#musicbrainz

is this ok: CAINE 01 : Das Amulett von Kyan'Kor or should it be CAINE, Episode 01: Das Amulett von Kyan'Kor

is this ok: "CAINE 01 : Das Amulett von Kyan'Kor" or should it be "CAINE, Episode 01: Das Amulett von Kyan'Kor"

not sure. certainly not " : ", so at least "CAINE 01: Das ..."

given https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caine_%28H%C3%B6r... it should probably be Caine instead of CAINE

official site

my OCD wants "CAINE, Episode 01: Das Amulett von Kyan'Kor"

I'm inclined to see WP as more authorative and use Caine - artist intent is hard to prove; but I don't feel super strongly about it

as for the ", Episode", is it called an episode anywhere specifically?

otherwise I'd probably fall back on ", Volume" as generic descriptor; and I'm not sure what MB's policy is (if any) on keeping leading zeroes on chapter/volume numbers

So if I was adding these CDs, I would probably use "Caine, Volume 1: Das Amulett von Kyan'Kor"

I read it somewhere, i´ll search

they seem to be standalone radio plays, so i'd still use Volume; Episode to me suggests more of a continuity

ah, the official store lists them as 'Folge 9: Kartaan' etc

so "Caine, Folge 1: Das ..." I suppose

We are still international, so I guess englisch is better except for the title

(it also has "Mehr von Caine", not "Mehr von CAINE")

nah, I don't mind the Folge

that was a lot of work :D

i can imagine. any reason the 40th one there has different RG attributes than the rest?

because it´s a soundtrack only

no spoken words

ok

would still have used Album instead of Other for the others though

but that's a minor point

I'm also not sure I would have used the main character as release artist; according to https://beta.musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Specific... it should probably be the author instead

yep, I only changed the titels

but thought about it aswell

I think I have Episode from this channel, and it was that it has more of "ongoing" than volume

can´t find it though on the site

[19:37] <Zastai> otherwise I'd probably fall back on ", Volume" as generic descriptor;

nah, we just go with whatever "generic discriptor" they have, including *no* name at all, just number, name etc. what you're thinking of is the *old*, (hopefully, by now, officially) depreciated volume guideline :)

[19:41] <Gore|home> We are still international, so I guess englisch is better except for the title

that contradicts itself. :) we are international, so we can use german, japanese, norwegian, etc "volume" words

agreed, that does sound contradictory

Gore|home: We're international, so it's better to use the original/native wording. ;)

And I see CatQuest already said as much! 👍

Gore|home: Have a look at https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Specific_type... - it may or may not apply to your specific case.

But it does touch on using "chapter" and "part" etc., so if nothing more specific to your use case is in the guidelines, it probably wouldn't be completely off to glance towards those.

(Note that the audiobook guidelines have this bit in them: "Note, that if the release is not an English language release, the appropriate language's equivalent of "Chapter" and "Part" can be used." - re: being international. :))