#musicbrainz

/

      • CatCat
        loi ocharles squeduling game 's usagage of times have entered the vernacular

        • 2012-01-13 01356, 2012

      • nikki
        reosarevok: dunno

        • 2012-01-13 01311, 2012

      • hawke_1
        whaaaaaat? nikki doesn’t know of a ticket??

        • 2012-01-13 01324, 2012

      • nikki
        I don't know of one, but I also haven't read many of today's jira emails either

        • 2012-01-13 01342, 2012

      • nikki
        so it could be that there is one

        • 2012-01-13 01358, 2012

      • CatCat
        is there a way to STOP picard from adding "disc 1" to stuff? also STOP it from adding tracknumbers like 1/12 2/12 etc

        • 2012-01-13 01326, 2012

      • CatCat
        it's a pitaqq to remove this after you tag

        • 2012-01-13 01329, 2012

      • CatCat
        ?

        • 2012-01-13 01335, 2012

      • CatCat
        pita not pitaqq?

        • 2012-01-13 01336, 2012

      • hawke_1
        CatCat: What do you mean? It doesn’t do the tracknumber thing as far as I know

        • 2012-01-13 01342, 2012

      • CatCat
        ys it does

        • 2012-01-13 01344, 2012

      • hawke_1
        ?

        • 2012-01-13 01350, 2012

      • reosarevok
        It depends on your naming scheme I guess?

        • 2012-01-13 01354, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Or something

        • 2012-01-13 01354, 2012

      • kepstin
        CatCat: sounds like you have some extra plugins or tagger script installed

        • 2012-01-13 01354, 2012

      • CatCat
        it most certainly does

        • 2012-01-13 01356, 2012

      • hawke_1
        Mine just saves TRACKNUMBER and TOTALTRACKS

        • 2012-01-13 01304, 2012

      • hawke_1
        the rest sounds like a plugin

        • 2012-01-13 01304, 2012

      • kepstin
        CatCat: it doesn't do that by default

        • 2012-01-13 01310, 2012

      • CatCat
        i have nothing, that is NOTHING installed (never figured out how)

        • 2012-01-13 01326, 2012

      • nikki
        hawke_1: it depends on the format

        • 2012-01-13 01327, 2012

      • hawke_1
        CatCat: in file names or tags?

        • 2012-01-13 01330, 2012

      • CatCat
        yea that total tracks make it stop doing that

        • 2012-01-13 01333, 2012

      • CatCat
        tags

        • 2012-01-13 01339, 2012

      • CatCat
        i don't mind in filenames

        • 2012-01-13 01358, 2012

      • CatCat
        given dics nr are 1<

        • 2012-01-13 01304, 2012

      • hawke_1
        CatCat: you could tell taggerscript to unset %totaltracks%

        • 2012-01-13 01306, 2012

      • kepstin
        CatCat: what version of picard are you using?

        • 2012-01-13 01307, 2012

      • CatCat
        discs*

        • 2012-01-13 01310, 2012

      • CatCat
        hm

        • 2012-01-13 01317, 2012

      • CatCat
        0.15 beta

        • 2012-01-13 01329, 2012

      • CatCat
        or wait on the other mac

        • 2012-01-13 01346, 2012

      • kepstin
        CatCat: you really should be using 0.16.

        • 2012-01-13 01307, 2012

      • bitmap joined the channel

        • 2012-01-13 01320, 2012

      • CatCat
        well i'm not used to picard updatign his often :P

        • 2012-01-13 01324, 2012

      • CatCat
        this*

        • 2012-01-13 01319, 2012

      • CatCat
        is that thing at the end of the field thing fixed in 0.16?

        • 2012-01-13 01342, 2012

      • CatCat
        typing and then it goes t othe end of the sentence which is pita

        • 2012-01-13 01316, 2012

      • hawke_1
        http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-4183 entered for the release editor problem

        • 2012-01-13 01335, 2012

      • kepstin
        dunno, I never type anything in picard.

        • 2012-01-13 01301, 2012

      • hawke_1
        warp: You do stuff with the RE, right?

        • 2012-01-13 01311, 2012

      • bitmap
        CatCat: it's not fixed in 0.16, but it's fixed for 1.0 (though I'm not sure when 1.0 is being released)

        • 2012-01-13 01318, 2012

      • warp
        hawke_1: sometimes I add or edit releases. yes. :P

        • 2012-01-13 01329, 2012

      • hawke_1
        warp: :-p

        • 2012-01-13 01332, 2012

      • reosarevok
        warp, http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-4183

        • 2012-01-13 01337, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I guess :p

        • 2012-01-13 01342, 2012

      • hawke_1
        warp: You make changes to the code of the release editor, right? :-p

        • 2012-01-13 01307, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        haha

        • 2012-01-13 01321, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        I found a two different songs that have the same ISWC apparently

        • 2012-01-13 01351, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        what to do?

        • 2012-01-13 01308, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Cry

        • 2012-01-13 01310, 2012

      • warp
        hawke_1: yes, that too. missing entities is originally ocharles' work, so either of us is qualified to work on that bug.

        • 2012-01-13 01337, 2012

      • hawke_1
        hrglgrmpf: enter them both with an annotation? Or does MB enforce 1 work per ISWC?

        • 2012-01-13 01321, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        no... but it seems strange... I can't be sure if they have both the same ISWC, since they also have the same name

        • 2012-01-13 01323, 2012

      • hawke_1
        warp: Indeed, I just wanted to call it to your attention.

        • 2012-01-13 01357, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        but it seems so... the band had a song "Hexagons IV" on their album, and then released a EP with "Hexagons I"-"Hexagons VI", all new songs... and all the new songs got ISWCs, except the old "Hexagons IV" :-)

        • 2012-01-13 01300, 2012

      • hawke_1
        And it’s definitely not a new performance of the old song?

        • 2012-01-13 01308, 2012

      • warp packs up and runs off.

        • 2012-01-13 01311, 2012

      • warp
        bye!

        • 2012-01-13 01336, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        hawke_1: yes, completely new song, shares nothing (music/lyrics)

        • 2012-01-13 01349, 2012

      • hawke_1
        Sounds like someone screwed up I guess

        • 2012-01-13 01308, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        http://musicbrainz.org/release/f4c43048-05f1-41d1…

        • 2012-01-13 01331, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        yes, seems like it...

        • 2012-01-13 01333, 2012

      • kepstin finishes upgrading his replicated db to schema version 14 :)

        • 2012-01-13 01305, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        but it feels wrong to give them the same ISWC, since it is due to an error, and could possibly be fixed later

        • 2012-01-13 01330, 2012

      • kepstin
        hrglgrmpf: i'd put the iswc only on the original work, and leave the new one without an iswc

        • 2012-01-13 01336, 2012

      • kepstin
        add an annotation to explain why

        • 2012-01-13 01344, 2012

      • hrglgrmpf
        kepstin: yes, that's the plan

        • 2012-01-13 01334, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel

        • 2012-01-13 01338, 2012

      • CatCat
        I'll wait for 1 then

        • 2012-01-13 01300, 2012

      • hawke_1
        Hmm, did something change the sort order on label pages?

        • 2012-01-13 01314, 2012

      • hawke_1
        http://beta.musicbrainz.org/label/cafee478-ec00-4… → the Intégrale list used to be in order

        • 2012-01-13 01336, 2012

      • ruaok
        we did have to futz with the sort order on label stuff yesterday.

        • 2012-01-13 01353, 2012

      • hawke_1
        :-(

        • 2012-01-13 01313, 2012

      • ruaok
        better file a bug

        • 2012-01-13 01316, 2012

      • hawke_1
        k

        • 2012-01-13 01329, 2012

      • hawke_1
        Filed.

        • 2012-01-13 01309, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel

        • 2012-01-13 01312, 2012

      • aylex joined the channel

        • 2012-01-13 01348, 2012

      • aylex
        Hey. Can anybody tell me what the "sampled by" relation ship is good for? I came to this question when seeing a recording of Orff's "O Fortuna" from Carmina Burana being sampled by "Hate me now (feat. Puff Daddy)", which seems kind of odd (http://musicbrainz.org/recording/ec198d16-cab2-49…)

        • 2012-01-13 01334, 2012

      • Clint
        odd how?

        • 2012-01-13 01335, 2012

      • aylex
        odd in the sense that the recording is on a release from 1968, and it seemed strange that a relationship to Puff Daddy is displayed for it.

        • 2012-01-13 01357, 2012

      • aylex
        I kind of didn't expect to see it there.

        • 2012-01-13 01326, 2012

      • kepstin
        aylex: that relation says that a portion of the 1968 recording was 'sampled' for use in the new recording.

        • 2012-01-13 01343, 2012

      • kepstin
        i.e. parts of it were copied and incorporated into the new recording.

        • 2012-01-13 01346, 2012

      • aylex
        ok, so Puff Daddy used part of that recording.

        • 2012-01-13 01317, 2012

      • aylex
        then it might indeed make sense :)

        • 2012-01-13 01318, 2012

      • drsaunde1 joined the channel

        • 2012-01-13 01336, 2012

      • kovacsur_ joined the channel

        • 2012-01-13 01347, 2012

      • xdnny_ joined the channel

        • 2012-01-13 01317, 2012

      • ehrgeiz
        http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Category:Engineer_Rela… there is a balance engineer relationship mentioned.. but it's not present!

        • 2012-01-13 01339, 2012

      • skd5aner joined the channel

        • 2012-01-13 01329, 2012

      • kovacsur_ has left the channel

        • 2012-01-13 01346, 2012

      • kovacsur joined the channel