#musicbrainz

/

      • CatCat
        thanks warp
      • 2012-01-23 02332, 2012

      • CatCat
        welcoem back btw
      • 2012-01-23 02337, 2012

      • CatCat
        welcome even
      • 2012-01-23 02342, 2012

      • derwin
        beyond that I live very frugally
      • 2012-01-23 02344, 2012

      • derwin
        oops
      • 2012-01-23 02357, 2012

      • lidel
        from 36% to 51% in 30 seconds!
      • 2012-01-23 02300, 2012

      • lidel
        \m/
      • 2012-01-23 02355, 2012

      • outsidecontext_ joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02326, 2012

      • navap
        "we can do like congress and have
      • 2012-01-23 02328, 2012

      • navap
        ammendment of the ammendment of the ammendment"
      • 2012-01-23 02335, 2012

      • navap
      • 2012-01-23 02329, 2012

      • adhawkins joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02355, 2012

      • the_metalgamer joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02342, 2012

      • hawke_
        The release editor loses track number changes when deleting a track. Is this a known problem?
      • 2012-01-23 02325, 2012

      • hawke_
        Related: is there a way to apply track re-ordering without hitting Next and then Previous?
      • 2012-01-23 02350, 2012

      • kovacsur joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02340, 2012

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02331, 2012

      • ocharles
        [hiphop] "new" DaVinci album is quite nice http://swtbrds.bandcamp.com/album/feast-or-famine
      • 2012-01-23 02343, 2012

      • ocharles
        freebie too
      • 2012-01-23 02354, 2012

      • kepstin-laptop
        yey freezing rain :/
      • 2012-01-23 02327, 2012

      • bitmap joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02353, 2012

      • nano-
        Humm.. I have a song that I've written metadata to with picard, of type wma, but mutagen-inspect can't inspect it.... and yet picard uses mutagen?
      • 2012-01-23 02302, 2012

      • nano-
        What's up with that?
      • 2012-01-23 02311, 2012

      • luks
        nano-: picard itself can read it?
      • 2012-01-23 02304, 2012

      • nano-
        yeah
      • 2012-01-23 02317, 2012

      • luks
        old version of mutagen perhaps?
      • 2012-01-23 02318, 2012

      • nano-
        'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xbc in position 0: ordinal not in range(128)
      • 2012-01-23 02327, 2012

      • nano-
        ii python-mutagen 1.19-2.1 audio metadata editing library
      • 2012-01-23 02311, 2012

      • luks
        mutagen had a bug regarding saving cover art
      • 2012-01-23 02310, 2012

      • nano-
        it didn't contain coverart when that got printed though, but now i added the coverart plugin to picard and now it has coverart, still same error message though.
      • 2012-01-23 02341, 2012

      • luks
        hm, now that I think about it, this might be a different issue
      • 2012-01-23 02300, 2012

      • luks
        I remember mutagen-inspect having problem with printing the binary tags in wma
      • 2012-01-23 02301, 2012

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02349, 2012

      • nano-
        I think it had a binary tag before, think WM/MCDI is binary.
      • 2012-01-23 02328, 2012

      • djce joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02338, 2012

      • HeinzBoettjer joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02350, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        murdos: ping
      • 2012-01-23 02314, 2012

      • murdos
        hrglgrmpf: pong
      • 2012-01-23 02347, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        I think I watched a MBID switch by chance last week or so
      • 2012-01-23 02300, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        but I'm not sure, and I can't research it quite well
      • 2012-01-23 02314, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
      • 2012-01-23 02323, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        so a clarification would be great :-)
      • 2012-01-23 02351, 2012

      • murdos
        indeed :-)
      • 2012-01-23 02323, 2012

      • Leftmost joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02345, 2012

      • hawke_
        murdos: Are there all that many cases of different recordings with the same ISRC?
      • 2012-01-23 02352, 2012

      • hawke_
        murdos: (as in, in MB)
      • 2012-01-23 02316, 2012

      • murdos
        hawke_: more than 2000
      • 2012-01-23 02308, 2012

      • hawke_
        Does that mean “at least 2000, but the number is unknown? or “not much more than 2000, but the precise number is unknown”?
      • 2012-01-23 02317, 2012

      • jordan__ joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02314, 2012

      • jordan__
        wondering if anyone could shed some light on a problem I running into on setting up musicbrainz server
      • 2012-01-23 02315, 2012

      • murdos
        hawke_: it means I don't have the exact number in front of me
      • 2012-01-23 02324, 2012

      • hawke_
        But somewhere around that?
      • 2012-01-23 02321, 2012

      • murdos
        hawke_: I think it was more around 3000, but my query is still not perfect and doesn't put aside recordings with multiple ISRCs
      • 2012-01-23 02344, 2012

      • murdos
        so the exact number of recordings to be merged is not yet determined ;-)
      • 2012-01-23 02303, 2012

      • hawke_
        It’s a relatively small number though, considering the number of recordings in MB
      • 2012-01-23 02344, 2012

      • murdos
        a lot of merging has already been done
      • 2012-01-23 02355, 2012

      • murdos
        (based on ISRC I mean)
      • 2012-01-23 02335, 2012

      • HeinzBoettjer has left the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02346, 2012

      • murdos
        hawke_: however I think there's a need for frequent merging based on ISRC.
      • 2012-01-23 02300, 2012

      • murdos
        e.g. when I add a new release, I add new recordings by default, then add ISRCs. So I'm sure to not misuse one recording. But then some merging is needed.
      • 2012-01-23 02314, 2012

      • hawke_
        I think there’s a need for frequent merging, period. :-p
      • 2012-01-23 02330, 2012

      • hawke_
        For essentially the same reason you gave
      • 2012-01-23 02350, 2012

      • hawke_
        It’s unfortunate that such merging is a gigantic pain
      • 2012-01-23 02319, 2012

      • hawke_
        I just had to do that on (almost) the entire works of Jonathan Coulton, about 175 tracks
      • 2012-01-23 02338, 2012

      • murdos
        do you think automatic merging based on acoustid can be safe?
      • 2012-01-23 02348, 2012

      • hawke_
        Not currently, and in general no.
      • 2012-01-23 02308, 2012

      • kovacsur
        it usually gives remasters the same acoustid as the originals
      • 2012-01-23 02327, 2012

      • hawke_
        That, and there are too many recordings with wrong acoustIDs.
      • 2012-01-23 02354, 2012

      • murdos
        any ideas where this incorrect acoustIDs come from? is it because they were added based on an existing wrong recording-PUID mapping?
      • 2012-01-23 02304, 2012

      • hawke_
        I believe so.
      • 2012-01-23 02328, 2012

      • hawke_
        Many of them are easily detected by having completely wrong durations
      • 2012-01-23 02335, 2012

      • hawke_
        Some of them are harder than that. :-)
      • 2012-01-23 02303, 2012

      • reosarevok joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02305, 2012

      • hawke_
      • 2012-01-23 02342, 2012

      • hawke_
        I’m fairly sure one of those is “Grease” and the other is “Grease (reprise)” but it’s not easy to tell by duration alone
      • 2012-01-23 02325, 2012

      • hawke_
      • 2012-01-23 02358, 2012

      • CatCat
      • 2012-01-23 02329, 2012

      • mylogic joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02325, 2012

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2012-01-23 02306, 2012

      • hawke_
        CatCat: Voted.
      • 2012-01-23 02308, 2012

      • CatCat
        tackar
      • 2012-01-23 02315, 2012

      • CatCat
        och nu, natti natti
      • 2012-01-23 02328, 2012

      • hawke_
        murdos: Something else to consider with regard to acoustID/recordings/remasters, is how difficult it is to copy a existing release’s tracklist without copying the recordings too, when adding a remaster album
      • 2012-01-23 02334, 2012

      • CatCat
        takk SultS stealth voting also
      • 2012-01-23 02347, 2012

      • CatCat
        natta!