#musicbrainz

/

      • reosarevok
        Use it
      • 2013-05-16 13602, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Date but no country is OK
      • 2013-05-16 13622, 2013

      • reosarevok
        It's neither when it's broken
      • 2013-05-16 13635, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        ah.
      • 2013-05-16 13616, 2013

      • SultS
        can it be multiple dates without a country?
      • 2013-05-16 13619, 2013

      • hawke_1
        kepstin-work: the ~ and AND is nice too, but I’ve covered that specific ground before.
      • 2013-05-16 13648, 2013

      • reosarevok
        SultS: no, there's a limit of one date per country and one unknown
      • 2013-05-16 13657, 2013

      • reosarevok
        SultS: whether that makes sense or not I don't know
      • 2013-05-16 13636, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        it does mean that we need another schema change if we want it to be more flexible, and have a more complicated model in the mean time :/
      • 2013-05-16 13617, 2013

      • reosarevok
        kepstin-work: indeed
      • 2013-05-16 13635, 2013

      • kepstin-work believes that restrictions on data should be done more on the social side than hardcoded into the data structures when reasonable.
      • 2013-05-16 13644, 2013

      • hawke_1
        kepstin-work: You mentioned in -devel that you recalled that echoprint’s matching was more vague than acoustID’s?
      • 2013-05-16 13657, 2013

      • SultS
        While I don’t nessesarily need multiple dates per country, I can already see a use for them
      • 2013-05-16 13603, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        hawke_1: that was my impression. I didn't test it that much
      • 2013-05-16 13625, 2013

      • reosarevok
        SultS: example? First at a concert later officially?
      • 2013-05-16 13631, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (that's the only one I can think of)
      • 2013-05-16 13633, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        I know it was derived from software designed to get a song name from noisy partial matches (e.g. sampling a song off radio)
      • 2013-05-16 13636, 2013

      • hawke_1
        kepstin-work: I wonder if acoustID could be tuned to handle both: it fairly often seems that when I lookup a 'new' recording (one not seen by acoustID before) it will find a different recording of the same work.
      • 2013-05-16 13650, 2013

      • SultS
        reosarevok: different releases dates on different stores for a digital medium…
      • 2013-05-16 13623, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        hawke_1: the chromaprint lookup matching is designed to be more liberal-matching than the acoustid generation.
      • 2013-05-16 13637, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        so it might match on the initial lookup, but then generate a new acoustid when you submit
      • 2013-05-16 13642, 2013

      • hawke_1
        kepstin-work: right, it does.
      • 2013-05-16 13644, 2013

      • luks
        it only uses a different threshold
      • 2013-05-16 13648, 2013

      • luks
        but the process is the same
      • 2013-05-16 13654, 2013

      • hawke_1
        kepstin-work: But that suggests that the …yeah, that.
      • 2013-05-16 13637, 2013

      • SultS
        reosarevok: I can sort‐of use multiple dates for these cases already… using download link with begin date set
      • 2013-05-16 13657, 2013

      • reosarevok
        SultS: I'm mostly hoping most people won't be that crazy as to add n stores in all m countries they operate in
      • 2013-05-16 13627, 2013

      • reosarevok
        But yeah, I'm afraid since we started going that way, we'll end there
      • 2013-05-16 13655, 2013

      • hawke_1
        digital is [worldwide]? ;-)
      • 2013-05-16 13657, 2013

      • SultS
        probably won’t… just the limit for 1 per country doesn’t nessesarily make sense to me
      • 2013-05-16 13600, 2013

      • reosarevok
        honestly, as I don't particularly care about this use of the "feature", I'll probably just try to ignore it as much as I can
      • 2013-05-16 13607, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        hawke_1: sometimes, not always.
      • 2013-05-16 13610, 2013

      • reosarevok
        SultS: oh, that I agree with
      • 2013-05-16 13620, 2013

      • kepstin-work has seen a lot of japan-only digital releases, for example.
      • 2013-05-16 13607, 2013

      • hawke_1
        kepstin-work: I know, but it seems like a good principle to avoid the hassle.
      • 2013-05-16 13621, 2013

      • hawke_1
        kepstin-work: besides, what makes it 'japan-only'?
      • 2013-05-16 13639, 2013

      • reosarevok
        SultS: tbh though, I'm kinda in favour of "use the first date it was released in there, add the rest to the specific purchase rels if you want them"
      • 2013-05-16 13651, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        hawke_1: they provide no way for people outside of japan to purchase it.
      • 2013-05-16 13657, 2013

      • Kabaka joined the channel
      • 2013-05-16 13606, 2013

      • hawke_1
        kepstin-work: how do they verify that you’re in Japan?
      • 2013-05-16 13612, 2013

      • nikki
        amazon does it somehow
      • 2013-05-16 13618, 2013

      • SultS
        reosarevok: I might be as well, actually :P
      • 2013-05-16 13631, 2013

      • reosarevok
        SultS: we wouldn't add a second release event because they had to bring the CDs by car from Tallinn to Tartu and they started selling here one day later :p
      • 2013-05-16 13632, 2013

      • hawke_1
        as opposed to, say, using a proxy.
      • 2013-05-16 13640, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        hawke_1: by selling it through the cell phone network is pretty common too
      • 2013-05-16 13653, 2013

      • reosarevok
        SultS: so, I'd rather see it as "first date this specific release was available there"
      • 2013-05-16 13634, 2013

      • hawke_1
        luks: 502s on acoustid.org?
      • 2013-05-16 13603, 2013

      • luks
        on the website, I assume?
      • 2013-05-16 13622, 2013

      • luks
        I'm doing a MB upgrade on that server and forgot that its DB is used by the website
      • 2013-05-16 13631, 2013

      • hawke_1
        yeah, on the website.
      • 2013-05-16 13640, 2013

      • reosarevok
        hawke_1: that'd be a bit like having a red button in a locked room and claiming it was there for you because you took the door off with a screwdriver :p
      • 2013-05-16 13658, 2013

      • SultS
        maybe one more use case would be the same release being sold early on a concert
      • 2013-05-16 13601, 2013

      • reosarevok
        I thought releases were the intention :p
      • 2013-05-16 13602, 2013

      • nikki
        hawke_1: for amazon, I think they use something based on the payment method. e.g. I can buy from amazon.co.uk despite not being in the uk, but only because I have a uk bank and uk address and stuff I can use
      • 2013-05-16 13636, 2013

      • nikki
        hawke_1: I tried to buy from .jp and they told me to get lost 'cause they don't want my money
      • 2013-05-16 13641, 2013

      • nikki
        (well, not in those words.)
      • 2013-05-16 13642, 2013

      • hawke_1
        reosarevok: yeah, 'over the cell network' is a bit of a strong method. :-D
      • 2013-05-16 13606, 2013

      • hawke_1
        I’ve bought from both .co.uk and .co.jp without trouble other than 'amazon marketplace' stuff
      • 2013-05-16 13612, 2013

      • nikki
        mp3s?
      • 2013-05-16 13618, 2013

      • nikki
        I'm not talking about physical releases
      • 2013-05-16 13621, 2013

      • hawke_1
        Ah, nope. Physical releases.
      • 2013-05-16 13648, 2013

      • nikki
        not that I recommend amazon.co.jp for physical releases. the shipping costs are daylight robbery
      • 2013-05-16 13620, 2013

      • reosarevok
        well, technically, if you buy them at day, being in Japan...
      • 2013-05-16 13628, 2013

      • reosarevok
        isn't that more like nightime robbery?
      • 2013-05-16 13658, 2013

      • hawke_1
        amazon is definitely not my preferred .jp CD source.
      • 2013-05-16 13609, 2013

      • hawke_1
        but sometimes they have stuff I can’t find otherwise.
      • 2013-05-16 13621, 2013

      • nikki
        reosarevok: no, that loses the meaning of the phrase.
      • 2013-05-16 13653, 2013

      • reosarevok
        nikki: that was part of the joke, meh. I guess it was so bad it wasn't even clear :p
      • 2013-05-16 13607, 2013

      • nikki
        well of course. your jokes are all bad! :D
      • 2013-05-16 13635, 2013

      • derwin
        hawke_1: fwiw, I mostly agree with you about the search :)
      • 2013-05-16 13624, 2013

      • reosarevok
        now, now, not so much agreeement. He's not used to it, he might overdose
      • 2013-05-16 13631, 2013

      • hawke_1
        lol
      • 2013-05-16 13624, 2013

      • hawke_1
        With all this agreement, maybe I should put the vinyl track numbering proposal out again.
      • 2013-05-16 13641, 2013

      • hawke_1
        agreement is like a battery, I can use up what I’ve stored, right?
      • 2013-05-16 13643, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        don't push your luck too far ;)
      • 2013-05-16 13647, 2013

      • nikki
        haha
      • 2013-05-16 13606, 2013

      • nikki was mostly fine with the vinyl numbering part of the proposal
      • 2013-05-16 13615, 2013

      • nikki
        I think you fixed the issue I had with that bit
      • 2013-05-16 13659, 2013

      • hawke_1
        nikki: You were OK with pseudo-releases for SACD layers?
      • 2013-05-16 13631, 2013

      • nikki
        I don't remember and to be honest I also don't really want to think about it right now either
      • 2013-05-16 13638, 2013

      • hawke_1
        all good.
      • 2013-05-16 13628, 2013

      • nikki
        I guess I'm just suggesting that it doesn't need to be all or nothing. we can have a guideline for vinyl (which is pretty common in the db) even without deciding what to do with sacds (which are not) :P
      • 2013-05-16 13658, 2013

      • hawke_1
        Hmm. Personally I’m not too worried about SACD either (as it’s not common), but it’s applicable to DVDs as well.
      • 2013-05-16 13614, 2013

      • hawke_1
        (alternate audio tracks are, I mean)
      • 2013-05-16 13621, 2013

      • STalKer-X joined the channel
      • 2013-05-16 13642, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        they're fairly rare on music dvds, tho.
      • 2013-05-16 13643, 2013

      • nikki
        dvds are still nothing compared to the amount of vinyl :P
      • 2013-05-16 13607, 2013

      • STalKer-X joined the channel
      • 2013-05-16 13625, 2013

      • hawke_1
        True. Maybe I should just strike the alternate audio tracks bit.
      • 2013-05-16 13638, 2013

      • hawke_1
        and just use it anyway where applicable. :-D
      • 2013-05-16 13650, 2013

      • hawke_1
        I doubt anyone would notice
      • 2013-05-16 13651, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        it might be good to add at some point as a guideline, but we can do that later.
      • 2013-05-16 13654, 2013

      • hawke_1
        yeah
      • 2013-05-16 13637, 2013

      • ListMyCDs joined the channel
      • 2013-05-16 13619, 2013

      • reosarevok
        meh
      • 2013-05-16 13620, 2013

      • reosarevok
      • 2013-05-16 13630, 2013

      • reosarevok
        this suggests disc 2 is one track, right?
      • 2013-05-16 13609, 2013

      • reosarevok
        I guess "die die langjährige Erfolgsgeschichte der Band erstmalig auf einem Track musikalisch zusammenfasst und Revue passieren lässt" does too
      • 2013-05-16 13614, 2013

      • reosarevok
      • 2013-05-16 13624, 2013

      • reosarevok wonders how to store the tracklist
      • 2013-05-16 13628, 2013

      • reosarevok
        recording annotation?
      • 2013-05-16 13634, 2013

      • navap
        THe back cover image suggests one track for disc 2
      • 2013-05-16 13658, 2013

      • hawke_1
        hmm, dropping alternate audio tracks breaks parallel grooves too. Also a rare case, but… :-/
      • 2013-05-16 13631, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        can cover parallel grooves without going into alternate tracks on other types of media
      • 2013-05-16 13601, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        then when you add the others later you can say "it's a natural extension of the parallel grooves stuff!"
      • 2013-05-16 13615, 2013

      • hawke_1
        heh
      • 2013-05-16 13640, 2013

      • hawke_1
        parallel grooves doesn’t feel important enough to have a whole section/numbering section.
      • 2013-05-16 13656, 2013

      • johtso joined the channel
      • 2013-05-16 13659, 2013

      • hawke_1
        when that section can be used on SACD, DVD, and parallel grooves it feels worth it.
      • 2013-05-16 13632, 2013

      • hawke_1
        but at the same time it seems like parallel grooves at least deserve a mention.
      • 2013-05-16 13631, 2013

      • SultS_ joined the channel
      • 2013-05-16 13626, 2013

      • CatQuest
      • 2013-05-16 13622, 2013

      • reosarevok
        So
      • 2013-05-16 13645, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Before I vote no
      • 2013-05-16 13652, 2013

      • reosarevok
        am I the only one who thinks this is wrong? http://musicbrainz.org/recording/3377ef81-c3ab-40…
      • 2013-05-16 13607, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (changing the individual artists as producers and composers to the duo artist)
      • 2013-05-16 13606, 2013

      • hawke_1
        depends, do they qualify as a 'collaboration artist'?
      • 2013-05-16 13633, 2013

      • reosarevok
        As for artist credits? Probably
      • 2013-05-16 13635, 2013

      • hawke_1
        the wikipedia page for 'ed rush & optical' is wrong though.
      • 2013-05-16 13614, 2013

      • reosarevok
        heh
      • 2013-05-16 13619, 2013

      • reosarevok
        only partially :p
      • 2013-05-16 13626, 2013

      • reosarevok
        It's an anchor to their common discography
      • 2013-05-16 13640, 2013

      • Kabaka joined the channel
      • 2013-05-16 13644, 2013

      • hawke_1
        alright, any glaring errors in http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Hawke/Proposal/T… ? Is my quick description of the former 'alternate audio' good enough for the parallel grooves situation?
      • 2013-05-16 13653, 2013

      • reosarevok
        The Sub-tracks section seems to be asking for people to add them instead of real tracks
      • 2013-05-16 13627, 2013

      • nikki
        is the sub-tracks bit really only for single-sided stuff?
      • 2013-05-16 13651, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Is the sub-tracks bit really *wanted* was more my doubt
      • 2013-05-16 13623, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        the subtracks bit is certainly the most controversial part of that proposal
      • 2013-05-16 13646, 2013

      • culinko joined the channel
      • 2013-05-16 13658, 2013

      • hawke_1
        well, no one said anything about it up to now.
      • 2013-05-16 13608, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        hawke_1 and I finally agreed on some wording for specifying the track ordering for that a while back :)
      • 2013-05-16 13629, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Well
      • 2013-05-16 13634, 2013

      • reosarevok
        They're not *tracks* is my point
      • 2013-05-16 13600, 2013

      • hawke_1
        nikki: you’re right, there’s no need for it to specify 'single-sided', and dual-disc is an exception.
      • 2013-05-16 13622, 2013

      • hawke_1
        reosarevok: they’re musicbrainz tracks.
      • 2013-05-16 13628, 2013

      • reosarevok
        They are?
      • 2013-05-16 13635, 2013

      • reosarevok
        So what are the actual tracks on the release then?
      • 2013-05-16 13638, 2013

      • reosarevok
        MB nothings?
      • 2013-05-16 13647, 2013

      • hawke_1
        what’s a DVD chapter in MB?
      • 2013-05-16 13606, 2013

      • kepstin-work
        the answer depends on the dvd; but either a track or a nothing.
      • 2013-05-16 13609, 2013

      • hawke_1
        It’s always been a track from what I’ve seen.
      • 2013-05-16 13627, 2013

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2013-05-16 13655, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Possibly? But for CDs, what I've always seen (in booklets too) is to list indices *under the track heading*
      • 2013-05-16 13605, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Which suggests there's clearly a track there
      • 2013-05-16 13633, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Yet this seems to say "we should ignore the actual track and just can't because discIDs are silly"
      • 2013-05-16 13640, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (can I get some opinions about my previous question so I can vote no or abstain accordingly? :) )
      • 2013-05-16 13659, 2013

      • warp
        I agree indexes on CDs usually mark subdivisions of a single track, and they need other database support than just removing discids.
      • 2013-05-16 13603, 2013

      • hawke_1
        reosarevok: I thought I did — if they qualify as a collaboration artist, they can certainly collaborate on production and composition.
      • 2013-05-16 13620, 2013

      • hawke_1
        warp: clearly true, and I am not saying to remove discIDs.
      • 2013-05-16 13646, 2013

      • hawke_1
        the guideline is intending to say “you can't use the sub-tracks section of this guideline on CDs”