#musicbrainz

sorry

:)

oh ok ;)

sorry

(since the ones with EP on the cover are different songs, not single + remix)

yes in that case they include two different songs

Oh, btw

exactly

thanks ;)

I imagine you've noticed the changes by now

yeees ;)

thanks thanks many thanks!

;)

But I don't know if you've seen you can select several secondary types by control-clicking

:)

oh that one didn't know but that's awesome!

ehehe now I'll add single+remix which is amazing

is it just me or MB is superslow?

_5moufl: basic browsing seems ok for me

Yeah, I haven't noticed anything too bad

\q

nvm ocharles, it's just my wifi :x

sometimes it slows down until I reinstall the (same) driver :s

heh

"Abusing wireless to download new MusicBrainz dump (@ The Phoenix Cinema)"

hum, I can't seem to find one, but is there some kind of plugin for picard that would add lyrics to tracks ?

$if($eq(%album%,'[non-album]')

is this valid?

ah without ' '

you're missing at least one parenthesis

yes it's if(arg1,arg2,..)...

hum, more than one iswc for a work ?

many userscripts broke, damn, better call it a day and decide it's the week end

mat_: sadly, it happens

(having two or even three ISWCs for the same thing)

it happened to me but they were slightly different versions of the same work :-)

anyway, I said week end :-)

heh

soooooooooooooooooooo weird

all the anti- genres seem like slight variations of the non-anti genre, so to me it always seems like a bullshit prefix.

is single also considered a remix, if it has original + remixes on it?

SultS: i'd say usually not - a lot of singles (maxi-singles?) come with various extra tracks, such as remixes.

so only if there is no original version on it?

oh, but it’s for a release group… and it can contain both variants

Yeah

I don't know if there's a clear agreement on whether "X: The Remixes" is the same RG as X

if they release a single that's marketed distinctly from the original single, and is primarily remixes, then it would go into a new release group

imo

most singles I come across contain mostly mixes and/or remixes that are different from the original mix, but mostly also include the original… I would like have them all in the same group

SultS: yeah, most of those are just considered different variations of the same single, with the remixes being extra/bonus tracks.

sure, but some of these don’t have the original, yet released at the same time as the rest

hey why it's not possible to upload simple avatar

dubwai: “simple avatar”?

dubwai: because that would mean we have to store the avatars ourselves

reosarevok: cover art archive? ;-)

i don't like web2.0 collecting personal information service, but i like to show my "face"

lol musicbrainz forum save avatar, but main site not possible?

It's pre-built in the forum

10kb is so much :-D

Maybe it will be done later, I don't know - the point was more avoiding coding all that, I think

good idea because http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/44717/i...

Well, that's why it's optional :)

Another way of having an avatar would be nice, but it's admittedly not a very big priority

yes priority is not bit :-)

also why blog header don't follow to blog home page

i foung "Blog Home" at right side ~1 minute

*found

Hmm, live + spokenword + albums: http://musicbrainz.org/artist/f2a05fc2-b8bc-448...

Can anyone think of any possible examples of an '(radio drama|audiobook) (album|single|ep)' before I propose those as additional primary types?

machigaeta_mofumofushitaio's english isn't great, but you could ask him to confirm that the albums were performed live for an audience.

kepstin-work: It wasn’t that I don’t trust it, I just think it’s good to see combinations. :-)

http://www.discogs.com/release/293350 : misspelling, or artist intent? :-)

This is why I hate http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Principle/Arti...

huh

"creating new imaginary words for stylistic purposes"

Does this suggest those should be "fixed"?

I would say it does.

I mean, the examples seem to imply "no", but then the writing of the rationale is confusing

wtf is a anti-x genre?

I'm listening to any-crap?

CatCat: the same as a genre, but done by pedantic hipsters

:P

Now grooving to: Queen ~ One Vision (5:50) (from Live at Wembley '86 (disc 1)) (1986)

in picard will be add changes to show primary and secondary types?

in tags

Isn’t it basically “alternative x”?

to be precise, anti-folk is simply folk done be people who don't like being labelled as folk.

or “neo x”?

or “neo-neo x”

dubwai: probably - ask bitmap or luks, but probably

the amusing thing is just that the release I linked is tagged both 'folk' and 'antifolk' :)

reosarevok: the examples are actually counter-examples or exceptions

(so I can grab the native-language sortname)

d

re [17:49] reosarevok"creating new imaginary words for stylistic purposes"

se ENGRISH

how long is you long your hair to be grow to be?

I ams to not knows this

but every non-n<tive does this at soem pint

bizarro!

we do it ven i nnorway

it's called "engorsk"

swedish/norwegian mangeled is caleld "svorsk"

hawke_: my point is that "creating new imaginary words for stylistic purposes" sounds like pretty much the definition of artist intent

reosarevok: Yep.

That's like correcting Motörhead because "Motor doesn't have that weird thing!!!!"

even if not non-native english, peopel are bound to see this and make up shit becasue they think it's "cool"

thoghu I don't mind whne peopelpaly with language

reosarevok: dude totally

hn fail typing why today?

:p

You Are Nothing If Not a Hound-dog

:(

Why aren't there more rap listeners on style

I'm never going to get opinions about the mixtape/street thing

Forums? (when they work)

That adds... maybe one or two

(I mean, the only one I know for sure is voice and he suggested the wording)

um, ping known active hip-hop-minded editors and ask them to weigh in?

Maybe

Guess it won't hurt

It's worked for me (although I got no sense of whether it annoyed the editors I pinged, because I'm too self-absorbed to know that sort of thing)

I guess if they mind they can not answer :p

of course there's http://musicbrainz.org/work/45ec51ab-2614-33fd-... but that's pretty sketchy

Wow, this looks like a clusterfuck: http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/2e515ed9-3...