All releases, physical and digital, have phonographic copyrights. This information is readily available from digital media stores and on the back cover / disc of physical releases."
2013-09-17 26005, 2013
yindesu
I suppose you would also need to say it's a Label-Release and Artist-Release relationship
yindesu: Musick Assault is also distributer... but It re-released that album (as far I can know)
2013-09-17 26017, 2013
Jozo
yindesu: So what is real label? :)
2013-09-17 26025, 2013
yindesu
the re-release, no idea. If you know Musick Assault is a digital distributor (not a store), I would link it with a label-release Distributed relationship. (currently, it's part of a massive "Publisher" relationship.)
release label, I know some auto-editors would want you to use the original label
2013-09-17 26044, 2013
Jozo
yindesu: And it takes me some minutes to trafer that bath... And you just can say I'm wrong :)
2013-09-17 26016, 2013
yindesu
yeah, I would use the original label then
2013-09-17 26030, 2013
yindesu
Musick Assault helps artists get their (old?) music onto stores.
2013-09-17 26029, 2013
Jozo
yindesu: So it's not released by original record company..
2013-09-17 26052, 2013
yindesu
yeah, there's certainly not agreement on digital
2013-09-17 26043, 2013
yindesu
currently, the label-release "Publisher" relationship is supposed to be used for distribution
2013-09-17 26011, 2013
Jozo
something like that
2013-09-17 26038, 2013
yindesu
" The publisher is the person or organization that manufactures (or contracts out manufacturing), distributes (or contracts out distribution), and promotes (or contracts out promotion)."
2013-09-17 26054, 2013
yindesu
assuming no one objects to my RFV, in 2 days those things will be split out of that massive failure from 2005
2013-09-17 26009, 2013
yindesu
those things are not at all equivalent, why are they in the same relationship type :(
2013-09-17 26015, 2013
Jozo
yindesu: +1 (I'm not said on anything on list cos I do not like say ;)
