#musicbrainz

Can someone check https://goo.gl/6KcCJW edits ? i don't have time for that now, but it seems to me this will be a mess, editor is not new, but he has very few edits since 2009

Yeah, this looks just wrong

I'll no-vote and ask for explanations for now

Or well, try at least (enter_votes 504)

jesus2099: Ping

ok, this is kinda ridiculous

Still can't get the votes to send

bitmap: ^^

Heh. It submitted from beta, somehow

ah, I thought we could add a specific credited as for things like conductor relationships, like you can with instruments

is that still in the works?

"credited as" just seems to be for variations of their name, not for more specific relationship titles

Yeah

I think that's specifically for instruments/vocals right now

What happens if an 'add release group' edit is voted down but the corresponding 'add release' edit is not?

Does the 'add release' fail?

yeah, modbot would fail it when applying it, i think

hmm. but the release group can't be removed while the release is still pending either

I'd expect it just will fail to reject the add

Looking at https://musicbrainz.org/edit/36234164

is the add release group an autoedit when adding a release?

Apparently not? :-)

If the user chooses to make all edits votable, then no

I'll merge

Oh, there's an open merge already

so, has anyone figured out what's up with submitting votes/edit notes being so slow?

Dunno but I'd love to know :/

Haha, I see all of us commented

but we couldn't, i bet we all wrote our posts, hit submit, and waited :)

I wonder if we could change that system so if someone else has commented between when you last viewed the page and when you submit, it'll bring you back to review the new comments and resubmit

That'd be good

I dunno how common it is, for stuff that doesn't get posted in here, but still

be tricky to handle for batch submissions, too

We just have to Web 3.0 that sucker. Automatically show new comments while you're writing.

Leftmost: that seems better, honestly. I'd be confused as to why my edit didn't go through unless it was made really clear somehow.

at least all of our comments weren't exactly the same ;)

påååååååååå,.

På what?

PiPiPiPARU. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeBcFkvjE6M

påååååååååå,.22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222

222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

p trrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr-------------7.llll

uh-huh

おhcらp&p

oh crap

sorry!!!!

apparently my cat decied to type loads while I was doing disches

>____<

!m CatQuest's cat

You're doing good work, CatQuest's cat!

A Cat Called Quest left his wallet in el keyboardo

CatQuest, so... your cat's pås were all over the keyboard?

[12:53:07] * reosarevok still trying

Well, they’ll have got the message, then. Twenty times or so. ;-)

I have a release with http://musicbrainz.org/label/be04fe66-c4cd-4a65... prominently displayed on the back and with an associated catno. Should I use http://musicbrainz.org/label/30c7b2eb-371b-487b... anyhow, even though the artwork clearly identifies "Nova Tekk Media + Distribution"?

Leftmost: This logo? http://www.discogs.com/label/523036 I would say yes, but I'm working from my own understanding of what a label is.

callerno6 might be less biased on the topic.

chirlu`: are we really sending the email even when we don't finish submitting the votes?

(I wish we had label images...)

In that case shit, I hope I didn't scare some newbies away :/

(And if so this really should be hotfixed ASAP...)

Leftmost: In fact I can't understand why basically everything at http://musicbrainz.org/label/30c7b2eb-371b-487b... isn't attached to "Nova Tekk Media + Distribution"

Who came up with that "use only for distribution" ridiculousness?

Yep, that logo, hawke1.

It especially makes no sense with the catno starting with "NTD".

Right, yes.

are the "NT ####" Nova Tekk originals, and the "NTD" nova tekk distributed?

I'm looking at http://musicbrainz.org/release/ed2bef74-2de2-4c... which says "distributed in germany by Soul Food" and has cat no "NT 30102" which seems to be Nova Tekk but obviously not NTD

reosarevok: Yes, we are.

I see http://ia902507.us.archive.org/10/items/mbid-ed... has a slightly different Nova Tekk logo too.

Shit.

reosarevok: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-4858 3 year old issue :/

Older, only the ticket is from three years ago.

It only matters when something doesn’t work, i.e. from time to time.

time to time is happening more often nowadays tho

Yes, my guess is that something might be slowing down sending emails at the moment.

How hard a fix is this? Do we know?

The transaction issue specifically

Well, to fix it properly is rather hard.

Not for GCi. :-)

I thought about doing something on the Perl side only, that would be easier.

But might mean emails are lost instead, if things go wrong.

*when

Leftmost: Is the separator between "Media" and "distribution" definitely a +? Or is it a stylized bullet point?

why are some add release edits still put to vote? and why does that entail add release group and add mediume edits?

well, add release, add release group, and add medium are always going to be separate edits due to the way the database and edit system is structured.

(not really "always", but it's gonna be like that for a while)

People can choose to make their edits votable.

but as for the add release going to vote, that's intentional.

hawke1, could be a bullet point, looking closely. Especially given that the legal name appears to be Nova Tekk Media Distribution GmbH.

oh, wait, is release addition an autoedit for everyone now?

they can still be put to a vote if the user checks the 'Make all edits votable' checkbox

kepstin, yes

I'm following my preferences on this and I'll start a discussion on removing the disambig and cleaning the label up.

http://musicbrainz.org/edit/36255972 for anyone who wants to discuss the choice for that particular album further.

huh, http://www.engadget.com/2015/12/04/casio-and-th... is a neat read.

Why does my router keep enabling AP isolation? I don't want it enabled.

(And it keeps doing it while showing it as disabled.)

I know its a three year old change, but is there any way to easily recreate the three releases that were destroyed by this change: http://musicbrainz.org/edit/20248806 . While these albums may have been sold in cardboard sleeves as a three volume set, they were also sold individually in jewel boxes. I'm assuming that I just need to re-add the three CDs but wasn't sure if I hat to re-enter all the data or if I could some

hnngg..

well, I suppose I should be happy people are amused and not angry at the cat's spam

dhampton: You can use the release duplicate feature in the release editor to start from the existing release.