or maybe not as a group, but as an artist -- and then propose a new artist type. :-)
ianmcorvidae
"Institution"? :P
kurtjx joined the channel
DremoraLV joined the channel
jacobbrett joined the channel
JoeLlama joined the channel
JoeLlama joined the channel
CallerNo6 joined the channel
ruaok joined the channel
dankine joined the channel
31NAB7CQ6 joined the channel
18WAB6C9S joined the channel
dankine joined the channel
g-ram joined the channel
jacobbrett joined the channel
davitf joined the channel
davitf
I threw it here a few days ago, but only CallerNo6 was around to look, so perhaps I can get some more opinions: http://musicbrainz.org/edit/19118070
I still think the old way was fine, but I can't express it in a rule
CallerNo6
You could point out that "French Version" doesn't refer to the release country. The liner is French. That's the sort of thing that's nice to be able to see when editing or when looking for something specific.
davitf
his point is that it's easy to see whether any release is the French version just by looking at the language and even the track names
one argument would be that the RG and search pages already show the country but not the language, although that would be too specific to me
g-ram joined the channel
*that would seem
my feeling is that the disambiguation should be different when the content is different (i.e. when there are different tracks, bonus tracks, remasters), but not when the content is the same
hum, I must be getting old and forgetting things, because I'm sure I already asked, but importing this : http://itunes.apple.com/fr/album/ternion/id4912... is there a way to note that the last 4 tracks are videos ?
reosarevok
Not really
CatCat
Now grooving to: MECO ~ Asteroid Field and Finale (6:36) (from The Empire Strikes Back) (1980)
reosarevok
I mean, definitely add "video" to the recording comment
CatCat
in this case, "grooving" is trés accurate.
reosarevok
But until we implement some actual "video" flag, that's all we have...