#musicbrainz

hey people who are good at extracting images from youtube. can has this image? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJy-i-64s1A

Why not just take some other of the ones in https://www.google.ee/search?q=Fresh+Blueberry+... ?

well obviously that's what iwanted but in eeded somewhere to get the initial "google image search" seed from :P

sometimes you get other results than just searchign name and artist

godi hate that thing with the topmost right corner that stuff gets expanded fullscreen

stupid apple

especially since chrome sometimes showes tabs all that far if you have enough tabs open

oh dear

CatQuest: about the angry inch thing. I have seen advertisements for that on the streets and also thought it was an artist name.

it's like spinal tab etc

don't we have fixed that in MusicBrainz with the Ar tothe right composers?

no we haven't

hmmmmmmm

that really should be fixed. can we talk about it here and get a consencus

I really think this should follow the rightthing

i mean for classical we even now follow the cover who is credited

Well, if there is an artist touring with that name. It is a valid artist name. I am not completely sure though if I remember the advertisement correctly. Possibly this really wasn't advertised as the name of an artist.

and the argument (or so it went) was that soundtracks were "pseudo-classical-style" so it went to composer (initially it was composer-lyrecists comboes so initially hair was under 3 guys) but it should be moved (with AR's and artist credits where appropriate) to credited right

ARs should go to the right composer, either way.

indeed

i see this no different than spinal tap or Dethklok

gorlliaz ffs

cast should (ugh?) be under the linked thing. this is why moulin rouge is under performers not the composers or Baz luhrman (arranger)

thing like "angry inch" could possibly be under traks still if it has his name on it but I don't know this

I want to make these edits ages ago bt i didn't because hornest nests

I really thought this had been fixed

i won't make nay edits before a consensus is made

move them to the thing they're actually credited as (Hedwig and the Angry Inch) "fictional" in-universe artist

ah, got it

but spinal tap isn't fictional! i saw them perform. unless, hmm, was the not a musical performance? maybe it was a theater performance that had a fictional band in it. damn. maybe i was part of a fictional audience.

loi

anyway you agree then?

:P

I'll have to get back to you on that.

hmmmm

I mean, spinal tap releases are credited as if the band exists. Doesn't that make a difference? I wouldn't expect to see tracks on http://musicbrainz.org/release/4e6da9ac-325a-36... credited to the in-film fictional composers unless the release is actually presented that way. (in this case, it's hard to tell)

I'm sure this has been argued and re-argued many times. I was probably asleep that day.

it hasn't really een argued about for atleast since before NGS

here's the "stage" adaption cd cover http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/28225153/He...

here is the movie adaption cd cover http://theinterrobang.com/wp-content/uploads/20...

that one is a bit more dubtious

Maybe spinal tap is a real band with fictional members? More like GWAR than like e.g. Future Villain Band (Aerosmith in http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/6766c82a-c... )?

I don't care man, dethklok are a cartoon

What O

there is like a korean or something band that's actually made up of bal joint dolls

blup?

oops. What I'm asking is, at what point do we decide to credit (or not credit) fictional artists?

Is it based on how the release(s) is/are credited?

imho if it's a fictional *music* then we credit them, if its just fictional, we do not (example i disagree with crediting muppets, but the actual muppet band and it's members I am fine with)

it's a distinction that is a pit gradient and maybe arbitrary but we ar *music* brainz

Seems its fictional if the real person behind the character is not credited to the releases or tracks.

At least that is what I read here... http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Fictitious_Artist

Directly credited, I should say

hmm, but (atleast in the west, and olderwize) it is more common to assign it to the cartoon/thingy whatever that people knew, since "voiceacting" wasn't really a high prestige thing untila few years ago

where as in the east in asia whole "voiceacting" is a way to fme in its own right

japanese seiyu's india's singer asha bosle

etc

australian cast version cover http://cdn.soundtrack.net/img/album/7827.jpg

all the different cast ones migt be proper on the composer I don't know

i feel that not crediting *anything* to HatAI is WRONG

but I am not sure here either

and http://musicbrainz.org/release/273502c1-ff29-46... is even credited wrongly imho

see http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00008AV6V?tag...

it's simply called "wig"

Seems someone put an edit on that one and pulled it.... was that you?

(aside) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7Z6gR_8tuw was fucking a head of his time, i mean ,it sounds like BITUNES heh(/aside)

eehh

it'd be easier if you say the editor name? :P

I am CatCat

what edit is it?

Nope, someone else.. http://musicbrainz.org/edit/8296670

that's weird I was looking at the edithistory but found not this edit

huh now i do

weird :P

but yes the CPT cast should be artist imho

if classical now follow this so should soundtracks

credited t oStephen trask/CPT cast as "wig"

imho

what say reosarevok ?

(yes I am being eeevi land dragging you into this)

s/eeevi/eeevil

Are you asking me about soundtracks? All I know about soundtracks is I want to run away from them :p

that's how most people find classical

me i seem them as similarly guidelined

they are composed/writtne by some guy and then several others takes turns and performes their versions of thme

this is especially true for the teathre versions

Curious, what did Stephen trask have to do with it

LOL

oh oolld drama

snartal, he's the songwriter

(so if you follow soundtrack style, he's the release artist)

which is all sorts of wrong in many cases imho

(or so the argument goes)

silly argument

this just feels wrong too http://musicbrainz.org/release/ac535f7f-cf70-4b... it's not a soundtrack but an (ep?) of remixes of the one song

maxi-single

alsos wut, "progressive house"?

oh ye what that's the re-misx

CatQuest: about the 2005 edit you linked to above, too funny: "once Advanced Relationships comes along this whole mess will be much easier to take care of"

haaha

oh god

yea noone wanted to deal with it the

ni don't think it's been touched since

we always think it's going to get easier.

pft

heh

things occasionally get easier, but it's with things like the relationship editor or the cover art uploader, not style :P

:D yea

anyone can give me a hint how to extract images like on amazon zoom pages? http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/B00AED4...

nothing google brought up seems to work for me

is the high resolution image actually only 1 image? firefox gives me 4 corners of that higher resolution image, like http://z2-ec2.images-amazon.com/R/1/a=B00AED4KD...

ehrgeiz ↑

oh, http://z2-ec2.images-amazon.com/R/1/a=B00AED4KD...

thx @SultS

I’m not certain it’s the largest version they have though

but using +d=_SCR(0,0,0)_ as part of the link gives the full image of something

oh yea I've had issues like that too

I don't know how to fix :(

if you find I'd sure like to know

heureka!

enjoy :)

I cracked the code with some help :P

it should work with any amazon image

._SX_SCRMZZZZZZZ_ is the important part

_SX is for the dimension

_SX400 would return 420x420px image

not sure what SCRMZZZZZZZ exactly does, but it should mean max resolution (source?) image

it screams zzzzzzzzzzzz (guess it's sleepy)