#musicbrainz

/

      • kepstin-laptop adds them by hand if they 'look' reasonable :/
      • 2011-07-18 19955, 2011

      • hawke_
        ocharles: Did you remove ISRC 0000000000?
      • 2011-07-18 19904, 2011

      • ocharles
        no
      • 2011-07-18 19911, 2011

      • hawke_
        Because I see http://musicbrainz.org/isrc/000000000000 says “not associated”
      • 2011-07-18 19924, 2011

      • ocharles
        probably because it's not valid, so you can't view it
      • 2011-07-18 19932, 2011

      • hawke_
        heh
      • 2011-07-18 19933, 2011

      • kepstin-laptop
      • 2011-07-18 19952, 2011

      • kepstin-laptop
        they added isrcs for every track on that 98 track release :(
      • 2011-07-18 19913, 2011

      • ocharles
        hawke_: I wouldn't bother manually removing them, I'll do that now
      • 2011-07-18 19920, 2011

      • ocharles
        or actually, when we release the validation
      • 2011-07-18 19947, 2011

      • hawke_
        ocharles: k
      • 2011-07-18 19928, 2011

      • reosarevok
        If anyone feels like helping me fix these works, http://musicbrainz.org/user/reosarevok/edits/open needs some lovin
      • 2011-07-18 19902, 2011

      • reosarevok is starting to like this "fix classical works" thing
      • 2011-07-18 19946, 2011

      • kepstin-laptop has done one classical work merge :)
      • 2011-07-18 19954, 2011

      • derwin
        sounds like a nightmare to me
      • 2011-07-18 19900, 2011

      • derwin
        keeping all that stuff straight
      • 2011-07-18 19901, 2011

      • hawke_
        reosarevok: I really like them as well.
      • 2011-07-18 19942, 2011

      • reosarevok
        derwin: you mean the classical works? Not at all
      • 2011-07-18 19953, 2011

      • reosarevok
        In fact, it's much easier
      • 2011-07-18 19902, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Because there's normally something to compare them with
      • 2011-07-18 19907, 2011

      • reosarevok
        And the guys are dead
      • 2011-07-18 19909, 2011

      • kepstin-laptop
        http://musicbrainz.org/work/ebb107a6-6e6f-3bbc-aa… - only merged that one because one of the japanese pop artists I follow performed it on piano ;)
      • 2011-07-18 19912, 2011

      • reosarevok
        So once it's done, it is done
      • 2011-07-18 19937, 2011

      • reosarevok is mostly creating, not merging, though
      • 2011-07-18 19945, 2011

      • reosarevok
        This guy started with like 5 or 6 works
      • 2011-07-18 19947, 2011

      • derwin
      • 2011-07-18 19913, 2011

      • derwin
        I'm going to go with "female"
      • 2011-07-18 19924, 2011

      • derwin
        wendy carlos = "female"
      • 2011-07-18 19930, 2011

      • derwin
        walter/wendy = "other"
      • 2011-07-18 19901, 2011

      • hawke_
        derwin: Why “other”?
      • 2011-07-18 19929, 2011

      • derwin
        because you can't put "male" or "female" for the artist
      • 2011-07-18 19943, 2011

      • derwin
        unless you seperate "Wendy" as a perforance name
      • 2011-07-18 19954, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2011-07-18 19906, 2011

      • luks
        derwin: you can also leave it empty
      • 2011-07-18 19913, 2011

      • derwin
        sure, but I'd think that if "other" has any meaning, that'd be it?
      • 2011-07-18 19906, 2011

      • hawke_
        derwin: I would use it for “what the artist currently identifies as”
      • 2011-07-18 19924, 2011

      • luks
        hawke_: that invites edit wars
      • 2011-07-18 19939, 2011

      • derwin
        hawke_ : so if an artist kept switching, you'd.. ?
      • 2011-07-18 19949, 2011

      • luks
        somebody will try to change it male eventually
      • 2011-07-18 19925, 2011

      • hawke_
        Speaking of Wendy Carlos: http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14840548
      • 2011-07-18 19926, 2011

      • luks
        I don't really know why is the Other option there
      • 2011-07-18 19905, 2011

      • hawke_
        luks: People who identify as neither?
      • 2011-07-18 19957, 2011

      • derwin
      • 2011-07-18 19916, 2011

      • derwin
        can you tell I live in the SF bay area?
      • 2011-07-18 19939, 2011

      • luks
        I think that leaving it empty is better than having a questionable "Other" option
      • 2011-07-18 19916, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        leaving it empty signifies there is something missing, some data that's yet to be filled in
      • 2011-07-18 19928, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        like an empty barcode/cat no., etc
      • 2011-07-18 19939, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        having "other" means "yes, we know this person's gender, and it's neither"
      • 2011-07-18 19959, 2011

      • derwin
        +1
      • 2011-07-18 19944, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        identifications really don't change all that often; going with "how the artist identifies" is actually pretty reasonable in practice
      • 2011-07-18 19902, 2011

      • hawke_
        ianmcorvidae: As with everything, there’s probably an exception.
      • 2011-07-18 19920, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        there are always edge cases; they aren't really that important :P
      • 2011-07-18 19925, 2011

      • hawke_
        If nothing else, an artist who claims to change sexual identity regularly just to be a dick (so to speak, heh)
      • 2011-07-18 19932, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        lol
      • 2011-07-18 19939, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        just set that to Other, if it's every other week or something
      • 2011-07-18 19921, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        has the problem of inviting controversy re: gender, but I don't think there's a way to deal with that situation that _doesn't_ invite edit wars
      • 2011-07-18 19904, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        leaving it empty says "fill this in!" and then people will get annoyed if it's the wrong thing; either gender, for someone who's switching often, will clearly get questioned, etc.
      • 2011-07-18 19908, 2011

      • reosarevok
        "What the artist identifies with" seems to me the less controversial option
      • 2011-07-18 19920, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        yeah
      • 2011-07-18 19941, 2011

      • derwin
        reosarevok : what if the artist identifies as "intergender" ?
      • 2011-07-18 19955, 2011

      • luks
        I'd use "it's complicated" rather than "other" then
      • 2011-07-18 19957, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        then "Other"
      • 2011-07-18 19900, 2011

      • reosarevok
        derwin: that's not male nor female, so it's other :p
      • 2011-07-18 19904, 2011

      • derwin
        luks!
      • 2011-07-18 19909, 2011

      • derwin
        "it's complicated" heheeh
      • 2011-07-18 19919, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        too Facebook :P
      • 2011-07-18 19905, 2011

      • reosarevok can fight an edit war with any ultraconservative who doesn't agree with "what the artist identifies with" any day
      • 2011-07-18 19917, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Oh, damn
      • 2011-07-18 19924, 2011

      • reosarevok
      • 2011-07-18 19933, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Either it is 25: IV or 22: III
      • 2011-07-18 19909, 2011

      • reosarevok
        They could at least get the data right :(
      • 2011-07-18 19949, 2011

      • derwin
      • 2011-07-18 19953, 2011

      • derwin
        male or female?
      • 2011-07-18 19949, 2011

      • derwin
      • 2011-07-18 19956, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou1 joined the channel
      • 2011-07-18 19900, 2011

      • derwin
        <- could do this for.. another 2 minutes or so, then I'm out
      • 2011-07-18 19911, 2011

      • hawke_
        Never heard of those artists; no idea
      • 2011-07-18 19924, 2011

      • derwin
      • 2011-07-18 19945, 2011

      • derwin
        P-Orridge has two daughters, Caresse and Genesse, with former wife Paula P-Orridge (born Alaura O'Dell). After marrying Lady Jaye Breyer P-Orridge in 1993, they began a project to become Breyer P-Orridge, a single pandrogynous entity
      • 2011-07-18 19902, 2011

      • hawke_
        derwin: Sounds like someone who’s a jackass for worrying too much about it. :-)
      • 2011-07-18 19908, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2011-07-18 19921, 2011

      • derwin
        hawke.. he is quite a famous figure in the history of industrial music, and is good fun.
      • 2011-07-18 19924, 2011

      • derwin
        but sure.
      • 2011-07-18 19928, 2011

      • derwin
        " Genesis and his second wife Lady Jaye, née Jacqueline Breyer, relocated to Brooklyn.[12] There, they began an ongoing experiment in body modification aimed at creating one pandrogynous being named Breyer P-Orridge.[13] They received breast implants and adopted gender neutral and alternating pronouns. "
      • 2011-07-18 19934, 2011

      • hawke_
        Yup.
      • 2011-07-18 19945, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        oh, part of Throbbing Gristle
      • 2011-07-18 19950, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        okay
      • 2011-07-18 19907, 2011

      • derwin
        yeah, one of the founders, also historically involved in the "acid house" scene etc.
      • 2011-07-18 19942, 2011

      • dubwai joined the channel
      • 2011-07-18 19943, 2011

      • reosarevok
        AWESOME
      • 2011-07-18 19946, 2011

      • dubwai
        if i have proper lossless rip of cd can i add PUIDs
      • 2011-07-18 19904, 2011

      • reosarevok
        So
      • 2011-07-18 19917, 2011

      • reosarevok
        The back cover just says "Fantasy & Minuet"
      • 2011-07-18 19924, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Very helpful, RCA Victor
      • 2011-07-18 19953, 2011

      • reosarevok
        dubwai: I don't think people even care too much if their rips are proper and lossless before submitting them
      • 2011-07-18 19959, 2011

      • reosarevok
        So I can't see why not
      • 2011-07-18 19918, 2011

      • hawke_
        dubwai: You don’t need lossless, PUIDs are equally useful and relevant for lossy rips.
      • 2011-07-18 19931, 2011

      • hawke_
        dubwai: but: “yes”
      • 2011-07-18 19924, 2011

      • dubwai
        but why in Picard button is inactive :-)
      • 2011-07-18 19956, 2011

      • hawke_
        dubwai: Either because the PUIDs are already there (the ones you found aren’t new)
      • 2011-07-18 19910, 2011

      • hawke_
        or because it wasn‘t able to get a PUID for the track
      • 2011-07-18 19910, 2011

      • dubwai
        no how i can upload PUIDs to musicbrain release that doen't have it in picars "Submit PUIDs" always inactive http://i.imgur.com/qaQpL.jpg
      • 2011-07-18 19926, 2011

      • nikki
        (the encoding doesn't really make a difference anyway, I tested once with a file I ripped, I had to encode it as something stupid like 16kbps mp3 before it would generate different puids)
      • 2011-07-18 19938, 2011

      • hawke_
        dubwai: I understand what you’re saying. The button is inactive for one of the two reasons I described above.
      • 2011-07-18 19950, 2011

      • derwin
        dubwai PUID is dead, I think?
      • 2011-07-18 19900, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Not yet
      • 2011-07-18 19908, 2011

      • reosarevok
        But maybe the PUID-making service is down again…
      • 2011-07-18 19921, 2011

      • hawke_
        dubwai: It only becomes active if a new PUID/track association could be made, and if there are PUIDs available for your local files.
      • 2011-07-18 19943, 2011

      • kepstin-laptop
        dubwai: if the song hasn't already been scanned into the puid database with another (proprietary) tool, picard won't be able to look up the puid.
      • 2011-07-18 19937, 2011

      • dubwai
        so picard can't genrete it only submit?
      • 2011-07-18 19907, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        it can only generate fingerprints (which can be used to look up PUIDs), not PUIDs
      • 2011-07-18 19902, 2011

      • bitmap
        you have to use genpuid or the musicip mixer to analyze the files and wait for them to assign a PUID (who knows how long that takes nowadays)
      • 2011-07-18 19927, 2011

      • hawke_
        PUIDs are basically just a record number in MusicIP’s database, not something that can be generated elsewhere
      • 2011-07-18 19923, 2011

      • dubwai
      • 2011-07-18 19947, 2011

      • hawke_
        dubwai: Yes?
      • 2011-07-18 19940, 2011

      • dubwai
        "MusicDNS/PUID is now officially end of life and should not be used anymore in new development."
      • 2011-07-18 19957, 2011

      • hawke_
        dubwai: Yes.
      • 2011-07-18 19904, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Yeah
      • 2011-07-18 19906, 2011

      • reosarevok
        It was sold
      • 2011-07-18 19909, 2011

      • MBChatLogger
        Ponies and sunshine and myspace and glitter!!
      • 2011-07-18 19909, 2011

      • reosarevok
        To Gracenote
      • 2011-07-18 19922, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Which is basically the same as killing it
      • 2011-07-18 19920, 2011

      • hawke_
        Well, it wasn’t exactly perfect before it was sold, either, was it?
      • 2011-07-18 19941, 2011

      • luks
        note that "Submit PUIDs" will only become active after you "Scan" the files, it find the PUIDs, but not matches in the MB database and then you match it to a release
      • 2011-07-18 19951, 2011

      • luks
        it won't activate without scanning the files first
      • 2011-07-18 19920, 2011

      • hawke_
        luks: Doesn’t it autoscan new files by default anyway?
      • 2011-07-18 19934, 2011

      • luks
        no
      • 2011-07-18 19949, 2011

      • luks
        there is an option for that, but it's not enabled by default
      • 2011-07-18 19946, 2011

      • hawke_
        ah, I thought that option was on by default — I think I must just always turn it on. :-)
      • 2011-07-18 19916, 2011

      • luks
        picard never had it on by default
      • 2011-07-18 19927, 2011

      • reosarevok
        hawke_: when you go on classical rampages, remember to also add links to IMSLP!
      • 2011-07-18 19928, 2011

      • reosarevok
        :)
      • 2011-07-18 19937, 2011

      • reosarevok thinks it's a great thing to have
      • 2011-07-18 19958, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Even though I can't play any instrument anyway and I can't use the scores
      • 2011-07-18 19910, 2011

      • hawke_
        reosarevok: WTF is IMSLP? :-p
      • 2011-07-18 19926, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Does nobody know the rels we have?
      • 2011-07-18 19932, 2011

      • reosarevok
      • 2011-07-18 19902, 2011

      • hawke_
        Ah, that.
      • 2011-07-18 19926, 2011

      • hawke_
        I didn’t know we had a relation to IMSLP pages, no.
      • 2011-07-18 19952, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Well
      • 2011-07-18 19953, 2011

      • hawke_
        But then I don’t really like having a bunch of specialized URL-relations
      • 2011-07-18 19957, 2011

      • reosarevok
        We have "contains the score for"
      • 2011-07-18 19908, 2011

      • reosarevok
        (but IMSLP is the only whitelisted page at the moment)
      • 2011-07-18 19912, 2011

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2011-07-18 19951, 2011

      • hawke_
        bitmap: Did you see the post regarding sleeps in Picard on mb-devel?
      • 2011-07-18 19917, 2011

      • bitmap
        hawke_: I did, but I didn't look at it yet
      • 2011-07-18 19956, 2011

      • bitmap
        it seems like adding files in Picard should be faster than it is currently, so maybe that's one of the issues
      • 2011-07-18 19902, 2011

      • reosarevok
        wow
      • 2011-07-18 19911, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Recordings should really be moved to performers
      • 2011-07-18 19918, 2011

      • reosarevok
        But it's going to be an *eternal* job