i guess it’s probably know nbut i have many 502 Bad Gateway yesterday and today
2014-08-23 23550, 2014
KillDaBOB
yeah. i’m getting a lot of 502s right now
2014-08-23 23531, 2014
JESUS2099 has left the channel
2014-08-23 23505, 2014
regagain joined the channel
2014-08-23 23524, 2014
regagain joined the channel
2014-08-23 23509, 2014
STalKer-X joined the channel
2014-08-23 23538, 2014
djpretzel joined the channel
2014-08-23 23513, 2014
kepstin ponders how to respond to https://twitter.com/hatsunetsumikos/status/503164118283452416
2014-08-23 23559, 2014
Rundll joined the channel
2014-08-23 23536, 2014
kepstin does so
2014-08-23 23553, 2014
kepstin
writing in english that i've double-checked gives reasonably accurate results in google translator :)
2014-08-23 23553, 2014
kepstin
"Tim Vegas" is a pseudonym, I'm pretty sure he's not proficient in English; the tweet after that he says "google translate is my friend" or something to that effect :)
it's got no disc ids, the release (as per cat no) contains another relase
2014-08-23 23523, 2014
entil
should the disc id be attached accordingly?
2014-08-23 23553, 2014
CallerNo6
entil: I wouldn't. DiscIDs differ between pressings.
2014-08-23 23528, 2014
entil
that's strange, because I've found quite a few that match a different release
2014-08-23 23549, 2014
CallerNo6
Sure. That /might/ be the case.
2014-08-23 23507, 2014
CallerNo6
At the same time, the same exact release may have more than one DiscID.
2014-08-23 23516, 2014
entil
for example Mandylion by The Gathering; I have the Sand and Mercury box and mb identifies five releases, all of them not the Sand and Mercury box ;)
2014-08-23 23519, 2014
CallerNo6
That could be accurate. It could also be an artifact from before NGS, when releases were stored differently.
2014-08-23 23523, 2014
entil
some releases are real messy, but I dunno... I'm collecting release uuids and disc ids for my flacs and I manually fudged that if_then_else release to match the collector box
2014-08-23 23514, 2014
entil
kinda hate doing that because it's invalid, and musicbrainz is none the wiser because it doesn't have a real disc id there, just a comment saying "this release"
2014-08-23 23536, 2014
entil
why isn't it better to store the disc id also in musicbrainz for that release? it's "kinda" there as an annotation anyway, but only screws up people who want to have their records straight :/
it contains digipak 77298-2, it says so in the annotation, but it doesn't have its disc id
2014-08-23 23507, 2014
entil
and if I understood you correct, adding that disc id is not ok
2014-08-23 23546, 2014
reosarevok
Heh
2014-08-23 23550, 2014
entil
it probably isn't even a different pressing from the vailla digipak release
2014-08-23 23504, 2014
entil
*vanilla
2014-08-23 23510, 2014
reosarevok
This one might be a special case, since it does sound (from http://www.discogs.com/release/1070532 ) that it literally just has the original release inside a box
2014-08-23 23531, 2014
entil
I just dug the digipak out, got it in front of me, and verified it as well
2014-08-23 23550, 2014
reosarevok
In that case I wouldn't be against adding that discID I guess
2014-08-23 23519, 2014
CallerNo6
I stand by my advice. Unless you know for a fact that it's the same pressing, I don't think it's right to add the DiscID from a different release.
2014-08-23 23522, 2014
entil
I just wanted to check because there's sometimes somewhat nasty data on mb and I'd rather contribute to something clean.. though sometimes I feel like I'm just especially good at finding broken stuff ;)
2014-08-23 23548, 2014
entil
cNfrYa0BA1_jZWVyVhZAbNnjIHI- is the id it matches to
the data's a bit lacking but the cat no matches still
2014-08-23 23540, 2014
entil
that's proof it's the same pressing, right?
2014-08-23 23547, 2014
reosarevok
If you have this specific release, then by all means do attach the discID :)
2014-08-23 23501, 2014
reosarevok
(the one with the box)
2014-08-23 23537, 2014
entil
I'd also tend to add it because the disc id resolves to the release that's mentioned in the annotation anyway
2014-08-23 23547, 2014
reosarevok
If you have the other, please just fix the other one to have the missing data :)
2014-08-23 23500, 2014
reosarevok
(whether you attach the discID to the box one or not)
2014-08-23 23550, 2014
entil
now I'm not sure I follow :D fixing the other one, as I understand it, means attaching the relevant disc id (of the digipak release inside) to the box release
2014-08-23 23528, 2014
entil
because now my flac ripper thinks I have the digipak release, which is wrong; I have the box (containing the digipak and poster and sticker)
2014-08-23 23528, 2014
CallerNo6
The only way to prove it's the same pressing is to have a copy of both releases (or find somebody who does)
2014-08-23 23537, 2014
reosarevok
hahaha
2014-08-23 23538, 2014
reosarevok
Ok
2014-08-23 23544, 2014
reosarevok
Then yes, please do add the discID!
2014-08-23 23546, 2014
entil
really? why would it resolve to the same disc id if it's not the same pressing?
