ijabz2: Maybe pgbouncer has different "buckets" for beta and prod? I'll admit that I have no knowledge of how pgbouncer works though.
2015-05-01 12111, 2015
Freso
derwin: No.
2015-05-01 12103, 2015
derwin
Freso: it was very, very newsworthy.
2015-05-01 12109, 2015
johtso_ joined the channel
2015-05-01 12144, 2015
peaveyman joined the channel
2015-05-01 12159, 2015
McVegan joined the channel
2015-05-01 12135, 2015
LordSputnik
MusicBrainz people! If you're interested in shaping the BookBrainz style guidelines, send a message to bookbrainz-style+subscribe [at groups.io] to subscribe to our brand new style mailing list! We'll do an announcement on there in the next couple of days when the style process is officially launched.
there were some "issues" what exactly happened, or how
2015-05-01 12153, 2015
STalKer-X_s
like "lost a lawsuit"
2015-05-01 12143, 2015
reosarevok
Well, settled out of court I think? But in general, I guess if you don't pay *and* suck at taking down stuff when requested, eventually you get shut down :p
2015-05-01 12103, 2015
STalKer-X_s
the legality was questionable :)
2015-05-01 12140, 2015
STalKer-X_s
MB does not even allow to link to non-official youtube videos of stuff, i think
2015-05-01 12131, 2015
STalKer-X_s
that part is funny, though:
2015-05-01 12132, 2015
STalKer-X_s
Grooveshark entered beta in September 2007.[15] In the beta, users bought and sold tracks amongst themselves for 99 cents.[16] Around 70 cents went to the record label, 25 cents went to the user selling the track, and 4 cents went to Grooveshark. Grooveshark's model had been approved by various small record labels, but not by any of the major record companies.[16]
2015-05-01 12108, 2015
reosarevok
Heh
2015-05-01 12133, 2015
STalKer-X_s
they probably did not like that other people made money from the music
