#musicbrainz

/

      • tschwinge
        warp: Ack.
      • 2011-05-23 14312, 2011

      • tschwinge goes looking where to file a ticket.
      • 2011-05-23 14313, 2011

      • warp
        tschwinge: ofcourse if you remember what you did, please do describe the steps you've taken and the data you've entered.
      • 2011-05-23 14320, 2011

      • warp
      • 2011-05-23 14307, 2011

      • tschwinge
        Found it. :-)
      • 2011-05-23 14346, 2011

      • _bibi joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14342, 2011

      • tschwinge
        warp: MBS-2244 filed.
      • 2011-05-23 14357, 2011

      • STalKer-X joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14355, 2011

      • stuffcorpse joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14318, 2011

      • kkretschmer joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14336, 2011

      • warp
        tschwinge: thank you!
      • 2011-05-23 14355, 2011

      • lidel
        wtf MBS-2237 ?
      • 2011-05-23 14337, 2011

      • lidel
        http://musicbrainz.org/artist/ac1f2ed7-8133-492f-… <- this band is present on few VA releases
      • 2011-05-23 14317, 2011

      • lidel
        seems that it was miss-credited, other D-Saster: http://www.discogs.com/artist/D-Saster
      • 2011-05-23 14314, 2011

      • zazi joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14359, 2011

      • ijabz_ joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14316, 2011

      • reosarevok
        lidel: I expected them to be a nazi band that was afraid of being threatened or something
      • 2011-05-23 14337, 2011

      • reosarevok
        But I don't know. If that's not the case, paranoid Germans are ridiculous
      • 2011-05-23 14313, 2011

      • gridaphobe joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14338, 2011

      • tschwinge
        Hehe. :-)
      • 2011-05-23 14347, 2011

      • nikki
        speaking of german :P
      • 2011-05-23 14352, 2011

      • nikki runs off to her german class
      • 2011-05-23 14322, 2011

      • tschwinge is german.
      • 2011-05-23 14359, 2011

      • lidel
      • 2011-05-23 14307, 2011

      • lidel
        :P
      • 2011-05-23 14336, 2011

      • tschwinge
        Haha!
      • 2011-05-23 14341, 2011

      • Mineo sees germans taking over musicbrainz
      • 2011-05-23 14306, 2011

      • zazi joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14352, 2011

      • kkretschmer joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14329, 2011

      • _bibi has left the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14330, 2011

      • chrisb joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14308, 2011

      • davitf_ joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14327, 2011

      • bitmap joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14349, 2011

      • zazi joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14304, 2011

      • hawke__ joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14347, 2011

      • jesus2099 joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14322, 2011

      • hawke__
        Is there some kind of a release diff utility?
      • 2011-05-23 14340, 2011

      • hawke__
      • 2011-05-23 14359, 2011

      • jesus2099
        anyone knows why release web service v1 returns track arranger, producer, insts and vocals but not compo and lyrics ? I know compo and lyrics are works rels but so is arranger isn’t it ? (and I see arranger) example : http://musicbrainz.org/ws/1/release/277eeaaf-0dec…
      • 2011-05-23 14315, 2011

      • jesus2099
        hawke__: try with classic.musicbrainz.org
      • 2011-05-23 14338, 2011

      • jesus2099
        oh it’s aklready down!?
      • 2011-05-23 14340, 2011

      • jesus2099
        :/
      • 2011-05-23 14315, 2011

      • hawke__
        arranger is not a works rel
      • 2011-05-23 14315, 2011

      • jesus2099
        ah no, you have to add .html in the URL’s end but however one of the erleasees is new and is not present in old mb
      • 2011-05-23 14334, 2011

      • jesus2099
        oh arranger is not a work rel ? mmh yes that’s logical in fact....
      • 2011-05-23 14310, 2011

      • jesus2099
        so the release web service v1 doesn’t retrieve stuff from works then… ach is there a v2 ? :)
      • 2011-05-23 14330, 2011

      • hawke__
        No idea.
      • 2011-05-23 14346, 2011

      • jesus2099
        hawke__: your 2 release have the same tracklist (same ID)
      • 2011-05-23 14351, 2011

      • hawke__
        Hmm, one of the releases is new? Strange that there is no “Add release” edit though…
      • 2011-05-23 14359, 2011

      • jesus2099
        it’s a duplicate imo
      • 2011-05-23 14333, 2011

      • hawke__
        I agree in theory, but I’m curious if there’s some difference I just don’t see.
      • 2011-05-23 14336, 2011

      • hawke__
        Hence the question. ;-)
      • 2011-05-23 14337, 2011

      • jesus2099
        They are striclty equal now but there are pending edits, check out edit history
      • 2011-05-23 14339, 2011

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14310, 2011

      • hawke__
        The pending edits are a merge of disc 1-3
      • 2011-05-23 14321, 2011

      • hawke__
        but one of those releases is untouched by that
      • 2011-05-23 14341, 2011

      • MBChatLogger
      • 2011-05-23 14341, 2011

      • hawke__
        Wow, artist search is badly broken on classic.mb.org
      • 2011-05-23 14359, 2011

      • hawke__
        In fact, all search appears to be broken.
      • 2011-05-23 14323, 2011

      • hawke__
        direct search works, whew
      • 2011-05-23 14345, 2011

      • hawke__
        Ah, I see where the dupe release came from…
      • 2011-05-23 14351, 2011

      • hawke__
        classic has dupe release events.
      • 2011-05-23 14334, 2011

      • zazi joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14320, 2011

      • jesus2099
        hehe ... yes the same server is used for classic and ngs indexed searches I think it’s why we have to use direct searches in classic now
      • 2011-05-23 14332, 2011

      • hawke__
        yes.
      • 2011-05-23 14341, 2011

      • hawke__
        Maybe direct search should be made default on classic
      • 2011-05-23 14351, 2011

      • jesus2099
        it would be gr8 to keep classic instead of shutting it down so soon. we can see much more info in this
      • 2011-05-23 14332, 2011

      • hawke__
        Oh?
      • 2011-05-23 14356, 2011

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14316, 2011

      • outsidecontext has left the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14303, 2011

      • Shisma joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14320, 2011

      • gioele joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14324, 2011

      • Shisma
        hey
      • 2011-05-23 14347, 2011

      • Shisma
        should I enter whole mixes into musicbrainz?
      • 2011-05-23 14309, 2011

      • hawke__
        What is “whole mixes”?
      • 2011-05-23 14310, 2011

      • Shisma
        tracks that are multiple hours long and contain multiple songs
      • 2011-05-23 14303, 2011

      • warp
        Shisma: as they as they have been release in some fashion, yes.
      • 2011-05-23 14305, 2011

      • hawke__
        I don’t see much value in it myself, but I would say “why not?”
      • 2011-05-23 14308, 2011

      • warp
        s/as/as long/
      • 2011-05-23 14321, 2011

      • Eelis
        warp: does "having been played on the radio" count as "released"?
      • 2011-05-23 14326, 2011

      • Vorpal joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14352, 2011

      • Eelis
        there is certainly precedent
      • 2011-05-23 14354, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: not in itself. but if such radio shows are regularly recording and available as bootleg torrents for example, then yes.
      • 2011-05-23 14304, 2011

      • Eelis
        wow, so torrent availability is a factor?
      • 2011-05-23 14305, 2011

      • warp
        recorded*
      • 2011-05-23 14307, 2011

      • Eelis
        that's crazy
      • 2011-05-23 14317, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: I'm just using it as an example.
      • 2011-05-23 14324, 2011

      • Eelis
        but obviously a realistic example
      • 2011-05-23 14326, 2011

      • Shisma
        is it possible that a lot of url relationship are gone since we are on ngs?
      • 2011-05-23 14331, 2011

      • warp
        if you recording it yourself, for yourself, it hasn't been released.
      • 2011-05-23 14341, 2011

      • warp
        (aaargh, grammar today).
      • 2011-05-23 14305, 2011

      • Shisma
        do you mean my grammer?
      • 2011-05-23 14306, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: but if someone records it, and makes it available to hundreds of people, it has obviously been released.
      • 2011-05-23 14312, 2011

      • warp
        Shisma: no, my own :)
      • 2011-05-23 14313, 2011

      • hawke__
        Eelis: It is a factor though. No reason you can’t just self-publish a release on bittorrent. :-)
      • 2011-05-23 14318, 2011

      • hawke__
        Even a compilation
      • 2011-05-23 14329, 2011

      • hawke__
        If it weren’t such a pain, I’d add the SXSW torrents.
      • 2011-05-23 14338, 2011

      • Eelis
        hawke__: but what warp now seems to be saying is that it depends on how many people then download the torrent
      • 2011-05-23 14307, 2011

      • hawke__
        Eelis: no, “Makes available” is not dependent on number of downloads.
      • 2011-05-23 14325, 2011

      • Eelis
        but every public torrent is in principle available to the whole planet
      • 2011-05-23 14336, 2011

      • hawke__
        Yes.
      • 2011-05-23 14345, 2011

      • Eelis
        which makes every public torrent a "release"
      • 2011-05-23 14350, 2011

      • hawke__
        Yup.
      • 2011-05-23 14351, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: correct.
      • 2011-05-23 14319, 2011

      • Eelis
        then my "so torrent availability is a factor" was correct after all
      • 2011-05-23 14326, 2011

      • hawke__
        Yup.
      • 2011-05-23 14313, 2011

      • Eelis
        ok, good
      • 2011-05-23 14339, 2011

      • Eelis
        does it matter if the torrent is "legal"?
      • 2011-05-23 14345, 2011

      • hawke__
        Nope.
      • 2011-05-23 14350, 2011

      • Eelis
        excellent, thanks
      • 2011-05-23 14311, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: we do have a rule against chart torrents though.
      • 2011-05-23 14316, 2011

      • Eelis
        what are those?
      • 2011-05-23 14329, 2011

      • hawke__
        A torrent for a billboard top 100 for a given year, e.g.
      • 2011-05-23 14350, 2011

      • warp
        the kind of bootleg releases which include all tracks for the Top 40 chart of a specific region for a specific timeframe (usually weekly).
      • 2011-05-23 14353, 2011

      • Eelis
        but we don't have a similar rule against CDs of the same type?
      • 2011-05-23 14357, 2011

      • hawke__
        Where the list itself is (questionably) copyrighted.
      • 2011-05-23 14315, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: I'm not sure what you mean with CDs of the same type.
      • 2011-05-23 14324, 2011

      • Eelis
        warp: chart CDs
      • 2011-05-23 14351, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: can you give an example?
      • 2011-05-23 14335, 2011

      • Eelis
        aren't record stores full of cd's like "Top 20 Trance Hits of 2010" ?
      • 2011-05-23 14339, 2011

      • hawke__
        Eelis: It’s basically because no one claims copyright on tracklistings for normal CDs, where as a top 40 listing is the entire business of the company which tracks that crap and therefore they’re more likely to sue/care.
      • 2011-05-23 14331, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: ah. yes, those are allowed.
      • 2011-05-23 14338, 2011

      • Eelis
        hmm
      • 2011-05-23 14350, 2011

      • warp
      • 2011-05-23 14318, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: and http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Style/Miscellaneous for the guideline which does not allow chart torrents.
      • 2011-05-23 14332, 2011

      • xlotlu joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14306, 2011

      • Eelis
        ok
      • 2011-05-23 14340, 2011

      • Eelis
        what's the difference between "published" and "released"?
      • 2011-05-23 14358, 2011

      • warp
        I would say published involves a publisher.
      • 2011-05-23 14308, 2011

      • Eelis
        ah, i see
      • 2011-05-23 14315, 2011

      • hawke__
        I would say “nothing”
      • 2011-05-23 14320, 2011

      • Eelis
        oh
      • 2011-05-23 14346, 2011

      • warp
        haha
      • 2011-05-23 14349, 2011

      • pesto joined the channel
      • 2011-05-23 14306, 2011

      • pesto
        huh. adding an artist doesn't auto-subscribe you to that artist any more?
      • 2011-05-23 14307, 2011

      • Eelis
        what's "non-human music"?
      • 2011-05-23 14317, 2011

      • pesto
        Eelis, vocaloid? :)
      • 2011-05-23 14322, 2011

      • Eelis
        pesto: never heard of it. i'll look it up
      • 2011-05-23 14328, 2011

      • pesto missed the start of the conversation
      • 2011-05-23 14329, 2011

      • warp
        music made by computer programs.
      • 2011-05-23 14330, 2011

      • Eelis
        ah
      • 2011-05-23 14307, 2011

      • kepstin-laptop
        note that vocaloid actually doesn't count for that, because it's a synthesizer instrument programmed by humans.
      • 2011-05-23 14313, 2011

      • kepstin-laptop
        not completely computer-generated.
      • 2011-05-23 14321, 2011

      • warp
        Eelis: or music made by animals or aliens, or....
      • 2011-05-23 14329, 2011

      • Eelis
        warp: i can't think of any examples
      • 2011-05-23 14331, 2011

      • warp
        :)
      • 2011-05-23 14335, 2011

      • Eelis
        kepstin-laptop: what would be an example that /does/ count?
      • 2011-05-23 14347, 2011

      • jesus2099
        Here is a new userjs (opera, firefrox, greasemonkey) for fast Classic / NGS switching http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/103422 (most of my other MB userjs are currently ☠)
      • 2011-05-23 14348, 2011

      • Eelis
        bird songs?
      • 2011-05-23 14301, 2011

      • ruaok joined the channel