So either a new work with that credit, or just on recording
2012-04-27 11858, 2012
reosarevok
(well, not a new work since the work is there)
2012-04-27 11812, 2012
reosarevok merges promenades
2012-04-27 11838, 2012
Mineo
hawke_1: you did see the decca logo on that cover, right? no need to look at those small covers on amazon :)
2012-04-27 11854, 2012
hawke_1
Mineo: I know. Like I said, I worked on it before and remember it
2012-04-27 11859, 2012
CallerNo6
I still tend to believe that an arrangement has to prove it's workness.
2012-04-27 11802, 2012
hawke_1
I just wish we had a better way to deal with derivative works
2012-04-27 11824, 2012
hawke_1
e.g. hide them from the original composer’s works list, possibly as an expansion of the original work
2012-04-27 11815, 2012
reosarevok would still like an extra "arrangement" level :p
2012-04-27 11812, 2012
hawke_1
And I would like an extra “master” level…but we both have to actually *use* this database
2012-04-27 11825, 2012
CallerNo6 chuckles
2012-04-27 11838, 2012
hawke_1
This report is really nice though
2012-04-27 11846, 2012
hawke_1
much easier than searching for BWV # manually
2012-04-27 11853, 2012
kurtjx joined the channel
2012-04-27 11813, 2012
hawke_1
I do not like BWV 61. :-/
2012-04-27 11856, 2012
hawke_1
Also it would be nice if this sorted (roman numerals) consistently.
2012-04-27 11807, 2012
reosarevok
Yeah
2012-04-27 11823, 2012
reosarevok
I told nikki, but she was doing other stuff (nikki, can we convince you? :) )
2012-04-27 11845, 2012
reosarevok
Hmm
2012-04-27 11849, 2012
reosarevok
61 seems to agree
2012-04-27 11855, 2012
reosarevok
(as in, simple merges)
2012-04-27 11836, 2012
hawke_1
Mostly…There seems like a little disagreement in the number of movements
2012-04-27 11844, 2012
hawke_1
I just merged based on the name
2012-04-27 11851, 2012
hawke_1
BWV 82/82a is … interesting
2012-04-27 11859, 2012
hawke_1
maybe name BWV 82 “Cantata for bass, oboe, two violins, viola, and basso continuo…” and 82a “Cantata for soprano, flute, two violins, viola, and basso continuo.”?
2012-04-27 11802, 2012
hawke_1
Seems a little wordy though
2012-04-27 11846, 2012
reosarevok
So 82 is for bass and 82a for soprano?
2012-04-27 11855, 2012
reosarevok
Why not disambiguations, "for bass" and "for soprano"? :p
2012-04-27 11805, 2012
hawke_1
yes, and the oboe part is replaced with flute
2012-04-27 11827, 2012
hawke_1
reosarevok: The guideline says include instrumentation! ;-)
2012-04-27 11848, 2012
reosarevok
What guideline? There's no work guideline :p
2012-04-27 11858, 2012
hawke_1
I know
2012-04-27 11808, 2012
hawke_1
was quoting your message from earlier
2012-04-27 11813, 2012
reosarevok
Yeah, yeah
2012-04-27 11831, 2012
reosarevok
You can add the full instrumentation to the annotation, though, since you have it
2012-04-27 11837, 2012
reosarevok
(of the parent works)
2012-04-27 11852, 2012
nikki
CatCat: whoever said 3 days is totally deluded, it's definitely two weeks o_O
2012-04-27 11801, 2012
nikki
CatCat: after all, it's from fourteen nights...
2012-04-27 11812, 2012
nikki
kepstin-laptop: well, what I can say, it's nice and simple :P and now it's been like that so long I can't bear to change it
2012-04-27 11818, 2012
nikki
reosarevok: what two state switch are you after?
2012-04-27 11832, 2012
reosarevok
"checked / fixed" vs. "not checked / fixed"
2012-04-27 11839, 2012
reosarevok
So we can know what is done
2012-04-27 11842, 2012
nikki
how do I know if it's checked/fixed?
2012-04-27 11847, 2012
reosarevok
We tell it :p
2012-04-27 11852, 2012
reosarevok
A button or whatever
2012-04-27 11804, 2012
reosarevok
(if that can't be done, maybe it can mark stuff being merged?)
2012-04-27 11805, 2012
nikki
I can mark things with pending edits easily
2012-04-27 11820, 2012
reosarevok
And sort?
2012-04-27 11829, 2012
reosarevok
I guess that's harder?
2012-04-27 11813, 2012
hawke_1 votes for ditching roman numerals. Screw tradition on this one!
2012-04-27 11817, 2012
reosarevok
Not that it solves much
2012-04-27 11835, 2012
reosarevok
I mean, a lot of work-parts don't have any official numbering
2012-04-27 11846, 2012
reosarevok
Or it's not sequential
2012-04-27 11849, 2012
reosarevok
So...
2012-04-27 11808, 2012
reosarevok looks at Pictures at an Exhibition and its promenades between numbered parts
2012-04-27 11826, 2012
nikki
sorting is a bit harder
2012-04-27 11840, 2012
CallerNo6
ordinality for works!
2012-04-27 11804, 2012
CallerNo6
(is a broken record right twice a day? probably not)
2012-04-27 11807, 2012
CatCat
nikki: yea I know
2012-04-27 11823, 2012
bitmap joined the channel
2012-04-27 11852, 2012
hawke_1
CallerNo6: lol “preëxisting”
2012-04-27 11817, 2012
CatCat
🙈 🙉 🙊
2012-04-27 11858, 2012
Shepard joined the channel
2012-04-27 11835, 2012
the_metalgamer joined the channel
2012-04-27 11855, 2012
nikki
reosarevok: it shows pending edits now
2012-04-27 11803, 2012
reosarevok
:D
2012-04-27 11809, 2012
reosarevok
hawke_1, CallerNo6 ^
2012-04-27 11827, 2012
nikki
do you have an example of where the sorting is wrong?
