cjk32: it applies every hour, refreshing every 5 minutes won't change that
2011-08-18 23051, 2011
warp wonders if jQuery().trigger() fires events in a predictable order.
2011-08-18 23056, 2011
reosarevok
I come from a country where minimum wages are 1200+ and kebabs are like 3 euros, and here minimum wages are like 300 euros and kebabs are like 5
2011-08-18 23002, 2011
reosarevok
It's just too expensive
2011-08-18 23023, 2011
cjk32
Sorry, I must be missing something. When modbot next runs, will all these not then dissappear, but end up replaced with another set in exactly the same state?
2011-08-18 23051, 2011
reosarevok
cjk32, yeah, they should
2011-08-18 23012, 2011
reosarevok
And that set should become larger the closer the hour is
2011-08-18 23013, 2011
CallerNo6
reosarevok: In that sense, the kebab /is/ like a burrito. If it costs more than $7 it misses the point entirely.
2011-08-18 23044, 2011
cjk32
Okay, so I normally expect to see the entire first page in the state state then, except for very shortly after the hour?
2011-08-18 23050, 2011
ocharles
cjk32: pretty much
2011-08-18 23029, 2011
reosarevok
If you're voting on the full Open Edits list
2011-08-18 23039, 2011
reosarevok
You could as well start always in page 40 or something
2011-08-18 23050, 2011
reosarevok
It will be equally helpful and you'll avoid those
2011-08-18 23009, 2011
Shepard joined the channel
2011-08-18 23021, 2011
cjk32
Ah okay, I was thrown by nikki's comment "It's not that common", which was on reflection part of another converstation :)
2011-08-18 23038, 2011
nikki
I didn't realise you were looking at *all* open edits
2011-08-18 23008, 2011
reosarevok
Few people do that, to avoid death by voting
2011-08-18 23030, 2011
MaynardWaters joined the channel
2011-08-18 23034, 2011
reosarevok
There's a limit to the number of source-less edits a person can survive per day :)
2011-08-18 23044, 2011
cjk32
I'll start a few pages in. It seems pointless voting Yes on things that will get accepted shortly anyway, and a unfair to vote No without an chance to respond.
2011-08-18 23002, 2011
cjk32
Sorry, I should have been clearer about where I was looking.
2011-08-18 23027, 2011
cjk32
I started with all edits; I'm ambitious!
2011-08-18 23043, 2011
reosarevok
cjk32, if you want to be ambitious AND extra helpful
2011-08-18 23053, 2011
reosarevok
Start with all removal and merging edits
2011-08-18 23000, 2011
ocharles
yea
2011-08-18 23014, 2011
reosarevok
(well, if you avoid merge recording and merge work for a while you'll keep more sanity)
2011-08-18 23014, 2011
ocharles
merge edits (especially release and release group) ones usually don't need any source info
2011-08-18 23049, 2011
Shepard joined the channel
2011-08-18 23059, 2011
cjk32
With several invariably without a duration
2011-08-18 23026, 2011
reosarevok
cjk32, merge recording and merge work are a pain, and hard to vote on if you don't know the artist well
2011-08-18 23037, 2011
reosarevok
But the rest of the mergers are relatively simple
2011-08-18 23049, 2011
reosarevok
Either they're correct or they're clearly wrong, most of the time
2011-08-18 23001, 2011
ocharles
I want to create an "iterative" voting system
2011-08-18 23021, 2011
ocharles
it would show you an /edit/id page (from a search) and when you submit your vote, it shows you the next edit in the search
2011-08-18 23025, 2011
ocharles
useful?
2011-08-18 23018, 2011
warp
when I vote, i generally do most of the voting on an overview page with X edits. not the /edit/id page.
2011-08-18 23021, 2011
reosarevok
Yeah
2011-08-18 23034, 2011
warp
I usually only see the /edit/id page by clicking links in this channel.
2011-08-18 23021, 2011
ianmcorvidae
ocharles: yes, useful :) I don't get enough info on the search page
2011-08-18 23038, 2011
ocharles
hmm, the search page and the /edit/id page give the same info though
2011-08-18 23011, 2011
reosarevok
They don't give you voting info
2011-08-18 23017, 2011
ianmcorvidae
^ that
2011-08-18 23019, 2011
reosarevok likes to know what trusted users have voted
2011-08-18 23043, 2011
ianmcorvidae
if I see that nikki or someone like that voted yes, I'm pretty likely to say "oh, okay" without checking _quite_ as thoroughly
2011-08-18 23045, 2011
reosarevok
Hmm
2011-08-18 23056, 2011
ianmcorvidae
or if I know someone who really knows this given artist is voting yes
2011-08-18 23058, 2011
ianmcorvidae
or whatevr
2011-08-18 23013, 2011
cjk32
ocharles: agreed, a list of edits is busy on the screen, and when switching between tabs to check things can be quite awkward
2011-08-18 23023, 2011
reosarevok
Actually, I wouldn't mind a pref to show votes by certain editors, selected by me, on the edit list
2011-08-18 23039, 2011
reosarevok
(with needing to go to the actual edit to see them all)
2011-08-18 23045, 2011
ianmcorvidae
that's just needlessly complex, I think
2011-08-18 23050, 2011
reosarevok
Maybe
2011-08-18 23006, 2011
ianmcorvidae
it's a really twiddly level of control that only AEs and other over-users like me would use :P
2011-08-18 23007, 2011
nikki
isn't that the case for pretty much everything in the advanced search? :P
2011-08-18 23037, 2011
ijabz joined the channel
2011-08-18 23048, 2011
ocharles
Another thought
2011-08-18 23055, 2011
ocharles
having automatic facts under edits might quite nice
2011-08-18 23019, 2011
ocharles
for example, in merge release groups "Facts: * all release group artist credits are the same * all titles are identical * all release groups have matching types"
2011-08-18 23013, 2011
reosarevok would rather show them only when that wasn't the case
2011-08-18 23018, 2011
reosarevok
But I can see how it might be nice
2011-08-18 23009, 2011
cjk32
"ERROR: column reference "status" is ambiguous", known issue?
2011-08-18 23029, 2011
ocharles
yea, and fixed
2011-08-18 23036, 2011
ocharles
sadly there's no work around, other than "wait for monday"
2011-08-18 23044, 2011
ocharles
you can't search for an artist/label and provide a status too
2011-08-18 23023, 2011
cjk32
okay, thanks. Monday's not too far.
2011-08-18 23049, 2011
ocharles
Hrm, if you merge 2 separate release into one, there's no need to merge the release groups, is there?
2011-08-18 23004, 2011
ocharles
I guess actually, it's more correct to do that than wait for them to be deleted
2011-08-18 23030, 2011
reosarevok
Well, you shouldn't force it for sure
2011-08-18 23031, 2011
nikki
there's a ticket about merging release groups
2011-08-18 23052, 2011
reosarevok
But the previous way, in which you chose whether to also enter a Merge RG edit, was kinda nice
2011-08-18 23018, 2011
nikki
that only showed up if there was only one release in the release group that would be merged, didn't it?
2011-08-18 23038, 2011
nikki
(which I guess makes sense, if there are others, you should go take a look and make sure they should be merged)
