#musicbrainz

so were their DVD reissues

I would make three release groups

(and hope we eventually get a relationship for linking them)

yeah, I think three

I guess three is also better because merging is easier than splitting

hmm. you can make vol 1 & 2 parts of a series, but where does that leave the LD?

is everything that uses "vol" automatically a series though? :P

well, they're sequential parts of a whole. I dunno.

an analogous thingy would be http://musicbrainz.org/release/863483df-1dbb-49...

well, discs are sequential parts of a whole too!

Did we ever solidify a guideline for event titles?

no

I've been using [tour title] @ [venue] for a while now

(I've seen artists use @ for this purpose)

you might be interested in http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-8006 for unnamed events

https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Event has "Main Artist at Place" but that's more an example of a descriptive name, it's not a guideline as such

I hate how MediaWiki doesn't let me use proper paragraphs within a list.

KRSCuan: I guess you missed the bit on that page where reosarevok said to use the mailing lists or forums for discussion longer than a vote comment (and I included a link, so it's not like anyone can claim they didn't know where they could respond to me :P)

I don't even have a forum account.

And what's the point of spreading out the discussion in multiple places so no one sees it?

that's ok, they're free

Also, wasn't the style process supposed to be more unified?

One time we vote and discuss things on the tracker, now it's the wiki as well as the mailing list and the forums.

yes, what's the point of spreading it out? the existing discussion is on the forums, so it doesn't really make sense to continue it on the wiki

Oh you.

If you want to respond, maybe take it to the mailing list. :p

Depending on there this is headed, we might end up throwing out a guideline that has been in place for at least 10 years, which will fragment the data.

And nobody is going to "fix" stuff like "RMX" that we've been standardizing all this time.

If that is even what we are discussing there.

Some of those replacements are also done automatically by using guess case.

So nikki, no response for me unless I repost the stuff in the proper place, or just no time yet for a response?

well, I would prefer if it were posted in the right place so that I can reply to that normally, but I'm also perfectly capable of just copying and pasting and shoving quote tags round it and pretending it was posted in the right place

but right now I'm doing other stuff

I wouldn't get your hopes up about a fast response though. there are plenty of things I'm good at, but responding quickly to people is generally not one of them :P far too easily distracted and stuff

That's fair.

But really, the discussion and voting should be in the same place.

(which might even be the forums, if we decide to move further style discussions there)

In general, not just this proposal.

agreed. i assume the vote-on-the-wiki method is not a permanent solution.

I mean, I agree that *ideally* voting and discussion would be in one place. But as they say, you go to war with the MB you have :-)

If this is a war, are you a neutral party?

am I neutral? I /think/ I know my opinion, but I'm going to read through the discussions again to see if anybody can change my mind.

Hoo boy, here we go again with the definition of "bootleg"… http://musicbrainz.org/edit/31163162

heh... I've considered whether it'd make more sense to have multiple statuses for unofficial stuff

Or maybe just rename bootleg to "unofficial"

Though that could be misunderstood as well.

oh yeah

well, that's wouldn't solve what I wanted to solve :)

even "official" is fluid enough to get blurry at times

Snoop Dogg has an unsanctioned album released on Death Row Records after he parted from the label.

But the label owned the rights to those songs.

There are lots of similar examples

what I was trying to do when I was thinking about it was to distinguish counterfeit releases from unauthorised recordings, because the former are generally just a way of making money for the wrong people whereas the latter are generally just releasing stuff that nobody will ever get to hear otherwise

(I suppose there's some overlap but...)

And there'd be the whole problem of migrating stuff to that new definition again.

Okay, I guess counterfeit would be mostly bootlegs in a group with other official releases.

While the others would be unique, such as live bootlegs.

yeah

But if I copy and album, add a few songs I dubbed from a live concert and sell the product, it would be a counterfeit with some new stuff.

hah found it. the unsanctioned thing reminds me of https://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User_talk:BrianSch... (from years ago)

Generalizing "bootleg" into unofficial would help with something I had in mind for pseudo-releases/alternative track lists.

Should I leave this as a pseudo-release? http://musicbrainz.org/release/21c8bef9-07e6-40...

The original version has the main titles in English with the parenthesized text in Japanese

16 DEVIL'S WIND (Devil's Wind) ← heh

this editor has been copy-pasting the English translations off VGMdb and adding them as official releases

scratch that, there's a cluster of them

I'm trying to see if one or more of them is a sockpuppet

yes

Both? Or just one?

both

Mineo: oh?

there's the allgemeiner deutscher hochschulsportverband (http://www.adh.de/) which does all kinds of stuff and my universitys sports centre posts about the stuff they won on facebook all the time :D

I was wondering more about the colours

the only thing I can think of where we had specific colours was school uniforms

I think our sports colors are green and black, at least that's what I've seen all the teams where when they were training

hm, I suppose if they only use them for sport it would explain why I don't recall any

well, we don't have school uniforms, so :P

but everywhere else the CI colors are a dark blue and orange

well, sure, we didn't have uniforms at uni, but you could buy stuff like t-shirts and hoodies and those didn't have specific colours

you can do that here as well - in green, dark blue or orange :P

or cobalt blue, orange and white here http://utamavs.cbscollegestore.com/store.cfm?st...

having had a look, it seems like they might have colours, but apparently it wasn't common/consistent enough for me to have realised :P

from bombogenesis

University sports aren't big at all in Germany.

Maybe Mineo's in an exception.

But usually it's more recreational.

If you play football or something, then in an association.

I'm getting some good-ish vibes about RKM012

he's asking me for help http://musicbrainz.org/edit/31205019

Has someone already started a tag to keep track of flexidiscs?

(i.e. mark them since the media format is not available)

couldn't it be easier to add the format and just enter edits to change the mediums?

making the ticket now

so, I have this album title

The Black Album Remastered - Compilation and this cover art: http://f1.bcbits.com/img/a3387474789_10.jpg

the original album is called “The Black Album”

I wonder whether I should include Remastered into the title…/

album title, specifically

what's the syntax to create url with labels in the notes?

[url|label] didn't work :s