That would be absurdly harsh, but would kind-of make sense, if he had also moved the discID to the other release
2012-08-16 22901, 2012
reosarevok
But if not it's just stupid
2012-08-16 22903, 2012
reosarevok
(I mean, the vote)
2012-08-16 22950, 2012
reosarevok
"Hi, I just saw the other one we had wasn't right but was the same as this and I've fixed it and moved the discID there, would you mind canceling?" or something
2012-08-16 22907, 2012
hawke_1
Exactly.
2012-08-16 22915, 2012
hawke_1
as is it makes me want to just say “fuck you, murdos <lose discID>”
2012-08-16 22933, 2012
murdos
well, your edit was really of low quality: wrong capitalization of title, no barcode/catno, provided source with no tracklist ; as if you had not really knocked yourself out to find interesting information
2012-08-16 22944, 2012
murdos
that doesn't help for saying : "please merge"
2012-08-16 22902, 2012
hawke_1
How was it wrong capitalization? It’s exactly the same as the existing release, caps-wise
2012-08-16 22923, 2012
murdos
"À la poursuite du bonheur" vs "A la poursuite du bonheur"
2012-08-16 22939, 2012
hawke_1
Yeah, that’s the same capitalization
2012-08-16 22907, 2012
murdos
ok, but then the first character is not the same one
2012-08-16 22909, 2012
hawke_1
So yeah, I trusted the CDStub entry.
2012-08-16 22924, 2012
hawke_1
Regardless though, to say “you should have just attached it to this release which is perfect” when I *could not have done that* due to the track count difference is a dick move.
2012-08-16 22956, 2012
murdos
I'm not saying that. I'm saying you should have searched further and then you would have found that the other release was wrong. That's all. Quick and dirty editing just get quick and dirty voting.
2012-08-16 22903, 2012
hawke_1
Right, but even if I had: I’m not an autoeditor so I couldn’t have fixed the other release and attached it there
2012-08-16 22940, 2012
JoeLlama joined the channel
2012-08-16 22942, 2012
JoeLlama joined the channel
2012-08-16 22955, 2012
DrDyna
hm, crashed twice now, gonna take off compatibility mode and see if it does it again
culinko: My vote would be abstain — I don’t see much point in changing “&” vs. and, and I would prefer “as on release” for the tracklist at least (if not the recordings)
2012-08-16 22915, 2012
hawke_1
I don’t know enough about the Hahn one to vote, though I would be inclined to make it an artist credit
2012-08-16 22923, 2012
Orcie_ joined the channel
2012-08-16 22934, 2012
culinko
well i'm also changing to proper artist in track 19 in 3rd edit and some other changes here and there. even if those 3 edits will fail, there would be some releases with "&" and some with "and". i don't care about this, but i just want some consistency.
that's happening because the javascript that's run when you click the 'relate to' button returns true
2012-08-16 22923, 2012
kepstin-work
if you make the js code return false, it'll fix it
2012-08-16 22931, 2012
kepstin-work
should be a one-liner :)
2012-08-16 22939, 2012
Orcie_ joined the channel
2012-08-16 22902, 2012
DrDyna
cool, fingerprinting seems to go a lot faster than I was anticipating it would.
2012-08-16 22919, 2012
DrDyna
it may actually be done by tomorrow, hah
2012-08-16 22905, 2012
DrDyna
my poor music drive though, rahh rahhh rah hisss rahhhh
2012-08-16 22932, 2012
culinko
is there any way to see if the tracks on the release have acoustids without going to the recordings and fingerprints tab? some script or something would be cool :s
The latter shows icons for tracks that have acoustIDs, the former shows the acoustID(s) for each track much like the credits
2012-08-16 22950, 2012
culinko
hawke_1: sweet! that's exactly what i wanted
2012-08-16 22908, 2012
hawke_1
Those scripts are some of my favorites
2012-08-16 22941, 2012
culinko
well, the second one seems better for me (yet), the only thing i miss is to display a number of acoustids instead of the icon.
2012-08-16 22925, 2012
hawke_1
I like the first one for that.
2012-08-16 22912, 2012
hawke_1
Which reminds me: jesus2099: When you read the scrollback — feature request: can you have that script sort active/linked acoustIDs before unlinked ones?
2012-08-16 22940, 2012
kepstin-work loves how that script adds recording disambiguation comments to the release page
2012-08-16 22955, 2012
hawke_1
I love most everything about that script now.
2012-08-16 22907, 2012
winstonw joined the channel
2012-08-16 22920, 2012
hawke_1
The hiding of the +relate +merge links removed the last irritation
2012-08-16 22958, 2012
winstonw
Hi how would I search for a CD by Album title?
2012-08-16 22914, 2012
kepstin-work
winstonw: on the web page?
2012-08-16 22926, 2012
winstonw
What tag is it?
2012-08-16 22928, 2012
winstonw
Recording?
2012-08-16 22935, 2012
hawke_1
release
2012-08-16 22940, 2012
kepstin-work
winstonw: release group is probably what you want
2012-08-16 22945, 2012
kepstin-work
or release group, maybe.
2012-08-16 22949, 2012
kepstin-work
or release*
2012-08-16 22952, 2012
winstonw
kind of useless :P
2012-08-16 22908, 2012
hawke_1
how so?
2012-08-16 22917, 2012
DrDyna
seems to work for me :P
2012-08-16 22918, 2012
winstonw
I mean, this should be on the wiki or the how to :D
