#musicbrainz

(unrelatedly: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2016/01/04/fina... ! awesome)

neato

also unrelated: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/breaking-ne...

luks: we talked about that with ijabz back when he was still around - we came with no decent way to define "popularity" for sorting

I agree, in principle

number of tracks would be good enough

all count of all objects in MB, to make it more generic

*or

I guess since we're working on a new search server anyway, we could try to look into that again

Not sure how it would interact with the rest of the matching (should Nirvena match Nirvana before some obscure Nirvena with one track?)

But it is definitely something that we should think about

I think it should do exactly this - https://www.google.sk/search?q=nirvena

it would make the drop-down searches a little more complex, but I think it makes sense even there

the advantage of solr is that these kind of things should be possible without too much effort

But yeah, some kind of popularity influence in "scoring" would be good in any case

However we do it

opatel99, you had a question but I don't know that I have an answer.

(about video tasks)

opatel99: shoulda named it Yet anOther Great User Repository Tool

:D

darwin, I like the song more if I imagine scraper bikes.

woot! https://oaklandwiki.org/Scraper_Bikes

ZaphodBeeblebrox: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/yaourt#French :)

Amidoinitrite? http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-8715

Anybody able to identify the label on http://musicbrainz.org/release/2a720c48-6b29-44... -- it's definitely not EMI like the release says.

aha, got it: http://www.discogs.com/label/86658-Imperial-4