#musicbrainz

/

      • Leftmost
        Is it a top 500 albums period list
      • 2015-08-08 22045, 2015

      • Leftmost
        ?
      • 2015-08-08 22050, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        nothing russian!
      • 2015-08-08 22059, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        it's "Rolling Stone"
      • 2015-08-08 22015, 2015

      • Leftmost
        Yeah, I figured it'd be top 500 rock albums so.
      • 2015-08-08 22019, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        http://musicbrainz.org/series/8668518f-4a1e-4802-… drdid all the work, so mad props to him but
      • 2015-08-08 22042, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        but it does say "Rolling Stone: 500 Greatest Albums of All Time"
      • 2015-08-08 22010, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        not "the greatest English language Rock albums of all time : diclamber we like the beatles but no other british band 'sept the who
      • 2015-08-08 22004, 2015

      • Leftmost
        I have a lapkitty.
      • 2015-08-08 22007, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        :D
      • 2015-08-08 22009, 2015

      • Leftmost
        Sorry, not relevant, but I'm happy about it.
      • 2015-08-08 22020, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        I have a pushing on my leg kitty :D
      • 2015-08-08 22040, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        Is the word "album" key here?
      • 2015-08-08 22059, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        Like, maybe RS would include Queen in a list of top bands, or top singles.
      • 2015-08-08 22059, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        CallerNo6: i.. don't know?
      • 2015-08-08 22005, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        but.. but
      • 2015-08-08 22014, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        "A Night at the Opera"
      • 2015-08-08 22021, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        IS a one of the greates albums
      • 2015-08-08 22027, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        ther is like.. not a single dull moment
      • 2015-08-08 22050, 2015

      • Leftmost
        Okay, I love the Beatles and all, but not "half of the top ten" love.
      • 2015-08-08 22059, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        it's.. like epic man. (yes just my opinion but) "Bohemian Rhapsody" is from there.
      • 2015-08-08 22008, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        it deserves a top 10 for that alone
      • 2015-08-08 22015, 2015

      • Leftmost
        And I don't believe the Rolling Stones have any place that high on the list.
      • 2015-08-08 22016, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        Leftmost: exactly me too
      • 2015-08-08 22035, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        hah. i expected tme higher. name and all (mom was astones fan)
      • 2015-08-08 22038, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        :P
      • 2015-08-08 22004, 2015

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox
        this album title always makes me laugh http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/60a754f9-50e…
      • 2015-08-08 22014, 2015

      • Leftmost
        It's pretty great.
      • 2015-08-08 22037, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        +1
      • 2015-08-08 22052, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        No matter how much attention Devo gets, I still feel like they're underrated.
      • 2015-08-08 22030, 2015

      • snoozebrainz
        if the song titles are added with more information in the booklet compared to the back-cover, which one should be prefered (like song on back cover, song (some info) in the cover booklet)?
      • 2015-08-08 22035, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        Like Pere Ubu, but something people actually enjoy listening to.
      • 2015-08-08 22039, 2015

      • Leftmost
        snoozebrainz, opinions vary. I prefer the back of the case with further information presented through disambiguation, recordings, and relationships, but you may get other answers.
      • 2015-08-08 22030, 2015

      • snoozebrainz
        they should name it top 500 greatest rock and roll albums for people that really like beatles :)
      • 2015-08-08 22011, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        I'm glad the beatles didn't release 500 albums then
      • 2015-08-08 22014, 2015

      • xplt joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22056, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        also, agree with Leftmost on back vs insert. but there are probably exceptions. link to the album in question?
      • 2015-08-08 22052, 2015

      • snoozebrainz
        voted on a change to a album, http://musicbrainz.org/edit/34348123
      • 2015-08-08 22020, 2015

      • reosarevok
        snoozebrainz: for classical at least we'd usually prefer booklet, but otherwise, not sure :)
      • 2015-08-08 22010, 2015

      • xps2 joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22056, 2015

      • snoozebrainz
        I felt like it reducted to information so that was why I voted no, but then I felt bad cause I might have caused him to cancel it something that maybe not was as clearcut as I thought ;/
      • 2015-08-08 22012, 2015

      • snoozebrainz
        reduced the amount of information even :)
      • 2015-08-08 22022, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Oh. duh, missed the link :p Let's see this specific case :)
      • 2015-08-08 22042, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        oh. yeah, I would have voted "no" too. a multi-disc compilation probably can't fit everything they'd like to on the back cover.
      • 2015-08-08 22017, 2015

      • xplt
        ZaphodBeeblebrox: >>"[21:38:48] ZaphodBeeblebrox nothing russian!" If it includes only albums, then no wonder: I can't remember anything spectacular in contemporary Russian music
      • 2015-08-08 22029, 2015

      • blup joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22058, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Not even Kino or something like that? I suspect in a more wide list they might have something. But yeah, it's a Rolling Stone list, they're never going to put in something that their readers won't have heard about
      • 2015-08-08 22004, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        Who /are/ their readers? People under 30 in a dentist's waiting room?
      • 2015-08-08 22050, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        (no offense to people under 30 who are in a dentist's waiting room!)
      • 2015-08-08 22051, 2015

      • reosarevok
        heh
      • 2015-08-08 22055, 2015

      • reosarevok
        "Writing in USA Today newspaper, Edna Gundersen described the list as predictable and "weighted toward testosterone-fueled vintage rock"."
      • 2015-08-08 22056, 2015

      • snoozebrainz
        seems to be almost only british and/or american bands as well
      • 2015-08-08 22052, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Yeah, that's for sure. But even withing that
      • 2015-08-08 22054, 2015

      • reosarevok
        They have Green Day but no Fugazi, or Bad Brains, or... I see Husker Du made it at the bottom of it all :p
      • 2015-08-08 22036, 2015

      • reosarevok
        It's shamelessly mainstream, which I guess it's not a bad thing, but it makes sense only for a certain definition of "greatest"
      • 2015-08-08 22016, 2015

      • blup
        indeed
      • 2015-08-08 22020, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        Some day maybe somebody will be able to explain the Green Day thing to me. I mean, they're okay I guess.
      • 2015-08-08 22033, 2015

      • reosarevok
        No Pulp and Blur, and Oasis at 378 (under Arctic Monkeys? I mean I personally do like the first Arctic Monkeys album more than Oasis, but still)
      • 2015-08-08 22002, 2015

      • reosarevok
        CallerNo6: too late, you're waay too much in the wrong side of 16
      • 2015-08-08 22034, 2015

      • blup
        I like that mashup thing
      • 2015-08-08 22007, 2015

      • blup
        "Bouleward of Broken Songs"
      • 2015-08-08 22028, 2015

      • blup
        English is dumb.. Boulevard
      • 2015-08-08 22035, 2015

      • reosarevok
        I mean, if I put on old Green Day stuff I'll definitely enjoy it
      • 2015-08-08 22043, 2015

      • reosarevok
        But that's mostly because I was a teenager at the right time :p
      • 2015-08-08 22051, 2015

      • blup
        heh
      • 2015-08-08 22027, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        I concede, "dookie" is a great title.
      • 2015-08-08 22033, 2015

      • xplt
        lol
      • 2015-08-08 22045, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Would I be able to claim with a straight face that they're in the 500 greatest albums of all time though? Pfft, I'd struggle to say with a straight face that they're in the 100 best punk albums of all time :p
      • 2015-08-08 22025, 2015

      • blup
        i listened to Deep Purple, Queen, Whitesnake, Scorpions, Alice Cooper and Metallica as a teen :P
      • 2015-08-08 22053, 2015

      • reosarevok
        I listened to Blind Guardian and Stratovarius :p
      • 2015-08-08 22053, 2015

      • Leftmost
        reosarevok, I'd struggle to say with a straight face that they're in the punk albums of all time. :-P
      • 2015-08-08 22012, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Which I'd also enjoy now but I would never claim are actually good :p
      • 2015-08-08 22012, 2015

      • blup
        didn't like contemporary stuff at all. which was.. uuh Nirvana and thel inke. years later i actually listened ot some Perl Jam and liked
      • 2015-08-08 22040, 2015

      • blup
        :)
      • 2015-08-08 22047, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Leftmost: the old ones are pretty much punk. I mean, soft punk, sure, but still
      • 2015-08-08 22007, 2015

      • blup
        yea I mean. I liked "Bobbysocks" when they won Eurovision so :P
      • 2015-08-08 22011, 2015

      • CallerNo6
        The "weighted towards vintage testosterone" part makes sense, I guess, if you figure that "album oriented rock" is pretty much that.
      • 2015-08-08 22019, 2015

      • blup
        also "Animalize" from Kiss
      • 2015-08-08 22028, 2015

      • blup
        hn
      • 2015-08-08 22035, 2015

      • Leftmost
        I liked Nevermind when I was growing up, but I think I appreciate Nirvana a lot more now than I did then.
      • 2015-08-08 22046, 2015

      • reosarevok
        They also actually were a pretty punk, DIY band at first, I have friends who saw them after their first album in some squat venue in the Basque Country where they made about zero money
      • 2015-08-08 22047, 2015

      • blup feels that's uneccesarry sexist though. what females can't enoy this music?
      • 2015-08-08 22057, 2015

      • blup
        especially this is ironic vtr Betales?
      • 2015-08-08 22034, 2015

      • blup
        I uh. never really got "into" Nirvana
      • 2015-08-08 22036, 2015

      • reosarevok
        So I do have a fair amount of respect for Green Day (as opposed to, say, Panic at the Disco or all those crappy newer bands)
      • 2015-08-08 22055, 2015

      • reosarevok
        But still, no fucking way in hell they're greatest of anything :p
      • 2015-08-08 22003, 2015

      • Leftmost
        reosarevok, fair. I can't say that I knew much about them at that point. I'm only really familiar with their albums that got lots and lots of play and I feel like they're all pretty tame.
      • 2015-08-08 22005, 2015

      • blup
        oh yea Green DAy , i can't say I hate them. I haven't heard much but maybe 2 songs tohguh
      • 2015-08-08 22009, 2015

      • blup
        also Offspring
      • 2015-08-08 22004, 2015

      • Leftmost
        It's worth noting that I don't have a whole lot of regard for pop punk in general.
      • 2015-08-08 22013, 2015

      • blup
        feel the same about "Animlaize" I mean ,that album I love it soo much, still I wouldn't really put it on a "greatest xxx" type list
      • 2015-08-08 22050, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Leftmost: they *are* pretty tame, yeah - think they've always been
      • 2015-08-08 22002, 2015

      • blup
        I'm also amused by a few of these "anthology" and "best of" albums on this list
      • 2015-08-08 22031, 2015

      • blup
        another funny album title http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/33446893-8c9… (it's liek they belong in mb)
      • 2015-08-08 22032, 2015

      • reosarevok
        That said, London Calling is also pretty tame
      • 2015-08-08 22008, 2015

      • reosarevok
        And a lot of Ramones or Buzzcocks stuff
      • 2015-08-08 22026, 2015

      • reosarevok
        I mean, I'd much rather listen to Minor Threat or The Mob or Discharge, but still :)
      • 2015-08-08 22036, 2015

      • blup
        I actually like the "early" type punk stuff when it was more kinda rockish, the later stuff I don't like much
      • 2015-08-08 22011, 2015

      • Leftmost
        Not tame in quite the same way, I think. I just mean that the Green Day I've listened to is very well-suited to the mainstream tastes of the time. Granted, I have less perspective on early punk because I wasn't around then.
      • 2015-08-08 22049, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Probably true :)
      • 2015-08-08 22055, 2015

      • reosarevok
        (neither was I, of course)
      • 2015-08-08 22011, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Which is probably how they ended up with two albums in a list like that :p
      • 2015-08-08 22033, 2015

      • blup
        I feel so out of touch. i mean my "teen" music was like 70's and 80's stuff. in my teens, people where listening to green day and offsping and all those punk things. nirvana and such
      • 2015-08-08 22053, 2015

      • reosarevok
        Actually, looking at the rest of that list, I'm surprised Hüsker Dü somehow made it in, heh
      • 2015-08-08 22056, 2015

      • blup
        yea. seems ot un-mainstream to me
      • 2015-08-08 22009, 2015

      • xps2 joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22026, 2015

      • xps2 joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22054, 2015

      • yvesr joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22002, 2015

      • Eggs joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22027, 2015

      • hibiscuskazeneko joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22048, 2015

      • Lotheric joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22001, 2015

      • hibiscuskazeneko
      • 2015-08-08 22006, 2015

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22032, 2015

      • xps2 joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22046, 2015

      • praest76 joined the channel
      • 2015-08-08 22059, 2015

      • Nyanko-sensei joined the channel