#musicbrainz

/

      • JoeMoose joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15949, 2012

      • JoeMoose joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15951, 2012

      • jcazevedo joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15920, 2012

      • kurtjx joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15944, 2012

      • Leftmost joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15946, 2012

      • kurtjx joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15923, 2012

      • jacobbrett
      • 2012-06-07 15952, 2012

      • jacobbrett
        Heh, I just got a file through the WMG method and it doesn't exactly match the printed artwork.
      • 2012-06-07 15900, 2012

      • jcazevedo joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15926, 2012

      • Dremora joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15915, 2012

      • kurtjx joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15914, 2012

      • STalKer-X joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15907, 2012

      • hawke_ joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15933, 2012

      • jmvanel joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15915, 2012

      • noobie
        i don't understand why the ia is not offering archives for community audios,it'is very unhandy to download every file manually
      • 2012-06-07 15939, 2012

      • DWSR joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15931, 2012

      • Dremora joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15927, 2012

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15914, 2012

      • DWSR joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15903, 2012

      • DWSR joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15928, 2012

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15905, 2012

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15908, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15916, 2012

      • CatCat
        the ones i've seen alsohas archives
      • 2012-06-07 15924, 2012

      • noobie
        but only for mp3 files :(
      • 2012-06-07 15954, 2012

      • noobie
        they provide various file formats but you have to download each file seperatly
      • 2012-06-07 15938, 2012

      • CatCat
        most people want mp3 for listen
      • 2012-06-07 15942, 2012

      • noobie
        :/
      • 2012-06-07 15907, 2012

      • noobie
        nowadays storing capabilities are good enough to use lossless audio
      • 2012-06-07 15904, 2012

      • Laverne joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15957, 2012

      • reosarevok joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15959, 2012

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15908, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15928, 2012

      • warp
        noobie: hm? usually ia has an easy way to download an archive.
      • 2012-06-07 15933, 2012

      • warp
        noobie: url?
      • 2012-06-07 15947, 2012

      • noobie
      • 2012-06-07 15959, 2012

      • noobie
        well you could use www.archive.org/compress to download ALL files
      • 2012-06-07 15910, 2012

      • noobie
        but if you just want all flac files
      • 2012-06-07 15932, 2012

      • noobie
        guess that won't work
      • 2012-06-07 15958, 2012

      • warp
        ah, right
      • 2012-06-07 15921, 2012

      • noobie
        not sure why they are not providing such an option
      • 2012-06-07 15928, 2012

      • warp
      • 2012-06-07 15929, 2012

      • warp
        :)
      • 2012-06-07 15934, 2012

      • noobie
        yes ofc
      • 2012-06-07 15939, 2012

      • noobie
        client side is not a problem ;)
      • 2012-06-07 15946, 2012

      • noobie
        but let's say you have a limited bandwith on your server and you'd like to provide a download of release abc you could use the ia
      • 2012-06-07 15957, 2012

      • noobie
        but only for mp3 files
      • 2012-06-07 15928, 2012

      • warp
        I don't see that as a problem.
      • 2012-06-07 15942, 2012

      • noobie
        if you want to provide lossless audio it is
      • 2012-06-07 15952, 2012

      • warp
        it would be nicer for clients to have an easy way to download lossless audio
      • 2012-06-07 15927, 2012

      • warp
        but the internet archive doesn't seem intended for your personal hosting needs. if you want to host lossless audio for others to download, do that yourself.
      • 2012-06-07 15937, 2012

      • noobie
        but it aims to provide easily accessible data and information for everyone
      • 2012-06-07 15959, 2012

      • noobie
        so i don't see why it should not serve the purpose of distributing and sharing information
      • 2012-06-07 15920, 2012

      • warp
        the main goal is to preserve that information, easily accessible should be viewed within that context.
      • 2012-06-07 15929, 2012

      • noobie
        prolly
      • 2012-06-07 15941, 2012

      • noobie
        but isn't mb doing that too
      • 2012-06-07 15953, 2012

      • noobie
        by using their server to store the cover art..
      • 2012-06-07 15915, 2012

      • warp
        and viewed like that, they more than meet that goal by having regular HTTP downloads, unrestricted by geographic IP bans or passwords or anything like that.
      • 2012-06-07 15920, 2012

      • noobie
        ts purposes include offering permanent access for researchers, historians, scholars, people with disabilities, and the general public to historical collections that exist in digital format.
      • 2012-06-07 15933, 2012

      • warp
        noobie: the coverartarchive is a collaboration between the internet archive and musicbrainz. again, I think the main focus for the archive here is to preserve that information, and the secondary goal is to make it easily accessible to all.
      • 2012-06-07 15946, 2012

      • noobie
        i see
      • 2012-06-07 15923, 2012

      • warp
        the goal is not to allow third parties to make stuff easily accessible through the archive.
      • 2012-06-07 15927, 2012

      • DocPlatypus joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15931, 2012

      • noobie
        i guess i misunderstood their objective
      • 2012-06-07 15911, 2012

      • warp
        so I think it is not a problem that the archive makes stuff easily accessible in a way they think is suitable, but which is inflexible for third-parties to embed in their own websites.
      • 2012-06-07 15957, 2012

      • warp
        noobie: obviously I don't speak for the archive, I'm just giving you my opinion on this :)
      • 2012-06-07 15903, 2012

      • noobie
        well,i do not consider it that easily imo,but ok,i accept that
      • 2012-06-07 15907, 2012

      • warp
        I could be totally wrong.
      • 2012-06-07 15924, 2012

      • noobie
        well,i just read at their page
      • 2012-06-07 15942, 2012

      • noobie
        i guess you are right,
      • 2012-06-07 15901, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        honestly, the IA is horribly understaffed
      • 2012-06-07 15902, 2012

      • warp
        perhaps not offering .flac as a .zip is just something they forgot or they didn't have time yet to implement.
      • 2012-06-07 15911, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        if you want their stuff to be more accessible, you should probably volunteer to write it :P
      • 2012-06-07 15928, 2012

      • noobie
        well,that feature is really easy..
      • 2012-06-07 15958, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        only if you have the time to turn it on/implement it/whatever
      • 2012-06-07 15902, 2012

      • ianmcorvidae
        which they almost certainly do not
      • 2012-06-07 15929, 2012

      • noobie
        hm alright,i do not know anything about their staff
      • 2012-06-07 15901, 2012

      • noobie
        but since they already provide the option to compress a directory,it should be fairly easy to just compress certain files in that directory..
      • 2012-06-07 15921, 2012

      • Knio joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15919, 2012

      • reosarevok
        noobie: "<ianmcorvidae> if you want their stuff to be more accessible, you should probably volunteer to write it :P" ;)
      • 2012-06-07 15923, 2012

      • noobie
        i don't think they will let some unknown stranger modify their scripts
      • 2012-06-07 15946, 2012

      • noobie
        + i don't know anything about their server(-structure and concepts) ^^
      • 2012-06-07 15931, 2012

      • reosarevok
        b) seems reasonable. a), not so sure. as ian said, they really need people
      • 2012-06-07 15942, 2012

      • reosarevok
        So they would probably be OK with giving you access
      • 2012-06-07 15948, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ... and then forget to actually give it
      • 2012-06-07 15925, 2012

      • noobie
        :d
      • 2012-06-07 15950, 2012

      • DocPlatypus
        I've just downloaded all the FLAC files one by one
      • 2012-06-07 15907, 2012

      • DocPlatypus
        my OS/DE lets me just drag links to a file manager window and download that way
      • 2012-06-07 15946, 2012

      • jesus2099 joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15909, 2012

      • jesus2099
        I’m not botherd by this but I’ve noticed that some fields are greener than others : http://musicbrainz.org/edit/17904482
      • 2012-06-07 15917, 2012

      • jesus2099
        in the diff. stuff
      • 2012-06-07 15908, 2012

      • ocharles
      • 2012-06-07 15933, 2012

      • DocPlatypus
        jesus2099: I think that's intentional
      • 2012-06-07 15935, 2012

      • Vorpal joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15909, 2012

      • reosarevok
        woot SND
      • 2012-06-07 15958, 2012

      • warp
        ocharles: hm, no download?
      • 2012-06-07 15930, 2012

      • ocharles
        warp: apparently not
      • 2012-06-07 15929, 2012

      • bitmap joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15953, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Speaking of mixes
      • 2012-06-07 15959, 2012

      • reosarevok
      • 2012-06-07 15903, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (not me)
      • 2012-06-07 15920, 2012

      • jesus2099 joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15959, 2012

      • jesus2099
        DocPlatypus: I don’t see why the date is greener, the gender and country were empty, so was the date actually. Empty → Data should give same green level imo :) Madcatz Street Fighter IV PS3
      • 2012-06-07 15911, 2012

      • jesus2099
      • 2012-06-07 15902, 2012

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15927, 2012

      • rubin110 joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15943, 2012

      • CatCat
        :DDD
      • 2012-06-07 15954, 2012

      • CatCat
        Now grooving to: プッチモニ ~ ちょこっとLOVE (Instrumental) (4:00) (from ちょこっとLOVE) (1999)
      • 2012-06-07 15907, 2012

      • CatCat
        oh you mean to that the dater is "higlhighted" ?
      • 2012-06-07 15912, 2012

      • CatCat
        yea.. why is that?
      • 2012-06-07 15940, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Probably because it's designed to highlight only the part that changes
      • 2012-06-07 15945, 2012

      • reosarevok
        But in this case, everything did
      • 2012-06-07 15947, 2012

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15934, 2012

      • jacobbrett
        I'm actually considering buying the "radio mix" of a song, just to compare the waveform to the album version (and work out which one the music video belongs to).
      • 2012-06-07 15934, 2012

      • reosarevok
        :p
      • 2012-06-07 15907, 2012

      • jacobbrett
        reosarevok: Then I must again ask you: Are we a video encyclopedia, too?
      • 2012-06-07 15915, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Since it has, well, a video, and it's likely that it has some changed audio to fit the video, and videos are supposed to get ISRCs too
      • 2012-06-07 15928, 2012

      • jacobbrett
        Are they? interesting.
      • 2012-06-07 15955, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (also because it's not too strange, especially in Japan, that 10 videos are put out for the same song with the same -or barely modified- music)
      • 2012-06-07 15905, 2012

      • jacobbrett
        I'd guess 50% of videos I've added have different audio (non-music intro, etc.)...unless they're recognised by real people as different recordings, is it useful to add them as new recordings in MB (the ISRC aspect makes this more muddled)?
      • 2012-06-07 15922, 2012

      • reosarevok
        And well, it depends what you call a video encyclopedia
      • 2012-06-07 15955, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I'd say it's very useful to have better video support, and I'd definitely say people wouldn't say they bought the same thing if they bought a song on iTunes or a video on iTunes
      • 2012-06-07 15954, 2012

      • jacobbrett
        Good point. You know, I think the real solution is to support masters/mixes (so one can easily lookup the relevant video, while it still being technically correct as its own entity).
      • 2012-06-07 15901, 2012

      • reosarevok
        heh
      • 2012-06-07 15919, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I don't know if "masters/mixes" is the right word for that in this case
      • 2012-06-07 15943, 2012

      • reosarevok
        But I still agree it would make sense for videos to be able to be linked to their music-only recordings in any case
      • 2012-06-07 15945, 2012

      • jacobbrett
        Whatever you want to call them...I'm sure you understand what I mean
      • 2012-06-07 15907, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Whether like that, or with a relationship, I don't know
      • 2012-06-07 15929, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Anyway, I can't debate now, let's talk videos after I've finished my exams and I'm back in EE
      • 2012-06-07 15930, 2012

      • reosarevok
        )
      • 2012-06-07 15931, 2012

      • reosarevok
        *:)
      • 2012-06-07 15938, 2012

      • reosarevok goes back to studying
      • 2012-06-07 15942, 2012

      • jacobbrett
        Haha, good luck
      • 2012-06-07 15950, 2012

      • adhawkins joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15926, 2012

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15959, 2012

      • Wizzcat
        what the what, adding discogs to an add release edit note auto-links it?
      • 2012-06-07 15927, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ¿?
      • 2012-06-07 15957, 2012

      • Digweed
        Damn, edits stay open for so long, I want to tag my files properly lol.
      • 2012-06-07 15955, 2012

      • Wizzcat
        reosarevok: or it just my muscle memory doing things without my noticing?
      • 2012-06-07 15910, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Wizzcat: I don't think that has changed it
      • 2012-06-07 15918, 2012

      • reosarevok
        So, either it was you
      • 2012-06-07 15928, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Or you're seeing an RG link and thinking it's release
      • 2012-06-07 15952, 2012

      • Wizzcat
        must've been myself doing it, weirdest thing...
      • 2012-06-07 15909, 2012

      • ijabz wish sit did do that
      • 2012-06-07 15932, 2012

      • Wizzcat
        would probably make more sense to just add a url field to the add release edit page so you could bulk paste all the windows you have open anyway instead of waiting for the edit to go through
      • 2012-06-07 15959, 2012

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15933, 2012

      • jcazevedo joined the channel
      • 2012-06-07 15918, 2012

      • ijabz
        This release http://musicbrainz.org/release/0b0ec1f1-0450-4e3e… has no track lengths , although each associated recording does
      • 2012-06-07 15908, 2012

      • ijabz
        I tried to fix by going into edit/ recording tabs, clicked on 'infer track duratuons from associated recordings' and do an edit
      • 2012-06-07 15925, 2012

      • reosarevok
        And it did nothing?