boston Pops Orchestra, with suboptimal credits both tagged and in the annotations.
      • 2012-05-10 13114, 2012

      • brianfreud
        I've always said no to that one kepstin-work when I've entered them
      • 2012-05-10 13115, 2012

      • reosarevok
        kepstin-work: who knows
      • 2012-05-10 13119, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I'd say no
      • 2012-05-10 13128, 2012

      • reosarevok
        But it's ill-defined, as all others
      • 2012-05-10 13146, 2012

      • hawke_2
        kepstin-work: I would say yes, at least if it's “from and inspired by”
      • 2012-05-10 13158, 2012

      • brianfreud
        the soundtrack to an imaginary sequel which never existed: http://musicbrainz.org/release/6fe503b3-fd03-489f…
      • 2012-05-10 13102, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        it's not 'from' though, if it wasn't used in the original work
      • 2012-05-10 13125, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        the case I'm thinking of right now is the 'character song singles' seen with a lot of japanese anime series
      • 2012-05-10 13130, 2012

      • hawke_2
        Hmm, doesn't that also apply to alternate soundtracks?
      • 2012-05-10 13131, 2012

      • billy_ran_away joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13151, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        where they have voice actors from the show sing songs vaguely related to their characters, and release it with branded artwork
      • 2012-05-10 13102, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        Just added a new (to MB) release, does anyone care to peer review it? http://musicbrainz.org/release/b5b967bc-a06c-4a3a…
      • 2012-05-10 13103, 2012

      • brianfreud
        kepstin-work, how would that differ from a rejected soundtrack?
      • 2012-05-10 13139, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        This is only my 2nd contribution so I'm sure I messed something up.
      • 2012-05-10 13100, 2012

      • hawke_2
        billy_ran_away: Looks reasonable to me
      • 2012-05-10 13113, 2012

      • brianfreud
      • 2012-05-10 13124, 2012

      • brianfreud changes to soundtrack
      • 2012-05-10 13133, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        billy_ran_away: man, that band has a confusing name - that looks like it's a soundtrack even though it's not :)
      • 2012-05-10 13148, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        kepstin-work: It's not a soundtrack...
      • 2012-05-10 13148, 2012

      • reosarevok
        billy_ran_away: yeah. I might consider calling it "Futurecop! The Movie", since it's clearly a joke on soundtrack albums
      • 2012-05-10 13100, 2012

      • Dremora joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13101, 2012

      • reosarevok
        But in any case, it's not wrong as it is :)
      • 2012-05-10 13130, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        Did brianfreud change the release type to soundtrack?
      • 2012-05-10 13143, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        billy_ran_away: he was talking about a different release.
      • 2012-05-10 13147, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        Awww
      • 2012-05-10 13112, 2012

      • brianfreud
        sorry I confused ya :D
      • 2012-05-10 13113, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        I'm going to leave the album name as is, since that's how it shows up on both iTunes and Amazon...
      • 2012-05-10 13125, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        brianfreud: np : )
      • 2012-05-10 13126, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        billy_ran_away: that's fine.
      • 2012-05-10 13129, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        Cool
      • 2012-05-10 13136, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        So did anyone approve it?
      • 2012-05-10 13139, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        it's consistent with their other releases as it is now.
      • 2012-05-10 13159, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        billy_ran_away: no need to - after a couple weeks, it'll pass automatically even if nobody's voted.
      • 2012-05-10 13130, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        billy_ran_away: take a look at http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Introduction_to_Voting to see how it works.
      • 2012-05-10 13142, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        kepstin-work: I wanted to use it to tag my music...
      • 2012-05-10 13150, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        billy_ran_away: you can do that right away.
      • 2012-05-10 13156, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        Not with beet
      • 2012-05-10 13105, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        Well I might...
      • 2012-05-10 13116, 2012

      • hawke_2
        billy_ran_away: http://soundcloud.com/futurecop/sets/futurecop-th… says: Futurecop! "The Movie" OST
      • 2012-05-10 13138, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        ... you /should/ be able to do that right away. Depending on the application, you might have to wait a couple hours for it to be indexed for search.
      • 2012-05-10 13152, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        but the data is available to tagger applications immediately after you added it.
      • 2012-05-10 13119, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        hawke_2: Sure, but http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/the-movie/id4876… says "The Movie"
      • 2012-05-10 13127, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        and so does Amazon...
      • 2012-05-10 13152, 2012

      • hawke_2
        billy_ran_away: I know. Just pointing it out. Either interpretation is probably fine./
      • 2012-05-10 13102, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        hawke_2: Oh okay cool
      • 2012-05-10 13121, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        hawke_2: Yea, I like the other way better, Futurecop!: The Movie OST
      • 2012-05-10 13133, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        hawke_2: But I felt like it should just match iTunes and Amazon
      • 2012-05-10 13117, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        Consider that a lot of people use those two sources for tagging, so if they switch to or from MB it'd make it easier to keep it consistent...
      • 2012-05-10 13120, 2012

      • hawke_2
        billy_ran_away: usually “Artist Intent” trumps everything, so if you find evidence that the artist intended it that way, it’s more important. Anyway, release looks just fine
      • 2012-05-10 13121, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        That was my thought anyway
      • 2012-05-10 13157, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        hawke_2: Fair enough
      • 2012-05-10 13105, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        hawke_2: Thanks for input guys
      • 2012-05-10 13114, 2012

      • billy_ran_away
        Err that last message was meant for everyone : )
      • 2012-05-10 13147, 2012

      • SSand joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13124, 2012

      • reosarevok
        :)
      • 2012-05-10 13148, 2012

      • Mineo
        reosarevok: is the description for the guest attribute of the conductor relationship the same as for guest everywhere else? it's looking odd, talking about "the band", not "the orchestra"
      • 2012-05-10 13159, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Mineo: it is
      • 2012-05-10 13102, 2012

      • reosarevok
        And I know
      • 2012-05-10 13131, 2012

      • reosarevok
        But it can't be personalised for each rel, and I wanted to add a phrase for orchestras but nikki told me there's a crash there and it won't let me
      • 2012-05-10 13133, 2012

      • reosarevok tries anyway
      • 2012-05-10 13147, 2012

      • reosarevok
        In case it's been fixed
      • 2012-05-10 13136, 2012

      • billy_ran_away has left the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13139, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Caught exception in MusicBrainz::Server::Controller::Relationship::LinkType->edit "Can't call method "id" without a package or object reference at lib/MusicBrainz/Server/Data/LinkType.pm line 88.""
      • 2012-05-10 13142, 2012

      • reosarevok
        So, no
      • 2012-05-10 13158, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ocharles: a regression that *does* impede my job :) http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-4662
      • 2012-05-10 13113, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (the other one is not too important since it's easy to bypass)
      • 2012-05-10 13108, 2012

      • reosarevok tweets about the rel - had forgotten before :D
      • 2012-05-10 13136, 2012

      • Ismael joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13107, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Grrr
      • 2012-05-10 13113, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I hate the way the inline search works now
      • 2012-05-10 13118, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (prioritising the first word like mad)
      • 2012-05-10 13153, 2012

      • iliketurtles joined the channel
      • 2012-05-10 13135, 2012

      • hawke_2
        ?
      • 2012-05-10 13140, 2012

      • hawke_2
        inline search?
      • 2012-05-10 13107, 2012

      • kepstin-work
        hawke_2: the search used in the 'related to...' dialogues, etc.
      • 2012-05-10 13112, 2012

      • hawke_2
        ah