CallerNo6: yes and no. I think the current interface for adding labels is good, but storing them as rels makes sense.
2015-11-01 30544, 2015
hawke
Also I think we should have better guidelines and/or label filtering before label adds are auto-edit, but eh no big deal.
2015-11-01 30553, 2015
Leftmost
hawke, that's the hope: store as rels, edit as we do now.
2015-11-01 30550, 2015
chirlu` has quit
2015-11-01 30541, 2015
br01 has quit
2015-11-01 30559, 2015
phunyguy has quit
2015-11-01 30512, 2015
LordSputnik has quit
2015-11-01 30538, 2015
LordSputnik joined the channel
2015-11-01 30525, 2015
reosarevok
hawke: the auto-edit thing is basically because since it's both auto-edit to add and remove, people who care (and subscribe to labels) can still just remove the ones that they feel are wrong
2015-11-01 30529, 2015
LordSputnik has quit
2015-11-01 30545, 2015
ben1 joined the channel
2015-11-01 30545, 2015
br01 joined the channel
2015-11-01 30550, 2015
ben1 is now known as LordSputnik
2015-11-01 30553, 2015
CallerNo6
hawke: what I was thinking is this: if labels are rels, then we can be more descriptive, instead of simply saying "these are the release labels".
2015-11-01 30554, 2015
reosarevok
Only difference would be that newbies adding releases don't get No-voted :p
2015-11-01 30508, 2015
reosarevok
The idea is that we can have a generic "this is an involved label"
2015-11-01 30518, 2015
reosarevok
Which is probably enough for the average user
2015-11-01 30536, 2015
reosarevok
But more expert users can move them into the specialised relationships if they want
2015-11-01 30546, 2015
reosarevok
("I happen to know this is the distributor here, specifically" or the like)
2015-11-01 30549, 2015
CallerNo6
exactly. I might word it as "these imprints are displayed on the release" or something.
2015-11-01 30515, 2015
phunyguy joined the channel
2015-11-01 30531, 2015
drsaunders
i would suggest that if add releases are autoedits, that we bring back the possible duplicates warning (like if the UPC matches that of an existing release)
2015-11-01 30525, 2015
TwistedFate joined the channel
2015-11-01 30536, 2015
TwistedFate is now known as SubZer0
2015-11-01 30545, 2015
artlba1 joined the channel
2015-11-01 30519, 2015
reosarevok
Well, the point is that we shouldn't be rejecting duplicates now in the first place
2015-11-01 30522, 2015
reosarevok
We should be merging them
2015-11-01 30534, 2015
reosarevok
That said, I do agree that we could have a warning for stuff like that
2015-11-01 30541, 2015
reosarevok
Is there a ticket? If not throw one in
2015-11-01 30531, 2015
drsaunders
it would just be a checkbox warning, like we had before
