cjk32: it applies every hour, refreshing every 5 minutes won't change that
warp wonders if jQuery().trigger() fires events in a predictable order.
reosarevok
I come from a country where minimum wages are 1200+ and kebabs are like 3 euros, and here minimum wages are like 300 euros and kebabs are like 5
It's just too expensive
cjk32
Sorry, I must be missing something. When modbot next runs, will all these not then dissappear, but end up replaced with another set in exactly the same state?
reosarevok
cjk32, yeah, they should
And that set should become larger the closer the hour is
CallerNo6
reosarevok: In that sense, the kebab /is/ like a burrito. If it costs more than $7 it misses the point entirely.
cjk32
Okay, so I normally expect to see the entire first page in the state state then, except for very shortly after the hour?
ocharles
cjk32: pretty much
reosarevok
If you're voting on the full Open Edits list
You could as well start always in page 40 or something
It will be equally helpful and you'll avoid those
Shepard joined the channel
cjk32
Ah okay, I was thrown by nikki's comment "It's not that common", which was on reflection part of another converstation :)
nikki
I didn't realise you were looking at *all* open edits
reosarevok
Few people do that, to avoid death by voting
MaynardWaters joined the channel
There's a limit to the number of source-less edits a person can survive per day :)
cjk32
I'll start a few pages in. It seems pointless voting Yes on things that will get accepted shortly anyway, and a unfair to vote No without an chance to respond.
Sorry, I should have been clearer about where I was looking.
I started with all edits; I'm ambitious!
reosarevok
cjk32, if you want to be ambitious AND extra helpful
Start with all removal and merging edits
ocharles
yea
reosarevok
(well, if you avoid merge recording and merge work for a while you'll keep more sanity)
ocharles
merge edits (especially release and release group) ones usually don't need any source info
Shepard joined the channel
cjk32
With several invariably without a duration
reosarevok
cjk32, merge recording and merge work are a pain, and hard to vote on if you don't know the artist well
But the rest of the mergers are relatively simple
Either they're correct or they're clearly wrong, most of the time
ocharles
I want to create an "iterative" voting system
it would show you an /edit/id page (from a search) and when you submit your vote, it shows you the next edit in the search
useful?
warp
when I vote, i generally do most of the voting on an overview page with X edits. not the /edit/id page.
reosarevok
Yeah
warp
I usually only see the /edit/id page by clicking links in this channel.
ianmcorvidae
ocharles: yes, useful :) I don't get enough info on the search page
ocharles
hmm, the search page and the /edit/id page give the same info though
reosarevok
They don't give you voting info
ianmcorvidae
^ that
reosarevok likes to know what trusted users have voted
if I see that nikki or someone like that voted yes, I'm pretty likely to say "oh, okay" without checking _quite_ as thoroughly
reosarevok
Hmm
ianmcorvidae
or if I know someone who really knows this given artist is voting yes
or whatevr
cjk32
ocharles: agreed, a list of edits is busy on the screen, and when switching between tabs to check things can be quite awkward
reosarevok
Actually, I wouldn't mind a pref to show votes by certain editors, selected by me, on the edit list
(with needing to go to the actual edit to see them all)
ianmcorvidae
that's just needlessly complex, I think
reosarevok
Maybe
ianmcorvidae
it's a really twiddly level of control that only AEs and other over-users like me would use :P
nikki
isn't that the case for pretty much everything in the advanced search? :P
ijabz joined the channel
ocharles
Another thought
having automatic facts under edits might quite nice
for example, in merge release groups "Facts: * all release group artist credits are the same * all titles are identical * all release groups have matching types"
reosarevok would rather show them only when that wasn't the case
reosarevok
But I can see how it might be nice
cjk32
"ERROR: column reference "status" is ambiguous", known issue?
ocharles
yea, and fixed
sadly there's no work around, other than "wait for monday"
you can't search for an artist/label and provide a status too
cjk32
okay, thanks. Monday's not too far.
ocharles
Hrm, if you merge 2 separate release into one, there's no need to merge the release groups, is there?
I guess actually, it's more correct to do that than wait for them to be deleted
reosarevok
Well, you shouldn't force it for sure
nikki
there's a ticket about merging release groups
reosarevok
But the previous way, in which you chose whether to also enter a Merge RG edit, was kinda nice
nikki
that only showed up if there was only one release in the release group that would be merged, didn't it?
(which I guess makes sense, if there are others, you should go take a look and make sure they should be merged)