#musicbrainz

/

      • aeontech joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13511, 2011

      • flamingspinach joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13559, 2011

      • DarkerAudit joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13549, 2011

      • davitf_ joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13544, 2011

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13505, 2011

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13517, 2011

      • drsaunde joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13526, 2011

      • bitmap joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13514, 2011

      • davitf_ joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13516, 2011

      • nikki
        luks: is there a way to find out which files it hasn't submitted fingerprints for?
      • 2011-05-15 13542, 2011

      • STalKer-Y joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13508, 2011

      • DarkerAudit joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13555, 2011

      • aeontech joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13558, 2011

      • caller_6 joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13522, 2011

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13550, 2011

      • alex-hu joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13515, 2011

      • reosarevok wonders if this is a record N-bomb http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=14426902
      • 2011-05-15 13515, 2011

      • nikki
        luks: you might want to change your vote on http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=14422571
      • 2011-05-15 13540, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        won't it fail anyway, with a stunning 15 No votes?
      • 2011-05-15 13518, 2011

      • nikki
        yes, but it's better if we can close it now
      • 2011-05-15 13512, 2011

      • nikki
        'cause the fewer edits there are, the easier it is to see which ones we can approve and which will just fail
      • 2011-05-15 13532, 2011

      • reosarevok
        flamingspinach: what about the doubly stunning 34 no votes from the previous link? :D
      • 2011-05-15 13532, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        then we should track down KeithIrwin and cooperaa too, no?
      • 2011-05-15 13545, 2011

      • nikki
        I already sent cooperaa an email
      • 2011-05-15 13552, 2011

      • nikki
        (wasn't going to comment and spam everyone ;))
      • 2011-05-15 13501, 2011

      • nikki
        meh
      • 2011-05-15 13504, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        reosarevok: haha whoa
      • 2011-05-15 13509, 2011

      • nikki
        now I'll send this keith guy one too
      • 2011-05-15 13516, 2011

      • nikki
        unless he's in here
      • 2011-05-15 13539, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        why would you vote yes on that...
      • 2011-05-15 13559, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        actually why would you even make that edit... too bad there's no edit summary to tell us :P
      • 2011-05-15 13542, 2011

      • nikki sent him a message too
      • 2011-05-15 13503, 2011

      • nikki
        flamingspinach: are you not going to add to all the no votes then? :P
      • 2011-05-15 13521, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        that just seems opportunistic :P
      • 2011-05-15 13527, 2011

      • nikki
        aww
      • 2011-05-15 13557, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        I feel guilty about not voting no on the unsung bad edits that doubtless slip by all the time...
      • 2011-05-15 13519, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        this edit freeze does have the benefit that it made people (other than me) start voting on edits :P
      • 2011-05-15 13528, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        I guess I'm only in the second layer of ruaok's onion (as described at https://jhemerly.wordpress.com/robert-kaye-interv… ) so I don't have much of an opinion on most edits, so I don't usually vote...
      • 2011-05-15 13555, 2011

      • reosarevok
        flamingspinach: yeah. It's a shame that NGS is going to launch such an amount of work and recording merges upon us that nobody will have the willpower to vote on them :(
      • 2011-05-15 13559, 2011

      • nikki shakes her head
      • 2011-05-15 13510, 2011

      • nikki
        I read that as "so I don't have much of an onion on most edits"
      • 2011-05-15 13516, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        lol
      • 2011-05-15 13521, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        that too is a true statement
      • 2011-05-15 13546, 2011

      • reosarevok wishes we had much of an onion on most edits
      • 2011-05-15 13559, 2011

      • reosarevok
        We could end world hunger
      • 2011-05-15 13524, 2011

      • nikki
        although the world would be much smellier
      • 2011-05-15 13546, 2011

      • reosarevok likes the smell of onion anyway
      • 2011-05-15 13507, 2011

      • nikki likes the taste of onions but hates cutting them
      • 2011-05-15 13524, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Oh, but you see
      • 2011-05-15 13529, 2011

      • reosarevok
        They'd be cut already!
      • 2011-05-15 13544, 2011

      • reosarevok
        That's why we would have much of an onion, not a full onion
      • 2011-05-15 13552, 2011

      • reosarevok
        :D
      • 2011-05-15 13510, 2011

      • nikki
        they'd probably still hurt my eyes
      • 2011-05-15 13523, 2011

      • reosarevok has red onions with everything
      • 2011-05-15 13539, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Pasta with onions, rice with onions, potatoes with onions, bread with onions
      • 2011-05-15 13552, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Well, I actually haven't tried cereals with onions
      • 2011-05-15 13555, 2011

      • nikki
        haha
      • 2011-05-15 13556, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Probably for the best
      • 2011-05-15 13504, 2011

      • nikki
        hmm
      • 2011-05-15 13511, 2011

      • nikki
        it's been a long time since I had red onios
      • 2011-05-15 13514, 2011

      • nikki
        onions too
      • 2011-05-15 13523, 2011

      • nikki
        I always get white ones
      • 2011-05-15 13529, 2011

      • reosarevok
        aww
      • 2011-05-15 13533, 2011

      • reosarevok
        White onions are boring
      • 2011-05-15 13555, 2011

      • nikki
        I wonder if I've even seen red ones here...
      • 2011-05-15 13500, 2011

      • alex-hu
        How could I submit tag name corrections (and other metadata) corrections to the database? Is getting an account and using picard sufficient?
      • 2011-05-15 13543, 2011

      • nikki
        alex-hu: at the moment you can't edit (we're in the middle of closing all edits so we can do a big upgrade)
      • 2011-05-15 13550, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Normally, you don't even need Picard, as long as you have an account
      • 2011-05-15 13554, 2011

      • nikki
        but yes, you just need an account and then you can edit on the website
      • 2011-05-15 13558, 2011

      • reosarevok
        You need time, willingness and sources
      • 2011-05-15 13504, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Especially sources
      • 2011-05-15 13506, 2011

      • reosarevok
        :)
      • 2011-05-15 13548, 2011

      • alex-hu
        What do you mean by sources? Original rips?
      • 2011-05-15 13519, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Nope
      • 2011-05-15 13528, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Something that proves the changes
      • 2011-05-15 13544, 2011

      • reosarevok
        (be it scans, URLs, whatever. some kind of proof)
      • 2011-05-15 13501, 2011

      • alex-hu is puzzled
      • 2011-05-15 13531, 2011

      • aeontech
        link to discogs listing of album, amazon, scan of cd back cover showing tracklist, or artist's official discography entry for the album is normally what is used
      • 2011-05-15 13550, 2011

      • aeontech
        to show that your correction is in fact correct
      • 2011-05-15 13559, 2011

      • aeontech
        usually not hard to come by
      • 2011-05-15 13530, 2011

      • alex-hu
        aah, ok; no problem with that ;-)
      • 2011-05-15 13541, 2011

      • reosarevok is amazed at the kind of things Mexican drug cartels do http://www.blogdelnarco.com/2011/05/localizan-vehiculo-de-los-zetas-el.html
      • 2011-05-15 13508, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        there is some kind of plugin for picard which uploads your tags as an add release edit
      • 2011-05-15 13523, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        I couldn't get it to work for me though because it uses HTTP GET which has data length limitations :P
      • 2011-05-15 13528, 2011

      • nikki
        the add cluster as release one
      • 2011-05-15 13533, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        yup, that one
      • 2011-05-15 13545, 2011

      • aeontech
        orly?
      • 2011-05-15 13547, 2011

      • aeontech
        nice
      • 2011-05-15 13549, 2011

      • nikki
        the limit was increased a few weeks back
      • 2011-05-15 13549, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Yeah
      • 2011-05-15 13555, 2011

      • reosarevok
        But will it work in NGS?
      • 2011-05-15 13515, 2011

      • aeontech
        i wish there was a plugin to do a straight up discogs release import
      • 2011-05-15 13516, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        nikki: really? why?
      • 2011-05-15 13539, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        sounds like a good idea - we have freedb stubs, why not discogs stubs?
      • 2011-05-15 13540, 2011

      • aeontech
        for good quality releases it's such a waste of time having to copy and paste the data over manually
      • 2011-05-15 13543, 2011

      • aeontech
        even with a track parser
      • 2011-05-15 13544, 2011

      • aeontech
        yeah
      • 2011-05-15 13545, 2011

      • aeontech
        exactly
      • 2011-05-15 13545, 2011

      • nikki
        'cause the limit broken a few things which submit a bunch of data using get :)
      • 2011-05-15 13502, 2011

      • nikki
        I think for ngs we'd just need picard to display a box with a copyable tracklist
      • 2011-05-15 13502, 2011

      • aeontech
        and discogs has way better metadata than freedb
      • 2011-05-15 13520, 2011

      • nikki
        anything has better metadata than freedb :P
      • 2011-05-15 13524, 2011

      • aeontech
        exactly
      • 2011-05-15 13526, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        yeah, no kidding
      • 2011-05-15 13550, 2011

      • aeontech
        also would be nice if it auto-linked releases to url's in 'add release' edit notes
      • 2011-05-15 13557, 2011

      • aeontech
        if they're recognized
      • 2011-05-15 13515, 2011

      • nikki
        it'd be better to be able to add the relationships when adding a release
      • 2011-05-15 13518, 2011

      • aeontech
        half the time it's an amazon or discogs url, why do I have to go and add a relationship manually if i already noted it in the edit note as proof
      • 2011-05-15 13539, 2011

      • nikki
        I mean... I could link to amazon saying "it doesn't appear to be this version", I wouldn't want it to automatically add an amazon relationship ;)
      • 2011-05-15 13544, 2011

      • alex-hu
        Do I instruct picard about genres somehow (I'm aware that they're not stored on the server; from faq), or is it assumed that I should continue tagging my music after tagging it with picard?
      • 2011-05-15 13552, 2011

      • aeontech
        nikki: true
      • 2011-05-15 13510, 2011

      • aeontech
        nikki: but at least it could say "hey, you had these url's in the edit note; do you want me to auto-link it now"
      • 2011-05-15 13513, 2011

      • aeontech
        and default to no
      • 2011-05-15 13538, 2011

      • aeontech
        alex-hu: genre stuff is kinda iffy and very very ill-defined, so picard doesn't do anything with genres for you by default
      • 2011-05-15 13501, 2011

      • alex-hu
        "by default"; does it mean, I could still use picard to add such tags?
      • 2011-05-15 13506, 2011

      • aeontech
        alex-hu: but there's a plugin for picard that will use folksonomy tags from last.fm and/or musicbrainz and populate your 'genre' field with the most popular tags
      • 2011-05-15 13511, 2011

      • aeontech
        iirc
      • 2011-05-15 13513, 2011

      • alex-hu is trying to avoid using a zillion of applications for tagging
      • 2011-05-15 13527, 2011

      • aeontech
        alex-hu: yeah, with that plugin you could
      • 2011-05-15 13536, 2011

      • aeontech
        basically
      • 2011-05-15 13539, 2011

      • alex-hu
        hmm; ok. I'll do it manually then ;-)
      • 2011-05-15 13516, 2011

      • aeontech
        alex-hu: yeah, everybody has their own conventions of how they want to use the genre filed, so it's kinda left wide open
      • 2011-05-15 13530, 2011

      • flamingspinach
        I just don't use it, I don't see any conceivable use for the genre tag
      • 2011-05-15 13536, 2011

      • aeontech
        yeah i don't use it either
      • 2011-05-15 13541, 2011

      • aeontech
        it's way too limiting
      • 2011-05-15 13516, 2011

      • alex-hu
        maybe, it's a good idea -- to forgo the tag in the file; thank you, that's how I'll do it
      • 2011-05-15 13547, 2011

      • alex-hu
        *genre tag*
      • 2011-05-15 13547, 2011

      • aeontech
        alex-hu: i mean if you actually need them, you can still tag them in itunes or your preferred music player.
      • 2011-05-15 13529, 2011

      • alex-hu
        I think, if I ever need them, they'll be added in through some metadata.xml file in the directory or such.
      • 2011-05-15 13530, 2011

      • aeontech
        but for myself, it's both "how do I tag this mix of electro/dubstep/folk", and "damn, this genre is so precise it's useless for finding related stuff"
      • 2011-05-15 13500, 2011

      • aeontech
        if i were to use it, I would probably go with "top 3 genre tags from last.fm for this artist"
      • 2011-05-15 13501, 2011

      • alex-hu
        well, something like ambient + noise or dark ambient + noise is quite useful
      • 2011-05-15 13532, 2011

      • aeontech
        but even that fails when you have an artist whose albums are in different genres
      • 2011-05-15 13534, 2011

      • mchou joined the channel
      • 2011-05-15 13546, 2011

      • aeontech
        yeah i guess i'm just used to mentally organizing it by artist name, instead of genre
      • 2011-05-15 13524, 2011

      • alex-hu
        So, is there some application that I could use to submit my changes adjustments in batch, after I finished tagging the collection?
      • 2011-05-15 13539, 2011

      • aeontech
        alex-hu: genre changes?
      • 2011-05-15 13548, 2011

      • alex-hu
        no, minor title changes
      • 2011-05-15 13510, 2011

      • nikki
        right now the only way to submit edits is through the website
      • 2011-05-15 13545, 2011

      • alex-hu
        for instance, http://musicbrainz.org/release/ddeb0348-b94a-41df… has all caps in track 9, but on the cover it's "Rsaa"
      • 2011-05-15 13555, 2011

      • aeontech
        well capitalization changes are auto-edits
      • 2011-05-15 13559, 2011

      • aeontech
        ie, they do not require voting
      • 2011-05-15 13521, 2011

      • aeontech
        so that you can fix and it will immediately show up when you reload the release in picard
      • 2011-05-15 13503, 2011

      • aeontech
        normally the flow is 1) make edits/add release on website; 2) use picard to tag your files with data form website
      • 2011-05-15 13553, 2011

      • aeontech
        once you've tagged the files with picard, they store the MBID in track metadata
      • 2011-05-15 13523, 2011

      • aeontech
        so if there are changes to the data on the website, if you re-run the files through picard, they will pick up any changes from website.
      • 2011-05-15 13526, 2011

      • alex-hu
        does MBID change from adjustments to the work?
      • 2011-05-15 13530, 2011

      • aeontech
        nope
      • 2011-05-15 13533, 2011

      • aeontech
        mbid is permanent
      • 2011-05-15 13542, 2011

      • alex-hu
        aah, I see; that's great then