#musicbrainz

/

      • hawke__
        Whew, done going through weird al recordings and adding disambiguation comments
      • 2011-11-22 32623, 2011

      • Kryztof joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32646, 2011

      • drsaunde1 joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32611, 2011

      • uptown joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32637, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32605, 2011

      • Leftmost joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32603, 2011

      • kepstin joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32610, 2011

      • CallerNo6 joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32614, 2011

      • iarp joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32628, 2011

      • iarp joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32603, 2011

      • iarp joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32641, 2011

      • iarp joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32624, 2011

      • kepstin
        I'm getting a lot of "could not load album" in picard right now, is there some sort of server issue?
      • 2011-11-22 32656, 2011

      • bitmap
        503s?
      • 2011-11-22 32608, 2011

      • kepstin
        dunno, I don't have the debug log open atm
      • 2011-11-22 32618, 2011

      • bitmap
        I started getting 503s a few days ago
      • 2011-11-22 32601, 2011

      • bitmap
        around that time some article referencing Picard was published, so I figured that's why the servers were busy
      • 2011-11-22 32655, 2011

      • kepstin has a replicated db locally, he really should get the website+webservice running on it so he doesn't have to run picard against the main musicbrainz servers
      • 2011-11-22 32658, 2011

      • bitmap
        that's even slower than the main servers for me (though at least all of the requests go through :P)
      • 2011-11-22 32617, 2011

      • kepstin
        yeah, I'm hoping for reliability over speed here :)
      • 2011-11-22 32617, 2011

      • kepstin doesn't expect his 1.8ghz atom running the db on a raid of wd green drives to be a speed daemon.
      • 2011-11-22 32626, 2011

      • derwin
      • 2011-11-22 32630, 2011

      • kepstin
        huh, yeah.
      • 2011-11-22 32652, 2011

      • derwin
        it just edited some of my subs, and is.. pretty clearly a bot :)
      • 2011-11-22 32602, 2011

      • kepstin
        looks like it's just someone's normal user account, but he's running a bot on it.
      • 2011-11-22 32625, 2011

      • derwin
        I'm glad he's auto-relating
      • 2011-11-22 32635, 2011

      • derwin
        because you cant associate the discogs url with the label in one go
      • 2011-11-22 32640, 2011

      • derwin
        so I often add labels, but don't associate.
      • 2011-11-22 32600, 2011

      • kepstin
        hmm. actually, no, looks like most (all?) of the edits on that user are by a bot
      • 2011-11-22 32608, 2011

      • kepstin
        he seems to have improved it with time.
      • 2011-11-22 32644, 2011

      • kepstin
        hmm, never mind. I just didn't go back far enough.
      • 2011-11-22 32617, 2011

      • kepstin
        either way, the current bot seems to be doing pretty thorough checks and is writing good edit notes, I can't complain :)
      • 2011-11-22 32655, 2011

      • derwin
        yeah looks sane to me :)
      • 2011-11-22 32643, 2011

      • kepstin-netbook joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32656, 2011

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32648, 2011

      • iarp joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32636, 2011

      • hawke_ joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32615, 2011

      • Ian_Corne joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32609, 2011

      • olaf_ joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32612, 2011

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32632, 2011

      • djce joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32645, 2011

      • hawke_
        Is a radio broadcast considered “live”?
      • 2011-11-22 32608, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        only if it's performed live in the studio
      • 2011-11-22 32653, 2011

      • praest76 joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32644, 2011

      • PeepoAWAY joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32645, 2011

      • xplt joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32644, 2011

      • marvs_ joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32601, 2011

      • reosarevok joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32625, 2011

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32615, 2011

      • VxJasonxV joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32653, 2011

      • xplt joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32641, 2011

      • Ismael joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32616, 2011

      • uptown joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32644, 2011

      • uptown1 joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32616, 2011

      • uptown1 joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32626, 2011

      • uptown1 joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32655, 2011

      • uptown joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32639, 2011

      • Jormangeud joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32621, 2011

      • sezuan joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32648, 2011

      • pecastro joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32654, 2011

      • pecastro has left the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32620, 2011

      • uptown2 joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32626, 2011

      • CatCat
        [01:01] hawke__ Whew, done going through weird al recordings and adding disambiguation comments
      • 2011-11-22 32634, 2011

      • CatCat
        well done hawke !!
      • 2011-11-22 32657, 2011

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32620, 2011

      • xplt joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32604, 2011

      • dubwai joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32644, 2011

      • CallerNo6 joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32637, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32655, 2011

      • adiblol joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32639, 2011

      • dubwai
        hey if on cover stay %title% (vx: Name) thats meean vocal, but how to enter to song title to MB %title% (feat. Name) or %title% (Name vocal)
      • 2011-11-22 32642, 2011

      • uptown joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32600, 2011

      • CatCat joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32614, 2011

      • iarp joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32631, 2011

      • xplt joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32656, 2011

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32622, 2011

      • Kryztof joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32631, 2011

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32638, 2011

      • xplt joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32604, 2011

      • reosarevok_ joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32613, 2011

      • xplt joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32649, 2011

      • uptown joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32634, 2011

      • hawke__ joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32627, 2011

      • hawke__
        VxJasonxV: That’s what I was thinking, but how is “performed live in the studio at a radio station” any different than “performed live in the recording studio”?
      • 2011-11-22 32636, 2011

      • hawke__
        What exactly is it that makes it “live”?
      • 2011-11-22 32629, 2011

      • hawke__
        (Talking here about relatively early recordings that would have been cut directly to disc regardless of where they were recorded)
      • 2011-11-22 32648, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        because people don't consider studio recordings live
      • 2011-11-22 32601, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        live at a radio station is immediately broadcast to all listeners
      • 2011-11-22 32616, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        the question is not where, it's what.
      • 2011-11-22 32617, 2011

      • hawke__
        Heh
      • 2011-11-22 32641, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        performing/recording in a studio isn't live because it's usually multiple takes
      • 2011-11-22 32653, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        even sometimes people are not all there at the same time. god bless multi-track recordings
      • 2011-11-22 32613, 2011

      • hawke__
        Right, that applies after the invention of multi-track recordings though
      • 2011-11-22 32621, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        basically what I have in mind is: Traditional concert. A band sets up at a venue and plays. Live.
      • 2011-11-22 32634, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        Radio concert. KROQ's acoustic christmas or whatever, those were all live.
      • 2011-11-22 32641, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        A band in a studio with no audience is not live.
      • 2011-11-22 32650, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        A band in a studio with an audience is live.
      • 2011-11-22 32617, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        .oO(at least I thought KROQ's stuff was live. I actually don't know first hand...)
      • 2011-11-22 32633, 2011

      • hawke__
        So it’s the audience that counts, regardless of whether they’re actually present?
      • 2011-11-22 32610, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        I assume you mean physically present, yes.
      • 2011-11-22 32629, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        performing for studio engineers is not really live :).
      • 2011-11-22 32646, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        live usually infers a single take, too
      • 2011-11-22 32633, 2011

      • CallerNo6 seems to remember hearing "recorded live in the studio" to mean "same take, no overdubs"
      • 2011-11-22 32653, 2011

      • hawke__
        Yes, but that also applies to a lot of early recordings which were cut directly to disc
      • 2011-11-22 32611, 2011

      • hawke__
        and even a fair amount of taped ones, before 1955 or so.
      • 2011-11-22 32639, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        I don't understand how that could be considered live.
      • 2011-11-22 32648, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        Let's make an analog
      • 2011-11-22 32603, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        A lot of TV shows are "recorded live in front of a studio audience"
      • 2011-11-22 32612, 2011

      • CallerNo6 only meant that "live" might mean different things in different contexts
      • 2011-11-22 32618, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        that's live to the audience, which is live enough. It's not live to air.
      • 2011-11-22 32634, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        And even the audience watches do-overs (I've seen it in person at radio shows too.)
      • 2011-11-22 32618, 2011

      • hawke__
        So you’d say it’s the audience that makes it live, and people involved in the production don’t count?
      • 2011-11-22 32625, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        absolutely
      • 2011-11-22 32602, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        I understand CallerNo6's point. The use of that colloquially is strange, but I understand it.
      • 2011-11-22 32636, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        Much of MBz is not science, it's art :D.
      • 2011-11-22 32623, 2011

      • CallerNo6
        ... and curating
      • 2011-11-22 32611, 2011

      • hawke__
        I was just hoping it wasn’t something like “advertised as live”
      • 2011-11-22 32628, 2011

      • hawke__
        or something equally arbitrary
      • 2011-11-22 32650, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        I think that applies as well
      • 2011-11-22 32607, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        it's like the EP release type. it exists if the album says EP, and really not much else. At least not in recent times anyways.
      • 2011-11-22 32620, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        if the album says EP or the artist calls it an EP.
      • 2011-11-22 32626, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        but otherwise, it's an album.
      • 2011-11-22 32606, 2011

      • warp
        hm, I do use it on occasion for things which are not labeled EP.
      • 2011-11-22 32639, 2011

      • kepstin-netbook uses ep for japanese 'mini-albums',lacking a better choice
      • 2011-11-22 32624, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        this is exactly my point about science/art ;)
      • 2011-11-22 32644, 2011

      • hawke__
        What I’ve got here is recordings listed as being performed for radio, and not published until relatively recently in an artist retrospective
      • 2011-11-22 32600, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        is there a web page we can look at as well?
      • 2011-11-22 32603, 2011

      • CallerNo6
        I entered a release that was recorded with an audience as "studio" because it didn't seem like it was a "performance for the audience" so much as "we let some friends and fans hang out"
      • 2011-11-22 32618, 2011

      • CallerNo6
        ... "while we recorded"
      • 2011-11-22 32658, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        I actually don't exactly know what the ARs are in this case.
      • 2011-11-22 32602, 2011

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32614, 2011

      • hawke__
        VxJasonxV: If that was directed at me, not really because it’s from a book.
      • 2011-11-22 32648, 2011

      • hawke__
        VxJasonxV: There’s kind of this as well: http://www.paulvernonchester.com/DjangoInRome.htm
      • 2011-11-22 32607, 2011

      • hawke__
        “25/10/49 - Radio Geneve”
      • 2011-11-22 32601, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        yeesh
      • 2011-11-22 32628, 2011

      • xplt joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32635, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        so, this case kinda sounds like what CallerNo6 was talking about. It's not broadcasted live over the radio, it's just recorded in a radio studio, to give it the single take 'live' sound.
      • 2011-11-22 32644, 2011

      • hawke__
        No…the book lists it similarly, as “Radio broadcast, Radio Genève”
      • 2011-11-22 32650, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        well then
      • 2011-11-22 32658, 2011

      • CallerNo6
        N.B. "The Peel Sessions" releases have been entered as "EP" nearly half the time and "Live" the other half.
      • 2011-11-22 32613, 2011

      • hawke__
        But, you know, not live with a physically-present audience.
      • 2011-11-22 32622, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        but live with a remotely-present audience
      • 2011-11-22 32633, 2011

      • VxJasonxV
        as the artists played, people heard it. that's live.
      • 2011-11-22 32634, 2011

      • hawke__
        Thus making it essentially the same as most of the other recordings the artist in question did. :-)
      • 2011-11-22 32659, 2011

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32655, 2011

      • hawke__
        I think what makes me question the live status of a radio broadcast, is the lack of audience feedback.
      • 2011-11-22 32645, 2011

      • hawke__
        There’s no opportunity for the artist to react to the audience’s reception of his performance.
      • 2011-11-22 32630, 2011

      • voiceinsideyou1 joined the channel
      • 2011-11-22 32642, 2011

      • CallerNo6
        I agree that that's an important distinction. The question in my mind is, if "live" vs "album" doesn
      • 2011-11-22 32600, 2011

      • CallerNo6
        't really make it clear, what would? Listing the venue?